Suicide bombers kill hundreds in Northern Iraq

On August 14, suicide bombers drove trucks into two Yazidi communities, al-Qataniyah and al-Adnaniyah, in northern Iraq.  The Iraqi Army reported the death toll to be over 400, making it the most deadly attack of the Iraq war.  However, casualty estimates range from 150 to as high as 500.  Estimates of those injured range from 200 to 350 people.  The attack also left 600 homeless.

The majority of the deaths and injuries resulted from mud houses collapsing on their inhabitants.  Rescue teams used bulldozers, shovels, and hands to remove the fallen debris to uncover survivors and bodies.  In these poor communities, as many as 30 family members live in a single house.  So the destruction of a single home may result in many losses.

While no group claimed responsibility for the bombing, it is believed that members of the al-Qaeda (AIQ) in Iraq were the perpetrators.  The US military stated that the attack bore resemblance to other AIQ attacks.  It also stated that it expected an increase in violence in the region prior to a report on the Army’s troop surge due in mid-September.  In addition, targets such as these are seen as soft (easy) targets by insurgents driven out of large cities as a result of this recent surge.

The Yazidi are a religious minority in the Kurdish region of Iraq.  They are an isolated community, due to their religious beliefs and years of persecution by Muslims and Christians.  The main reason for their continued persecution is that the Yazidi revere an angel, in addition to a god, which Muslims and Christians equate to Satan.  Recent violence against the Yazidi includes an attack by gunmen in April, which resulted in 23 deaths.  It is believed that a stoning of a Yazidi girl who converted to Islam and eloped with a Sunni man sparked the earlier attack.

Many have condemned the attacks and Major-General Mixon, the commander of US forces in northern Iraq described the attacks as acts of genocide.  As many individuals in the Yazidi community lost family members in the attack, members fear annihilation.  Members of the Yazidi community have talked with Deputy Prime Minister Barham Salih and asked for more security.  Other members have threatened that unless Iraq provides them with sufficient security that they will form their own security to protect their community.

For more information please see:
BBC:  “Fears over rising Iraq bomb toll”  16 August 2007. 

The Economist:  “No one is safe”  16 August 2007. 

International Herald Tribune:  “Iraq’s intolerance”  16 August 2007. 

London Times:  “Al-Qaeda bombing kills and maims 600”  16 August 2007. 

St. Petersburg Times:  “Once more, Yazidis find themselves as targets”  16 August 2007. 

Telegraph:  “Iraq bombs:  500 die in worst terror attack”  16 August 2007. 

Washington Post: “Toll in N Iraq Passes 400; Attack is deadliest of war”  16 August 2007. 

Washington Post:  “Yazidis fear annihilation after Iraq bombings”  16 August 2007. 

Reuters:  “Factbox: Who are the Yazidis?”  15 August 2007.

Northern Mariana Islands: H.R. 3079 debated in Saipan; S. 1634 to be revised

The Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands is a dependent territory of the United States, which means that it is bound by U.S. federal law and legislation.  Since it became a Commonwealth of the United States in 1970, CNMI has handled its own immigration.  Recently, the United States has been pushing for CNMI immigration to be federalized, to the consternation of CNMI local government, through Senate Bill 1634 or House Bill 3079.  (See the Impunity Watch reports here and here.)


Christensen_fitial_5
U.S. Virgin Islands Rep. Donna Christensen and CNMI Governor Benigno Fitial shake hands after Wednesday’s hearing as House Subcommittee for Insular Affairs staffer Tony Babauta looks on.  (Photo by Jacqueline Hernandez, for the Saipan Tribune.)

U.S. Congresswoman Donna Christensen, delegate for the U.S. Virgin Islands and sponsor of the House version of the bill (H.R. 3079), told the Marianas Variety that there is increasing support for the United States to federalize and assume control over immigration and labor in CNMI.  Christensen was in Saipan on Wednesday to conduct a hearing on the proposed legislation.  Among those present were Guam delegate Madeline Bordallo and American Samoa delegate Eni Faleomavaenga.  Faleomavaenga was less supportive of the proposed measures, and told the Saipan Tribune that  he was concerned about the impact the proposed legislation would have on American Samoa, which also controls its own immigration, and is the only other United States territory to do so.

CNMI Governor Benigno Fitial had strong words for the U.S. government during his testimony on Wednesday, as he has had for the entire span of this proposal.  He criticized the actions of the federal government, particularly during the Trust Territory period, and said, “Anyone who lived under the Trust Territory and today supports federalization provides further evidence of our human impulse to allow hope to triumph over experience.”  [Note: The Trust Territory period refers to the years 1947-1986, when the United States administered the United Nations Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, which was composed of what is now the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, and CNMI.]

Fitial proposed his own border control bill and submitted it to the U.S. House Subcommittee on Insular Affairs during Wednesday’s hearing.  He believes that his version of the bill would be more effective and less invasive than the legislation currently on the table.  Christensen seemed skeptical of Fitial’s proposal during the hearing, but told the media that the subcommittee would review it, and that if there was something that could be added or adjusted in the House version of the bill.  The Senate version of the bill is currently being redrafted to include amendments suggested by David Cohen, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Insular Affairs, who has been working closely with CNMI’s Washington representative, Peter Tenorio.

Cohen and Fitial exchanged heated words via press releases just last week.  Friday, Cohen blasted Fitial for making the comment that those protesting outside the hearing on Wednesday were all “illegals,” stating that while comments against the United States government were not offensive, that particular comment crossed a line.

Meanwhile, members of CNMI’s House have proposed a commission to explore the relationship between CNMI and the United States.  In their proposed legislation, they state that “The people desire to re-examine whether continuing in a ‘commonwealth’ relationship with the United States is in their best interest, or whether some other political status will better enable them to fulfill their aspirations of full and meaningful self-government.”

Please see also:
“Increasing support for Washington takeover, Congresswoman says”  Pacific Magazine (15 August 2007)
“Only minor changes to ISLA”  Saipan Tribune (16 August 2007)
“Fitial proffers own border control bill”  Saipan Tribune (16 August 2007)
“Review of US-CNMI relations pushed”  Saipan Tribune (16 August 2007)
“DOI redrafting US Senate bill”  Saipan Tribune (17 August 2007)
“Fitial’s ‘illegals’ remark unfair – Cohen”  Saipan Tribune (17 August 2007)
“US Senate federalization bill will be redrafted”  Marianas Variety (17 August 2007)

* More of Ms. Hernandez’s photography of the hearing, the first of its kind held on Saipan, can be found on the Saipan Tribune‘s website here.

Impending Water Shortage in Yemen’s Capital City

Yemen is facing an impending water shortage.  Saana, the capital, is most prone for disaster because of its rapid growth.  The water shortage is further compounded because of the contamination in the nation’s limited supply of drinking water.

Yemen is a dry land.  The country estimates that it only obtains about 2,500 million cubic meters (MCM) of fresh water a year.  However, the country’s demand for freshwater is 3,200 MCM a year creating a 700 MCM yearly deficit.  This deficit makes the nation vulnerable to drought and possible famine, because of the inaccessibility of drinking water.  For example, a well in the Yemen must be from 600-1200 meters deep, whereas wells in other gulf nations are only 200 meters deep. The limited water supply creates a looming problem.

Sanaa’s rapid growth exacerbates the shortage.  The capital city’s population is growing at a rate near 7-8% per year.  In 1975, the city only had 175,000 residents in 1975.  Currently, two million residents live in the city.  The city’s infrastructure, especially regarding water, has not adjusted to the city’s growth.  For example according to IRIN, only 15-25% of the city households get drinking water from the public water supply network and use the public sanitation system.  The rest of the households rely on private vendors for their water supply. 

Another problem is contamination.  The World Health Organization believes that only 50% of the Yemen’s water supplies are safe.  According to the Yemen Observer, over 75% of the 20 million Yemenis are exposed to water borne diseases because of contaminated water.  A Yemeni parliamentary report stated that 20,000 children die from water related illnesses every year in Yemen, which is 50% of all child related deaths in Yemen.  The most common causes of death from water related diseases are diarrhea, malaria or typhoid.  The contamination is usually caused by the human and factory waste. 

This problem has not been adequately addressed by the Yemeni government.  The nation is facing an impending shortage of water where Yemen will have to rely heavily on imported water.  This will place undue pressure on an already struggling people, which may force many to choose to drink contaminated water because they cannot afford clean water.

IRIN.  YEMEN: Rapid urbanisation threatening capital’s water supplies.  14 August 2007.

Yemen Times.  Water in Yemen …….Reduction and pollution. 29 June 2005. 

Yemen Observer. Contamination continues to plague Yemen’s drinking water.  28 July 2007.

India and Pakistan Mark 60th Anniversary of Independence

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com

Pakistanindia_3Image at MSNBC

India and Pakistan celebrated its 60th anniversary of independence from British rule today with parades, gun salutes, and speeches.  The anniversary sees both countries at important crossroads in their histories.

Sixty years ago, the departing British split the subcontinent in one of the most violent upheavals of the 20th century.  In one of history’s largest mass migrations, about 10 million people moved across borders, splitting the subcontinent into Muslim Pakistan and Hindu-majority India.  Riots and fighting surrounded the partition.  Even the fasting and pleas for peace by Mohandas Gandhi were of little avail.  In the end, an estimated 200,000 to over 1 million were dead from the bloodshed.

In marking the 60th anniversary of independence, the rivalry between the two countries is finally mellowing.  Even though mutual animosity still lingers, their focus is less on each other and more on their own aspirations and problems.

Pakistan, a nation of 160 million people, has found itself amidst a violent struggle between moderates and Islamic extremists.  Pakistan’s president, General Pervez Musharraf, last week toyed with imposing an emergency rule.

Across the border in India, the story was different.  India, with a population of 1 billion, is racing to become an economic powerhouse.  Growth in the country has been fast and has transformed the country, hoping to regain itself as a great economic power.  Additionally, India has had fair and free elections for decades.  Many of its people, however, are being left behind.  Indian children are more likely to be malnourished than African ones.

For more information, please see:

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/08/13/ap4014300.html

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-South-Asia-at-60.html?em&ex=1187323200&en=0969a58d8cda09e2&ei=5087%0A

http://www.guardian.co.uk/india/story/0,,2148622,00.html

Charles Taylor Trial Possibly Delayed

By Impunity Watch Africa

The Special Court for Sierra Leone will consider next week an application by defense lawyers to postpone the trial until January of next year.  The Court announced that the trail will not proceed on August 20 as previously scheduled, but instead a “status conference” will be held to determine the length of delay.  Taylor’s new defense team asked in their motion that the trial be postponed until January 7 to allow “adequate time and facilities for the preparation of [Taylor’s] defense, as required by Article 17 of the Statute of the Special Court of Sierra Leone.”  The prosecution’s response stated that it was ready to begin leading evidence, however it agreed that the defense team’s request for more time was justified.  The duration of the delay is left to the court’s discretion.

Taylor is on trial in The Hague, accused of committing crimes against humanity and war crimes including mutilations, murder, sexual slavery, sexual violence, recruiting children as soldiers, abduction, and forced labor.   Taylor has pleaded not guilty to all of the charges.  In June, Taylor initially boycotted the trial, calling it unfair and without legitimacy. He fired his court-appointed attorney and requested a new one be appointed and that he receive more money for his legal defense fund.  The court has since appointed a new attorney from the UK, and increased his legal fund several times.

The Special Court for Sierra Leone was established with United Nations backing to try those deemed most responsible for crimes against humanity that occurred during the 1991-2002 war.  Taylor’s trial is being held in The Hague due to fears that it could create instability if held in Sierra Leone’s capital, Freetown.  On Saturday, Sierra Leone held its first elections since UN peacekeepers left the country a year ago.

For more information, please see:

Afrol News – Taylor’s attorneys seek adjournment – 14 August 2007

AllAfrica – Taylor Seeks to Postpone Trial Again – 14 August 2007

Washington Post – Trial of Liberia’s Taylor Delayed Again – 13 August 2007