Tunisian Trade Leader and Others to be Tried for Protests

By Nykoel Dinardo
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

GAFSA, Tunisia – Tunisian trade leader, Annan Hajji, and 37 other activists are being tried before Tunisian courts for their involvement in protests in the Gafsa Region of Tunisia earlier this year.  Hajji is the Secretary-General of the local office of the General Union of Tunisian Workers (UGTT).  They have been charged with “forming a criminal group with the aim of destroying public and private property.”  If convicted, they could each face up to more than ten years in prison.  At least six of those convicted are being tried not in their presence. 

The Gafsa Region of Tunisia is a phosphate-rich area; protests sparked after the Gafsa Phosphate Company, the major employer in the city of Redeyef, announced the results of a recruitment competition.  The results were denounced as fraudulent by several people and organizations, including the UGTT.  Following this incident, protests were held about the high unemployment in the region and other labor related issues.  The protests spread to several neighboring cities and police forces were deployed to break up the groups.  Protesters and other groups have claimed that the protests were entirely peaceful but that police forces used violence to force dispersement.

 A video of the protests that was posted on YouTube.

Amnesty International and several other human rights organizations have criticized these trials.  According to Amnesty International (AI), there have been allegations of torture and the misuse of force by law enforcement officials that bring the events into question.  One of those arrested in the protests, Ms. Zakia Dhifaoui claims that she was sexually harassed and threatened with rape by police officials if she did not sign a statement whose contents she did not know.  Several other protesters say that they were detained for questions and released, then re-arrested. 

According to French media sources, the Tunisian government has ordered the local media not to cover the incidents.  According to Tunisian journalist Rachid Khéchana, “Tunisian authorities do not want the scandal to be known to the outside world; authorities believe that if information is dispersed that they will lose control of the situation.”  Those who have provided information to foreign media risk imprisonment.

AI has asked the Tunisian government to do an independent investigation into the allegations and protests. They also request that the government release the findings of an investigation into a death at one of the protests, which resulted from police gunfire into a crowd of protesters.

For more information, please see:

Amnesty International – Tunisian Trade Leader on Trial for Role in Protests – 4 December 2008

Le Monde – Les Leaders des Émeutes de Gafsa devant La Justice Tunisienne [The Leaders of the Riots of Gafsa Face Tunisian Justice] – 4 December 2008 [In French]

Nouvelorbs – Gafsa :  38 Syndicalistes Jugés Pour S’être Révoltés [Gafta :  38 Union Leaders Judged for Revolting] – 4 December 2008 [In French]

Rojo y Negro – Tunéz : La Dictatura al sur de Lampedusa [Tunisia :  The Dictatorship South of Lampedusa] – 14 November 2008 [In Spanish]

Frontline Defenders – Tunisia :  Arrest and Restricted Movement of Human Rights Defenders – 6 August 2008

Nuclear Test Victims of Marshall Islands Denied Compensation for Third Consecutive Year

By Sarah E. Treptow
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

MAJURO, Marshall Islands – The Nuclear Claims Tribunal based in Majuro announced last week that it will not provide any compensation payments for a third year in a row.  The announcement comes despite the fact that it owes more than $2 billion in already approved awards to Marshall Islanders for personal injuries, land damage, and nuclear clean-ups.

The Tribunal was established in the 1980’s by a Compact of Free Association between the U.S. and the Marshall Islands with a mandate to adjudicate and compensate personal injury and other claims coming out of the 67 nuclear tests the U.S. performed at Bikini and Enewetak atolls.  After a multi-year process of hearings, land appraisals and expert testimony, the Tribunal awarded Enewtak, Bikini and Rongelap more than $2 billion in land damage and clean-up funding.  Only $3.9 million of the land damage claims have been paid for lack of funds.

The fund that was once at $150 million is now down to a quarter of a million dollars which Tribunal Chairman Gregory Danz reports is barely enough to keep the Tribunal operational for a few more months.  Danz added that maintaining operations into the future is crucial to meet the needs of people who develop cancers from exposure to U.S. nuclear tests in the coming years.  The U.S. National Cancer Institute study from 2004 estimated that 531 cancers would result among Marshall Islanders exposed to fallout from the nuclear testing program and it said that over half of these cancers were not yet developed in the population.

President Tomeing has started to pressure U.S. government officials, seeking endorsement of a plan to use U.S. grant funding to provide $1.2 million annually for Marshall Islanders with approved but not paid personal injury awards.  He called this proposal an interim measure until a satisfactory compensation program can be put into place.

Almost half of the 2,000 islanders who have been awarded nuclear test compensation from the Tribunal have died before receiving their full award.

Mr. Danz calls the U.S. provided compensation funding “manifestly inadequate.”  The inability to provide 100 percent of its compensation awards “provides the best indication of (the) inadequacy (of nuclear test compensation from the U.S.) and the closure of the Tribunal would cripple the efforts of the Marshall Islands to obtain additional funding under (the Compact’s nuclear compensation) provision.”

For more information, please see:

Radio New Zealand International – For third year no compensation for Marshall Islands nuclear test victims – 08 December 2008

Pacific Magazine – No Compensation for N-Test Victims in 2008 – 07 December 2008

BBC News – Timeline: Marshall Islands

HRW: Police Violence Increases in Turkey

By Laura Zuber
Impunity Watch Senior Desk Officer, Middle East

ISTANBUL, Turkey – On December 5, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report titled, “Closing Ranks Against Accountability,” documenting 28 cases of police violence since early 2007.  The 80 page report cites two main sources of this increase in police brutality.  First, changes in Turkish laws, which gave police excessively broad discretion to use lethal force and encourage arbitrary stops and searches by police. The second cause is a “culture of impunity,” characterized by the failure of the government to investigate and punish abuses.

The cases documented in the report involve fatal and non-fatal shootings by the police; ill-treatment and excessive use of force by police against demonstrators; and ill-treatment during or following identity checks.  For example, Feyzullah Ete, 26, a factory worker with two children, died after being kicked in the chest by a plain-clothed officer who had demanded to see his ID in a children’s play area.  Additionally, a video clip of police officers beating a 15 year old M.K during Kurdish New Year’s celebrations in Van in March 2008 is posted on the HRW’s website.

In the report, HRW stated that the number of complaints filed against the police for excessive force increased over the past year.  In 2006, there were a total of 2,854 complaints, while in 2007, 3,339 complaints were fled.  In addition to the increase of complaint filed, there is a decrease in the number of convictions.  In 2006, 48 police officers were convicted after investigations, while in 2007, only 21 were.

When launching the report in Istanbul, HRW’s executive director, Kenneth Roth, stated that the increase in violent incidences are partly attributable to three changes in Turkish law.  First, a law which permits the police to use lethal force before it becomes necessary to prevent a threat to life.  Second, allowing officers to conduct identity checks without reasonable grounds for suspicion.  And lastly, anti-terrorism legislation which permits denying suspects access to a lawyer for 24 hours.

In addition to the legal sources, Roth stated, “”A culture of impunity prevails and we fear that culture lies behind this increase in police violence.”  The report stated that investigations following complaints were often tainted by the police, who attempt to conceal, contaminate, and plant evidence.  In addition, prosecutions are slow, lasting months or years, often with no result.  Even when the prosecution ends in conviction, they rarely lead to prison sentences.

While changes in anti-terrorism laws have increased protection to suspects in police stations, there has been an increase in the number of incidents of police abuse or excessive force occurring outside the formal places of detention.  Also, the report found that police are ready to use firearms against unarmed civilian demonstrators; sometimes killing them.

In order to combat the increasing occurrence of police violence, Roth states that the government must replace its “culture of impunity,” with a culture of accountability.  The report concluded by suggesting several recommendations to Turkish authorities.  They include: establishing an independent commission to investigate complaints of police violence; requiring the police to report when they use stop-and-search authority and requiring that those stopped are given a form with the police officers’ names and reason for the stop; clarification on when lethal force may be used; and action to ensure that officers to commit abuses are punished.

For more information, please see:

Guardian – Police Violence Soaring, Says Report on Turkey – 6 December 2008

Human Rights Watch – Turkey: Rising Police Violence Goes Unpunished – 5 December 2008

Human Rights Watch – Closing Ranks Against Accountability – 5 December 2008

Hurriyet – Cop Violence Up Due to the Culture of Impunity – 5 December 2008

Voice of America – Report Alleges Human Rights Violations by Police in Turkey – 5 December 2006

Migrant Workers Stranded in Baghdad

By Lauren Mellinger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BAGHDAD, Iraq– On December 5, Iraqi security forces stormed a warehouse at Baghdad airport, using tear gas and smoke grenades to forcibly remove dozens of migrant workers from the premises for deportation.  The migrant workers had been lured to Iraq three months earlier by recruiters for a defense contractor who promised the men jobs.

Last week, during a visit to the warehouse by Iraqi immigration officials, a riot broke out when the migrants protested their poor treatment by throwing bottles and stones at the officials.  In response, Iraqi security guards opened fire shooting into the air to silence the protest.

According to the workers, the recruiting agents guaranteed them jobs with Najlaa International Catering Services, a subcontractor to US defense company Kellog Brown and Root (KBR).  The workers, mostly men from India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Uganda, claim that the recruiting agents charged them between $3,000 and $5,000 to travel to Iraq.  Before leaving their homes many of the migrants sold their property and other valuables to raise the money to make the trip. 

Around 600 of the migrants have been kept in derelict warehouse at the Baghdad airport for months, while the remaining 400 have been living in a “make-shift” camp nearby.  They are provided with little food, have little access to working showers, and are forced to sleep four to a bed.  According to a spokesman for Najlaa International, to maintain their safety and prevent kidnappings, they are not permitted to leave the warehouse.  When reporters attempted to gain access to the facility, they were ordered away from the area by armed Iraqi security forces.

Several of the Ugandan workers claim they have been handcuffed and beaten by Iraqi police.  One man claims the Iraqi  police told him, “If you are here for the US, we’re going to show you the difference between the US government and the Iraqi government.”  The Iraqi police have not responded to the allegations of abuse.

The migrants are currently stranded in Iraq.  They are unable to remain in the country because of their visa status and cannot afford to make the return trip back to their home countries.   The workers claim they were tricked into handing their passports and visas over to the Iraqi security forces earlier this month, after being assured that Najlaa International required their information in order to pay them.  The passports were not returned and the paychecks not forthcoming, which led to speculation among the migrants that they were going to be forcibly deported from Iraq without payment.

Najlaa International denies allegations that it confined migrant workers to a warehouse where they were forced to live in dire conditions and kept there without pay.  According to Marwan Rezk, General Manager of Najlaa International, “They are living in a decent environment, provided three meals a day, showers and latrine facilities.”  Rezk maintains that the workers are well cared for and are temporarily residing in airport housing facilities while awaiting assignments on US bases.  Rezk further claims that the migrant workers’ contracts stipulate that they are only to be paid once they begin to work.

While the US military is looking into the matter, the conditions that the workers have been living in since they arrived in Iraq appear to be in violation of US military guidelines.  The guidelines were passed in 2006 to encourage defense contractors to deter human trafficking in Iraq.  In addition to regulating recruiters, the guidelines stipulate “minimum acceptable” living spaces and require companies to fulfill their contract obligations with employees.  Additionally, seizing passports and visas is a violation of the guidelines. 

According to KBR, it does not condone such unethical behavior, and was not involved in this recruiting scam.  The company has stated it plans “to remediate the problem and report the matter to the proper authorities.”  The company is already the target of other lawsuits involving allegations of human trafficking.

For more information, please see:

CNN – Workers in Iraq Say Scores of Them Removed by Force – 5 December 2008

CNN – Stranded Workers in Iraq: Recruiters Duped Us – 4 December 2008

ISS – Migrant Workers in Iraq Riot Over Treatment by KBR Subcontractor – 4 December 2008

Times UK – Iraqi Guards Open Fire as Migrants Riot About Deportation – 4 December 2008

AP – KBR Subcontractor Denies Confining Workers in Iraq – 3 December 2008

Human Rights Watch Urges Kazakhstan to Fulfill OSCE Commitments

By Shayne R. Burnham
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

Kazakhstan – Human Rights Watch urged the Kazakh government that it should make human rights reforms before taking chair to the Organization for Security and Cooperation (OSCE).  Kazakhstan was chosen last year to become chair in 2010.  Human Rights Watch issued a 55-page report, “An Atmosphere of Quiet Repression:  Freedom of Religion, Expression and Assembly in Kazakhstan,” which documents Kazakhstan’s extensive restrictions on freedom of religion, express and assembly, all in contravention of human rights law.

The United States urged Kazakhstan to reform human rights violations by the end of this year.  U.S. assistant secretary of state for the region, Richard Boucher, stated that, “Despite slow and uneven progress, President Nazarbayev assured me earlier this year that Kazakhstan will stand by its commitments… Clearly, a great deal of work must be done by the end of 2008.”

President Nazarbayev promised last month for a more democratic Parliament, allow more media freedom, and change electoral law.

Opposing members of the OSCE and human rights groups protest the Kazakh appointment, stating that it is too early for the country to lead in democracy.

Human Rights Watch calls upon Kazakhstan to fulfill its pledges it promised OSCE and that are required of it as a member of the OSCE such as:  “revise the draft religion law to bring it into conformity with the Kazakh constitution and international human rights standards; Make public a review of the draft religion law by the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights; Place a moratorium on criminal libel cases and review the relevant articles in the Criminal Code with a view towards abolishing criminal libel, and establish a cap on defamation awards; and Abolish legal provisions that permit unnecessary restrictions on locations where demonstrations can take place.

Assuming Kazakhstan does take chairmanship, it will be the first post-Soviet country to lead the organization.

For more information, please see:

Human Rights Watch – An Atmosphere of Quiet Repression:  Freedom of Religion, Expression and Assembly in Kazakhstan – 1 December 2008

Human Rights Watch – Kazakhstan:  Fulfill OSCE Commitments on Human Rights – 1 December 2008

Reporters Without Borders – Kazakhstan ‘s OSCE Presidency Opposed After Heavily Biased Election Coverage – 22 August 2007

Reuters – U.S. Urges Kazakhstan to Uphold OSCE Values – 23 July 2008