Kenya Defends al-Bashir’s Diplomatic Visit

By Laura Hirahara
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

President Omar al-Bashir at Kenyas constitution ceremony; Photo courtesy of AFP
President Omar al-Bashir at Kenya's constitution ceremony; Photo courtesy of AFP

NAIROBI, Kenya- On Thursday, Kenya’s government defended their decision to invite Sudan’s president Omar al-Bashir to the country for a ceremony in which Kenya adopted its new constitution.  Following al-Bashir’s trip last week, many have criticized Kenya for not arresting al-Bashir, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes and genocide in the Darfur region.  Kenya’s government, which is a signatory of the ICC and has recognized its jurisdiction, said that arresting al-Bashir now would destabilize Sudan creating negative ripple effects for its neighbors.  Alfred Mutua, a government spokesman for Kenya, stated Thursday, “In the context of Omar al-Bashir’s case, Kenya’s obligation was first to the [African Union] and then to ICC. If Sudan [is] destabilized it is us who would suffer, not the West.”

The U.N. estimates 300,000 people have been killed and another 2.7 displaced in Darfur since al-Bashir seized power in 1989 through a coup.  The ICC has charged him with organizing a militarized force that has committed acts of rape, murder and other crimes against humanity since al-Bashir began fighting rebels there in 2003.  Sudan denies these charges and the African Union has stated they also oppose the arrest warrants.  In response to their refusal to arrest al-Bashir, the ICC has reported Kenya to the U.N. Security Council and the prime ministers of several European nations have directly questioned Kenya’s government officials.  On Wednesday, the United Kingdom spoke with Kenya’s ambassador about al-Bashir’s visit.  After the visit, Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt said, “We made clear that the British government expects the government of Kenya to stand by its obligations under the Rome Statute (that established the ICC), and as a U.N. member state.”

Some within Kenya’s government, while not addressing the warrant against al-Bashir directly, believe inviting him was the wrong move.  A representative from the prime minister’s office stated Tuesday that Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga thinks the visit “sen[t] wrong signals in regard to Kenya’s commitment to the ICC and also Kenya’s respect for human rights.”  In a statement to Voice of America, Elizabeth Evenson, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, said al-Bashir’s visit went against Kenya’s new government after the violence that erupted over their last presidential elections, insulting both the victims in Darfur and Kenya.  Al-Bashir has travelled extensively since the arrest warrants were issued, including to ICC signatory country Chad earlier in the year.

For more information, please see;

Voice of America- Kenya Defends Bashir Invitation– 27 August, 2010

CNN- Kenya Pushes Back Over War Crime Suspect’s Visit– 2 September, 2010

BBC- Kenya Ambassadors Summoned Over Omar al-Bashir’s Visit– 1 September, 2010

Sheriff Sued by U.S. for Civil Rights Abuses

By R. Renee Yaworsky
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

Sheriff Arpaio calls himself Washingtons whipping boy.  (Photo courtesy of NY Daily News)
Arpaio calls himself "Washington's whipping boy." (Photo courtesy of NY Daily News)

ARIZONA, United States—The self-proclaimed “toughest sheriff in America” is now being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department for possible civil rights abuses.  Allegations against him include systematically discriminating against Latinos and being uncooperative in the investigation.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County has become a household name, gaining popularity and controversy for his relentless pursuit of illegal immigrants.  He is also noted for aggressive law enforcement policies and his colorful, defiant attitude.

Some of Arpaio’s practices include using minor traffic violations as an excuse to check individuals’ legal status, and making prisoners in the county jail wear striped uniforms with pink socks and underwear.

Arpaio is often the subject of numerous protests; earlier this summer, opponents of Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration bill chanted, “Sheriff Joe, we are here.  We will not live in fear.”  Undaunted by criticism, he has been elected to office five times and has already raised $2 million for his next run for re-election in 2012.

The Justice Department is alleging that Arpaio violated civil rights laws by “unlawful searches and seizures, discriminatory police conduct, and a failure to provide basic services to individuals with limited English.”

Arpaio was taken to court this week after the Justice Department filed a lawsuit accusing him of obstructing their investigation.  Arpaio’s office ignored repeated requests by the Department for documents and tours of certain facilities.

Thomas Perez from the Department’s civil rights division called Arpaio’s actions “unprecedented” and lamented the fact that the government “was forced to resort to litigation to gain access to public documents and facilities.”

Arpaio responded to the allegations at a press conference on Thursday, saying, “This is the people of Arizona they are going against, using me as a puppet.  They’re not going to put handcuffs on this sheriff.  I’m not going to surrender!”  He told ABC News that the federal government should be thanking him for “all of the hard work that we are doing assisting them.”  He considers the allegations a “ruse” and denies racially profiling Latinos.

Arpaio’s office is faced with losing federal grants if it is found to have acted with discrimination.  Legal troubles continue to grow as a federal grand jury in Phoenix is also investigating alleged intimidation of county workers by evening visits to their homes.

The sheriff has said that he will not be “intimidated” and has vowed to fight.  “I’m going to continue, maybe tomorrow, to enforce all the illegal immigration laws.”

For more information, please see:

ABC News-Controversial Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Under Investigation for Allegedly Violating Civil Rights-3 September 2010

NY Times-Justice Dept. Sues Sheriff Over Bias Investigation-2 September 2010

LA Times-U.S. sues Arizona sheriff in civil rights probe-2 September 2010

Mother of Arrested Syrian Blogger Pleads for Her Release

By Alyxandra Stanczak
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
 

DAMASCUS, Syria – Student and blogger Tal Bint Dawser al-Ballouhi was summoned on 27 December 2009 by Syria’s intelligence apparatus, the Syrian Intelligence Services. The goal of the summoning was to interrogate al-Ballouhi about articles and poetry she wrote about her home country, Palestine, as well as Syrian and Arab affairs in general. After her interrogation, she was arrested and detained, and her family has not seen or heard from her since her disappearance.

Syrians are increasingly turning to blogging as a source of reliable media. Photo courtesy of arabmediasociety.com
Syrians are increasingly turning to blogging as a source of reliable media. Photo courtesy of arabmediasociety.com

Syrian authorities seized al-Mallouhi’s computer from her Damasucus home after her detainment. Al-Mallouhi specifically criticized the Partnership for the Mediterranean (an EU initiative to reach out economically to certain Arab countries), a French diplomatic initiative bringing together Arab and European countries, as well as Israel. The Syrian authorities have not commented on her arrest, which is common in the arrest of political activists.

Al-Mallouhi’s situation is not unique, as many Syrian bloggers have been arrested and sentenced to long prison terms. Syrians have turned to the internet as an outlet of news and information since print media in the country is largly regulated and censored by the government. Blogging has allowed citizens to express their opinions and obtain news to which they would otherwise not have access.

Al-Mallouhi’s Mother has appealed to Syrian president Bashar Assad and has attempted to make compelling pleas to the government for her daughter’s release. She has even gone so far as to talk to specific Syrian security branches and obtained a promise from one security branch that her daughter would be released before Eid ul-Fitr, or the end of Ramadan, which this year occurs on 10 September 2010. Al-Mallouhi’s mother does not believe this security branch will honor their deadline and is petitioning President Assad to intervene, citing that her daughter, who is a high-school student, did not know the political implications of her writings.

For more information, please see:

Arab News – Mother of young Syrian blogger appeals for her release – 3 September 2010

The Peninsula – Arrested blogger’s mom writes to Assad – 3 September 2010

Syrian Human Rights Committee – Humanitarian campaign for the release of prisoners of conscience – 2 July 2010

Hunger Striker Dies in Military Hospital

By R. Renee Yaworsky
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

Franklin Brito had gone on several hunger strikes since 2005.  (Photo courtesy of El Universal)
Hunger striker Franklin Brito. (Photo courtesy of El Universal)

CARACAS, Venezuela—A man who had been protesting President Chavez has died of a hunger strike.  His supporters accuse Chavez of human rights abuses and call the death state-sponsored murder.

Franklin Brito, who was 49 and a father of four, died of a heart attack Monday in a military hospital.  He had been there since last December when authorizes took him away from a protest.  When he died, he weighed 77 pounds.

His protests, ranging from food strikes to cutting off a finger and sewing his mouth shut on live TV, stemmed from government seizure of his property in 2003.

Brito’s yucca and watermelon farm had been taken by the government during a land reform drive.  Brito repeatedly demanded compensation and petitioned the president after being denied by other officials.

Tal Cual editor Teodoro Petkoff wrote, “But the president did not have time to bother with what must have seemed an insignificant matter, a bother which he couldn’t waste precious time on.  So he let him die.”

Many laud Brito as a hero.  Chavez has had a history of seizing property and his foes claim that the nation is becoming a socialist dictatorship.  About 2.5 million hectares (6 million acres) have been nationalized in what the government says is an effort to reverse rural inequality.   This reform has caused widespread food shortages.

The government has been unimpressed with accusations against its reform and Brito’s death.  In a statement, the government blasted opposition leaders for crying “hypocritically” over Brito.

Brito’s relatives plan to sue government officials in the International Court of Justice for “cruel, inhuman and humiliating treatment.”  Brito’s death is considered the result of a series of unconstitutional acts.  He was denied his own doctor, and police violated due process by putting him in the military hospital last year.  “I see little chance that [Brito’s rights] and his heirs can be respected in the country,” lawyer Gonzalo Himiob said.

In a statement, Brito’s family wrote: “Franklin Brito lives on in the struggle of the Venezuelan people for the right to property, access to justice, for liberty and the respect of governments for human rights, both collective and individual.”

For more information, please see:

Reuters-Venezuela says opposition sought protester’s death-2 September 2010

El Universal-Relatives of late Venezuelan striker to take his case to international courts-1 September 2010

Irish Times-Hunger striker dies in Venezuela-1 September 2010

Miami Herald-Hunger-striking Venezuelan farmer dies at 49-1 September 2010

ARMED MILITIAS CAUSING PROBLEMS FOR LEBANON

By Eric C. Sigmund
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BEIRUT, Lebanon – Armed militias engaged in an intense four-hour firefight in the streets of Beirut after a dispute arose over a parking space.  The fighting pitted Hezbollah, an Iranian backed governmental organization many consider to be a terrorist group, against a rival militia.  The fighting left 3 dead and 11 others wounded.  Civilians recall snipers running through the streets and rocket propelled grenades being shot around a Beirut neighborhood.  Ten people have since been arrested for their involvement in the clash.

A Lebanese Gunman Takes Position in the Streets of Beirut (Photo Courtesy of AFP)
A Lebanese Gunman Takes Position in the Streets of Beirut (Photo Courtesy of AFP)

This outbreak in violence however, is not an isolated incident and the recent rise in hostilities between armed militias in Lebanon has received international attention.   Earlier today the United Nations voted unanimously to extend the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), an international peacekeeping force in Lebanon, for at least another year.   UNIFIL currently operates approximately 12,000 troops in southern Lebanon.   Although UNIFIL’s primary mandate is to deter encroachment over the blue line between Israel and Lebanon, it recognizes that internal disputes within Lebanon may raise tensions between the two nations. 

Nadim Houry, the Beirut director at Human Rights Watch, told the Associated Press that many “people still in this country have RPGs in their homes.”  This fact allows street clashes to escalate quickly, threatening the lives of many civilians.  General Jean Kahwaji, in a statement to As-Safir, reports that the government will continue army operations in southern Beirut in order maintain peace.  General Kahwaji notes “what is important is that no one ignite a fire and then demand the army put it out.”  The Lebanese army has stepped up operations in Beirut in order to address fears surrounding the outbreak of another civil war in the country.

The Prime Minister of Lebanon, Saad Hariri, has also repeated his call for militias to disarm.  The United States has already temporarily suspend $100 million of military aid money to the Lebanese government to support its ill-equipped army in response to concerns that Mr. Hariri is not doing enough disarm militias in his nation.  The Prime Minister stated that he will continue to examine an additional “series of measures.”

It is unlikely however, that Mr. Hariri’s order will be heeded.   Hezbollah is not only the largest militia in Lebanon, obtaining both financial assistance and arms from Iran, but it also is a party of the Lebanese government and has veto power.   Even Prime Minister Hariri himself notes that his call for a “weapons free” Lebanon does not apply to Hezbollah.   Although there is wide popular support for Hariri’s attempts to disarm Lebanese militias, many still support Hezbollah and rely on services provided by the organization.   Until a more comprehensive security arrangement can be agreed upon, the nation will likely continue to be the victim of internal violence. 

For more information, please see;

Daily Star Lebanon – Higher Defense Council Vows to increase Security Measures – 1 Sept. 2010

Daily Star Lebanon – UNIFIL to Maintain Troop Numbers After Clashes in South – 1 Sept. 2010

Agence France Presse – 10 Held Over Beirut Clash as government Mulls Arms Control – 31 Aug. 2010

Associated Press – Armed Militias: A Quandary for Lebanon, U.S. – 31 Aug. 2010