By Patrick Vanderpool
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil – Brazilian comedians are prohibited from publicly making fun of candidates ahead of the upcoming presidential election.  The law, which could last until the runoff election at the end of October, has been dubbed the “anti-joke law.”  Specifically, the law forbids television and radio programs from “using trickery, montages or other features of audio or video in any way to degrade or ridicule a candidate, party or coalition.”

Brazilian internet services are not licensed by the government and therefore the ban does not cover internet material, but the material could still be judged by the Brazilian courts.

The law was a product of Brazil’s 1964-1985 dictatorship and specifically prohibits satire about political candidates in the three months preceding and election.  Violating the law is punishable by a fine of up to $112,000 and a broadcast license suspension.

Brazilian performers are not taking the ban lying down and plan to fight the prohibition.  There is public outcry that the law violates freedom of speech and several groups have planned protests in Rio de Janeiro, and other cities, on Sunday.  The groups claim that the ban on speech is a stain on the democratic country’s international reputation.

Marcelo Tas, a comedian-turned-reporter and the host of a weekly television comedy show that targets politicians, asked “[d]o you know of any other democracy in the world with rules like this?”  Tas also stated that people would have to look at classic comedian Monty Python’s material to find a bigger joke than the “anti-joke law.”

Proponents of the law claim that the law’s true purpose is to ensure that all candidates are portrayed in an even light so as not to skew voting.  According to backers, the ban on satire encourages candor because candidates will not fear widespread political jokes.

Tas, on the other hand, uses President Obama’s popularity leading up to the 2008 presidential election as a prime example of the benefit of satirical programming.  According to Tas, candidates, including Barack Obama, benefit from showing a more humane and personal side of themselves that generally shines through when one is confronted with a critical opinion.

On Deadline – Satirists (seriously) protest Brazil’s Political Anti-joking Law Ahead of Election – 17 August 2010

Press Association – Satire banned from Brazil election – 17 August 2010

Telegraph – Satire banned in Brazil ahead of presidential election – 17 August 2010

By R. Renee Yaworsky
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BOGOTA, Colombia—At least 13 people were injured when a car bomb was detonated near a popular radio station in north Bogota.  The blast is thought to have been the work of left-wing FARC rebels.

The bomb, which exploded early Thursday, damaged an entire block, including the studio of Caracol Radio.  The car bomb had been placed in the country’s financial center, just five blocks from the capital city’s stock exchange and near the American Embassy.

Windows of nearby buildings and cars were shattered in the explosion, which caused extensive material damage.  People sleeping in their bedrooms awoke to glass falling on their heads.

Police say the car had been packed with more than 50 kilograms of explosives.

The Prosecutor General’s Office has reported that a man who confessed to switching the license plates on the car used in the attack voluntarily turned himself in to police.  He denied knowing, however, that the car would be used for such a harmful purpose.

Police also arrested the man who provided the false license plate.  Both men are not suspected of being involved in any illegal organization.

FARC, or the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, has been blamed for the incident and a member of the group is now in custody.  According to RCN Radio, the local prosecutor’s office has already identified the suspects directly responsible for the detonation.

Newly-elected President Santos has announced that diplomacy and mediation will not be employed to end Colombia’s domestic armed conflict until “the government considers the circumstances warrant it.”

“We have not thrown the key to dialogue into the ocean, but the door is closed,” Santos continued.  “[Illegal groups’] deceitfulness in the past has made us incredulous.  Now the government is holding the key, and we won’t give it to anyone until the conditions we have outlined are met.”

Santos explained that the rebels must illustrate through “concrete deeds” that they seek peace.  After visiting the scene of the crime Thursday, Santos called the blast a terrorist act.

FARC has been a violent opponent of Colombia’s government since the 1960s.  Bombings were on the decline under Santos’ predecessor, Alvaro Uribe, who had been president until August 7, 2010.  Uribe had worked to eradicate left-wing guerrilla groups, including the FARC.

Santos has vowed to take a hard-line stance against illegal groups, saying, “Their only aim is to sow fear, and that they will not achieve.  We will continue to fight terrorism.”

For more information, please see:

Bloomberg-Colombia Captures FARC Member After Bogota Car Bombing, RCN Radio Reports-14 August 2010

Colombia Reports-Bogota police arrest two suspects in radio station car bomb case-14 August 2010

Buenos Aires Herald-Bogota carbomb ‘final spasms of a dying dog,’ Santos-13 August 2010

BBC-Colombia offers Bogota car-bomb reward-13 August 2010

Guardian-Colombia capital hit by car bombing-12 August 2010

Voice of America-Colombian President Calls Bogota Car Bombing ‘Terrorist Act’-12 August 2010

By Ricardo Zamora

Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – Thousands of Argentine women of all ages suffer at the hands of negligent or abusive reproductive healthcare services each year, Human Rights Watch reported Tuesday.

In a report titled “Illusions of Care: Lack of Accountability for Reproductive Rights in Argentina,” Human Rights Watch explained that doctors and clinics place unnecessary obstacles that women must satisfy before they can access healthcare services to which they are entitled, such as contraception, voluntary sterilization procedures, and abortion after rape. Such obstacles include financial barriers, a husband’s permission for treatment, and unnecessary delays and referrals to other clinics. This results in speculative access to medical treatment, at best.

Human Rights Watch also reported that doctors who deny women treatment or impose arbitrary requirements are often not penalized.

Miguel Vivanco, Americas director at Human Rights Watch, stressed that “women need dependable care throughout their reproductive lives but in Argentina it’s more like a lottery: You might be lucky enough to get decent care but you are more likely to be stuck with deficient — or even abusive — services.”

Even female victims of rape experience difficulty obtaining abortions or other, less intrusive, medical services. As a result, up to 40% of pregnancies in Argentina terminate by unsafe abortions. Vicanco reports that “Unsafe abortion has been the leading cause of maternal mortality in the country for decades.”

Vivanco believes that while Argentina’s reproductive health policies are not perfect, they would be much more effective in preventing maternal suffering if implemented and that the Argentine Government is not exerting sufficient effort in monitoring how the policies are implemented and is not punishing doctors who violate them.

The Argentine government responded positively to the publication of “Illusions of Care” and has taken steps to address many of the concerns it highlights. However, it has yet to take action. For example, in May, the National Health Ministry created a educational telephone service which logged complaints and provided information about where to find reproductive health care services. Human Rights Watch reports that, in June, one day after the Ministry announced that it would ensure that abortions where carried out for women threatened by pregnancy and those who have been raped, the government retracted its statements, noting that such treatments were not guaranteed.

“The Argentine government seems to be slowly waking up to the notion that laws on reproductive health mean nothing unless they are enforced,” Vivanco Said. “But unless changes are constant and clear, women and girls will continue to suffer and, in some cases, die.”

For more information please see:

Human Rights Watch – Argentina: Guarantee Women’s Access to Health Care – August 10, 2010

Human Rights Watch – Illusions of Care – August 10, 2010

United Press International – Argentine Healthcare Failing Women? – August 10, 2010