Phillipine Army Falsely Labeling Children as Rebels

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

 MANILA, Philippines –The Philippine army is facing allegations that they have been falsely claiming that children taken into custody are rebel “child warriors” of the rebel New People’s Army.

The Philippine army has been accused of detaining children and falsely declaring them to the public as rebel "child warriors" (Photo Courtesy of Now Public).

According to Elaine Pearson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, “[t]he army is concocting stories of rebel child soldiers that are putting children at risk for propaganda purposes.”

Since June 2010, according to Human Rights Watch, there have been at least six cases involving twelve children in which the children were not only taken into custody but also publicly exposed to the media as captured rebel combatants. This public exposure is not only a violation of Philippine law, but is also a violation of international law which prohibits the exposure of captured combatants to the public and the media.

In one case, three young boys were detained by soldiers while doing chores and then publicly declared to be rebel child soldiers. One of the children illustrated his experience by stating, “[t]he soldiers shook me…they were trying to force me to admit we had planted a bomb…they tied my hands together…I was afraid.”

One of the other boys stated that the soldiers pushed him to the ground and told him that they would kill his father if he did not give them the names of other rebels.

In some cases, the children were detained by the army for days or weeks before being surrendered to the Department of Social Welfare and Development as required by Philippine law.

In July, a fourteen year old boy and his younger sister were taken into custody while on vacation in Northern Samar. The children were then publicly declared rebels and the younger child was kept in the army camp for three weeks. While detained, she was forced to do laundry and other chores before being released to the Department of Social Welfare and Development.

The social welfare and development officer found no evidence to support claims that the children were recruited by the rebel and reported that this conclusion can be supported by school records.

Often, children and their families have reported experiencing continued harassment and intimidation by the Philippine army following their release. One mother reported that the continued harassment forced her to relocate her children after members of the army came to her home and asked her to take her children to the military camp to sign “unspecified papers.”

The armed forces public affairs office chief, Col. Arnulfo Burgos, has combated the allegations by stating that falsifying information has never been accepted or tolerated and if “…soldiers are ground to be falsifying documents or fabricating evidences, we will not hesitate to punish them.”

Despite the assurance of Burgos, Elaine Pearson has warned that “[t]he use of child soldiers in the Philippines is a matter of grave concern that the government should be taking seriously.”

The battle between the government and the rebels has been ongoing since the Communist Party of the Philippines began a campaign to seize power in 1969. The conflict has claimed the lives of countless civilians who were caught in the crossfire or fell victim to atrocities.

 

For more information, please see:

ABS-CBN News – AFP Denies Lying About NPA ‘Child Warriors’ – 12 October 2011

Arab News – Philippine Army Falsely Tags Children as Rebels: HRW – 12 October 2011

Philippine Daily Inquirer – Rights Group Accuses Army of Fabricating Stories on Child Warriors – 12 October 2011

Human Rights Watch – Philippines: Army Falsely Tags Children as Rebels – 11 October 2011

Reuters – Philippine Rebels Must Stop Targeting Civilians – Rights Group – 5 October 2011

Venezuela Rejects 38 Human Rights Recommendations From UN Universal Periodic Review

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela – On Friday, October 7, Venezuela’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) began.  UPR’s are done on a four year basis, with every member state of the United Nations.  They are conducted by the Human Rights Council, which is made up of 47 member countries.  The goal of the UPR’s is to ascertain the progress that has been made in each country regarding human rights.

The UN Human Rights Council meeting, on Tuesday the Universal Periodic Review for Venezuela was released. (Photo courtesy of El Universal)

Once a UPR has begun, a “troika” of countries is assigned to it.  These three countries have 48 hours in which to prepare a final report that is then submitted to the Human Rights Council.  This report consists of recommendations for human rights improvements to be made.  The reports are not binding on the nations reviewed.  The “troika” of countries assigned to Venezuela was Burkina Faso, Czech Republic and Guatemala. 

Yesterday, the final report was submitted.  This report included 148 recommendations that spanned a variety of topics.  Venezuela chose to accept 95 of those recommendations.  Another 15 will be considered.  The remaining 38 recommendations were flatly rejected.  These recommendations all focused on issues of judicial independence, freedom of the press and protection for non-governmental activist groups.

Other suggestions were; more guarantees to allow for freedom of expression, increased safety for journalists, an independent and open selection process for prosecutors and judges as well as a higher respect for the independence of the judiciary.  Concerns regarding Venezuela’s failure to comply with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) and its denial of entry to UN special rapporteurs were also noted.

During their presentation, Venezuela made special note of signing on to most international treaties and covenants on human rights.  The Slovakian delegate politely chided this with a diplomatic statement inviting Venezuela to “observe them” in practice.

Brazil also gently chastised Venezuela.  “The guarantee of human rights needs independence of the Judiciary branch and full freedom of expression and freedom of the press,” was the Brazilian ambassador’s statement to the Human Rights Council. 

The Venezuelan vice minister of foreign affairs, Temir Porras Ponce de Leon addressed the rejections made with a statement that called the rejected recommendations “groundless statements” as well as “disrespectful and interfering.”

Venezuelan Foreign Affairs minister Nicolas Maduro said “[t]he proposals from the US are aggressive, cynical and boil down to a slap in the face to the dignity of our people.”  He noted that only twelve countries criticized the lack of judicial autonomy, limits on freedom of expression and insufficient protection for non-governmental organizations.

 

For more information, please see;

CNN International – Venezuela Rejects Certain Human Rights Recommendations – 11 October 2011

El Universal – UN Members Urge Venezuela to Meet International Agreements – 11 October 2011

El Universal – Report on Human Rights to be Submitted on Tuesday – 10 October 2011

El Universal – Venezuela Rejects UN Petitions to Repeal Crimes of Opinion – 10 October 2011

MercoPress – Brazil, in Friendly Tone, Asks Venezuela for Fair Judges and Freedom of Expression – 10 October 2011

UAE Trial of Activists Draws Scrutiny

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

ABU DHABI, The United Arab Emirates — Five activists charged with insulting state officials are facing ongoing prosecution in the United Arab Emirates.

Human Rights activist Ahmed Mansoor speaks at press conference in Dubai on Jan. 26, 2011 (Photo courtesy of Human Rights Watch).Human Rights activist Ahmed Mansoor speaks at press conference in Dubai on Jan. 26, 2011 (Photo courtesy of Human Rights Watch).

Ahmed Mansoor, Nasser bin Ghaith, Fahad Salim Dalk, Ahmed Abdul-Khaleq, and Hassan al-Khamis have been charged with committing crimes of instigation, breaking laws and perpetrating acts that pose a threat to state security, undermining the public order, opposing the government system, and insulting the president, the vice president and the crown prince of Abu Dhabi.

One of the men, Ahmed Mansoor, faces additional charges for supporting a petition advocating for wider powers for the UAE’s quasi-parliament.

The defendants deny all the charges.

The men’s lawyers have complained about the secrecy of the first four hearings, and their inability to adequately cross-examine state’s witnesses. State officials opened up the trial to the public on Sunday, but critics of the trial were not satisfied.

“If this was the showcase hearing, we can only imagine what previous hearings were like,” said Samer Muscati, a researcher with Human Rights Watch.  “This is more a political theater than a trial.”

The trial is unprecedented for the small gulf Arab nation. The United Arab Emirates is a young wealthy country ruled under a revered hereditary leadership.  Political expression is minimal.

The incident was a small tremor brought on by the larger Arab Spring movement that incited similar outbursts throughout the region. It is likely the fear of further incidents that has led the state to respond the way it has.

Rights groups dispute whether or not there is actually enough evidence for the state to have brought the action to be tried in Abu Dhabi’s Federal Supreme Court, which is usually used for charges like terrorism and forgery.

Due to the type of court this action has been brought in, the men will have no right of appeal.  The lack of due process, and other procedural mishaps has many rights groups

Government supporters, who are camping in a park outside of the court in support of the trial, have called the action of the five men un-nationalistic.

Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Front Line Defenders, and the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information have teamed up for a campaign – the first of its kind – to urge the UAE to drop the charges against the men.

A verdict is expected at next week’s hearing.  If the defendants are found guilty they face up to five years in prison, except Mansoor who faces up to nine years if found guilty of his additional charges.

For more information, please see:

Arabian Business — UAE activists boycott court over ‘unfair trial’ — 3 Oct. 2011

Wall Street Journal — UAE Trial of Activists Enters Home Stretch — 3 Oct. 2011

Arab Times — UAE Activists Trial ‘Unfair’: Rights Groups — 2 Oct. 2011

CNN — Activists on trial for insulting UAE president — 2 Oct. 2011

Human Rights Watch — UAE: Trial of Activists ‘Fundamentally Unfair’ — 2 Oct. 2011

Wall Street Journal — United Arab Emirates Trial Attracts Scrutiny — 30 Sept. 2011

Yemen on the Verge of Humanitarian Crisis

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

SANA’A, Yemen — As the situation in Yemen grows worse, aid workers fear it is on the verge of a humanitarian disaster.   Needs in the country are on the rise, and the delivery of aid is becoming increasingly more complicated.

Yemen is one of the poorest countries in the world, and it currently finds itself in a struggle with a rebel movement in the north, a secessionist movement in the south, and an ever-growing al-Qaeda presence.

Yemen’s inner turmoil has recently been complicated further by the recent violent governmental crackdown on pro-democracy protests across the country, a fuel crisis, and rising food prices.

The region’s insecurity, an almost uniform hesitancy of financial donors, and a series of logistical complexities have brought the delivery of aid to a near standstill.

“We have here in Yemen many concurrent humanitarian situations to deal with,” said Geert Cappelaere, representative of the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in Yemen. “Each and every one of these humanitarian situations is very often of an unprecedented complexity for us as the international humanitarian community.”

Historically, it has always been difficult to get the international community to pay attention to Yemen.  Donations in the billions of dollars have been made to Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, but Yemen once again finds itself left behind.

The funding that did exist is quickly shrinking, mainly out of fear that the money would be funneled through a widely reported government patronage system.  Countries and international organizations such as the United States, the European Union, and the World Bank have withdrawn or suspended funding, citing security and governmental concerns. The Friends of Yemen, a group of donors specifically concerned with the future of Yemen, have not met since the current crisis began in February.

“While the political stalemate has caused many donors to pause, this is the time when it is most critical to act,” said Oxfam, the international poverty and injustice organization. “No longer should politics and security be the drivers of aid strategies in Yemen,” it added, referring in part to a US insistence on focusing its aid on counter-terrorism, rather than on the areas of Yemen in most need.

Overall insecurity is one of the biggest complications facing the country.  The violent crackdown on protests throughout the country has led the United Nations to temporarily evacuate almost half of its international staff.  Similarly, most aid organizations have evacuated a large number of their staff in the country.

Renewed fighting in Southern Yemen has led to the displacement of over 100,000 people since May.  The World Food Programme has seen an increase in the number of people it is feeding from 30,000 in June to 63,000 today.  If the turmoil continues to worsen the organization will not have the resources to comply with the need.

In Northern Yemen malnutrition rates are among the worst in the world.  Nearly 1/3 of the children under five suffer from moderate to severe acute malnutrition.  This is more than twice the threshold for an emergency as defined by UNICEF.

A rupture to a major pipeline in March has made fuel prices rise (The price of transportation has increased by 100% and 200% in urban and rural areas respectively) as well as increase the price of food across the country (up 46% since January).  This increase in food prices comes at a time when 1/3 of the population, around 7.5 million people, already do not have enough to eat.

An Oxfam survey found that out of 100 families nearly 1/5 of them had taken their children out of school to put them to work, and nearly 2/3 were skipping meals.  Others have begun selling valuable items to buy food.

Despite these obvious problems the insecurity has hampered attempts at aid.  Anti-Government tribes make it difficult for humanitarian agencies to deliver supplies.  They have a strong distrust of the motives of outside groups.  Local agents are employed to attempt to bypass this barrier, but it is still proving difficult.  In cities affected by the anti-government protests there is indiscriminate shooting, which can make the humanitarian workers into indirect targets.

The problems in Yemen are so complex and layered that by attempting to deal with one it is possible to create or exacerbate another.  About 20,000 of the displaced people have taken temporary residence in 112 schools in Southern Yemen.   For this reason the new school year for many of the southern cities has been indefinitely suspended.  The government and aid community are searching for a more permanent location for the displaced peoples, but so far one has not been found.  If one can’t be found soon the problem will likely change to finding places to teach the school-less students.

On top of the need for humanitarian aid, international organizations are also worried about the steady increase in violence.  Almost weekly news comes out of new massacres and acts of brutality.  A serious concern for many is the number of women and children that are being targeted.  According to UNICEF, at least 94 children have been killed and 240 wounded since the current crisis began earlier this year.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General, has called numerous times for the government and opposition groups to meet with his special advisor, Jamal Benomar, to attempt a peaceful resolution to the crisis.  This so far has fallen on deaf ears.

For more information, please see:

Yemen Observer — WFP continues its operations in Yemen amongst civil unrest — 7 Oct. 2011

Bikyamasr — Urgent protection of children needed in Yemen — 6 Oct. 2011

The Examiner — At least 94 children killed so far in Yemen: UNICEF –6 Oct. 2011

AlterNet – Is Yemen on the Brink of Humanitarian Disaster? — 5 Oct. 2011

IRIN – Analysis: Aid delivery in Yemen becomes more complex — 5 Oct. 2011

UNICEF — Statement by UNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lake on the worsening situation in Yemen — 5 Oct. 2011

UN — UNICEF warns of lack of nutrition supplies to meet unprecedented global demand— 5 Oct. 2011


Australian Migration Agents Allegedly Aided in Sex Trafficking

By Brittney Hodnik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

CANBERRA, Australia – Authorities in Australia report that legal migration attempts are turning into sex trafficking, specifically in Sydney and Melbourne.  Today, the Sydney Morning Herald linked two migration agents to aiding in illegal sex slavery.  Most typically, the women come from Asia or Eastern Europe and are often looking for visas to migrate legally to Australia; before they know it, they are pushed into a world of human trafficking and illegal brothels.

Xu Xu Li, a migration agent in Sydney, is under investigation for her role in alleged sex trafficking. (Image courtesy of the Sydney Morning Herald)

The Sydney Morning Herald reports that Xu Xu Li and Yasmin Bao are under investigation for their role in the illicit sex trade.  Both women are licensed migration agents from Sydney and Melbourne, respectively.  They supposedly arrange student visas for women seeking them before forcing them to work as sex slaves.  Li denies her involvement with the whole thing, stating that she never met or communicated directly with the victims, but rather all contact was made through “people in the middle,” she told the Sydney Morning Herald.

Authorities have linked two brothels in Sydney and Melbourne to international human traffickers, according to Voice of America News (“VOA News”).  Reportedly, the gangs lure Asian women most frequently to Australia by promising a college education.  Instead, women are forced to have sex with men to repay their airfare and accommodation debts to the traffickers.

Because brothels are legal in some parts of Australia, the state has been slow to act.  Women are not being protected from illegal sex trafficking because of some of the leniency toward legal brothels and prostitution.  According to the Sydney Morning Herald, crime within the sex industry has not been deterred whatsoever by the regulation.

Project Respect works to help women in the sex industry, both those who have been forced into the industry and those who have not; it has found that abhorrent violations of human rights continue.

Sex trafficking is a very difficult crime to get accurate estimates for.  VOA News reports that the authorities have far underestimated the amount of trafficking cases in Australia.  Worldwide, sex trafficking is a multi-billion dollar business.

Christine Sykes, the chief executive of the Migration Agents Registration Authority told the Sydney Morning Herald “no agents in the past 10 years had been sanctioned over allegation of sex slavery or trafficking.”

Home Affairs Minister, Brendan O’Connor told MSN that Australia will continue its investigation into these two migration agents and other illegal sex trafficking.  “The law enforcement agencies in this country work closely and have to continue to work ever more closely,” he told MSN.

For more information, please visit:

The Sydney Morning Herald — Visa to Vice: Migration Agents Linked to Sex Workers — 12 Oct. 2011

MSN — Sex Slaves a Long-Term Investigation — 11 Oct. 2011

The Sydney Morning Herald — Sex Slavery Even in Licensed Brothels — 11 Oct. 2011

Voice of America — Sex, Human Trafficking Thriving in Australia — 10 Oct. 2011