Ex-Rwandan Military Officer Gets 15 Years for Genocide

By Kylie M Tsudama
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

ARUSHA, Tanzania – Colonel Tharcisse Muvunyi has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for inciting genocide.

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) Appeals Chamber sentenced the former military officer on Thursday.  Trial Chamber III of the ICTR is made up of Judges Dennis C.M. Byron, Gberdao Gustave Kam, and Vagn Joensen.  They found Muvunyi guilty of direct and public incitement to commit genocide after he gave a speech in May 1994 at the Gikore trading center.

“This message was very clear to us.  We understood it to mean that all Hutus who had Tutsi spouses should surrender them to be killed if not they all lose their lives,” said a witness.

The ICTR, a UN-backed tribunal trying suspects in Rwanda’s 1994 genocide, previously handed down a guilty verdict with a 25-year sentence in 2006.  In 2008, the ICTR Appeals Chamber set aside the convictions and ordered a new trial.

“The chamber unanimously sentences Tharcisse Muvunyi to 15 years imprisonment,” Judge Byron said.  “There is no reasonable doubt that in giving such a speech Muvunyi intended to incite the audience to commit acts of genocide.”

Muvunyi was arrested in February 2000 and will be given credit for the time he has already served.  Until he is transferred to the State to serve the remainder of his sentence, he will be kept in the ICTR’s custody.

According to Muvunyi’s lawyer, William Taylor, he was not “prosecuted but persecuted.”

The ICTR is based in Arusha, Tanzania and has convicted forty-one suspects and acquitted eight.

For more information, please see:

AFP – Ex-Rwandan Officer Gets 15 Years for Inciting Genocide – 11 February 2010

All Africa – ICTR Sentences Col. Muvunyi to 15 Years for Genocide – 12 February 2010

Human Rights Education Associates – Former Rwandan Soldier Sentenced to 15 Years for Genocide – 12 February 2010

Relief Web – Rwanda: Muvunyi Sentenced to 15 Years After Retrial – 11 February 2010

Army Mother Not To Be Court Martialed

By Stephen Kopko

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

GEORGIA, United States – The United States Army will not seek prosecution of Specialist Alexis Hutchinson for failing to report for duty. Hutchinson, a single mother, could not find a person to watch her son before her deployment to Afghanistan began. Instead of deploying with her unit, she stayed and cared for her son.

Hutchinson entered the Army directly out of high school.  The twenty one year old rose to the position of Specialist within the Army.  She was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan with her unit in November.  As a single mother, Hutchinson made plans for her mother to watch and care for her son before she was deployed to Afghanistan.  The day before she was to leave, Hutchinson’s mother informed her that she would be unable to care for the child.  Hutchinson then informed her commanding officer of the situation.  She was told she had thirty days to arrange for an alternate plan.  However, her brigade’s deployment was pushed up.  Hutchinson was then informed that she had twenty four hours to find somebody to watch her son.  Instead of deploying, Hutchinson stayed behind to care for her son.

Hutchinson was arrested for not deploying with her unit.  She was charged with four court-martial counts: being absent without leave, missing a movement, dereliction of duty, and insubordinate conduct.  If  she was prosecuted and found guilty of the offenses, Hutchinson would have faced two years in prison.  However, her case was settled before heading to trial.  Hutchinson received an other-than-honorable discharge from the Army.  She was also demoted from a Specialist to a Private and will not receive military or veterans benefits.

Currently, there are approximately eighty-five thousand single parents in the United States armed forces.  Ten-thousand single parents were deployed overseas last year.  The Army requires single parents to have a family care plan on file.  The file is to be updated when changes occur.  The plan outlines who will care for the child during long deployments, drills, and annual trainings.

For more information, please see:

NY TIMES–Single Mother Is Spared Court-Martial–11 February 2010

San Francisco Chronicle-Army discharges single mother who won’t deploy-11 February 2010

NPR–Soldier Mom Arrested After Refusing to Deploy–19 November 2009

Migrant Workers Settle Labor Case

By Stephen Kopko

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas – On Thursday, a petition to certify a settlement in a class action lawsuit against Superior Forestry Company by migrant workers was presented to federal district court.  The proposed settlement of almost three million dollars has the potential to be the largest payout to migrant workers ever.

The migrant workers brought a lawsuit in 2006 with the help of the Southern Poverty Law Center and two private law firms in Chicago.  They alleged that they were grossly underpaid by Superior Forestry.  According to the complaint, Superior took advantage of the migrants’ lack of ability to speak English to pay them less than the minimum wage and not pay the workers overtime.  Superior is one of the largest forestry contractors in the United States.  They are able to hire and recruit migrant workers from Mexico and Central American through a guest worker program.

The migrant workers asserted violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Workers Protection Act.  According to the Department of Labor, the Migrant and Seasonal Worker Protection Act provides employment opportunities for immigrants to do seasonal work in the United States.  Under the Act, the migrant’s employer must “pay workers their wages when they are due.”  Also, if the employer provides housing for migrant workers, the housing must meet federal and state health and safety guidelines.

Superior Forestry denies withholding pay from the migrant workers.  Instead of bringing the case to trial, they settled the case to avoid costly litigation expenses.  Superior stated that they paid the workers on a production basis instead of an hourly rate. The Southern Poverty Law Center stated that the settlement shows Superior’s guilt.  According to the Center, “this settlement sends a powerful message that these workers have rights and that their employers will be held accountable.”  The Center stressed that migrant workers are an exploited group of people who have the right to be compensated fairly for their work.  At the time of the settlement, approximately two thousand two hundred migrant workers participated in the class action suit.  The settlement has to be approved by a federal district court judge in a fairness hearing on March 26.

For more information, please see:

AP–Migrant forest workers get $2.75M wage settlement–12 February 2010

Earth Times-Migrant Tree Planters Find Justice: Forestry Company to Pay Record $2.75 Million Settlement to Foreign Guestworkers Seeking Back Wages–12 February 2010

NY Times–Migrants Win $2.75 Million–12 February 2010

Department of Labor-The Migrant and Seansonal Worker Protection Act

United States to Prosecute Child Soldier

By Stephen Kopko

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba – Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen accused of murdering United States military personnel in Afghanistan, is set to stand trial in July.  Khadr is one of the six Guantanamo Bay detainees being prosecuted in front of United States military commissions.  Controversy surrounds the trial of Khadr.  He was fifteen years old at the time that he allegedly committed the murder.  Therefore, some human rights groups as well as the United Nations believe that he should not be prosecuted for the murder because he was indoctrinated as a child soldier.

The United States will prosecute Khadr for the murder of a United States Special Forces soldier.  In 2002 United States military forces engaged in hostilities with extremists in eastern Afghanistan.  After the military excursion ended, soldiers approached and destroyed a compound where the extremists were hiding.  As they were approaching the compound, someone from inside threw a grenade at the soldiers.  The explosion from the grenade resulted in the death of one soldier and blinded another.  Khadr was the only person that was found inside the compound.  He was arrested and eventually became a prisoner at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility.  At the time of the incident, Khadr was fifteen years old.

The Obama Administration has been criticized for prosecuting Khadr.  United Nations officials, human rights advocates, and Khadr’s lawyers believe that Khadr was a child soldier at the time the incident happened and should not be prosecuted.  At the age of ten, Khadr moved to Afghanistan with his family.  His father became apart of Osama bin Laden’s organization.  Therefore, Khadr became indoctrinated with bin Laden’s message and mission at a young age and became a child soldier.  Radhika Coomaraswamy, the United Nations Special Representative for children in armed conflict stated that “the U.N position is that children should not be prosecuted for war crimes.” Also, there has been allegations that Khadr was tortured as a prisoner at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay.

The United States will try Khadr for his actions in July.  According to the senior prosecutor of the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay, Captain John Murphy, Khadr’s background will be taken into consideration by the commission in determining his guilt or innocence.  He stated that “even in our traditional court system, we try fifteen year olds, and we try them as adults.”

Despite the arguments against prosecuting child soldiers, there is no United States or international law prohibiting their prosecution.  Nevertheless, past war crimes tribunals have set the precedent of not trying child soldiers. Professor Michael Newton of the Vanderbilt University stated that the consensus in the international legal community is not to prosecute child soldiers.

For more information, please see:

MSNBC–U.S. trial of ex-boy solider raises fierce debate–10 February 2010

CBC News–Omar Khadr: Coming of age in a Guantanamo Bay jail cell–23 June 2009

Humans Rights Watch–The Omar Khadr Case: A Teenager Imprisoned at Guantanamo–June 2007

Ivory Coast President Dissolves Government

By Jennifer M. Haralambides
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

ABIDJAN, Ivory Coast – On Saturday the Ivory Coast opposition declared it will no longer support Laurent Gbagbo as president because he dissolved the government and electoral commission.

A spokeswoman for the opposition said the dissolution of the government on Friday night is the first step towards dictatorship which cannot be allowed to establish itself.

Neutral parties have also condemned the government dissolution.  “It runs in the fact of all the peace accords we’ve signed since 2004 . . . that today the president thinks he has the power to do this gives the impression that we’ve gone back twenty years into the past. ” said party secretary general Francois Kouablan.

Because of the oppositions refusal to support Gbagbo, the anticipated elections will be delayed further.  Gbagbo’s presidential term expired five years ago.  Since then, a date for elections has been set, and then canceled, every year since 2005.

“We want to have the elections as quickly as possible, but first we’re going to have to fix the rolls,”  said FPI election coordinator Martin Sokouri Bohui.

Tensions arose this past week after Gbagbo’s party accused the head of the independent election commission for attempting to add around 500,000 illegitimate voters into the rolls.  Accusations are coming from both sides as the opposition has accused the ruling party of trying to disqualify voters who were not allied with Gbagbo

At least a quarter of the nation’s twenty million people have been disqualified from voting based on the electoral law’s convoluted definition for determining eligibility, stoking the tension.

This anticipated election is aimed at ending the crisis that began with the attempted coup against Gbagbo in September 2002, which left the country split between the rebel-held north, which is mainly Muslim, and the government controlled south, which is mainly Christian.

For more information, please see:

AFP – Ivory Coast President Dissolves Government – 13 February 2010

AP – Ivory Coast Opposition Won’t Support President – 13 February 2010

VOA – Ivory Coast President Dissolves Government – 13 February 2010

Reuters – Ivory Coast’s President Dissolves Government – 12 February 2010