Canadian Official Claims Canada Indifferent to Torture of Transferred Detainees

November 22, 2009

22 November 2009

Canadian Official Claims Canada Indifferent to Torture of Transferred Detainees

By William Miller,

Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

Richard Colvin Testified that Canada was ignoring the torture of detainies transfered to Afganistan custody before a Parlimentary Comittee on Wednesday (PHOTO: Guardian)

OTTAWA, Canada – Richard Colvin, former second in command at Canada’s Embassy in Kabul Afghanistan, testified before a parliamentary committee on Wednesday November 18 that Canada transferred numerous Afghan detainees to afghan authorities despite knowing that they would likely be subjected to torture. Colvin further testified that many of the detainees where not involved in the insurgency.
Colvin implicated Canadian government departments including the Department of Foreign Affairs and international trade the department of defense and the Privy Council headed by the Prime Minister. All had received reports regarding the torture of transferred detainees over an 18 month period from 2006 to 2007 but failed to act on them. It was internationally known that Prisoners transferred to Afghan authorities were being tortured. Both NATO and the United Nations have previously raised concerns of abuse by officials in Afghanistan.

Colvin Testified that lax reporting systems brought Canada very close to being complicit in the torture. Both Britain and the Netherlands transferred detainees to Afghanistan authority but did so in lesser numbers and kept better records and actively monitored prisoners to safe guard them against torture. Canada allegedly went to great lengths not to address the problem and went so far as refusing to take phone calls from The Red Cross for months when they attempted to warn officials of the torture.

Unlike Britain and the Netherlands, Canada filed no reports on prisoner transfers. Officials claim that this was done for security reasons but Colvin alleges that it was to guard against the press and the public becoming informed of detainee torture. In 2007 government officials issued reports to their department not to write or record any statements about detainee torture and to sensor those in existence after the Globe and Mail reported on the torture of transferred prisoners.

Harper claims that he sent reports to Canadian Government officials himself over a 17 month period when Canadian Officials where denying that detainees were tortured.

Torture methods used on the prisoners included electric shock, beatings, and exposure to open flames, sleep deprivation and several other methods. Prisoners where often tortured for months at a time. If Calvin’s assertions are verified, Canada could face investigation for war crimes by the International Court.

Officials Colvin named in his testimony include Margrete Bloodworth, former National Security Advisor for Prime Minister Steven Harper, David Sproule, former Ambassador to Afghanistan, and half a dozen other high ranking officials.

For more information, please see:

CBC – A Who’s Who of Officials Named in Richard Colvin,s Testimony – 20 November 2009

Guardian – Canadian Diplomat Alleges Troops in Afghanistan Were Complicit in Torture – 20 November 2009

Ottawa Citizen – Grave Allegations – 20 November 2009

Japan Urged to Help Improve North Korea’s Human Rights

November 22, 2009

By Hyo-Jin Paik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

NEW YORK, United States – Several nongovernmental organizations have submitted a letter to the prime minister of Japan asking the new Japanese government to take leadership in help improving human rights in North Korea.

Prime Minister of Japan, Yukio Hatoyama. Courtesy of Reuters.

These organizations have also urged Japan to focus on North Korean refugees and the fate of Japanese who migrated to North Korea between 1959 and 1984.

Although Japan has previously raised awareness regarding North Korea’s human rights abuses, for example, the plight of Japanese abductees, the letter to the prime minister encouraged Japan to “play a stronger and more proactive role in promoting and protecting the human rights situations in North Korea.”

To do so, the organizations provided suggestions, such as raising human rights issues with North Korea in the future, pressuring China to protect North Korean refugees, accepting North Korea refugees who have no ties to Japan, and continuing to accept former migrants who return to Japan from North Korea.

Tokyo director of Human Rights Watch Kanae Doi said, “Abuses against North Korea take place right on Japan’s doorstep, but Japan has been largely silent on human rights issues except for abductions of Japanese citizens.”

Doi added “The new Japanese government should lead the way in raising wider human rights issues with North Korea.”

Between 1950s and 1980s, more than 93,000 Japanese migrated to North Korea as a result of a campaign by pro-North Korean groups which labeled North Korea as “heaven on earth.”

However, according to North Korean defectors, the North Korean government sent some of those migrants to labor camps where they died of starvation, lack of medical care and physical abuse. Some migrants who escaped North Korea have resettled in Japan, but the Japanese government does not have a clear policy on their resettlement.

Just last month, Japan, along with the European Union, submitted a resolution to the UN General Assembly in efforts to bring more awareness to the human rights conditions in North Korea.

“Improving human rights conditions in a country such as North Korea is a daunting task, but Japan should not waste this opportunity to help North Koreans both in and outside the country,” said Doi.

The letter to the prime minster also included topics such as offering food aid to North Korea and including human rights in bilateral and multilateral talks with the North.

For more information, please see:

Human Rights Watch – Japan: Press North Korea on Human Rights – 19 November 2009

Human Rights Watch – Joint letter to Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama on North Korea – 19 November 2009

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan – Japan-North Korea Relations – May 2004

North Korea Dismisses UN Resolution on Human Rights

November 22, 2009

By Hyo-Jin Paik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

SEOUL, South Korea – Earlier this week, the UN adopted a resolution condemning North Korea for its “systematic, widespread, and grave violations” of human rights in a 96 to 19 vote and urged Pyongyang to “respect fully all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

This resolution, adopted on Thursday, was co-sponsored by 53 nations and was approved by a special committee of the UN General Assembly. As a result of this resolution, the UN will be conducting a comprehensive review called Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the human rights conditions in North Korea next month. All UN member states are subject to UPR.

Some of the human rights abuses mentioned in the resolution include cruel and degrading punishment such as public executions and extrajudicial detentions, which are all prevalent in North Korea.

Demonstrators protesting North Korean refugee repatriation. Courtesy of AFP.

The resolution also expressed concern for fundamental freedoms of children, especially in terms of lack of access to basic economic, social and cultural rights, and the rights of North Korean refugees who seek asylum.

South Korea was a co-sponsor and voted for this resolution. Its Foreign Ministry released a statement saying they voted in favor because human rights are “universal values that must be handled separately from other matters.”

North Korea’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the UN resolution for being groundless. A spokesman for the North’s Central News Agency said the resolution is “nothing but ‘a stereotype political plot’ that forges hostility against the North every year.”

He added, “As we always did (in the past), we squarely reject the ‘resolution’ that the U.S. and its followers manipulated to harm our ideology and system under the pretext of protecting human rights.”

The UN also pointed out how North Korea continuously refuses to cooperate with UN special agents who monitor human rights in North Korea.

Although this resolution is not binding, it does lay the foundation for UN members to take action against North Korea for its human rights violations.
For more information, please see:

The Korea Times – UN Condemns Human Rights Abuses in North Korea – 20 November 2009

JoongAng Daily – Seoul backs UN vote condemning North – 21 November 2009

Yonhap News – U.N. urges N. Korea to respect all human rights – 20 November 2009

Soy Growers Spray Paraguayan Indigenous with Pesticide

November 22, 2009

By Sovereign Hager

Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

DEPARTMENT OF ALTO PARANÁ, Paraguay-217 indigenous Guarani were sprayed with pesticide last week after refusing to vacate their ancestral land. The government confirmed that there were no crops present where the pesticide spraying took place.

A formal eviction of the indigenous people was set for the same day, but a district prosecutor canceled the mandate right before execution. The local government’s refusal to evict the Guarani apparently led the soy growers to take matters into their own hands.

Over fifty men claiming ownership of the land arrived on November 6th and tried to remove the Guarani by force. The people resisted, using their bows and arrows. Later that day, an airplane sprayed pesticide directly above their homes. The pesticide is thought to be the same as that which is regularly used on soy crops. Over 200 people reported sickness and fainting. At least seven people were taken to the hospital. One person remains in critical condition.

Amnesty International has condemned the “use of apparently toxic pesticides to intimidate an indigenous community after they resisted being forcibly evicted from their ancestral lands.” Amnesty International noted the “worrying precedent” set by the Human Rights Commission of the Paraguayan State, who rejected a draft bill returning ancestral lands to another indigenous group, leaving ninety families homeless.

Amnesty International finds that even the most isolated indigenous groups are at risk due to deforestation. Satellite imagery shows that deforestation in the north of Paraguay occurs uninterrupted despite government regulation.

Paraguayan indigenous groups complain that they are not sufficiently protected against private commercial interests. An expert from the University of Maryland stated that the “economics and politics of Paraguay make sustained improvement unlikely.” Paraguayan researchers for Amnesty International say that “indigenous peoples’ lives are being put in jeopardy by those who should protect them,” calling the acts against the Guarani, “predictable.”

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ordered Paraguay to return ancestral lands to two indigenous communities. It is not clear whether that order has been carried out. Amnesty International has urged Paraguay to recognize international human rights standards, which recognize the right to traditional lands as crucial to indigenous peoples because they are a vital element of their sense of identity, livelihood, and way of life.

For more information, please see:

Global Voices-Paraguay:Indigenous Group Sprayed Aerially with Pesticides-12 November 2009

CNN-More than 200 Paraguayan Villagers Thought Sprayed with Pesticide-11 November 2009

Amnesty International-Paraguay Indigenous Community Threatened by Illegal Eviction and Pesticide Attack-10 November 2009

UN Condemns South African Xenophobic Attacks

November 21, 2009

By Kylie M Tsudama
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – The United Nations refugee agency condemned the latest xenophobic attacks in South Africa. According to the UNHCR (United Nations High Commission for Refugees) this is the first large-scale xenophobic attack on refugees and asylum-seekers in a year and a half.

“We have moved quickly to help the displaced,” said Andrej Mahecic, UNHCR spokesperson. “They are now awaiting the outcome of negotiations with local farmers who attacked their homes on Tuesday, accusing them of stealing their jobs by accepting cheaper wages in vineyards.”

Competition for farm jobs has sparked xenophobic attacks at squatter camps in the Western Cape town of De Doorns. The South African Red Cross has asked for humanitarian aid to protect and shelter some 3,500 foreigners, many of whom are Zimbabweans.

Zimbabweans living in South Africa have been accused of stealing the work and bread of nationals by underbidding for farm labor and other employment. At least 62 were killed in the violence and more than 2,500 Zimbabweans have been displaced because of this violence.

“This time we are dealing with a problem caused by the exploitation of migrant workers by both labour brokers and farmers in the affected province,” said Deputy Home Affairs Minister Malusi Gigaba. “We have learnt that the farmers favour employing migrant labourers so that they can pay them very little, while labour brokers fleece the same employees by taking away as much as two thirds of their monthly salaries for organizing those jobs for them.”

He added, “The exploitation has alienated the migrant community from the locals, who are now not being employed because they do not accept the exploitation.”

The International Red Cross Society has begun to provide assistance. The local government, however, has said that it will not provide any aid deferring all responsibility to the local municipality.

Those who have fled say that they still fear for their safety and would not be returning anytime soon.

For more information, please see:

The Zimbabwean – SA Government Blames Xenophobic Attacks on Labour Brokers and Farmers – 21 November 2009

BBC – UN Condemns South Africa Attacks on Zimbabwe Workers – 20 November 2009

UN News Centre – Xenophobic Attacks in South Africa Draw Condemnation From UN Agency – 20 November 2009

VOA – Anti-Zimbabwean Sentiment in South Africa Rises With Unemployment Rate – 19 November 2009