Despite British Objection, Nigerian Senate Passes Bill Banning Homosexuality

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

ABUJA, Nigeria­ – Gay rights in Nigeria took a step backwards on Tuesday.  In the face of the United Kingdom’s threat to cut off aid to Africa’s most populous country, its Senate unanimously passed a bill that, if approved by the House of Representatives and signed by President Goodluck Jonathan, would make same-sex relationships illegal.  The action has been met with widespread approval among the general population.

Newspaper headlines in Nigeria celebrated the Senate's passage of a bill that would make same-sex relationships illegal. (Photo courtesy of AFP/Getty Images)

The bill would have several significant effects on homosexuals.  If passed, which is expected, anyone who enters into a same-sex relationship or civil union would face a 14-year term in jail upon conviction.  Those convicted of “witness[ing], abet[ting] and aid[ing]” the performance of a same-sex marriage and “support[ing] the registration [of same]” would serve 10 years behind bars, as would anybody who registered or operated a gay nightclub or organization.  It would also invalidate any certificates of marriage for same-sex relationships issued outside of Nigeria.  Section 3 of the bill provides that “only marriage contracted between a man and a woman either under Islamic law, customary law or the marriage Act is [recognized] as valid in Nigeria.”

Last month, British Prime Minister David Cameron warned that his country would consider withholding aid to countries that discriminated against homosexuals.  In justifying the bill, Senate President David Mark considered it a way of protecting his country’s values.

“If there is any country that does not want to give us aid or assistance just because we want to hold on to our values, that country can keep her aid and assistance,” he said, in what may have been a reference to the threat.  “No country has the right to interfere in the way we make our own laws because we don’t interfere in the way others make their own laws.”

Nigeria had been debating this bill for the past month.  This morning, after the bill’s passage, The Sun Newspaper’s headline proudly declared “”Homosexuals are in trouble!”  But according to Chude Jideonwo, a Nigerian journalist, the country is already strongly homophobic.  To many, the belief is that “homosexuality is ‘of the devil,’ against our ‘culture’ and an encroachment of ‘sad Western values.’”  Even before passage, he said that there was not much demand, “even a quiet one,” for gay marriage of any form.  This raises the question of why the issue was raised in the first place.

“I can’t recall a particular place where this type of marriage has taken place in Nigeria,” said Adetokunbo Mumuni, director of the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project.  “This particular thing they have assented to is a thing of no substance to Nigeria. They should focus on things that affect the majority of Nigerians.”

In international circles, the bill has not received much praise.  Andrew Lloyd, the U.K.’s High Commissioner to Nigeria, reiterated the possibility of sanctions, but added that the media may have overblown Cameron’s remarks.  On Wednesday, he spoke to journalists in Dutse to better explain the British position, which he believed would be matched by most of the Western world.

“It is wrong to punish people for mere expression of their relationships or for choosing to become what they have chosen for themselves,” Lloyd said.  “Punishment is infringement upon their fundamental human rights and the western countries would not condone the action.”

Amnesty International, a human rights group, condemned the legislation and called for the House to halt the bill’s passage.  It is concerned with the potentially massive effect the law would have on human rights for a wide variety of people besides the newly-criminalized homosexual population.

“This bill would have a chilling effect on a range of civil society organizations and events while inciting hatred and violence against anyone suspected of practicing same-sex relationships, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people,” said Erwin van der Borght, director of the organization’s Africa Programme.  “By aiming to single out and deprive the rights of one group of people, this bill threatens all Nigerians by violating the country’s Constitution and international human rights obligations.”

According to one of its supporters, an alleged effect of the bill would be an improvement in Nigeria’s overall health.

“Same sex marriage has negative effect on the health of anyone that involved in it,” said Senator Nkechi Nwogu.  “It was unanimous decision by the Senate to pass the bill into law. It is very unfortunate that the western countries want to force their culture on us.”

With similar legislation being discussed or otherwise proposed elsewhere on the continent, this might be the right time for the continent start a dialogue on the topic, which is normally a social taboo. Many African countries depend heavily on foreign aid to remain afloat.  To some, this situation presents an opportunity to deal with the issue directly, instead of trying to suppress it.

“Now is the time to talk about it … to get our house in order.  Let’s use this opportunity to say, ‘OK, if we didn’t have aid, how would we survive?’” said Nigel Mugamu of Zimbabwe. “Let’s talk about gay rights issues. Let’s turn this into a national – African discussion.”

For more information, please see:

CNN — Anti-Gay Law: ‘Why I’m Ashamed to Be Nigerian’ — 01 December 2011

CNN — Nigerian Senate Passes Anti-Gay Bill, Defying British Aid Threat — 01 December 2011

Daily Trust — Britain Won’t Accept Anti-Gay Law, Says Envoy — 01 December 2011

Nigerian Tribune — Senate Recommends 14-Year Jail Term for Same Sex Marriage — 30 November 2011

This Day — Senate Criminalises Same-Sex Marriage — 30 November 2011

Amnesty International — Nigeria Urged to Halt Bill Banning Same-Sex Relationships — 29 November 2011

People’s Daily — Senate Outlaws Same-Sex Marriage — 29 November 2011

Vanguard — Senate Bans Same-Sex Marriage — 29 November 2011

Sentencing Minors to Life Without Parole

By Brittney Hodnik
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

WASHINGTON, United States – Amnesty International is advocating for the United States to stop its policy of courts sentencing children to life in prison without parole.  Amnesty’s recent publication, “This is where I’m going to be when I die; Children facing life imprisonment without the possibility of parole in the USA,” highlights the problems associated with condemning children to life in prison; the report illustrates the problem through the stories of three people.

Christi Cheramie was sentenced to life without parole at the age of 16. (Image courtesy of Amnesty International)

RTT News reports that there are more than 2,500 adult prisoners serving life in prison in the U.S. for crimes they committed as children.  Further, Irish Times News reports that in the United States, children as young as 11 years old have received life sentences.

Natacha Mension is a Campaigner on the USA at Amnesty International.  She said, “In the USA, people under 18 years old cannot vote, buy alcohol, lottery tickets or consent to most forms of medical treatment but they can be sentenced to die in prison for their actions.  This needs to change.”

As of now, according to RTT, Amnesty International reports that the United States and Somalia are the only two nations that have not ratified the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.  This convention forbids life sentences without parole for crimes committed by minors, no matter what the crime is.  The convention has been in place for nearly two decades now.

The United States Supreme Court found that “life without parole is an especially harsh punishment for a juvenile” because a child offender “will serve, on average, more years and a greater percentage of his or her life in prison than an older offender” will serve for the same crime, according to Amnesty International.

BBC News further reports that Amnesty reinforces the idea that it does not condone child crime whatsoever.  “We are not excusing crimes committed by children or minimizing their consequences, but the simple reality is that these sentences ignore the special potential for rehabilitation and change that young offenders have,” said Mension.

Amnesty’s above-mentioned case study took an in depth look at three people including Christi Cheramie.  Cheramie killed her 18-year-old fiancé’s great aunt when she was 16 years old.  She is now 33 and still in prison, seeking an executive clemency with the Louisiana Board of Pardons.  The report details her childhood which was “marked by sexual abuse” and at least two attempts of suicide.

Amnesty will continue to press the United States to change its policy in this area of law and sentencing, arguing that life imprisonment for a minor is too harsh a sentence.

For more information, please visit:

BBC News– US Must Stop Jailing Minors for Life, Says Amnesty — 30 Nov. 2011

Irish Times News — Too Young to Vote, But They Can Be  Sentenced to Die in a US Prison — 30 Nov. 2011

RTT News — US Urged to Halt Jailing Minors for Life Without Parole — 30 Nov. 2011

Amnesty International — USA Must Halt Life Without Parole Sentences for Children — 29 Nov. 2011

 

Belarus Under Fire For Death Sentence

By Terance Walsh
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MINSK, Belarus  —  Human rights groups and the Council of Europe have taken aim at Belarus’s death penalty practice, calling for its abolition.  Criticism follows the Belarusian Supreme Court’s November 30th death sentence for two convicted of a Minsk subway bombing.  Belarus is the only country in Europe that still executes criminals.

The two men who were sentenced to death (Photo courtesy of RFE/RL)

Dmitry Konovalov and Vladislov Kovalyov were convicted of “an act of terrorism” for the perpetration of a bombing of a subway in Minsk in April 2011.  The attack killed 15 people and wounded more than 200 others.  They were also found guilty of participating in three other bomb attacks between 2005 and 2008 that resulted in over 100 people being injured.

The explosion took place during a crackdown by Belarusian President Aleksander Lukashenko against his political opposition.  Lukashenko said the bombing attacks were “aimed at undermining peace and stability in the country.”

Both Konovalov and Kovalyov were arrested just days after the attack, but the prosecution offered little explanation and no forensic evidence to support their apprehension.

During the trial the government called the defendants “explosive enthusiasts” who were not motivated by any political persuasion.  The prosecution argued that the men were not part of any terrorist group but were only driven by “hatred for mankind.”

Prosecutors maintain that both men confessed to participating in the bombing, but Kovalyov retracted his confession during the trial.  He said his confession was given under duress.

Judge Aleksandr Fyodorstov said the defendants “pose an exceptional danger to society, and an exceptional penalty should be applied to them.”

After the sentence was issued Lyubov Kobalyov, the mother of one of the defendants, told the press that the case against her son was fabricated.

Council of Europe secretary general Thorbjorn Jagland has spoken out against Belarus’s practice of capital punishment in general following the sentence.  In a statement he said, “The crime they were found guilty of was barbaric, but their punishment should not be the same.  Belarus is the only country in Europe which still executes people and I would urge the authorities to introduce an immediate moratorium with a view to its ultimate abolition.”

Ultimately the decision whether or not to execute the defendants remains in Lukashenko’s hands.  The sentence cannot be appealed, the only recourse the defendants have is a request for a pardon from Lukashenko.

Human rights activists have also petitioned to Lukashenko to call off the death penalty.  They have also called into question the evidence used to convict the two men.  Lukashenko, however, has already called for use of the full brunt of the law for the two convicts.

Figures from Amnesty International show that Belarus has executed 400 people for various crimes since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.  Currently only one man is on death row in Belarus for murders committed during a robbery.

Between 1990 and 1993, 85 people were sentenced to death in Belarus and 102 were sentenced between 1998 and 2010.

Among former Soviet states Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan have adopted legislation officially abolishing the death penalty.  Kazakhstan, Russia, and Tajikistan have issued moratoriums on executions since 1991.

According to Amnesty International at least 17,800 people were sentenced to death worldwide in 2010.  The death penalty is most frequently imposed in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United States, and Yemen.

Belarus is the only European country that still maintains capital punishment and government polls show a majority of Belarusians support the use of the death penalty for serious crimes.  A 2010 poll conducted by the Presidential Information and Analytical Center in Belarus shows 79.5 percent of Belearusians in favor of the death penalty.  Only 4.5 percent of Belarusians call for an immediate abolition of the death penalty.

Polling by independent organizations in Belarus show different figures.  One such organization shows 48 percent of the population in favor of abolition of the death penalty with another poll showing 39 percent of Belarusians against the death penalty.

The only time President Lukashenko has ever commuted a death sentence was in 1996 when he reduced a death sentence to a sentece of 20 years imprisonment.

For more information please see:

Irish Times — Death Sentence Criticized — 1 December 2011

New York Times — Belarus: Two Get Death Sentences For Subway Bombing — 1 December 2011

BBC — Belarus Metro Bomb: Two Sentenced To Death — 30 November 2011

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty — Belarus And The Death Penalty — 30 November 2011

Voice of America — European Council Urges Belarus To Abolish Death Penalty — 30 November 2011

AIDS Activists Face Pressure From Chinese Authorities

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BEIJING, China – In anticipation of world AIDS day, prominent AIDS activists Hu Jia and Tian Xi have faced pressure from authorities for attempting to bring attention to difficulties faced by individuals living with AIDS in China.

AIDS activist Hu Jia in June 2011 (Photo Courtesy of Radio Free Asia).

Hu Jia was released from prison in June after serving a three-year jail sentence for subversion. As a condition of his release, Hu must undergo one year of constant surveillance and “…is tracked and videotaped by Domestic Security police.”

Despite his own recent release from prison, Hu has expressed his fear for fellow activist Tian Xi, who was recently released after serving a one year sentence for staging a protest on world AIDS day in 2009, by stating that “[i]f [Tian] is put back in jail by the authorities, I don’t think he will come out alive.”

Hu claims that Tian has been emotionally unstable since his release leading Hu to advocate for better treatment for AIDS patients on his behalf to prevent his re-imprisonment.

Despite his attempts to engage authorities, Hu has been unable to find a willing audience in the health ministry who has consistently ignored his requests and has threatened him with detention if he publicly protests or gives an interview.

Hu stated that in the past ten years he has approached the health ministry to discuss potential solutions to the problems facing AIDS patients at least sixty times but has received no response.

Tian Xi’s plight against AIDS and the government began when he pursued compensation after being infected with HIV through a tainted blood transfusion following a head injury he received at the age of nine.

In compensation for his contraction of HIV Tian was given 30,000 yuan which is the equivalent of $4,404 American dollars.

Rights activists allege that people with AIDS are often refused treatment and AIDS infected children are denied access to schools. In addition, the medication that is provided by local governments is substandard and becomes ineffective after three to five years.

Although health authorities maintain that sex and drug use are the main causes of HIV contraction, gynecologist Gao Yaojie, who was forced into exile, urges that tainted blood transfusions continue to infect blood recipients in the Hunan province.

An expert panel consisting of members from China’s Ministry of Health, the World Health Organization and UNAIDS estimate that China will have 154,000 AIDS patients by the end of the year. The total infected population in china is estimated at approximately 780,000 people.

 

For more information, please see:

Xinhua Net – China’s HIV/AIDS-Infected Population Estimated at 780,000 – 29 November 2011

Epoch Times – Activist Hu Jia Assists AIDS Patient’s Appeal – 28 November 2011

Radio Free Asia – AIDS Activists Under Pressure – 28 November 2011

Former Ivory Coast President Gbagbo Taken into Custody by ICC; Charges Filed

By Tamara Alfred

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

Former Ivory Coast President Laurent Gbagbo was taken into custody by the International Criminal Court (ICC) Wednesday to face charges of murder, rape and other crimes allegedly committed by his supporters after last year’s election.  He is scheduled to appear before judges at a hearing Monday afternoon to confirm his identity and that he understands his rights as a suspect and the charges against him.

A photo taken on April 11 shows Laurent Gbagbo and his wife, Simone, after their arrest. (Photo Courtesy of CNN.)

Gbagbo, 66, is the first former head of state arrested by the court since it was established in 2002.  After having been under house arrest since his arrest in April, Gbagbo was transferred to the court in The Hague on an overnight flight on Tuesday.  He is the sixth suspect taken into custody by the court, which has launched seven investigations, all of them in Africa.  In fact, Gbagbo will now be sharing a cell block with former Liberian President Charles Taylor, who is awaiting for a verdict in his trial before the Special Court for Sierra Leone on charges of orchestrating atrocities in Sierra Leone.

“Mr. Gbagbo is brought to account for his individual responsibility in the attacks against civilians committed by forces acting on his behalf,” Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo said in a statement.

The court charged Gbagbo with individual criminal responsibility as indirect co-perpetrator, for four counts of crimes against humanity – murder, rape and other forms of sexual violence, persecution, and other inhuman acts.  In his application for authorization to investigate possible war crimes and crimes against humanity, Moreno-Ocampo cited sources who said at least 3,000 people were killed, 72 people disappeared and 520 other were subject to arbitrary arrest and detentions after Gbagbo refused to concede defeat following the presidential election last year.  President Ouattara eventually took power in April of this year after help from French and United Nations (UN) forces.

Gbagbo, a history professor, came to power in a flawed election in 2000.  He failed to hold elections when his first five-year term expired and reschedule the vote a half-dozen times before it finally went ahead in November 2010.

News of Gbagbo’s arrest sparked both elation and anger in Abidjan, which is still divided into neighborhoods supporting Gbagbo or Ouattara.

“This is a great day for Laurent Gbagbo’s victims, for the people of Cote d’Ivoire, for international justice,” said Reed Brody of Human Rights Watch.  “This is a very important message to all the leaders in the world that if they use the atrocities and crime to stay in power that they too could face justice.”

Adama Diomande, a local leader of Ouattara’s political party, says there are 42 bodies in the mass grave and a total of 91 people were killed in the neighborhood during the post-election fighting.

Moreno-Ocampo stressed, however, that both sides of the political divide in Ivory Coast committed crimes and that his investigation is continuing.  “We have evidence that the violence did not happen by chance: widespread and systematic attacks against civilians perceived as supporting the other candidate were the result of a deliberate policy,” he said.

The UN, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International have all documented how forces loyal to Ouattara torched villages that voted for Gbagbo, and executed those that could not run away.  The elderly and the disabled were killed by rolling them inside mattresses and then setting them on fire.

Brody said Gbagbo’s indictment was only half the story as victims of crimes by forces loyal to Ouattara have so far gone unpunished.  “This created the perception of victor’s justice.  And if the cycle of violence in Cote d’Ivoire is to stop there has to be justice that is even handed and justice for the victims on both sides.”

“Ivorian victims will see justice for massive crimes,” Moreno-Ocampo said.  “Mr. Gbagbo is the first to be brought to account, there is more to come.”

Additionally, Gbagbo’s arrest comes a week before parliamentary elections are scheduled to be held in Ivory Coast.  Three political parties in an umbrella coalition with Gbagbo’s Front Populaire Ivoirien issued a statement saying they would boycott the elections as a result of Gbagbo’s transfer.

For more information, please see:

CNN – Former Ivory Coast president in international court custody – 30 November 2011

Huffington Post – Laurent Gbagbo: International Criminal Court Charges Former Ivory Coast President With Crimes Against Humanity – 30 November 2011

Reuters – Gbagbo faces charges of crimes against humanity: ICC – 30 November 2011