|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Justice for Sergei Magnitsky: US Criminal Grand Jury Convened to Examine Involvement of Son of Senior Russian Government Official in $230 Million Fraud exposed by Sergei Magnitsky
27 May 2016 – A US criminal grand jury has been convened to examine the involvement of Denis Katsyv, son of Russian government official Petr Katsyv, in the US$230 million fraud uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky. In 2008, Prevezon, a Cyprus-based company owned by Denis Katsyv, received funds traced by the US Department of Justice and the Swiss General Prosecutor’s office to the US$230 million fraud uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky.
Since September 2013, Denis Katsyv’s companies have been subject to a U.S. civil forfeiture case brought by the US Department of Justice for money laundering. Under that case the US government has frozen $14 million of assets belonging to Katsyv’s companies.
“The defendants [companies owned by Denis Katsvy] were involved in the laundering of the proceeds of the Russian fraud, which itself amounts to an elaborate series of criminal offences,” said US Justice Department in its court filing in New York.
“It is …entirely proper for the grand jury to investigate whether the defendants [Katsyv’s companies], who received proceeds from the fraud, were involved in it,” said the US Department of Justice.
A Criminal Grand jury is a form of criminal investigation in the United States used to determine whether criminal charges should be brought against potential defendants.
Previously, Katsyv’s companies tried to challenge the US and Swiss asset freezing orders, but courts in the US and Switzerland denied those motions and confirmed that the freezing was justified.
The wire transfers to Prevezon from the $230 million fraud uncovered by Sergei Magnitsky showed highly unusual payments. Prevezon disguised incoming payments for “sanitary equipment” and “auto parts,” which were supposed to be supplied but never delivered because Prevezon was in fact a real estate company.
According to the US Department of Justice, the falsified contracts used to justify Prevezon’s incoming wire transfers claimed that Prevezon was supposed to deliver 500 acrylic bath sets under the brand name “Doctor Jet,” manufactured in Sicilia, Italy, with dimensions of 190 x 120/95 x 65, to two shell companies in Moldova which did not do any legitimate business and never in fact purchased the bath sets.
Prevezon explained these suspicious wire transfers to the US Court stating that an agreement existed between its Russian director, a student named Timofei Krit, and “investor Petrov,” and denied knowledge of false wire descriptions.
However, during its investigation, the US Justice Department identified further false and questionable wire transfers to Prevezon from companies in Belize, BVI, etc. for an additional amount of US$2 million. These wire transfers were similarly disguised as payments for computers, video, home equipment, etc. that again were never delivered.
Previously, Denis Katsyv’s firm Martash paid US$8 million under the 2005 money laundering case by the State of Israel.
Denis Katsyv’s father, Petr Katsyv, has been Vice President of OAO Russian Railways, a state transportation monopoly, since 2014. Before that, he was Vice Premier of the Government and Transportation Minister in the Moscow Region. Contracts with Moscow Region’s government structures supported the business of his son, Denis Katsyv.
Similarly, Denis Katsyv’s Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya developed her business in part on contracts with Moscow government agencies, where her husband is Deputy Minister of Transportation (and was deputy to Katsyv senior during his time as Minister of Transportation), and previously, between 1984 – 2000 was official within the Moscow Region’s Prosecutor’s Office.
According to court filings, Petr Katsyv was previously in contact with the FBI to provide information on Russian organized crime but withdrew his proposal, when he was informed by the US authorities that his cooperation would not help settle the money laundering and civil forfeiture case by the US Justice Department pending in the Southern District Court of New York.
Sergei Magnitsky, who uncovered the US$230 million fraud and testified about the complicity of Russian officials in it, was tortured and killed in Russian police custody at the age of 37. The unprecedented events of this case are described in the New-York Timesbest-seller by William Browder, leader of global ‘Justice for Sergei Magnitsky’ campaign, called “Red Notice. How I Became Putin’s No 1 Enemy,” and in a series of justice campaign videos on Youtube channel “Russian Untouchables.”
For more information, please contact:
Justice for Sergei Magnitsky
e-mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Historic Sentencing for Operation Condor Military Officials
By Cintia Garcia
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina— In a historic human rights trial, Argentina’s last dictator and 14 military officials were sentenced to prison for their role in Operation Condor. Former general and Argentine dictator from 1982-83, Reynaldo Bignone, 88-years-old, was sentenced to 20 years of prison. Bignone was found guilty for illicit association, kidnapping and the disappearance of more than 100 people. He is already serving life sentences for various human rights violations.

In addition, Uruguayan army colonel, Manuel Cordero Piacentini was sentenced for his crimes against humanity. Argentine former general, Santiago Riveros was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Miguel Angel Furci, Argentine intelligence officer was sentenced to 25 years for illegally arresting and torturing dozens. The sentences among the defendants ranged from 8 to 25 years in prison. Since the trial began, five defendants have died, including Jorge Rafael Videla, former head of Argentina’s first junta.
The case against the former military officials began in 2013 in the domestic court of Argentina. This case marks the first time a domestic court has tried ex-military officials. The claim was brought forth by the victim’s families. The verdicts are a milestone for those affected by Operation Condor because it is the first time the conspiracy has been proven to exist. The evidence presented included testimonies by the families, victims, and documents such as a declassified FBI cable from 1976. The prosecutors were able to piece together the coordinated operation through an overwhelming amount of documents from the United States and South American archives.
Operation Condor was a US backed plan created by South American dictators to eliminate opponents and leftist. The operation lasted from mid 1970s to the early 80s. The countries that created and enforced the operation were Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Bolivia, Uruguay, and Brazil. The South American countries would meet and use their police powers to track the opponents and leftist. The dissidents were captured, kidnapped, tortured and disappeared. Many of their remains continue to be unaccounted for. In addition, the children of the women who were kidnapped were taken away from their mothers and given to other families, such as military officials. According to UNESCO’s International Center for the Promotion of Human Rights, there were 376 Operation Condor victims.
In regards to the role of the United States during Operation Condor, President Obama has promised to release all documents and records. In a statement, President Obama announced, “I believe we have a responsibility to confront the past with honesty and transparency.”
For more information, please see:
ABC NEWS – Argentine Court Sentences Ex- Dictator for Operation Condor – 27 May 2016
BBC – Operation Condor: Landmark Human Rights Trial Reached Finale – 27 May 2016
The Guardian – Argentina’s Last Military Dictator Jailed Over Role in Operation Condor – 27 May 201
Washington Post – A Look at the Operation Condor Conspiracy in South America – 27 May 2016
British Cluster Bombs Reportedly Used in Yemen
by Zachary Lucas
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
SANA’A, Yemen — Amnesty International has reported that British made cluster bombs were used by Saudi coalition forces in the current conflict in Yemen. The British government has denied that they are supplying Saudi Arabia with cluster munition and are seeking reassurances with the Saudi government that cluster munitions are not being used.

Field research by Amnesty in Sa’da, Hajjah, and Sana’a governorates led to the discovery of a partially exploded British manufactured BL-755 cluster bomb. According to Amnesty, the bomb had malfunctioned and scattered numerous unexploded “bomblets.” The cluster bomb was found near a farm in al-Khadhra village in the Hajjah governorate, close to the Saudi Arabian and Yemeni border.
British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond stated that there was no evidence that Saudi Arabia had used cluster munitions in the current conflict. Hammond, while responding to British Parliament, said that is illegal to supply cluster munitions under British law. The munition that was found was decades old and that Britain no longer supplied or manufactured the BL-755 cluster bombs. Hammond said that the cluster munition found was probably used in one of the the past conflicts in the region.
The Foreign Secretary stated that there will be an investigation into the report by Amnesty. The Saudi Arabian government in response said that cluster munitions are not being used nor have they been used in the conflict. The British government has said it will seek “fresh assurances” from Saudi Arabia that cluster munitions are not being used.
Saudi Arabia and its allies began a military campaign in Yemen in March 2015. The goal was to prevent Iran-allied Houthi rebels and forces loyal to the former Yemeni president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, from seizing control of the country. The civil war in Yemen has also seen attacks from groups loyal to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State.
The BL-755 cluster bomb was original manufactured in the 1970s by Bedfordshire company Hunting Engineering Ltd. The bomb contains 147 bomblets that are designed to scatter on impact and explode. They are intended to be dropped out of British Tornado fighter jets to pierce tank armor.
Cluster munitions were banned under the Convention on Cluster Munitions signed in 2008 and effective in 2010. Over 100 countries have signed the convention including the United Kingdom, but not Saudi Arabia. Oliver Sprague, Amnesty International UK’s Arms Control Director, called cluster munitions one of the “nastiest weapons” used in warfare. The concern with cluster munitions is that not all of the bomblets explode on impact. Amnesty documented instances in Yemen where unexploded cluster munitions blew up after being picked up by children.
For more information, please see:
Amnesty International — Saudi Arabia-led coalition has used UK-manufactured cluster bombs in Yemen — 23 May 2016
BBC — UK seeks Saudi cluster bomb assurances over Yemen — 24 May 2016
Guardian — MoD to investigate claims Saudis used UK cluster bombs in Yemen — 24 May 2016
Reuters — Britain investigating reports its cluster bombs used in Yemen — 24 May 2016
House Committee on Foreign Affairs – Ed Royce, Chairman: Subcommittee Hearing: The ISIS Genocide Declaration: What Next?
Subcommittee Hearing: The ISIS Genocide Declaration: What Next?
Webcast:
Witnesses
Mr. Carl A. Anderson
Supreme Knight
Knights of Columbus
[full text of statement]
[truth in testimony form]
Mr. Sarhang Hamasaeed
Senior Program Officer
Middle East and Africa Programs
U.S. Institute of Peace
[full text of statement]
[truth in testimony form]
Mr. Johnny Oram
Executive Director
Chaldean Assyrian Business Alliance
[full text of statement]
[truth in testimony form]
Mr. David M. Crane
Professor of Practice
Syracuse University College of Law
(Former Chief Prosecutor, United Nations Special Court for Sierra Leone)
[full text of statement]
[truth in testimony form]
Ms. Naomi Kikoler
Deputy Director
Simon-Skjodt Center for the Prevention of Genocide
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
[full text of statement]
[truth in testimony form]