Political Prisoner Judge on House Arrest

By R. Renee Yaworsky
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela—After spending a year behind bars, a Venezuelan judge has been granted house arrest by a Venezuelan court.  The judge’s imprisonment and sentence have been harshly criticized by human rights defenders, who consider her a political prisoner.  She has only been released from prison now because she has cancer and needs treatment.  Originally, President Hugo Chavez had called for the judge to serve the maximum sentence of 30 years in prison.

Maria Lourdes Afiuni, the judge, was imprisoned back in December of 2009 and faced charges stemming from her decision to free a banker who later jumped bail and absconded to the United States.  The banker, Eligio Cedeno, had been accused of breaking currency controls.  Afiuni was charged with abusing her authority.

Jose Amalio Graterol, Afiuni’s attorney, commented on the court’s decision last week to transition the judge from imprisonment to house arrest.  Graterol expressed his opinion that the change is a step in the right direction because he intends to prove that Afiuni is not guilty of any crime.  Graterol told Globovision, a television station in Venezuela with a reputation for opposing President Chavez, that Afiuni is being given house arrest so she can receive a hysterectomy and recover from surgery.   “They realized they were carrying out a death sentence against her,” the attorney said, referring to the judge’s poor health.

Human rights groups have said that the judge’s case sheds light on problems regarding the independence of Venezuela’s judiciary.  The Government, however, argues that her detention is the result of suspicions concerning Cedeno (the fleeing banker).

Afiuni has defended herself by stating that she acted lawfully by releasing Cedeno because he had been imprisoned for three years without a trial, which exceeds the legal limit.  Opponents of President Chavez regard Afiuni as a political prisoner and count her case as just one of several where the Government has overruled sound judicial procedure.

For more information, please see:

Today Online-Venezuelan court grants jailed judge house arrest-3 February 2011

BBC-Venezuela judge Maria Afiuni moved to house arrest-2 February 2011

El Universal-Attorney General officially requests house arrest for Judge Afiuni-2 February 2011

FARC To Begin Hostage Release Monday

By Patrick Vanderpool
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

Rescuers Ready Helicopters for Hostage Release (photo courtesy of Colobia Reports)
Rescuers Ready Helicopters for Hostage Release (photo courtesy of Colombia Reports)

BOGOTA, Colombia – Piedad Cordoba will travel to Brazil Monday to pick up the Brazilian helicopters and personnel involved in the planned release of five FARC hostages.

On her twitter account, the former Senator said “Friends, we are working out the latest details of the releases. Monday at noon the operation begins and I will leave for Brazil.”  According to the Red Cross, the first actual release is planned to take place on Wednesday.

Red Cross delegate to Colombia Christophe Beney told members of the press that Red Cross members and Cordoba will first pick up council member Marcos Vaquero in the southern Colombia and return him to the city of Villavicencio. On Friday, the helicopters will pick up council member Armando Acuña and marine Henry Lopez and bring them to Florencia.

Police major Guillermo Solorzano and soldier Salin Antonio Sanmiguel, the last two hostages, will “hopefully” be picked up the following weekend and be brought to the city of Ibague before Monday. “If there’s no surprises, this will be the order of the operation,” Beney said.

The release is a victory for freedom, not for the FARC. According to some media outlets, some people think that if the FARC kidnapped these people then they should not gain any publicity by setting them free.  However, this view “demonstrates a lack of understanding of both kidnapping and the significance of political kidnapping.”

To publicize the release with continuous reporting  only strengthens democratic institutions and denigrates the FARC, according to other media outlets.

For more information, please see:

Colombia Reports – FARC Hostage Release Operation to Begin Monday – 4 February 2011

Colombia Reports – The FARC Hostage Release: Who Benefits? – 3 February 2011

NDT Television – Colombia Readies Airports for Release of Hostages – 1 February 2011

UPDATE: Anti-Government Protests Continue throughout Egypt

By Daniel M. Austin
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

Egyptian Protesters in Tahrir Square. (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian).
Egyptian Protesters in Tahrir Square. (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian).

CAIRO, Egypt -On Friday, February 4, hundreds of thousands of people streamed into Tahrir Square to protest against Egyptian President Hosni Mobarak. The Friday protest, billed as “Departure Friday” follows two days of bloody clashes between anti-government demonstrators and pro-government supporters. The violence has left dozens of people killed and hundreds more injured. As President Mobarak clings to power, the international community is contemplating what to do next.

The Friday protest marks the 11th day of demonstrations and many in Tahrir Square do not plan on leaving until President Mobarak is removed from office.  Organizers of the protest were hoping to turn out one million demonstrators but initial estimates are closer to two hundred thousand.  Reports from Tahrir Square claim the atmosphere is festive, with less violence than has been seen in the past couple of days. The composition of the protesters cuts across social, economic, and religious lines. There is a mix of upper and middle class Egyptians as well as people with more moderate means. Additionally, the protesters include both Muslims and Christians.

The 11 days of protest have seen a mix of peaceful demonstrations as well as bloody clashes between anti-government supporters and Mobarak sympathizers. One reason for Friday’s calm atmosphere in Tahrir Square is due to the Egyptian army’s renewed presence. The army, which initially asserted itself during the first few days of the protest, then fell back as the pro and anti government factions clashed, has once again reasserted itself creating a security perimeter around the square. The army’s security barrier has helped to limit clashes between the opposing parties and create a more organized and safer environment.

Although Tahrir Square, also known as Liberation Square, has been the focus of intense media coverage, other acts of civil disobedience and protest have taken place in cities through Egypt including Giza and Alexandria.

Estimates vary widely on the number of people injured and killed since the demonstrations began. Anti-government protesters wounded in the clashes have received  medical treatment from both the Egyptian military as well as make shift hospitals that have sprung up in mosques around Tahrir Square. The Egyptian health minister claims that eight people have been killed and over eight hundred others have been wounded. On the other hand, the United Nations estimates that more than 300 people have been killed throughout Egypt while 4,000 people have been injured since the protests began on January 25.

INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE 

The response from the International community to this crisis has been restrained. The United States, Spain, France, Italy, Germany and England have expressed concern for the safety of protesters while at the same time calling on the Egyptian government to make necessary reforms. Unfortunately, difficult questions about how quickly President Mubarak should leave office and who should step into his position still remain. Several days ago, President Mubarak claimed he would not seek re-election in September of 2011; however this concession has not appeased the protesters who are looking for him to leave office immediately.

 As the situation in Egypt has become more intense, the international community has become more forceful with its words. The United States, who initially claimed support for President Mubarak, has been working hard to get out in front of this crisis. President Obama has recently made statements calling for political reforms to take place “now”, but he has been careful not to call for President Mubarak to step down immediately. Similar sentiments have been echoed by the leaders of other nations, including several European countries that sent a letter to the Egyptian President asking him to create a transitional government.

Furthermore, news outlets are reporting the United States is trying to broker a deal where President Mubarak will step down and his Vice President Omar Suleiman would assume power. The plan would call for Vice President Suleiman along with Egypt’s military leadership to form a transitional government until elections can be held. Conversely, other media outlets claim that the United States has already offered this suggestion and it has been rebuffed by the Egyptian President. Questions remain about whether Mr. Suleiman or the Egyptian military would want to break away from President Mubarak. The ties between the Egyptian President, his leadership team, and the Egyptian military continue to be tested. These ties will become further restrained as the protesters in Tahrir Square plan a march on the presidential palace.

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Egypt Holds ‘Day of Departure’– 4 February 2011

All Africa – Clashes Rock Cairo as Pro-Mubarak Supports Hit Back – 3 February 2011

BBC – ‘Day of departure’ rally in Egypt—4 February 2011

New York Times — White House and Egypt Discuss Plan for Mubarak’s Exit – 4 February 2011

Reuters — Egyptians rally for Mubarak to go now – 4 February 2011

The Guardian — US hatches Mubarak exit strategy as Egypt death toll mounts – 4 February 2011

Mandatory Death Sentence For Blasphemy Law Violators

David L. Chaplin II
Impunity Watch; Asia

BAHAWALPUR CITY, Pakistan – Controlled by Muslim law, Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy law has awarded a death sentence to Muhammad Rafiq in the Punjab province district court, presided by Judge Malik Riaz Ahmed.  Liberal politicians and human rights activists in Pakistan said the blasphemy law, which carries a maximum sentence of death, is often misused to settle personal scores and encourages Islamist extremism to persecute religious minorities.

Pakistani civil society activists shout slogans and hold placards during a protest in Lahore on January 8, 2011, against the killing of late Punjab Governer Salman Taseer. – Photos by Reuters and AFP
Pakistani civil society activists shout slogans and hold placards during a protest in Lahore on January 8, 2011, against the killing of late Punjab Governer Salman Taseer. – Photos by Reuters and AFP

Rafiq was convicted for committing blasphemy against the companions of Prophet Mohammed.

Police official Chaudhry Safdar said Rafiq was caught by local residents with a wooden slab around his neck that was inscribed with blasphemous remarks about the ”Sahaba Ikrams”.

Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer was assassinated last month by a police guard who said he was angered by the politician’s opposition to the blasphemy law, leading to what correspondents say is a climate of fear with few people daring to even mention the legislation.

The religious right praised the bodyguards actions.

The blasphemy law has been at the center of a heated debate since a court in Punjab sentenced Asia Bibi, a Christian woman, to death last year for allegedly committing blasphemy against Prophet Mohammed.

Last month, an imam and his son were sentenced to life imprisonment by another court in Punjab after being convicted on blasphemy charges.

Caving in to pressure from religious hardliners not to change the law, the government has said it has no plans to amend the statute.

Human Rights Watch has called on the Pakistani government to release a teenager who has been charged under the country’s controversial blasphemy law.

Muhammad Samiullah, 17, is under arrest in the southern city of Karach, he is accused of blaspheming against the Prophet Muhammad

“Pakistan has set the standard for intolerance when it comes to misusing blasphemy laws, but sending a schoolboy to jail for something he scribbled on an exam paper is truly appalling,” said Bede Sheppard, senior children’s rights researcher, at Human Rights Watch.

The alleged incident, reported by an invigilator, took place during high school final examinations, called intermediate exams, in Karachi’s North Nazimabad neighborhood.

Although the privately educated, 17-year-old Muslim apologized to the exam board, the apology was not accepted and the matter was reported to police.

Police refused to divulge the offending comment made in the exam out of fear that they would fall foul of the blasphemy law for repeating it.

The boy has been charged under Section 295-C of Pakistan’s penal code, which makes the death penalty mandatory for blasphemy. HRW said Pakistan has applied the blasphemy law to children before as well.

Hundreds of people have been charged under the law since it was added to the penal code in 1986 by the then military ruler General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq.

For more information, please see:

BBC –Pakistan urged to free schoolboy arrested for blasphemy – 2 February 2011

CNN –Pakistani teen jailed for blasphemy in school exam – 1 February 20122

OneIndia News – Man sentenced to death under blasphemy law in Pakistan – 3 February 2011