Rwandan Opposition Leader Arrested

By Daniel M. Austin
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

Rwandan Opposition Leader Victoire Ingabire (Photo Courtsey of Africanews.com
Rwandan Opposition Leader Victoire Ingabire. (Photo Courtesy of Africanews.com).

Kigali, Rwanda- One of Rwanda’s most prominent opposition leaders, Victoire Ingabire, was arrested on Thursday, October 14 after being accused of ties to a terrorist organization. Ms. Ingabire was arrested at her home and brought to a police station in Kigali. She was implicated by Major Vital Uwumuremyi after he was questioned by Rwandan authorities.

Major Uwumuremyi is a former rebel commander of  Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). He was arrested while trying to cross the border from Rwanda into Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) with false identification papers. Major Uwumuremyi is facing charges of buying and distributing firearms and ammunition to a terrorist organization as well as threatening national security and order.

In January 2010, Ms. Ingabire returned to Rwanda after 16 years in exile. She had intended to run for president, challenging current president Paul Kagame, an ethnic Tutsi. However, she was barred from running in the August  election. Along with her presidential aspirations, Ms. Ingabire is the leader of the FDU(United Democratic Forces)-Inkingi party, an opposition group made up of ethnic Hutu’s. During the Rwandan genocide, a conflict between Hutus and Tutsis, an estimated 800,000 people were killed, mostly ethnic Tutsis.

Ms. Ingabire was also arrested in April 2010 after she was accused of associating with a terrorist organization.  Additionally, she was accused of  making comments denying that the Rwandan genocide occurred. She was arrested under the country’s “genocide ideology” statutes which make it a crime to disagree with the official history of the Rwandan genocide. She was also charged with promoting genocide ideology and division.

After Ms. Ingabire was release in April, she was ordered not to travel outside the capital in anticipation of a trial, and Rwandan police continued to investigate her activities.

According to human rights groups. allegations of collaborating with terrorist organizations has been a threat used by the Rwandan government to silence opposition. This notion is further substantiated by a press release from Human Rights Watch on Friday, October 15 urging the Rwandan government to respect the rights of opposition parties and ensure that opposition leaders, like Ms. Ingabire, are treated fairly.

For more information, please see:
AFP — Rwandan police probe after opposition arrest – 15 October 2010.

BBC Africa — Rwandan opposition leader Victoire Ingabire arrested – 14 October 2010.

Human Rights Watch — Rwanda: Protect Rights and Safety of Opposition Leaders –15 October 2010.

Reuters Africa — Rwanda arrests opposition leader, rebel fugitive – 14 October 2010.

San Francisco Bay View — Rwandan opposition leader Victoire Ingabire arrested – 14 October 2010.


[Campaign for International Justice] International Inquiry Needed to Address Alleged War Crimes in Sri Lanka

International inquiry needed to address alleged war crimes in Sri Lanka

14 October 2010

Amnesty International has declined an invitation to appear before Sri Lanka’s Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) and calls again for an international inquiry into the evidence of war crimes and other abuses during the civil war.

In a joint letter released on Thursday, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Crisis Group announced that they would not appear before the Commission, saying it did not meet international standards for independent and impartial inquiries.

”Amnesty International would welcome the opportunity to appear before a credible commission of inquiry aimed at securing accountability and reconciliation in Sri Lanka,” said Madhu Malhotra, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Asia-Pacific.

”We believe effective domestic inquiries are essential to human rights protection and accountability. But the LLRC falls far short of what is required.”
 
Like its predecessors, the LLRC exists against a backdrop of continuing government failure to address accountability and continuing human rights abuses.

Amnesty International documented Sri Lanka’s long history of impunity and the failed Presidential Commission of Inquiry in its 2009 report Twenty Years of Make-believe; Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry.
 
”The LLRC’s mandate, its composition, its procedures, and the human rights environment in which it is operating all conspire to make a safe and satisfactory outcome for victims of human rights violations and their families extremely unlikely,” said Madhu Malhotra.

”Amnesty International is particularly concerned about the lack of any provisions for witness protection and the fact that former officials who have publicly defended the Sri Lankan government against allegations of war crimes serve on the commission.”

Amnesty International has received numerous credible reports from witnesses that both the government security forces and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) committed serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law during the armed conflict, particularly in the final months of the war.

Some of their testimony was included in Amnesty International’s 2009 briefing Unlock the Camps; Safety and Dignity For The Displaced Now. But the LLRC’s mandate does not require it to investigate these allegations, which include summary executions, torture, attacks on civilians and civilian objects, and other war crimes.

”The hundreds of civilians who sought to testify before the LLRC in Killinochchi in September did so without guarantees of protection or any real hope of justice. Their willingness to come forward shows the need of Sri Lanka’s war survivors for news about what happened to missing relatives and for justice,” said Madhu Malhotra.

”If the Sri Lankan government is serious about accountability and reconciliation, it must be serious about truth and justice for these people. Any credible commission must be given adequate scope and resources to allow for individuals to receive a fair hearing and sufficient authority to ensure redress. It must also treat all witnesses in a safe and humane fashion.”

Amnesty International said it remains committed to contributing to any genuine effort in Sri Lanka to find a just way forward from the decades of civil war and human rights abuses.

Read More
Sri Lanka: International inquiry needed to address alleged war crimes (Joint Letter to the Lessons Learned & Reconciliation Commission, 14 October 2010)
Sri Lanka: Unlock the Camps in Sri Lanka: Safety and dignity for the displaced now (Briefing paper, 10 August 2009)
Twenty Years of Make Believe, Sri Lanka’s Commissions of Inquiry (Document, 11 June 2009)

www.amnesty.org/en/international-justice
Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Amnesty-Internationals-Campaign-for-International-Justice/135454306496834
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Cmpn4IntJustice

[Campaign for International Justice] Moldova Commits to International Justice

Moldova commits to international justice

14 October 2010

Moldova has taken a welcome step towards tackling gross human rights violations by ratifying the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, said Amnesty International. 

”It is good to see that Moldova has committed  to international justice and working to end impunity for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes,” said Christopher Keith Hall, Senior Legal Adviser in the International Justice Project.

Wednesday’s ratification follows more than 10 years of campaigning by Amnesty International Moldova and other civil society groups. Moldova is now the 114th state to ratify the Rome Statute.

”Slowly but surely more countries are ratifying the Rome Statute and the impunity gaps that have denied justice to untold numbers of victims of these horrific crimes are being closed,” said Christopher Keith Hall.

However, Amnesty International  expressed concern about the number of countries that have ratified the Rome Statute, but have not yet fulfilled their commitments to the Court. 

Many countries that have ratified have yet to implement the Rome Statute effectively into national law or to enter into supplementary agreements with the Court on privileges and immunities, victim relocation and enforcement of sentences.

”Ratification is a major step, but only a first step,” said Christopher Keith Hall. “In particular, national law reform is vital to ensure that Moldova can cooperate fully with the Court and that its national courts can fulfil their obligations to investigate and prosecute cases of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.”

Français Español

Campaign for International Justice
Amnesty International
1 Easton Street
London WC1X 0DW
United Kingdom

www.amnesty.org/en/international-justice
Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Amnesty-Internationals-Campaign-for-International-Justice/135454306496834
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Cmpn4IntJustice