Former Saddam Hussein Loyalists on Trial for Persecution of Political Opposition

By Lauren Mellinger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BAGHDAD, Iraq – On December 27, the Iraqi High Tribunal commenced a new trial against several former Baathist officials, including former Iraqi Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz and Ali Hassan al-Majid, also known as ‘Chemical Ali’, on charges that they were involved in the persecution of political opponents while Saddam Hussein was in power.  20 other high-ranking members of Saddam Hussein’s government were also indicted.

The current charges allege that both Aziz and Al-Majid’s perpetrated crimes against humanity, including the arrest of nearly 250,000 members of Dawa and other political parties.  Between 1981 and the 2003 US-led invasion, many of those arrested were either imprisoned or executed.  In 1980, the Iraqi government banned the Dawa party and threatened to execute any members.

One incident included in the indictment, is the massacre in Balad in 1981, where the government arrested 1,135 Dawa members and their families and held them captive at a camp in the desert near the Saudi border.  All men ages 15 years and older were executed, resulting in a death toll of 379.  When the women and children were released in 1984, the government had confiscated their homes and property.

Prosecutor Mahdi al-Haddo cited other instances of the Hussein government’s persecution of Dawa members in his opening remarks to the court including, accounts of Dawa members being fatally poisoned, tied to dynamite, or thrown into vats of acid.  Other allegations include the rape of the wives and daughters of Dawa party members.

According to al-Haddo, “We want to give a true depiction of crimes committed by the Saddamists against sons of Iraq in Balad.  We must show people across the nation, especially those characterizing Saddam as an Arab nationalist and his government as a democracy.”

The Dawa Party is currently led by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.  While many Iraqis, including relatives of the victims, welcome the new charges, critics claim that the timing of the trial is a political move by the Maliki government to increase their support among its core constituency – Iraq’s Shia population – before the upcoming provincial elections in January.  These critics argue that the fact that several of the current defendants have previously been tried, convicted and sentenced suggests that the timing of the current trial is politically motivated.

Al-Majid has previously received two death sentences by the Iraqi court for his role in the gassing of Kurds in northern Iraq, which killed nearly 5,000 people, and for his role in suppressing a Shia uprising in 1991.  Aziz was previously tried for his involvement in the execution of Iraqi businessmen for allegedly raising prices during the first Gulf War.  Several of the other defendants are currently facing charges in other trials involving atrocities committed while serving in the Hussein government.

For more information, please see:

Alsumaria – New Charges Against Former Regime Officials – 29 December 2008

Azeri Press Agency –  Former Saddam Hussein’s Associate’s Tariq Aziz and “Chemical Ali” Go on New Trial – 29 December 2008

BBC – Saddam Loyalists Face New Charges – 28 December 2008

NY Times – Ex-Hussein Officials and Others Go on Trial  – 28 December 2008

Reuters – Iraq Tries Saddam Officials for Crushing Opponents – 28 December 2008

Peace Building Likely to be Main Task for Tanis, Newly Elected President of Bouganville

By Sarah E. Treptow
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

WELLINGTON, New Zealand – James Tanis, a former guerilla fighter, has been elected President of the autonomous Papua New Guinea province of Bougainville.  Former National Government Cabinet Minister, Sam Akoitai, says he is happy with the choice of Mr. Tanis because he was instrumental in the peace process.  He has urged the ABG under Mr. Tanis’ leadership to prioritize weapons disposal and the referendum which are both key issues in the Bouganville peace agreement.  Mr. Tanis took up arms against supporters of the Panguna Copper Mine says Bouganvilleans have been isolated from decision making processes over the last few years.  Irreconcilable differences over the mine divided the landowners and local communities before it was closed in 1988 during the provinces 10 year long civil war.

Monica Taga of the Bougainville InterChurch Women’s Forum says she is happy with the victory and says there is a need to finish peace building in the formerly war-torn province.  She says there are three pillars within this, “The first pillar being peace building in regards to weapons disposal – that is incomplete.  And also rehabilitation, thinking about, if weapons are disposed, how do you rehabilitate those that own the guns right now.  The ex-combatants and the civilians who are victims at this time and also the reconstruction of the essential services.”

Mr. Tanis, the former separatist, beat 13 other contenders for the post made vacant by the death of Joseph Kabui in June this year.  The Post Courier newspaper reports he was nearly two thousand votes ahead of the second highest polling candidate, Mr. Akoitai.  In the first election for President in 2005 Mr. Tanis finished third behind Mr. Kabui and former Governor John Momis.

Meanwhile, Mr. Akoitai says many Bougainvilleans were denied their democratic rights in the poll because their names were not on the common roll.

For more information, please see:

Pacific Islands Report – Tanis Elected President of Bougainville – 29 December 2008

Radio Australia – James Tanis new Bouganville President – 29 December 2008

Radio New Zealand International – Finishing peace building process likely main task for new Bougainville President – 29 December 2008

Amnesty International Urges that India’s Anti-Terror Laws Violates Human Rights

By Shayne R. Burnham
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

NEW DELHI, India – The Indian Parliament has passed anti-terror laws in response to the terrorist attacks that occurred in Mumbai last month in order to enhance police security and combat future acts of terrorism.  The new legislation currently awaits approval by the President.

The amendments include changes to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and provisions of the new legislation aiming to set up a National Investigating Agency which will investigate terrorism.

The new amendments include overly broad definitions of “terrorism” and what constitutes membership of a terrorist organization; extends the maximum detention of suspects involved in terrorism from 90 days to 180 days; denies bail for foreign nationals who enter the country illegally; in certain cases, requires suspects to prove their innocence, and; allows proceedings to be closed to the public without specified grounds.

According to Amnesty International, India’s new legislation against terror would violate international human rights treatises.  “While we utterly condemn the attacks and recognize that the Indian authorities have a right and duty to take effective measures to ensure the security of the population, security concerns should never be used to jeopardize people’s human rights,” said Madhu Malhotra, Asia Pacific Programme Deputy Director at Amnesty International.

Amnesty International also stated that “India’s experience with previous anti-terrorism laws has shown that they can lead to abusive practices.”

Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram defended the bill in Parliament stating that it provided an “adequate balance” between “the demands of human rights and the people of India for strong anti-terror laws.”   He went on to say, “You have captured the mood of the nation. The nation expects parliament to pass these laws today and restore their confidence.”

Amnesty International has called on India’s President to reject the new amendments and for the President and Parliament to review the amendments so that they conform to human rights standards.

For more information, please see:

Amnesty International – Proposed New Indian Anti-Terror Laws Would Violate Human Rights – 23 December 2008

Associated Press – Amnesty International Slams Indian Anti-Terror Law – 19 December 2008

Boston Globe – India Supports New Antiterror Laws – 18 December 2008

Saudi Arabia Initiates Ad Campaign to End Violence Against Migrant Domestic Workers

By Lauren Mellinger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

 RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – In December 2008, a Saudi corporation, which chooses to remain anonymous, initiated an ad campaign to stop abuse against migrant domestic workers in the country.  The campaign emphasizes religious teaching, focusing on mercy and compassion to advocate for a change in the treatment of foreign domestic workers.

 An estimated 1.5 million migrant domestic workers travel to Saudi Arabia annually in search of employment.  Many who are employed as domestic workers are subjected to emotional, physical  and sexual abuse by their employer.  For example, wealthy employers withhold wages.

 Human rights activities, including Human Rights Watch, claim that abuse against domestic workers is common in Saudi Arabia, and that the current ad campaign is a necessary first step toward addressing the issue.  All television advertisements end with a saying from the Prophet Muhammed regarding mercy and reciprocity.

The campaign features advertisements in several Saudi-owned newspapers and satellite television channels, and includes graphic images depicting the maltreatment of domestic workers in many Saudi homes.  One advertisement, which appeared in the newspaper Al Hayat, depicts a maid trapped in a kennel and wearing a dog collar; another ad shows a foreign chauffeur wearing saddle while a Saudi woman holds the reins.

 The ad campaign has been criticized heavily in Saudi Arabia, with many claiming that the harsh imagery is not an adequate representation of Saudi society.  Several journalists have called for an end to the ad campaign, claiming that it depicts Saudi society as cruel and heartless.  Several major newspapers have refused to publish the ads.  According to one journalist, Terad Al al-Asmari, the current campaign “could lead  to hatred between foreign labor and the Saudi citizen.”

 However,  a Saudi human rights lawyer and activist Abdel Rahmn al-Lahim has defended the campaign, stating that, “unlike conferences and seminar, a media campaign like Rahma reaches the average man and woman, who are more often than not, those same employers who mistreat their servants.”

 In response to a Human Rights Watch report released in 2008 regarding the plight of migrant domestic workers in Saudi Arabia, the government, through the Ministry of Labor, and the Saudi Association for Human Rights are collaborating to formulate guidelines that will regulate the relationship between foreign domestic workers and their employers.  The new regulations include legal guarantees for laborers, and an initiative to legalize professional contractors and corporations through which Saudi citizens can employ domestic workers based on a contractual relationship between the company, the migrant worker and the Saudi employer.  Both human rights advocates and the Saudi government consider eliminating the private sponsorship of migrant domestic workers to be a crucial step in ending abuse of migrant domestic workers.

 

 

Human Rights Watch is urging Saudi Arabia to ratify the UN Migrant Workers Convention, which guarantees migrant workers’ human rights and requires a state to provide protection for foreign workers against abuse by private employers and public officials.

 For more information, please see:

 Al Arabiya – Saudi Mercy Campaign Highlights Islamic Values – 24 December 2008

 Angola Press – Saudi Campaign Against Maid Abuse – 24 December 2008

BBC –Saudi Campaign Against Maid Abuse – 23 December 2008

 Reuters – Mideast Should Act Against Maid Abuse – 17 December 2008

Fiji Expels NZ High Commissioner

By Hayley J. Campbell
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania


SUVA, Fiji – Following threats to expel New Zealand’s acting High Commissioner, Caroline McDonald boarded a flight bound for Auckland this morning.

Ms. McDonald, NZ’s High Commissioner, was accompanied by her husband, Simon Mark, who is also New Zealand’s Trade Commissioner. The two left this morning after 11 months of working to establish better foreign relations with Fiji.

McDonald has made clear, however, that she is still a friend to Fiji, “despite the sadness I feel,” she said.

This morning, British and American embassy cars provided a special diplomatic escort for the couple. The two boarded a 10:20 am Air New Zealand flight to Auckland.

Friends and family gathered at Nadi Airport in Fiji to see the couple off. In Auckland, several members of the media and foreign affairs personnel awaited Ms. McDonald and her husband’s arrival.

Five days ago interim Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum announced plans to expel Ms. McDonald to show the interim government’s anger over travel sanctions. Both New Zealand and Australia set travel restrictions affecting Fiji interim officials as punishment for the bloodless military coup of Fiji’s federal government in 2006.

New Zealand’s foreign affairs minister, Murray McCully, says he will meet with Ms. McDonald to discuss Fiji’s political situation in the next few days.

For more information, please see:
Matangi, Tonga – Alarm sounds again for media freedom in Fiji – 22 December 2008

Fiji Times – NZ still a friend of Fiji, says McDonald – 29 December 2008

Fiji Times – Diplomat backs democracy for Fiji – 29 December 2008

Radio New Zealand News – NZ hopes Forum will help to resolve dispute with Fiji – 29 December 2008