International Groups Urge Chavez To Stop Anti-Semitic Campaign Against Capriles

International Groups Urge Chavez To Stop Anti-Semitic Campaign Against Capriles

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela  — Jewish groups in Venezuela and around the world are urging President Hugo Chavez to stop using anti-Semetic attacks as a political tool against opposition leader Henrique Capriles Radonski. International groups are voicing concerns that Chavez’s campaign for presidency will only become more threatening and offensive as the October elections approach.

Capriles has been slammed with insults coming from the Chavez campaign since winning the Democratic Unity coalition's presidential candidacy. (Photo Courtesy of The Huffington Post).

Last week, the government-run website of Radio Nacional de Venezuela posted a column that highlighted the Jewish ancestry of Capriles; his grandparents were Polish Holocaust survivors. The column labeled Capriles a secret follower of Zionism, which is a Jewish political movement that the column called “the most rotten sentiments represented by humanity.” The column urged Venezuelans to reject “international Zionism” by re-electing Chavez.

Abraham Foxman, the director of the New York-based Anti-Defamation League, believes Chavez’s anti-Semitic remarks are an early attempt to cast Capriles as a “traitorous Jew” who is not worthy of the presidency. “The Venezuelan political campaign has just begun, and this early appearance of government-sanctioned anti-Semitism is a deeply troubling sign of the depths that President Chavez is willing to go to retain his oppressive power,” he said.

In 2008, A U.S. State Department report named Venezuela a country where its leaders and governments “fan the flames of anti-Semitic hatred within their own societies and even beyond their borders.” The report also criticized Venezuela’s government-sponsored mass media for functioning as a medium for anti-Semitism.

Other attacks coming from the Chavez campaign include accusations that Capriles is involved in a group that promotes the “Aryan race” with ties to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, and that he is a pig and part of South America’s bourgeoisie. “You are not going to be able to disguise yourself, even if you look for advisers, masks. Dress yourself up however you dress yourself up. Pig’s tail, pig’s ears, pig’s nose: It’s a pig,” Chavez said.

Capriles, who spent four months in jail in 2004 on charges related to an attempted coup against Chavez, has denied the accusations against him in an interview and said he wants to focus his campaign on talking about the problems that really bother Venezuelans such as crime and unemployment. “They came here and they called me ‘Nazi,’ when my grandmother was in the Warsaw Ghetto,” Capriles told The Forward newspaper in response to the accusations.

Despite the aggressive campaign against him, Capriles is currently believed to be the most popular politician in Venezuela and a strong contender against Chavez, a socialist who has ruled Venezuela for the last 13 years. Chavez and Capriles will face off in October for the Venezuelan presidency.

 

For further information, please see:

International Business Times – Venezuela: Hugo Chavez’ Anti-Semitic Election Campaign – 24 February 2012

Bloomberg Businessweek – Chavez Media Say Rival Capriles Backs Plots From Nazi to Zionist – 21 February 2012

ABC News – Jewish Group: Chavez Foe a Target of Anti-Semitism – 17 February 2011

CNN – Jewish Groups Decry ‘anti-Semitic’ Venezuelan State Media Article – 19 February 2012

 

Tensions Running High in Senegal Before Sunday’s Election

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

DAKAR, Senegal – Two days before the election to determine the next president, there is no sign of an end to the acrimony that has dominated Senegal since January.  Despite appeals from the international community, President Abdoulaye Wade remains in the race.

President Abdoulaye Wade hits the campaign trail in suburban Dakar as he seeks a third term, which has been a source of conflict. (Photo courtesy of the Associated Press)

The situation is unusual for this West African country, which has had free elections since the late 19th Century and has never been upended by a military coup.  Protests have occurred in downtown Dakar, the seaside capital, on a daily basis, leading local businesses to cut their hours of operation in half and send employees home to avoid the chaos.  At least six people have died in rallies against the 85-year-old (officially; he is rumored to be even older) Wade’s candidacy.  After his election to a seven-year term in 2000, the constitution was amended to limit the president to two five-year terms.  It was re-amended to two seven-year terms after his re-election in 2007, which he believes allows him to run again.

Opponents have another story.  Earlier this week, dissenters rallied along Avenue William Ponty, close to Independence Square, singing and chanting: “He should go! He must go! He has to go!” in reference to Wade.  The interior ministry banned events held in Independence Square itself.  Even his former ministers had become disenchanted.

“The Constitution has been violated!” declared Idrissa Seck, one of six former prime ministers to have served under Wade and one of three to be running against him.  “We must prevent the coup d’état that is unfolding.”

Wade’s election campaign continues in spite of the vitriol.  Amadou Sall said that the president was willing to talk to opposition leaders about their concerns.  As far as he was concerned, Wade’s candidacy was legal.

“President Wade is a candidate of a group of parties who support him and we have the majority of the Senegalese people with us, and the constitutional court said the candidacy of Wade is good.  So, he is a legal candidate,” said Sall. “Now, you have the minority in the opposition who contest and who protest and the make demonstrations in just two areas in Dakar and fighting with policemen.  These guys are losers.”

Since Tuesday, former Nigerian leader Olusegun Obasanjo has been in Dakar as head of a joint African Union-Economic Community of West African States observer mission.  He has met with both Wade and opposition leaders about the situation, vowing to do more than observe if things do not improve.  After his meeting with Wade, the ruling party said that it would not postpone the election or withdraw its leader from the poll.

Hopes for success within the mission were running high when Obasanjo arrived in Dakar Tuesday.  But the reality may be much more harsh.  To Arame Tall, a researcher at John Hopkins University-Sais, breaking through the gridlock may not be possible.

“It is a stalemate. On one hand, Wade is obstinate and is at least 90-years-old, meaning that if he wins we would have a president that would finish his term at 97-years-old,” Tall told Al Jazeera.  “On the other hand, we have a highly divided opposition, animated by personal ambition – and they are also guilty of trapping the public because they simply refuse to unite and create a strong front to confront the old man.  The public has no choice, because they are faced with an old man they do not want and a fragmented opposition with no leadership.”

For more information, please see:

AllAfrica — Nigeria: Obasanjo Meets with Senegal Government — 24 February 2012

AllAfrica — Senegal: Wade Ignores Obasanjo Call to Pull Out of Poll –23 February 2012

Al Jazeera — Tensions Build in Run-Up to Senegal Vote — 23 February 2012

New York Times — An Atypical Unrest Troubles Senegal’s Election Season — 23 February 2012

Voice of America — Senegal Ends Campaigning Ahead of Sunday’s Vote — 23 February 2012

BBC — Senegal: Former Nigerian Leader Obasanjo in Peace Bid — 22 February 2012

International Conference Says World Security Depends on Somalia; Many Still Uneasy

By Tamara Alfred
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

British Prime Minister David Cameron urged the international community Thursday to help Somalia’s government tackle piracy, militants and hunger, or face terror threats from the troubled African nation.

World leaders from 40 countries, including Somali Prime Minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attended the conference on Thursday in London focusing on stabilizing and rebuilding Somalia after decades of war.  The conference sought to address terror and conflict in Somalia and find ways to resolve other critical problems, including famine and weak leadership.

An Al-Shabaab fighter stands guard as hundreds of residents are forced to watch an amputation punishment carried out. (Photo Courtesy of Getty Images).

“These problems in Somalia don’t just affect Somalia,” Prime Minister Cameron said.  “They affect us all.”

In a country where there is no hope,” Cameron continued, “chaos, violence and terrorism thrive.  Pirates are disrupting vital trade routes and kidnapping tourists.  Young minds are being poisoned by radicalism, breeding terrorism that is threatening the security of the whole world.”

The militant Islamist Somali rebel group Al-Shabaab emerged in about 2004 and has been fighting the government since.  Children as young as 10 years old are increasingly facing horrific abuse as the group forcibly recruits them to replenish its diminishing ranks of fighters.  According to Human Rights Watch, patterns have also emerged of children serving as human shields on the battlefields.

Al-Shabaab is also implementing strict Sharia law in the nation.  Women have been stoned to death for adultery; amputations and beheadings are common.  In some areas, listening to the radio has been banned, as have non-Arabic signs.  Al-Shabaab is also responsible for the assassination of several journalists.

In addition to the violence, the Somali people have endured bouts of natural disasters, including famine, drought and floods.  The U.S. government said 30,000 children had died in Somalia due to famine alone in the summer of 2011.

The prime minister stressed that the world cannot afford to look the other way anymore:  “If the rest of us just sit back and look on, we will pay a price for doing so.  For two decades, politicians in the West have too often dismissed the problems in Somalia as simply too difficult and too remote to deal with.”

Kenyan President Mwai Kibaki said Al-Shabaab’s recent announcement that it had joined al Qaeda should serve as a wake-up call.  “Clearly, a new and more dangerous theater for terrorist action has emerged in Somalia,” he said, “and this calls for focused and concerted international effort.”

Kenya is host to the world’s largest refugee camp, Dadaab.  The camp is currently over capacity with desperate Somalis who have fled their homeland.  The UN estimates that over 360,000 refugees reside in Dadaab.

Somali Prime Minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali said that he even welcomed airstrikes to rid his of country of Al-Shabaab terrorists, though this was not on the conference agenda.  “We have to face this menace, and al-Qaeda in Somalia is not a Somali problem – it is a global problem that must be addressed globally,” he said.

However, Secretary of State Clinton said that the U.S. sees no reason for military strikes.  She announced $64 million in humanitarian aid to the Horn of Africa countries and said the focus should be on political progress.  Clinton said the U.S. will continue to work with Somali officials to create jobs, provide health and education services, and conflict resolution.

Cameron announced agreements on key areas including a new task force on piracy ransoms and the willingness of Tanzania, Mauritius, and the Seychelles to take on judicial responsibilities to convict pirates.  There was recognition, however, that it would take time to bring change to a country that has come to epitomize a failed state.

“We are realistic – Somalia’s problems cannot be solved in a day, said British Foreign Minister William Hague, “but its people deserve a better future, and our own security requires their country to become more stable.”

Hague also applauded the UN Security Council’s decision on Wednesday to increase the African Union force in Somalia to 17,700 troops, almost 6,000 more than the current number.  Neighboring Kenya and Ethiopia have both sent troops directly, while Uganda, Djibouti, and Burundi are contributing peacekeepers.  The United States has used drones to target militants in Somalia.

Cameron commended the conference on their movement.  “Today’s conference has put new momentum into the political process,” he said.  “We’ve backed the Somalis’ decision to end the mandate of the transitional federal institutions in August.  This timetable will be stuck to.  There will be no further extensions.  We will hold the Somalis to this.  We’ll act against those who stand in the way of the peace process and we’ve also agreed the formation of a new government must be as inclusive as possible.”

Meanwhile, Hague dismissed criticism of the conference by some critics who said it lacked enough Somalia input.

“It’s not Western, it’s global,” Hague told CNN.  “Part of our objective here is to build up the local governments, the regional governments, the institutions that have been able to take root…which is why they are all here.  It’s not top down at all.”

And yet, at least three demonstrations protested outside the conference.  “The conference is about 40 countries coming together discussing the Somali issue, [but] what we feel is that Somalia not part of it,” said Cabdi Aakhiro of Voice 4 Somalia.  “They are discussing their interests, not the Somali interests.”

BBC Somalia analyst Mary Harper also seemed to think that while Cameron was saying that the conference was “not about telling Somalis what to do,” the policies do not seem to be leaving Somalia to the Somalis.

Amnesty International also said the conference failed to adequately address the “dire human rights situation” in Somalia.

“The recent surge in military operations increases civilians’ vulnerability to attacks and displacement, and brings more arms into a country already awash with weapons,” said Benedicte Goderiaux, Amnesty International’s Somalia researcher.  “Direct attacks against civilians, indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks, these are crimes under international law, these are war crimes.  This is a lethal mix that could fuel further human rights abuses.  At this conference, we hoped to see more efforts to improve the safety of the Somali population.”

One Somali man expressed unease that the conference gave a lot of attention to ending impunity for pirates.  “What about ending impunity for the war-lords who have killed so many of our children?” said the man.  “What about the African Union peacekeepers who shelled residential areas in Mogadishu?  What about Al-Shabaab and even our transitional government soldiers?”

The next international meeting on Somalia is scheduled for June in Istanbul, Turkey.

For more information, please see:

BBC News – Will the world help or hinder Somalia? – 23 February 2012

CNN – Cameron warns world security rests on Somalia’s future – 23 February 2012

CNN – Years of chaos take toll in Somalia – 23 February 2012

Voice of America – Somalia Conference Stirs Range of Sentiments – 23 February 2012

Germany Rejects Demands From Council Of Europe To End Castration Of Sex Criminals

By Terance Walsh
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BERLIN, Germany — Germany has rejected recent calls to end its practice of castration of sex offenders, reasoning that the punishment has a high deterrent effect.  The Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) has led the calls for Germany to end the practice recently.

Germany's voluntary castration of sex offenders is being criticized (Photo courtesy of The Daily Mail)

Voluntary castration was implemented as a punishment in Germany’s 1969 Law on Voluntary Castration.  A person over the age of 25 who has committed a sex crime may be subject to castration if he “displays an abnormal sex drive, which … gives reason to suspect that he will commit one or more criminal offenses.”

The punishment is not mandatory and may only be used with the informed consent of the offender.  The convicted offender can only be castrated after he is informed of the implications of his decision and medical approval is obtained.  Germany’s use of castration as a punishment is reportedly “rare”, only used on about five offenders annually during the past decade.

German officials posit that castration is not a punishment, but instead is a treatment for those with an abnormal sex drive.

Despite the rarity and consensual nature of the punishment the CPT has still called on Germany to stop castrating because of its degrading nature.  “It’s a highly controversial issue. There are divided opinions on the subject — some justify it on the basis that the results validate the process,” said Tim Dalton, leader of the CPT.  “[The CPT’s] fundamental position is that it’s not an appropriate response to the threat of reoffending to mutilate a person, which is in effect what is involved.”

The CPT also criticized the Czech Republic, the only other European nation to practice castration.  The Czech Republic still offers castration as an optional punishment for convicted sex offenders.

The CPT gave four main reasons for its opposition to castration.  First, the punishment has permanent effects that may cause physical or psychological damage.  Second, castration does not conform to the punishment guidelines set forth by the International Organization for the Treatment of Sex Offenders.  Third, there is no guarantee of a lasting reduction of the sex offender’s testosterone level.  And fourth, it is unclear how “consensual” the punishment actually is.

The CPT’s report also cites investigations into ill treatment of offenders during police custody, conditions for immigrants who have been detained, and allegations of violence amongst prisoners.

Germany has stood fast against the calls to cease castration, citing a high deterrent effect supported by a low recidivism rate.  Specifically, Germany points to a 1997 report that shows a three percent recidivism rate amongst those who opted for castration.  Out of 104 sex who underwent castration between 1970 and 1980, only three went on to repeat their offense.  The report also showed a forty-seven percent recidivism rate for a control group that did not get castrated.

A spokesperson for the German government stated, “Germany defends the procedure on the grounds that surgery helps where illnesses connected to an abnormal sex drive must be treated, or in order to counter the risk of future unlawful offences being committed by sexual offenders and/or violent offender.

“As far as the federal government is aware, there are quite a number of scientific studies on the criminological long-term effects of surgical castration.”

Presently Germany has no plans to eliminate castration as an option for convicted sex offenders, but Berlin has expressed agreeability to talks on the issue.

The Council of Europe is Europe’s primary watchdog for torturous practices, but the Council itself has no actual power to change laws.  Still, its opinions and critiques carry a great deal of influence.

The practice of castration of sex criminals dates back to Nazi Germany where thousands of sex criminals were forcibly castrated.

Russia recently implemented a form of voluntary chemical castration for sex offenders.  The law was proposed last summer and was approved this month.  During the course of the debate the majority party, which proposed the punishment, wanted chemical castration to be mandatory.

South Korea, Canada, France, Israel, Poland, some US states, Britain, Denmark, and Sweden offer voluntary chemical castration drugs to sex offenders.

For more information please see:

CNN — Germany Asked to Stop Castrating Sex Criminals — 23 February 2012

Daily Mail — Germany Rejects Demand to Stop Castrating Sex Criminals as Part of Their Punishment — 23 February 2012

JURIST — Council of Europe Criticizes Germany Castration Law — 23 February 2012

BBC — Germany Urged to End Sex Offender Castration — 22 February 2012

MSNBC — Germany Urged to Stop Castrating Sex Offenders — 22 February 2012

The National — Calls for Germany to End Surgical Castration of Sex Offenders — 22 February 2012

Reuters — Germany Urged to Halt Castration of Sex Offenders — 22 February 2012

UN Panel Lists Syrian Officials to Investigate

By Carolyn Abdenour
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DAMASCUS, Syria – On Thursday, 23 February, the United Nations (“U.N.”) panel announced it delivered a sealed list naming Syrian officials, including President Bashar Assad, whose actions may merit investigation by the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights to Geneva.  The U.N.-appointed Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria found the country “manifestly failed” to protect its citizens.

Homs has sustained its 20th straight day of shelling. (Photo Courtesy Al Jazeera).

The U.N. panel issued a report documenting reliable evidence exists to hold commanding officers and high-level government officials responsible for ordering security forces to commit crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations.  Since protests began in March 2011, security forces have killed approximately 8,000 people.  The U.N. Human Rights Council will meet in Geneva next week to review the panel’s report.

Brazilian professor Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, leader of this panel of experts, added the list includes armed opposition groups that committed gross abuses “not comparable in scale and organization with those carried out by the state.”

The U.N. panel relied on information from human rights activists and Syrian army defectors to compose the list because Syria denied the U.N. panel’s request to enter the country.  The government believed the panel exceeded the UN mandate and ignored official information.

The panel’s report asserts the ruling Baath Party’s National Security Bureau initiated the systematic arrest or killing of citizens by translating government policies into military operations.  The report also notes the country’s intelligence and security agencies “were at the heart of almost all operations.”  Furthermore, it describes how Shabbiha, informal pro-government militias, received funding and arms from businessmen.

Moreover, the report highlights the Syrian army and government ordered security forces to shell residential communities, kill unarmed women and children, and torture wounded protesters receiving hospital care.

The international community has sought avenues to support Syria’s citizens.  U.N. Secretary General recently expressed his desire for his humanitarian chief to negotiate access to Homs in Syria.  The U.N.’s top human rights official previously asked the International Criminal Court to review the situation in Syria.  This week the International Committee of the Red Cross requested a cease-fire in the worst affected areas to aid trapped and wounded victims.

UK Foreign Secretary William Hague noted the European Union could tighten its sanctions against Syria further.  “It is a deeply frustrating situation that people have been dying in [the] thousands…that the Assad regime has continued to act seemingly with impunity – but I think we can agree to a wider set of measures across a large group of nations,” he said.

For further information, please see:

Al Jazeera – UN Report Says Syria Committing War Crimes – 23 Feb 2012

BBC – UN Panel Draws Up Syria Crimes Against Humanity List – 23 Feb 2012

Haaretz – Assad, Top Syria Officials Could Face Crimes Against Humanity Charges, UN Report Says – 23 Feb 2012

San Francisco Chronicle – UN Panel Draws Up List of Syria Leaders To Probe – 23 Feb 2012