Monk’s Self- Immolation Results in Murder Convictions and Crackdown on Fellow Monks

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia
 

BEIJING, China – The self-immolation of a monk has led to three Tibetan monks being convicted as accessories to murder for allegedly helping a fellow monk burn himself to death in protest of government crackdown on Tibetan monks.

Three monks have been sentenced on murder charges for allegedly assisting in the self-immolation of a fellow monk (Photo Courtesy of Human Rights House).
Three monks have been sentenced on murder charges for allegedly assisting in the self-immolation of a fellow monk (Photo Courtesy of Human Rights House).

Two monks, Tsering Tenzin and Tenchum, were sentenced to ten and thirteen years respectively for “plotting, instigating and assisting” in the self-immolation of the monk.

The third monk, Drongdru, was sentenced to eleven years for “intentional homicide” after a trial lasting only one day. According to authorities the sixteen year old monk, Rigzin Phuntsog, was  kept in the Kirti monastery by Drongdru, his uncle,  for eleven hours following his March 16 self-immolation.

There is disagreement between Chinese authorities and local Tibetans regarding the circumstances surrounding the monk’s death.

While Chinese authorities maintain that he died as a result of self-immolation combined with being hidden by monks to prevent authorities from taking him to the hospital, rights groups are reporting a different story.

Tibetan rights groups insist that police put out the flames and then began to beat the young monk before other monks.  They say local villagers took him to the monastery to avoid the beating and then took him to the hospital a few hours later.

The U.S. State Department has expressed concern that the procedural rights of the three monks were not properly upheld. Other rights groups have expressed concern that the sentencing was a ploy to detract attention from the cause of the self-immolation and that sentences were handed down without evidence of the monks involvement.

Others however, found the sentences to be fair, expressing that “a monk who goes against dharma and against the law should be penalized.” The practice of self-immolation has been condemned by the Dalai Lama.

The death of Rigzin Phuntsog has caused renewed and heightened clashes between Chinese and Tibetans resulting in over 300 monks being taken from the monastery and the death of two villagers who were attempting to prevent the detention of the monks.

China repelled requests made by a U.N. human rights panel in June to provide information about the status of the 300 monks who had been taken from the monastery stating only that the monks were undergoing “legal education.”

“Legal education” refers to the Chinese government’s practice of systematically rounding up monks and forcing them to attend education sessions in which they are ordered to pledge their allegiance to China and denounce the Dalai Lama. This practice has largely fueled the conflict between China and Tibetans who feel that they are having their culture taken from them by the Chinese.

Although, the exact reason for the monk’s self-immolation is unknown, human rights groups have stated that the monk was protesting government policies in Tibet.

The relationship between Tibet and China has been severely strained since 1950 when the Chinese marched into Tibetan territory. Many Tibetans feel that their culture, freedom and worship are being suppressed by the Chinese government. Since fleeing Tibet after a failed uprising, the Dalai Lama has traversed the world advocating for increased Tibetan autonomy.

Some experts, such as Robert Barnett of Columbia University, fear that the stiff sentences given to the three monks at the monastery will aggravate tensions between China and Tibet because the sentences will “…be seen by the Tibetans as a manipulation of the law to intimidate people further.”

 

 

 

For more information, please see:

The Tibet Post –Int’l Rights Groups Condemn Unjust Sentencing of 3 Tibetan Monks – 1 September 2011

BBC – China Jails Two More Tibetan Monks Over Fire Death – 31 August 2011

The New York Time – China: Two Tibetan Monks Receive Lengthy Prison Terms – 31 August 2011

China Daily – Two Tibetan Monks Sentenced in Murder Case – 30 August 2011

Los Angeles Times –Tibetan Monks Get Stiff Prison Terms in Burning Death – 30 August 2011

BBC – Q&A: China and the Tibetans – 15 August 2011

New Libyan Government Reaffirms Vow of Democracy to World Leaders

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

PARIS, France – Yesterday, the leaders of Libya’s National Transitional Council (NTC) met in Paris with representatives of 63 countries to discuss the country’s transition to a democratic regime.  The nations in attendance agreed to give the provisional government $15 billion worth of frozen assets so that the rebuilding process can begin.  During the meeting, NTC chairman Mustafa Abdel-Jalil vowed that Libya would have a new constitution and elections for a permanent government within the next 18 months.

National Transitional Council Chairman Mustafa Abdel-Jalil and Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril, shown here talking with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, represented Libya at Thursdays meeting. (Photo courtesy of Getty Images)
National Transitional Council Chairman Mustafa Abdel-Jalil and Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril, shown here talking with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, represented Libya at Thursday’s meeting. (Photo courtesy of Getty Images)

While former leader Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi’s regime is all but dead, the man himself remains at large.  The NTC has promised to continue its search for the recently deposed despot until he is found “dead or alive,” and would not consider the present conflict to be over until then.  Despite this, Guma El-Gamaty, its representative in London, said that starting to undo the damage he wrought during his 42-year rule and the last six months of internal strife should not wait until that time comes.

“As long as Tripoli, the capital, is stabilized and secure and safe, which it almost is now, and the overwhelming majority of other cities and towns, then Libyans can get on with the process of transition and stabilization and the new political process,” El-Gamaty told the BBC.

Today, reconstruction minister Ahmad Jehani and rebuilding team member Aref Nayed, met with experts in post-conflict rebuilding from several groups, including the International Monetary Fund.  Libya’s financial situation was further buoyed when the European Union lifted sanctions on 28 entities, including its oil companies and banks, which should ease the financial burden on its reconstruction needs.  Five international oil companies have already arrived in order to help resume its operations.

“The issue of damage is not much and you can get procurement very fast,” Jehani reportedly said.  “This is helped by the fact the producing wells are under contract to international firms, if they feel they can deploy their people.”

In the short term, the temporary government must restore supply lines for food, water, and medicine, while also ensuring continued security.  Over the long term, the country expects to be capable of funding its own reconstruction because it is an oil-rich country with a small population.

Despite the positive vibes that emanated from the conference, which was held on the anniversary of Gaddafi’s ascension to power, the NTC remains in a tenuous position.  Libya is a historically tribal nation.  During the rebellion, these various tribes and ethnicities did not always fight as a single force, so unity is unclear.  Because so many interests exist, the NTC will have to first gain their trust before they can continue with its ambitions plan to set up a government, which include having a draft constitution within eight months and full elections in 2013.

The road to prosperity may be long, but the NTC is optimistic.  Though he said the world’s bet that the rebellion against Gaddafi would succeed paid off, Jalil did not consider the fight to be over yet.

“It’s up to you [the Libyan people] to accomplish what we promised: stability, peace and reconciliation,” he said.  “We have to make sure that we fulfill our side of the deal. We must have security in Libya. Tolerance and forgiveness must be promoted. The state of law must be respected.”

More than 70 countries, including the United States and Russia, have recognized the NTC as Libya’s legitimate government.

For more information, please see:

BBC — Libya interim leaders vow tolerance and respect for law — 2 September 2011

Reuters — WRAPUP 3 – Libyans pledge democracy as they win Gaddafi billions — 2 September 2011

Tripoli Post — European Union Lifts Sanctions on Libya Imposed Under Al Qathafi — 2 September 2011

Tripoli Post — Libya’s New Leaders Reaffirm Commitment to Democracy, Good Governance — 2 September 2011

New York Times — Libya’s Supporters Gather in Paris to Help Ease New Government’s Transition — 1 September 2011

New York Times — Russia Recognizes Libya Rebels as World Leaders Meet — 1 September 2011

Extradition Refusal Shows “Impunity is Institutionalized” in El Salvador

By Brittney Hodnik
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador  – El Salvador’s Supreme Court has refused to arrest nine men who voluntarily admitted to killing six Jesuit priests in 1989.  The Court said that without a formal extradition request from Spain, the men would not be arrested, according to the Associated Press.  Judge Eloy Velasco indicted 20 former soldiers to be tried in Spain under “universal jurisdiction,” reserved for those crimes that are so grave they can be tried anywhere.

Activists want the former soldiers extradited and brought to justice to end impunity in El Salvador. (Image Courtesy of BBC News)
Activists want the former soldiers extradited and brought to justice to end impunity in El Salvador. (Image Courtesy of BBC News)

El Salvador underwent a civil war from 1980-1992 between guerillas and U.S.-backed Salvadoran soldiers.  On November 16, 1989, Salvadoran soldiers shot six priests, their housekeeper, and the housekeeper’s 15-year-old daughter.  Over 70,000 deaths and 8,000 disappearances are a result of El Salvador’s civil war. 

The right-wing sector and military in El Salvador considered the priests allies to the guerillas because of their criticism of human rights abuses throughout the country.  However, 12,000 documents given to Judge Velasco show that the crime was premeditated, reported Latin America Press.

In May, Spain issued arrest warrants for the men through Interpol under the authority of universal jurisdiction.  This principle allows crimes that are so egregious to be prosecuted in countries other than where the crime took place.  In this case, Judge Velasco wants to prosecute the men in Madrid, Spain, rather than El Salvador.  Five of the priests were Spanish, and one was Salvadoran.

According to Latin America Press, in 1991, four officials and five soldiers went on trial for the crime.  Two of them were found guilty but were released shortly thereafter under the 1993 Amnesty Law.  The Supreme Court has previously denied the re-opening of this case, stating that the statute of limitations has already passed.

Another man involved in the killings is former Salvadoran military officer, Inocente Orlando Montano who had been living in Massachusetts.  As reported by The New York Times, Montano appeared in United States District Court in Boston on August 23 for immigration violations.  Upon his arrest, Spain can now seek extradition to Madrid.

A handful of conservative sector personnel have applauded El Salvador’s Supreme Court for refusing the extradition and protecting these men.  Many however, feel outraged and want to see these men brought to justice.  Ima Guirola from the Women’s Studies Institute told Latin America Press, “The ruling shows that impunity is institutionalized in the country.”  Furthermore, Ramon Villalta of the Social Initiative for Democracy told Latin America Press, “I believe that impunity has been a characteristic of El Salvador for years.”

The men who turned themselves in did so because they knew the Salvadoran government would protect them, according to Latin America Press.  The fight will continue between El Salvador and Spain as to whether the men will be extradited or not.

For more information, please visit:

Latin America Press — Impunity Rules in Jesuits’ Murder Case — 1 Sept. 2011

BBC News — Spain Pushes El Salvador Jesuit Murders Case — 25 Aug. 2011

The Associated Press — Spain Seeks El Salvador Clarification on Suspects — 25 Aug. 2011

The New York Times — Salvadoran Tied to Killings Faces Immigration Charge — 23 Aug. 2011

Bolivian Ex-officials sentenced for their role in the Black October deaths

By Paula Buzzi
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America


LA PAZ, Bolivia – Bolivia’s Supreme court of Justice convicted five ex-military commanders of genocide on Tuesday for their role in the deaths of at least 64 unarmed civilians in an army crackdown during an October 2003 riot.


2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a proposed pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera)
2003 riot sparked by a government plan to export natural gas through a pipeline to Chile. (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera).

The October 2003 riot, also known as “Black October,” was sparked by public outrage after the Bolivian government announced its plans to export Bolivia’s natural gas through a pipeline into Chile. Protestors who were fueled by years of anger over poverty and political marginalization, took to the streets of El Alto with sticks and rocks to demonstrate their disapproval.


Authorized by former president Sanchez de Lozada, soldiers opened fire on the protestors, killing 64 and wounding approximately 405. Among those killed were women and children. Sanchez claimed the use of force was justified because the protestors had cut off food and fuel supply to La Paz.


On Tuesday, three of the five former military officials responsible for ordering the crackdown, were each given 10 years in prison. The other two higher ranked military officials,  Roberto Claros, a former armed forces chief, and Juan Veliz, a former army commander, were each given 15-year sentences.


Also convicted of complicity in the killings were two former environment and labor Cabinet ministers, Erick Reyes Villa and Adalberto Kuajara, who were each given three year sentences.

Gonzalo Rocabado, one of the former military officials who received a 10-year sentence, stated that the trial was misguided because it was “a trial against the armed forces that followed the law.”


Family and friends of the victims of Black October cried out of mixed emotions at the verdict; some cried out of anger that the prison sentences were too short. Many had held a vigil outside the court house in Sucre for two months prior to the trial.


Indicted in the case but not tried because of Bolivia’s absentia law include Sanchez and Carlos Sanzhez Berzain, a former defense minister.


Both Sanchez and Berzain were forced into exile after the riot and currently reside in Florida. Bolivia has sought their extradition but strained relations between the U.S. and Bolivia may hinder this request.


For more information, please see:


Fox News – 5 Military Officers Convicted of Genocide in Bolivia; Two Ministers Guilty of Complicity – 31 August 2011

AljazeeraBolivia officers convicted over 2003 massacre – 31 August 2011

New York Times – Bolivia: 5 Officers Guilty of Genocide – 30 August 2011

Associated Press – Ex-military chiefs convicted for Bolivia crackdown – 30 August 2011

Leaked Cable Details Iraqi Women and Children Being Executed in U.S. Raid

By Tyler Yates
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BAGHDAD, Iraq — A diplomatic cable recently made public by WikiLeaks provides evidence that U.S. troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month old infant, before calling in an airstrike to destroy the evidence.  This incident took place in 2006 in Iraq’s central city of Ishaqi.

A cell phone photo of the aftermath of what autopsies reveal to be an execution of 11 people including women and children (Photo courtesy of McClatchy).
A cell phone photo of the aftermath of what autopsies reveal to be an execution of 11 people including women and children (Photo courtesy of McClatchy).

The cable contains questions posed by a United Nations (U.N.) investigator about the incident after local Iraqi officials, who were angered by the soldier’s actions, demanded some sort of a remedial response.  The official U.S. response at the time was to deny that anything out of the ordinary had occurred.

In 2006, at the time of the incident, Ishaqi, about 80 miles from Baghdad, and not too far from Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit, was considered extremely dangerous.  All roads in the area had been classified as “black,” meaning that there was a high probability they were booby-trapped with bombs.

The original report of the incident put the fault on an intense battle with an Iraqi Al Qaeda suspect that resulted in the complete decimation of the house he was hiding in, and the death of all of its inhabitants.

Townspeople denied this explanation, claiming instead that the soldiers had executed the 11 people living in the house, but military officials said that other accounts of the incident were highly unlikely to be true, and that they didn’t warrant further investigation.

Philip Alston, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, sent the cable to Condoleeza Rice, then Secretary of State, 12 days after the incident took place.  He had a different view of how the events unfolded.  Most disconcerting was his revelation that the autopsies performed on the dead from the incident revealed that they had been handcuffed and shot in the head.  Among the dead were four women and five children, all of which were 5 years old or younger.

Alston’s version of the events is as follows:  The troops approached a house belonging to a local farmer, and were met with gunfire lasting about 25 minutes.  After the firefight ended “troops entered the house, handcuffed all residents and executed all of them.” After the initial ground operation was completed a U.S. air raid occurred that destroyed the house.  “Iraqi TV stations broadcast from the scene and showed bodies of the victims.”

When questioned in an interview on Wednesday after the cable became public knowledge, Alston said that as of 2010 the U.S. officials still hadn’t responded to his requests for more information. He further said that such inaction and lack of response “was the case with most of the letters to the U.S. in the 2006-2007 period” of the Iraq war.

“The tragedy,” he continued, “is that this elaborate system of communications is in place but the (U.N.) Human Rights Council does nothing to follow up when states ignore issues raised with them.”

The newly leaked cable seems to vindicate the townspeople’s claims, and creates a lot of questions for both the military and Washington.  While civilian casualties are sadly a common occurrence during raid operations the killings described in the cable would clearly constitute a war crime.

Not surprisingly, the Pentagon hasn’t responded to any requests for comments on the incident, or the leak.

For more information, please see:

Daily Mirror — WikiLeaks reveals Atrocities by U.S. forces — 1 Sept 2011

Digital Journal — WikiLeaks cable says Iraqi children shot in head during U.S. raid — 1 Sept 2011

Huffington Post — WikiLeaks: U.S. Troops Executed Iraqi Children in 2006 Raid, According to U.N. Sources — 1 Sept 2011

International Business Times — WikiLeaks Cable Release: New Evidence that U.S. Troops May Have Massacred Iraqi Civilians — 1 Sept 2011

McClatchy — WikiLeaks: Iraqi children in U.S. raid shot in head, U.N. says — 31 Aug 2011