Resurgent Islamist Party Wins Big in Tunisia’s First Democratic Election

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

TUNIS, Tunisia – Monday was a historic day for Tunisia as the results of its election following January’s revolution were announced.  The moderate Islamist Ennahda party garnered 89 out of 217 seats in the country’s new constituent assembly, more than three times that of the next closest party.  The elected members face the task of assembling a government and writing a new constitution.  More than half of the electorate turned out to vote.

The victory for Ennahda, which had once been banned from taking part in Tunisian politics, marks a comeback for a strong, organized force whose ability to function had been crippled for decades.  Unlike political parties in the United States, Ennahda is also “a social movement,” according to Noah Feldman, a law professor at Harvard University.  This organization “gave it a substantial leg up when it came to organizing dedicated volunteers to motivate voters,” he wrote in a column for Bloomberg.

Ennahda is expected to form a coalition with the next two leading vote-getters, the left-wing Congress for the Republic (CPR) and the Popular Petition.  Negotiations to assemble the new government are still underway, but CPR leader Moncef Marzouki was selected as the interim president.  Marzouki’s position will be largely ceremonial, other than the possibility of mediating disputes between leading parties in the assembly.  Mustapha Ben Jaafar, head of the fourth-place Democratic Forum for Labor and Liberties, had been pushed as president, but it bogged down in negotiations.  He has since been offered the position of assembly president, but has yet to accept.  The interim government will also retain defense minister Abdelkrim Zbidi, who has gained respect among Tunisians for using the military to maintain order without being active in the political game.

Two parties ran anti-Islamist platforms, focusing on Ennahda in particular.  They won a combined 21 seats in the new assembly.

“Unlike the young secularists, many Tunisians see Islam as a defining feature of their personal and political identities,” Feldman said in an effort to explain why Ennahda faired so well.  “Islamists are also highly skilled at reaching across economic and social classes to build support. In poor rural areas, the mosque is sometimes the only gathering place, and Islam can be leveraged to provide a simple, time-tested and powerful political message.”

The elections were highly organized, even though the North African country had only four months to do so.  Kamel Jendoubi, leader of the election commission, said his group “clearly contributed to restoring the trust of Tunisians in their electoral process.”  He told the Associated Press that he planned to ask the assembly to make the commission a permanent aspect of future contests.

The assembly will hold its first meeting on November 22, and the interim government that it appoints will remain in place until the next round of elections, which has been tentatively scheduled for next year.

For more information, please see:

Washington Post — Tunisian Parties Choose Veteran Human Rights Activist as Country’s New Interim President — 15 November 2011

Al Jazeera — Final Tunisian Election Results Announced — 14 November 2011

AllAfrica.com — Tunisia: Islamists Win 89 of 217 Seats — 14 November 2011

Washington Post — Final Tunisian Election Results Confirm Win for Islamist Party — 14 November 2011

Al Jazeera — Tunisia Coalition to Be Formed in ‘Days’ — 10 November 2011

Bloomberg — Islamists’ Victory in Tunisia a Win for Democracy — 30 October 2011

Belarusian Opposition Leader Transferred From Prison, Whereabouts Unknown

By Terance Walsh
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MINSK, Belarus — Former Belarusian presidential candidate Andrei Sannikov has been transferred from a labor camp in the eastern city of Babruysk.  The transfer came without warning and Sannikov’s whereabouts are currently unknown.

Andrei Sannikov (Photo courtesy of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty)

 

Sannikov’s transfer came to light when his attorney arrived in Babruysk to meet with him.  There prison officials informed the attorney, Andrei Varvashevich, that Sannikov’s relatives would be given more information when he reached his final destination.  Officials were otherwise silent at that time.

One of authoritarian president Aleksander Lukashenko’s main political rivals, Sannikov was sentenced to five years in prison in the spring of 2011 for organizing a large antigovernment protest.  The conviction and sentence were part of Lukashenko’s wide-spread and harsh crackdown against opposition.

While in prison, Sannikov complained of torture, deprivation of sleep, exposure to the cold and threats to him and his family.  His attorney suspected that he had a broken leg but was denied an x-ray.

Sannikov was just one of seven opposition candidates who faced prison sentences for their roles in post-election violence in

Lukashenko has claimed that Sannikov was linked to the terrorist bombing of a Minsk subway station that killed 14 people.  Also, in the closing argument in Sannikov’s case the prosecutor stated that “[f]rom November to December 20, Sannikov and others organized mass unrest, accompanied by pogroms, preparations for arson, the destruction of property, violence against people and armed resistance against representatives of the government.”

The United States Department of State described the sentence as “politically motivated.”

In September Sannikov’s relatives were kept in the dark as to his whereabouts for two weeks.  His wife Iryna Khalip, a journalist, called the authorities effort to keep Sannikov’s location a mystery are part of an attempt “to intimidate him.”

Originally Sannikov was imprisoned in the city of Navapolatsak.  He was transferred on September 21 and his family was told he would be in Babruysk on September 24.  When his family went to Babruysk on the 24th he was not there and did not arrive there for another two weeks.

Former prisoners describe the prisoner transit process as a “tough ordeal.”  Living conditions while being transported are normally worse than being in prison itself.  The prisoners are held in tiny cells in “inhumane conditions.”  There are no newspapers, sanitary facilities, letters, and no opportunity to talk to anyone.

Since the initial discovery of Sannikov’s transfer, Khalip has gained more information as to his destination.  She told journalists, “It was [acting chief of the Corrections Department Syarhei] Pratesnka who explained to me several weeks ago why Sannikov had been transferred to Babruisk. He said it would be better for him there. Now he says Sannikov has been transferred from Babruisk colony Nr 2 to the Vitsebsk region due to danger to his life and health. Pratsenka did not say in what colony Sannikov was sent.”

There are five penal colonies in the Vitsebsk region.  When Sannikov’s attorney asked Pratesnka which prison Sannikov would end up in Pratesnka told the attorney he should figure out the location himself.

Currently all the penal colonies in the Vitsebsk region deny that Sannikov is present in their facility.  Officials at Babruisk continue to refuse to give Sannikov’s exact location, and where and why he is being transferred.

For more information please see:

Charter ’97 — Sannikov To Be Sent To Vitsebsk Region Again? — 16 November 2011

Charter ’97 — Sannikov Is Not In Vitsebsk Penal Colonies — 16 November 2011

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty — Jailed Belarusian Opposition Leader Again In Transit — 16 November 2011

New York Times — Sannikov, Belarus Opposition Leader, Gets Five-Year Sentence — 14 May 2011

Washington Post — Belarus: 7 Presidential Candidates Face 15 Years — 22 December 2010

Falun Gong Practitioners Jailed for Broadcasting Human Rights Abuses Into China

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

HANOI, Vietnam – Two Vietnamese men have been imprisoned for “the illegal transmission of information on a telecommunications network” into China amidst suspicion that the prosecutions were an attempt by Vietnamese authorities to please the Chinese government.

Vu Duc Trung (left) and Le Vanh Thanh (right) attend their trial on November 10, 2011 (Photo Courtesy of Radio Free Asia).

Le Van Thanh and his brother-in-law Vu Duc Trung were sentenced to serve two and three years respectively following a half day long trial.

Both of the men arrested were followers of the Falun Gong spiritual movement which is inspired by Buddhism and focuses on meditation. The movement was banned in China in 1999 after the group organized a peaceful protest in Tiananmen Square causing the Chinese government to designate the group as a “threat to social and political stability.”

The two men were initially detained in June 2010 for broadcasting the Sound of Hope news program into China in which they discussed human rights abuses, corruption and the persecution of Falun Gong followers. The transmissions were made from a farm outside of Hanoi from April 2009 until their detention.

Although outlawed in China, the Falun Gong practice is not prohibited in Vietnam and, according to Epring Zhang of the Falun Dafa Information Center, “…the Vietnamese constitution should protect people’s freedom of speech and expression.”

In addition, the transmissions of uncensored news to China did “…absolutely nothing to harm Vietnamese society or break Vietnamese law” according to Falun Dafa and the court failed to produce a law banning broadcasting into China when pressed by Vu and Le’s attorney.

Furthermore, the Chinese government has allegedly sent correspondences to Vietnam requesting not only that the government prevent the transmission of radio content from Vietnam into China but also that they restrict and harass Falun Gong practitioners. Following the requests, China sent a letter praising Vietnam for their assistance in controlling Falun Gong.

The correspondences between the Chinese and Vietnamese government in conjunction with the legality of the activities of Vu and Le have led many to speculate that the conviction of the two broadcasters was an effort by the Vietnamese government to cater to China’s influence.

For example, Phil Robertson of Human Rights Watch argued that “Vietnam should not violate human rights and punish its own citizens merely because their activism displeases China.”

In addition, Reporters Without Borders released a statement that the “…verdict shows the authorities were conveying the anger of their Chinese counterparts, who were the targets of criticism expressed in the radio programs.”

Since being outlawed, Falun Gong practitioners in China have been detained, held in psychiatric facilities and forced into re-education through labor programs.

Just days before the trial of Vu Duc Trung and Le Van Thanh thirty Falun Gong demonstrators were beaten and detained for protesting the trial of the two men outside of the Chinese embassy in Hanoi.

 

For more information, please see:

NTDTV – Vietnam Complicit With Chinese Regime’s Persecution of Falun Gong: Rights Groups – 15 November 2011

Amnesty International – China: Local Residents Petition for Falun Gong Releases – 14 November 2011

IEWY – Viet Nam: Falun Gong Practitioners Detained Over Meditation Protest – 14 November 2011

Radio Free Asia – Under Fire Over Falun Gong Jailing – 11 November 2011

AFP – Vietnam Falungong Jailed Over China Broadcasts – 10 November 2011

Indian Jails Hold Hundreds Uncharged

by Hibberd Kline
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

NEW DELHI, India— Hundreds of Pakistani citizens are being held without charge in Indian jails located in Jammu and Kashmir, India’s Supreme Court revealed on Friday.

Many of the prisoners have been held for years after mistakenly wandering across the border. (Photo courtesy of BBC News).

Speaking for the Court’s Bench, Judge RN Lodha proclaimed that it was “shocking that over 254 Pakistani nationals are languishing in jails without trial.”

The plight of the prisoners came to light as the Court heard a petition seeking the release of the prisoners.

Petitioner, Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party president Bhim Singh, said that the illegally detained prisoners included four Pakistani soldiers, a number of insurgents and nineteen women who had unintentionally across the border from Pakistan.

The four Pakistani soldiers were arrested between 1965 and 1967 after crossing the dividing line between Pakistani-controlled Kashmir and Indian-controlled Kashmir. The four have been held without charge ever since.

The Pakistani Army had initially informed the soldiers families that the four were dead. However, in 2006 a freed prisoner told the families that he had seen the soldiers in prison in 1998. Upon hearing the news, the families contacted the Red Cross in an attempt to find further information, but no trace of the prisoners could be found until last April.

In Ludhiana Jail in Punjab, another prisoner, who was pregnant when she was arrested in 2002 after crossing the border, has watched her daughter spend the first nine years of her life behind bars.

After learning of the large number of uncharged prisoners, the Court strongly chastised the government for failing to give a full account of the extent to which foreign nationals are imprisoned in Indian jails.

The Court ordered the government to file a “comprehensive report” including “complete information” within two weeks.

Judge Lodha stressed that; “…liberty is the most dear Article to [the Court] and the most precious right given to the people.”

The right to personal liberty is protected in Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and applies to everyone regardless of whether they are are Indian citizens or foreign nationals.

In 2010, the Court began monitoring the repatriation of Pakistani prisoners by the Indian government after Bhim Singh alerted them irregularities in the process. That year the Home Ministry reported that it had repatriated 293 Pakistanis including 130 prisoners and 163 fishermen.

However, the ministry also reported that an additional 500 Pakistanis remained in Indian prisons.

The ministry’s affidavit stated that India’s government exchanges prisoner lists with Pakistan twice each year.

The court order comes on the heals of Thursday’s more upbeat statement by the prime minsters of India and Pakistan. The two leaders proclaimed that the two countries relations are inextricably linked and promised a “new chapter” in Indian-Pakistani relations.

For more information, please see:

BBC News — India Court Shocked at Pakistanis Held without Charge — 11 November 2011

The Telegraph — India’s Supreme Court Denounces Pakistani Jail Term Discovery — 11 November 2011

Times of India — Pakistan Men in Jail for 40 Years Appals Supreme Court — 12 November 2011

The Nation — Indian SC ‘Shocked’ by Pakistanis in Jail — 11 November 2011

War Crimes Prosecution Watch Vol. 6, Issue 16 — Nov 7, 2011

Vol. 6, Issue 16 — Novemer 7, 2011

 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Central African Republic & Uganda

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kenya

Libya

AFRICA

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Special Court for Sierra Leone

EUROPE

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal

NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA

United States

TOPICS

Terrorism

Piracy

Universal Jurisdiction

Gender-Based Violence

REPORTS

UN Reports

NGO Reports

TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSIONS

Brazil

Canada

Nigeria

COMMENTARY AND PERSPECTIVES

WORTH READING

War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. For more information about War Crimes Prosecution Watch, please contact warcrimeswatch@pilpg.org.

Vol. 6, Issue 16 — Novemer 7, 2011

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Central African Republic & Uganda

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kenya

Libya

AFRICA

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Special Court for Sierra Leone

EUROPE

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal

TOPICS

Terrorism

Piracy

Universal Jurisdiction

Gender-Based Violence

War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world.  If you do not want to receive future issues of War Crimes Prosecution Watch, please email warcrimeswatch@pilpg.org and type “unsubscribe” in the subject line.