IDF Operations in Gaza and West Bank

On June 27, Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) carried out two operations in Gaza, one in Gaza City and the other in the southern city of Khan Younis.  The IDF states that the purpose of the incursions was to disrupt the terrorist infrastructure inside Gaza by finding and seizing militants and their weapons.  The incursions consisted of air strikes, as well a ground assault led by tanks.  The IDF claims that it “hit” 15 militants, while the media reports that 11 militants were killed, along with 2 civilians.  In addition, 40 people were injured, some in critical condition, and several dozens were arrested.  IDF reported that two soldiers were injured in these operations.

Then, early June 28, IDF went into the West Bank city of Nablus.  Witnesses stated that around 80 jeeps filled with Israeli soldiers entered the city.  Israeli troops interrupted radio and television programs and warned Palestinians to remain at home.  Again, IDF justified the incursion by stating that Nablus is a “hotbed” for terrorism and that the goal was to disrupt terror activity.  Israeli troops arrested two men suspected of being Fatah fighters and confiscated weapons.  Five IDF soldiers were wounded in a bombing in Nablus.  Al-Aqsa Brigades, the armed branch of Fatah claimed responsibility for the bombing.

Both Fatah and Hamas leadership condemned Israel’s actions.  Hamas accused Israel and Fatah of conspiring to pressure Hamas in Gaza.  While Salam Fayyad, the Prime Minister of the emergency Palestinian government, viewed the aggression as Israeli attempts to undermine the Palestinian government’s attempts to end the chaos.  Abbas condemned both of these military operations; calling the IDF’s actions as “criminal”.  He added that Fatah is against violence of any kind and criticized the launching of Qassam rockets.  Recently, Abbas vocalized his desire to disband all militias in both Gaza and the West Bank, even those affiliated with Fatah.

For more information please see:

Al Jazeera:  “Israeli troops raid Nablus” 28 June 2007.

Gulf News:  “Israel raids downtown Nablus” 28 June 2007.

Gulf News:  “Israeli raids stoke war fears” 28 June 2007.

IDF:  “Nablus:  an officer and soldier severely injured” 28 June 2007.

Washington Post:  “At least 14 Palestinians killed as Israeli military enters Gaza” 28 June 2007.

Al Jazeera:  “Israel launches deadly Gaza raids” 27 June 2007.

IDF:  “A summary of today’s events in the Gaza Strip” 27 June 2007.

International Herald Tribune:  “Israeli raids into Gaza leave 13 dead” 27 June 2007.

New York Times:  “Israelis kills 11 militants inside Gaza; 2 civilians die” 27 June 2007.

Kosovo And Macedonia Settle Longstanding Border Dispute

By David Sophrin
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

PRISTINA, Kosovo – On Friday Kosovo and Macedonia settled a long-term border dispute that has existed since Kosovo announced its independence.  The agreement reached clearly defines a stretch of border between the two nations.  Diplomatic ties between these two countries should be established immediately following the ratification of the border agreement.

Kosovo’s Prime Minister Hashim Thaci has stated that this agreement, which had been in the works for months, will “[deepen] regional cooperation and stability.”  The government of Macedonia still needs to ratify the agreement before it can go into effect.

Under this agreement, approximately 6,100 acres of land will become part of Macedonia.  Part of this land is owned by ethnic Kosovo Albanians.  It lies in the same area where other Kosovo Albanians began an insurgency against Macedonia in 2001.  The original border in this area was set up between Macedonia and Yugoslavia in 2001 while the United Nations was administering Kosovo.  In the past this area had been used by Albanian guerrillas for smuggling and gun running.

Following the agreement, U.S. Ambassador to Kosovo Christopher Dell noted that the agreement was a positive sign.  “This agreement opens the door to the establishment of full diplomatic relations between the two countries.”  Since Kosovo declared its independence from then Yugoslavia in 2008, 62 countries presently recognize Kosovo as a independent state, including the United States.  A number of eastern European nations, including Russia, have continued to refuse to recognize Kosovo’s independence.

There are still more than 1,000 international peace keepers patrolling this border area of Kosovo.

A similar border dispute still exists between Kosovo and its western neighbor Montenegro.  Negotiations have not begun.

For more information, please see:

RADIO FREE EUROPE – Kosovo Lawmakers Ratify Border Deal With Macedonia – 17 October 2009

REUTERS – Kosovo Lawmakers Back Border Deal With Macedonia – 17 October 2009

RIANOVOSTI – Kosovo says border with Macedonia demarcated – 17 October 2009

AP – Kosovo, Macedonia sign border deal – 16 October 2009

MACEDONIAN INTERNATIONAL NEWS AGENCY – Report: Macedonia, Kosovo to agree on border demarcation, diplomatic relations soon – 16 October 2009

SOFIA ECHO – Kosovo and Macedonia poised for border deal – 14 October 2009

Hundreds of Thousands Resettled in China for Water Project

By Megan E. Dodge
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BEIJING, China – An official from the Xinhua News Agency announced today that citizens in Hubei and Henan provinces are being relocated from their homes near the Danjiangkou reservoir. Approximately 330,000 people in central China are being dislocated to make way for a massive project to divert water hundreds of miles for a sluice to be built to divert water from the Yangtze river and its tributaries.

The project is estimated to cost $62 billion, which is nearly three times as much as it cost to construct the Three Gorges Dam, the world’s largest hydroelectric project. When the diversion project is complete, three routes will move billions of tons of water from China’s central, southern and western regions through pipes and canals to flow into Beijing and other fast-growing northern cities. The central route is due for completion by 2014, and is expected to supply about a quarter of Beijing’s water.

   FILE-In this file photo taken on Jan. 19,2009, a motorist passes by a signboard that promises safe water for the people on display near a water canal link to the South-to-North Water Diversion Project located in Zhengzhou, Henan province, China.  Authorities have started resettling 330,000 people in central China to make way for a massive project to divert water hundreds of miles (kilometers) to the booming cities in its arid north, a report said Sunday, Oct. 19, 2009.

In a photograph taken in January, a motorist passes a signboard promising safe water for people on display near a water canal link to the South-to-North Water Diversion Project located in Zhengzhou, Henan province, China. Photograph courtesy of Miami Herald 

Critics of the project have warned the water diversion will cause environmental damage and still not be sufficient to quench the thriving thirst of Beijing and other heavily populated cities. Moreover, opponents are concerned with the displacement that has begun to resettle citizens.

Resettlement, of about 330,000 people, has already begun, and is expected to be complete by 2011, according to official in Xinhua (in reference to reports by an report issued by Henan provincial authorities). Families have been told that they will be compensated for the cost of their immovable property, and be relocated to arable land. Citizens have also been told that their new villages will receive an annual subsidy of 600 yuan ($88) per person for the next twenty years. 

Human rights activists share concern over the forced agreement to relocate that was apparently forced upon them. Some citizens came forth stating that some resistant villagers were forced to sign a document indicating they were willing to resettle. Villagers expressed concern because they were being offered less than half the land they currently used for farming and other means of income.

The present water diversion project has been compared to the Three Gorges Dam, which forced over 1.4 million people to move. That project caused surrounding villages to be flooded in order to permit a 410 mile (660 kilometer) long reservoir to allow for a dam to be constructed on the middle of the Yangtze river. Here, though the number of displaced civilians is not as high, the same concerns and worries arise as people affected by the water diversion project face relocation and possible unequal and forced resettlement.

For more information, please see:

China Daily – China pushes international co-op in water sectors – October 19, 2009

Times of India – China to relocate 330,000 people for massive water diversion project – October 18, 2009 

China Review – Resettlement of 330,000 people starts to make way for China’s water diversion project  – October 18, 2009  

Yahoo! World News – China starts resettling 330,000 for water project – October 18, 2009

154,000 Political Prisoners in North Korean Camps

 

By Hyo-Jin Paik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

SEOUL, South Korea – Despite the recent revision in their constitution calling for more respect on human rights, North Korea is estimated to be holding 154,000 political prisoners in six prison camps.

Nk camp North Korean camp.  Courtesy of Michael Danby. 

These political prisoners are held in separate camps from other criminals, i.e., those who commit robbery or murder, and are forced to work for more than ten hours a day for only about 200 grams of food. 

The prisoners, usually dissidents, defectors who have tried and failed in fleeing North Korea and those who have been “accused of being disrespectful towards the leadership” or lost a political power struggle, are also said to be denied any medical care.  They are forbidden from communicating with family members as well.

A South Korean government official, Yoon Sang-hyun, reported that North Korea had about 200,000 political prisoners in ten camps in the 1990s, but North Korea closed four of these camps after condemnation from the international community.

Yoon said, “North Korea perpetrates various crimes against humanity, including public executions, tortures or rapes, against those who try to escape.”

North Korea does have a history of being among the world’s worst human rights abusers, but North Korea has rejected any criticism on its human rights violations and the existence of gulags.

In another study released by the U.S. Congress, there were reports that North Korea’s concentration camps have “evolved into a mechanism for extorting money from citizens trading in private markets.” 

This report said that there has been a rise in “market activity” in recent years in North Korea, and markets are the “only source of food” for the poor.  However, the North Korean government has banned such market activity, arresting those who engage in market activity as “economic criminals” and sending them to camps. 

These economic criminals, held separately from political prisoners, are held in low-level labor camps and are allowed to go home in about one month.

Nonetheless, reports state that North Korean authorities have “extraordinary discretion” in determining who goes to these labor camps and who gets to leave.  Furthermore, North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-il has absolute power and executions are carried out under Kim’s discretion.
 

For more information, please see:

 
BBC – North Korea gulags ‘hold 150,000’ – 17 October 2009

Canadian Press – North Korea holds 154,000 political prisoners in 6 camps: S Korean lawmaker says – 17 October 2009

Chosun Ilbo – N.Korean Officials “Use Gulag to Extort Bribes’ – 7 October 2009

Korea Times – N. Korea Holding 154,000 Political Prisoners – 17 October 2009

Proposed Changes to Peru’s Criminal Code Grant the Military Impunity

By Sovereign Hager

Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

LIMA, Peru-The Peruvian government sent Congress a package of bills that would limit action by prosecutors and grant extraordinary powers to the military authorities.  One of the draft laws in question would modify the Criminal Code to prevent legal action against soldiers and police who kill or injure civilians in “emergency zones”.

The “emergency zones” are areas controlled by security forces by order of the executive due to terrorist threats or political protests.  Prosecutors who want to investigate human rights violations by the military in the “emergency zones” must obtain a technical report from the armed forces or police.  The report explain why the accused used a degree of force that caused death or injury.

The Peruvian government has added a definition of “use of force” to the draft law, detailing situations where a member of the armed forces would be exempt from responsibility where he or she caused the death of a civilian. Where an officer can justify civilian deaths by the level of hostility and dangerousness in the surrounding area, he or she will be exempt from criminal, civil and administrative responsibility.

Another controversial law proposed by the government would allow the military and police to remove the bodies of members of the security forces without the presence of prosecutors, which is currently required. This requirement would reportedly allow the military to disturb a crime scene without judicial authorization.

The debate over the changes to the Criminal Code has pro-military groups on one side and non-governmental organizations on the other. Defense Minister Rafael Rey argues that the armed forces are wrongfully accused of crimes committed during the 1980-2000 internal conflict. Rey argues that the number of people killed by armed forces during that period totals under 1,000 people.

The 2003 independent Truth and Reconciliation Commission report found that 69,280 people were killed or disappeared by insurgents or state agents.  Fifty to sixty percent of the crimes are attributed to the Shining Path Maoist guerrillas. Amnesty International has compiled evidence that torture, killings and disappearances by state agents were widespread and systematic enough to amount to crimes against humanity.

Attorney General, Gladys Echaíz has directly challenged the laws, saying that they place impermissible limits on the prosecutors office and prevent prosecutors from doing their constitutionally mandated duties. “I don’t think the military and police need a cloak of concealment,” Echaíz said.

The deputy chair of the congressional committee on defense and internal order, Carlos Bruce, has openly questioned the constitutionality of the new laws, saying that the prosecution service must remain independent from executive branch bodies. The head of the National Human Rights Coordinating Committee stated that “Any legal initiative to secure impunity affects those members of the military who justifiably and with self-sacrifice fight against terrorism.”

For more information, please see:

IPS – Rights-Peru: Gov’t Seeks Legal Shield for Security Forces– 14 October 2009

El Comercio – Proyecto del Ejecutivo Condiciona Labor de Fiscales, Afirma Echaíz – 7 October 2009

ACTUALIDAD –Gladys Echaíz:”Ley que regula funciones del Ministerio Público en zonas deemergencia nos condiciona” – 6 October 2009