Former Director of Colombia’s Administrative Security Department sentenced to 25 years in prison for ties to paramilitary group and murder

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America


BOGOTA, Colombia — Former Director of the Administrative Security Department, Jorge Aurelio Norguera, was ordered to pay a fine of $1.9 million and sentenced to 25 years in prison on Wednesday by Colombia’s Supreme Court of Justice for his ties with far right-wing military groups and his involvement in the murder of a human rights worker in 2004.

Jorge Noguera receives stiff prison sentence for paramilitary ties. (Photo Courtesy of Huffington Post).
Jorge Noguera receives stiff prison sentence for paramilitary ties. (Photo Courtesy of Huffington Post).

Noguera, 47, was found guilty of destroying public documents and giving illegal right-wing death squads names of leftist activists, students and labor union leaders so they could be killed. The Supreme Court specifically held Noguera in connection to the murder of Alfredo Correa de Andreis, a prominent sociologist and human rights worker who was shot by assassins belonging to a paramilitary group in 2004.


According to a former senior deputy at Colombia’s Administrative Department of Security (DAS), Noguera helped coordinate Andreis assassination after Andreis had reportedly investigated suspicious activity by the right-wing military.


In addition to his sentencing and fine, Noguera has also been ordered to pay $89,000 in restitution to Andreis’ family. A lawyer for Andreis’ family said public money from DAS had been used for his murder.


Noguera’s sentencing is one of many scandals to come out of Colombia’s Administrative Department of Security (DAS). Several former officials and staffers of DAS have been investigated and accused of illegally wiretapping opposition leaders and judges.


Former President of Colombia, Alvaro Uribe, has also been accused of ordering DAS to wiretap his opponents while he was president. Uribe has denied any involvement with the wiretapping, stating last month “I never gave orders to do anything illegal.”


On Wednesday, Uribe referenced Noguera in a tweeter message stating: “I nominated him because of his résumé and his family. I trusted him; if he transgressed the law, it pains me and I offer apologies to the citizenry.” In a speech regarding Noguera in 2006, Uribe famously stated “I put my hands into fire for him.”


Noguera’s sentencing is the stiffest punishment to have been handed out so far to a member of Uribe’s government.


Director of the Americas for Amnesty International, Susan Lee, says Noguera’s sentencing is a critical move in the right direction for justice in Colombia. She calls for all those responsible for crimes under DAS to be promptly brought to justice.


In 2003, Colombia began a program which offered financial and legal assistance to members of paramilitary groups that voluntarily quit.


For more information, please see:


Ahram – Colombian Ex-Spy Chief Gets Stiff Prison Sentence 15 September 2011


CNN – Colombian Court Sentences Former Spy Chief for Paramilitary Ties – 15 September 2011

NY Times – Ex-Spy Chief of Colombia Is Sentenced to Prison – 14 September 2011

The Huffington Post – Jorge Noguera, Colombia’s Domestic Intelligence Chief, Convicted Of Criminal Conspiracy – 14 September 2011

Germany, Italy in Legal Bout Over WWII Reparations

By Terance Walsh
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Germany has turned to the United Nations’ highest court on Monday to repeal an order by an Italian court for Germany to pay reparations to Italian victims of Nazi war crimes in Italy during World War II.

Village of Distomo after WWII massacre (Photo courtesy of Athens News)
Village of Distomo after WWII massacre (Photo courtesy of Athens News)

In 2004 a court in Italy ruled that Luigi Ferrini, an Italian civilian, was owed restitution because he was deported to Germany in 1944 and was forced into slave labor in the armaments industry.  Ferrini initially filed his complaint against Germany in 1998.  Since the Italian court ruled in his favor hundreds of relatives of victims of Nazi war crimes have filed complaints for enslavement, imprisonment, and killing.

In 2008 the Italian court decided to seize Villa Vigoni, an Italian-German cultural center on Lake Cuomo, to pay for the judgment.  Germany initiated its case against Italy later that year.

The gravamen of the dispute is Germany’s contention that the Italian court’s ruling violates German sovereign immunity.  The Germans maintain that allowing national courts to have jurisdiction over other nations would lead to “legal disorder.”  Such a system would open the door for complainants to “shop around for the most favorable national courts” to hear their grievances, Germany’s top legal adviser said.  By issuing an order of restitution, Italy “failed to respect the jurisdictional immunity” Germany is due under international law.  Instead of focusing on the individuals, the Italian court should be concerned with the broader legal implications of its ruling.

Susanne Wasum-Rainer, Germany’s director-general of legal affairs, is concerned that if Italy were allowed to demand reparations “the consequences would be severe.”  A decision favorable to Italy “would put in question and challenge open to challenges before domestic courts.”

“What this case is not about is the Second World War, violations of international humanitarian law or the question of reparations,” Wasum-Rainer added.

In response Italy asserts that the protection of human rights supersedes all other legal interests.  No immunity, sovereign or otherwise, can be afforded in issues of crimes against humanity.

“Germany… has adopted a stance that denies Italian victims access to justice,” said Salvatore Zappala, Italy’s legal representative to the UN.  “States cannot absolve themselves from the responsibility of reparations for serious violations of humanitarian law.”

“State sovereignty cannot be absolute,” added Giacomo Aiello, another member of Italy’s legal team.  The Italian court held Ferrini’s rights higher than Germany’s interest in sovereign immunity because the crimes committed against Ferrini were “international crimes,” which took precedence over sovereign immunity.

The Greeks stand behind Rome in this matter.  Many of Greece’s citizens have similar claims against Germany and will be allowed to argue their case before the World Court.  The Greeks’ claims arise from the killing of 214 Greek civilians in the village of Distomo at the hands of the Nazis in June 1944.

To Miltiadis Sfountouris, the law suits are not about money.  “It’s a moral thing, to find justice.”  Sfountouris said his 78-year-old mother jumped from a window in Distomo to escape the Nazi death squads.  She still lives in Distomo and has never received reparations.  Even though courts have ruled in favor the victims’ families for war reparations, the victims have been blocked from confiscating German property in Greek territory to pay for the damages.  As a result, no reparations have actually been paid for the massacre.

In addition to individual Greek lawsuits, the Greek government will exercise its right to participate in the dispute between Italy and Germany.  Prime Minister George Papandreou announced the decision last January to his cabinet.  “We are all aware of the gravity and significance of this issue and of its special symbolism,” he said.  He cited “obvious moral, legal and political reasons but also important issues of the highest national importance and the overall interests of the country at a specially crucial period for our homeland….  Our actions serve a self-evident debt to actively honor the memory of those that sacrificed themselves for this homeland.”

Recently Germany paid almost $6 billion to over one million people or their relatives who were exploited by the Third Reich.

The UN Court will be charged with weighing individual rights against the order and consistency of state sovereign immunity.  Germany and Italy will argue their cases this week but the court is not expected to rule on the matter for several months.

For more information please see:

IOL News — Victims of Nazi war turn to court — 16 September 2011

Expatica — Nazi crimes victims before Italian courts a “last resort” — 13 September 2011

Tengri News — Germany, Italy before UN world court over Nazi reparations — 13 September 2011

Deutsche Welle — Germany, Italy face off in court over Nazi war crime reparations — 12 September 2011

The State — Germany, Italy at UN court over WWII compensation — 12 September 2011

Athens News — Greek government to back war reparations claim in ICJ — 12 January 2011

War Crimes Prosecution Watch, Vol. 6, Issue 12 — September 12, 2011

Vol. 6, Issue 11 — September 12, 2011

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Central African Republic & Uganda

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kenya

Libya

AFRICA

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

EUROPE

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

War Crimes Investigations in Burma

NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA

United States

TOPICS

Terrorism

Piracy

Universal Jurisdiction

Gender-Based Violence

REPORTS

UN Reports

NGO Reports

TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSIONS

Canada

Ivory Coast

Sierra Leone

South Africa

Soloman Islands

COMMENTARY AND PERSPECTIVES

WORTH READING

War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. For more information about War Crimes Prosecution Watch, please contact warcrimeswatch@pilpg.org.

Venezuela’s Presidential Elections Moved Forwards Possibly Assuring Chavez Re-election

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Rep0rter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela – Election changes have just been announced in Venezuela by Tibisay Lucena, the president of the National Electoral Council.  Presidential elections traditionally take place in December of election years.  In the upcoming 2012 election year, the Venezuelan Presidential election has been moved up to October 7.

Tibisay Lucena announces the election date changes.  (Photo Courtesy of El Universal)
Tibisay Lucena announces the election date changes. (Photo Courtesy of El Universal)

President Chavez tweeted, “7 October 2012: your destiny is written! We will write another revolutionary victory on your page! We will live and we will conquer!” as a response to this announcement.

Chavez, who announced his intention to run for re-election earlier, will be up for a third term in office and a victory will place him in power of Venezuela for a consecutive 18 years.  In 2007, Chavez attempted to modify the Constitution, which he had drafted, to allow him to run for re-election for a  third term.  This move was unsuccessful. 

Again, in 2009, Chavez sought to strike down term limits and amend the Constitution.  This move was highly controversial as it was noted that Constitutional amendments are only permissible once per congressional term.  Despite the reservations of this being an unconstitutional act, Chavez was successful, paving the way for his upcoming 2012 campaign. 

Earlier this summer, in June, Chavez announced that he was battling cancer.  On June 20 he had a tumor removed in Cuba and since then has undergone multiple rounds of chemotherapy.  He announced Tuesday that he will start a final round of chemotherapy soon.  He expects to be at full strength when he begins campaigning in December. 

Approval ratings for Chavez stood at 70% at his 2006 re-election.  Current polls place his ratings at roughly 50%.  Opposition parties point out that moving the election date forward makes it harder for other candidates to successfully challenge Chavez.  They note that this is a particularly opportune time for rival parties due to the President’s weakened position.

Instead of receiving a full year in which to campaign, the candidates will only get eight months to mount a successful opposition.  MercoPress reports that political analyst Luis Vicente Leon believes shortening the campaign period will favor Chavez because an effective opposition needs to spend extensive time traveling around the country, meeting people and gathering support.  Additionally, Chavez’s unlimited access to broadcast hours makes him the most recognizable politician in the Venezuelan arena.

The National Electoral Council is justifying their decision by citing a need to separate national from regional and local elections.  Regional and local elections of governors will still take place in December.  Tibisay Lucena claims this division is to benefit voters, so they can focus on each election, instead of having the Presidential race overshadow the others.

 

For more information, please see;

Americas Quarterly – Date Set for Venezuela’s 2012 Presidential Election – 14 September 2011

El Universal – Venezuelan Electoral Body Decides to Separate Elections – 14 September 2011

Latin American Herald Tribune – Venezuela Sets Presidential Elections for 7 October 2010 – 14 September 2011

MercoPress – Venezuelan Presidential Election Moved Forward to 7 October 2012 – 14 September 2011