Mud from Brazil Dam Burst is Toxic: UN

By Kaitlyn Degnan
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASILIA, BRAZIL — A report from the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights states that the mud and residue unleashed in areas of Brazil earlier this month contains toxic heavy metals and chemicals at high levels. This is in contrast to declarations made by the dam’s owner that the mud released in the collapse did not present a danger to human health and that the water was not contaminated.

Mud and mine waste cover the Bento Rodrigues district following the dam collapse. (Photo courtesy of Reuters)

The report was authored by special rapporteurs John Knox and Baskut Tuncak. The rapporteurs expressed their concern that information about the toxicity of the disaster took three weeks to surface.

Samarco claims that the levels of metals and chemicals in the water, while high, are below what is considered dangerous. The Brazilian government has also backed the company’s claims that there was no increase in the presence of heavy metals.

However the report, citing data obtained from the town of Baixo Guandu’s water department, describes heavy metal levels that are “several thousand times the acceptable maximum.”

Mr. Tuncak has said that he finds it “difficult to imagine that you would see such high, elevated levels normally – in a region where people are eating fish and drinking the water – and not have major impacts on human health or the environment.”

The dam was located at an iron ore mine owned by Samarco, which is jointly owned by BHP Billton (Anglo-Australian) and Vale (Brazilian). The collapse released 60 million cubic meters of mud and mine waste into the city of Mariana and the Rio Doce.

The initial burst and resulting outpour of mud and waste killed 13 people. A quarter of a million people in the region depend on the river for drinking water, which has been cut off as a result of the incident. Thousands of fish in the river have also died.

The incident has been called Brazil’s worst environmental disaster to date. Brazil’s Environment Minister Izabella Teixeira told reporters that Brazil’s federal and state governments intend to sue Samarco for 20 billion reais ($7.2 billion) in damages.

 

For more information, please see:

Guardian – Mud from Brazil dam disaster is toxic, UN says, despite mine operator denials – 25 November 2015

Wall Street Journal – Brazil Dam’s Failure Flooded Region With Toxic Waste, U.N. Report Says – 25 November 2015

Gaurdian – Arsenic and mercury found in river days after Brazil dam burst – 26 November 2015

Reuters – Mud from Brazil dam burst is toxic, UN says – 26 November 2015

Sydney Morning Herald – Brazil to sue BHP, Vale for $7b in damages for Samarco dam burst – 28 November 2015

Reuters – RPT-UPDATE 2-Brazil to sue BHP, Vale for $5 bln in damages for dam burst – 29 November 2015

Water World – Brazil mine disaster: Doce River transporting “toxic sludge” towards protected habitat, says UN – 30 November 2015

 

War Crimes Prosecution Watch Volume 10, Issue 19 – November 30, 2015

War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. To subscribe, please email warcrimeswatch@pilpg.org and type “subscribe” in the subject line.

Opinions expressed in the articles herein represent the views of their authors and are not necessarily those of the War Crimes Prosecution Watch staff, the Case Western Reserve University School of Law or Public International Law & Policy Group.

Contents

EUROPE

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Iraq

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal

War Crimes Investigations in Burma

TOPICS

Terrorism

Piracy

Gender-Based Violence

WORTH READING

WORTH READING

COMMENTARY AND PERSPECTIVES

BREAKING THE SILENCE: SOCIETAL ATTITUDES TOWARD SGBV IN SYRIA

As the Syrian conflict continues with increasing levels of violence, reports have emerged indicating that government forces and extremist groups are using sexual and gender based violence (SGBV) as a tool of war. However reliable information on SGBV remains scarce due to social stigma and survivors’ fears that they may be ostracized from their communities if they come forward with their stories.

As part of its efforts to ethically and comprehensively document all violations of the conflict, including SGBV, Syria Justice & Accoutnability Center commissioned a report from the Syria Research and Evaluation Organization (SREO) to assess Syrians’ attitudes towards the survivors and perpetrators of SGBV. The results were surprising – on the individual level respondents unanimously sympathized with survivors and wanted to support them. At the same time, the vast majority of respondents said that their respective communities would not be supportive and would instead shame survivors.

The panelists will discuss the report’s paradoxical findings, the role of awareness-raising for post-conflict SGBV prevention, and how other conflict contexts can provide lessons-learned for Syria. Speakers include:

Ambassdor Steven E. Steiner, Gender Advisor at United States Institute of Peace

Shabnam Mojtahidi, Legal and Strategy Analyst at Syria Justice & Accoutnability Center

Additional spekaers and modrator will be confrimed soon.

Light refreshments will be served.

Share this event on Facebook and Twitter

We hope you can make it!

Cheers,
Syria Justice & Accountability Center and InterAction

Refugees Face Possible Deportation to North Korea

By Christine Khamis

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

PYONGYANG, North Korea –

Nine North Korean refugees are believed to be detained in a Chinese military base, awaiting potential deportation to North Korea. Among the refugees are an 11-month-old baby and a teenager. The refugees were detained by police in Vietnam on October 22, according to their relatives. After their bus was stopped for a random check, they were detained for two days before being handed over to Chinese authorities.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human rights expressed concerns on Friday that the refugees had already been sent back to North Korea. Human Rights Watch believes, however, that the refugees are being held in Tumen, a Chinese town near the North Korean border. Tumen is the last stopping point for many North Korean refugees who are being returned to North Korea. Human Rights Watch is concerned that the refugees could be forcibly deported to North Korea at any time.

The North Korea-China border near Tumen. (Photo courtesy of Human Rights Watch)

Human Rights Watch has urged President Park Geun-hye of South Korea to pressure China to free the refugees and to allow them to seek asylum in a country of their choice. President Park’s office has stated that her government is working to secure the freedom of the refugees and to ensure that China will not forcibly deport the refugees back to North Korea.

Phil Robertson, the Asia deputy director for Human Rights Watch, has stated that if the refugees are handed back over to North Korean officials, they will likely vanish into North Korea’s prison camp system, which is “characterized by torture, violence, and severe deprivation.” Many North Koreans who have been able escape North Korea have stated that refugees sent back from China are subjected to torture and imprisonment in labor camps.

North Korea treats refugees as traitors and therefore subjects repatriated refugees to detention, torture and sexual violence, according to the U.N. Under a 2010 law, those who leave North Korea without permission are deemed guilty of “treachery” against the country, which is punishable by death.

China has often not recognized the refugee status of such North Koreans and instead has tended to treat them as illegal economic migrants. Consequently, China has deported many refugees back to North Korea. The act of forcibly sending refugees back to a country where they face potential persecution is known as “refoulment” and is banned under international treaties such as the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 protocol. As a party to those international treaties, China is not allowed return refugees to a place where their life or freedom would be threatened.

The U.N. Committee Against Torture recently expressed concerns about China’s practice of deporting North Korean refugees. Xu Hong, an official in China’s foreign ministry, told the U.N. that some illegal migrants from North Korea entering China for economic reasons do not meet the Refugee Convention’s conditions pertaining to the status of refugees and that some of them were criminals who had abused the principle of asylum.

Over 28,000 North Koreans have resettled in South Korea since the end of the Korean War in 1953, according to South Korea’s Unification Ministry. Most of the refugees have fled into China first, then have crossed into countries that have entry points into South Korea, such as Thailand and Vietnam.

 

For more information, please see:

The Guardian – Fears for North Korean Refugees Who May ‘Face Death” if Returned by China – 25 November 2015

Human Rights Watch – South Korea: Act to Save North Korea Refugees – 24 November 2015

The New York Times – South Korea Says It’s Working to Halt Refugees’ Return to North – 25 November 2015

Reuters – U.N. Asks Vietnam and China to Clarify Fate of North Koreans – 20 November 2015