|
Syria Justice and Accountability Centre- Refugees in Europe: An Opportunity for Justice
Over the past month, news on Syria has been dominated by the growing refugee crisis. An estimated 3,000 migrants, many of whom are Syrian, are arriving by boat and land to Europe each day. Over 4 million Syrians are registered with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Many more are unregistered or have recently decided to flee the civil war due to the growing, unabating violence and sheer frustration at the loss of opportunity that has resulted from over four years of economic devastation. As the refugee crisis spills over to Europe’s borders, an opportunity has emerged for Europe to make meaningful contributions to the bringing about justice and reconciliation for Syria, but concerted action needs to be taken, a difficult task in the face of the large anti-migrant sentiment sweeping the continent.
International law prohibits rendering refugees back to the areas from which they fled, a principle called non-refoulement. Anti-migration leaders like Hungary’s Viktor Orban claim that walls and other similar measures do not violate the principle because they are not aimed at sending Syrians back to a war zone, but prevent them from entering from countries that are all at peace. These leaders instead call on Turkey, the primary recipient of refugees from Syria to do more to prevent unauthorized departures from its soil. Some have even offered to pay Turkey to halt refugees at its borders, while others have offered a more sensible approach: creating refugee intake centers that could help track Syrians and place them in specific European countries based on a pre-established quota. To date, however, the Europe Union has failed to implement a unified strategy, drawing criticism from conservatives and liberals alike.
Politicians are not the only ones torn on what the current crisis means for Europe. Western news outlets either decry the influx as a threat to the stability and cultural integrity of the European Union or call for European countries to do their part, referencing both a moral duty to do so and the economic justification that stems from the current demographic imbalances of much of Western Europe. Despite the day-to-day polemics surrounding the threat of Syrian refugees, however, none have commented on the opportunity this issue presents to champion justice against those responsible for atrocities committed in Syria.
A Step towards Justice, a report which the Syria Justice and Accountability Center (SJAC) published in partnership with Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights, elaborates on several accountability options that the international community can pursue now, prior to the end of the conflict. According to the report, the most feasible pathway is prosecutions in European and North American courts under principles of active or passive nationality and universal jurisdiction. Among the refugees entering Europe are victims and witnesses to atrocities as well as former Syrian human rights defenders and documenters.
Former fighters from across the spectrum — Syrian government militias to extremist rebels — are also among those seeking safe-haven in Europe. Many use fake names and fake identification papers, an easy task as a Dutch journalist demonstrated recently. But the vast majority of Syrians offer Europe a trove of information and can help identify perpetrators by face even when their names and identities have been changed. Documentation groups, like SJAC, can also assist with this endeavor by connecting witnesses to prosecutors’ offices and sharing data on individuals involved in the conflict. Already, SJAC has worked to collect photos of alleged perpetrators who have sought refuge in Europe and is sharing the information with prosecutors’ offices.
But European governments will need to proceed with caution and work closely with refugee communities to ensure that innocent people are not convicted due revenge-seekers’ insincere finger-pointing. And for prosecutions to meaningfully contribute to the long-term goal of justice and accountability, prosecutors will need to communicate their decision-making process clearly to Syrians. Otherwise, investigations and trials will be disconnected from the reality of the Syrian context and hold little meaning for those they are meant to benefit. If done with careful consideration, however, Europe could begin to lay the foundations for justice, truth-telling, and ultimate reconciliation, helping to preserve evidence, lead by example, and provide Syrians with the impetus to prioritize justice during peace negotiations. Such a contribution would go above and beyond simply providing for the basic needs of hundreds of thousands of Syrians.
For more information and to provide feedback, please email SJAC at info@syriaaccountability.org
Victory for Journalist Rights in Egypt
By Tyler Campbell
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa
CAIRO, Egypt – Today Egyptian President, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi officially pardoned two of the three Al Jazeeran journalists who were jailed earlier this year, Mohamed Fahmy and Baher Mohamed. These three journalists were jailed on charges of airing false news against the state. They were heavily, and possibly illegitimately prosecuted, because of their alleged connection to the Muslim Brotherhood, an outlawed political group in Egypt. If the third journalist, Peter Greste, was pardoned is unclear at this time.

This whole situation started two years ago when the trio was sentenced to three years in jail for aiding a terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. This sentence was later overturned and a new sentence was handed down by Egypt’s high court. These sentences were met with loud international outcry from governments and human rights groups. Egypt, which had committed itself to democracy and free speech, seemed to be going back on its promise.
This criticism did seem to have had some impact on president Abdel Fatah al-Sisi’s decision. The decision to pardon these two journalists along with a 100 other prisoners coming days before a U.N. General Assembly meeting is likely more than a coincidence.
Most of these prisoners were arrested because they violated a questionable Egyptian law that had outlawed unsanctioned demonstrations. This type of law is a serious check on any real claim to free speech Egypt could make. The consequence of this law and its strict enforcement had all but ended demonstrations in Cairo against new government leadership.
It was a day of joy for the two men but not all is forgiven against Egypt. Greste, the unpardoned journalist living in Australia called it “absolutely extraordinary news,” but called for the undoing of injustice done to him and other prisoners by Egypt.
Al Jazeere, the employer of the two journalists, also had some pointed words about the occasion. Mostefa Souag, the network’s general director said, “It is hard to celebrate though, as this whole episode should not have happened in the first place. They’ve lost nearly two years of their lives when they were guilty of nothing except journalism.”
Such criticism is fair, especially if you believe that the move by president Sisi was motivated by politics and not by intent to change Egypt’s political climate. This action so close to a U.N. General Assembly meeting could simply be a political bargaining chip. It could also signal some real change finally coming from Egyptian leadership.
The release of these 100 prisoners should be seen as a step in the right direction. However, much still remains to be done. There are still many more who have been jailed for voicing criticism or backing the wrong political party. The 2013 law that outlawed unsanctioned demonstrations is also still in play. If Egypt really wanted to shows its commitment to change, releasing more political prisoners and repealing this law would be a smart place to start.
For more information, please see:
Al Jazeera – Al Jazeera journalists freed from Egypt prison – 23 September 2015
The Guardian – Egypt pardons and releases jailed Al-Jazeera journalists – 23 September 2015
Los Angeles Declares State of Emergency to Deal With Homeless Crisis
By Samuel Miller
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America and Oceania
LOS ANGELES, United States of America — The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday declared a State of Emergency on homelessness, calling for $100 million to help address the growing crisis. The West Coast city is the first in the country to declare a State of Emergency over the growing number of street dwellers.

According to an LA Times report, the number of homeless people living on the city’s streets has grown by 12 percent since 2013.
City Council President Herb Wesson, along with members of the council’s Homelessness and Poverty Committee, and Mayor Eric Garcetti, announced the plan during a news conference outside City Hall, as homeless people dozed nearby on a lawn.
“This city has pushed this problem from neighborhood to neighborhood for too long, from bureaucracy to bureaucracy,” Mayor Garcetti said. “Every single day we come to work, we see folks lying on this grass, a symbol of our city’s intense crisis.”
Los Angeles has one of the largest unsheltered populations in the country, and more than an estimated 25,000 homeless residents. Some of those men and women live on the city’s infamous Skid Row, a makeshift camp on public sidewalks that stretches for blocks.
Gary Blasi, a Professor Emeritus at the UCLA School of Law, said the promise to fund new housing and services for the homeless people in L.A. was a positive step for a city government that has recently been preoccupied with empowering police to crack down on encampments.
“If it is purely symbolic, that will be bad,” Professor Blasi said. “But at least people are engaging in a conversation about how to solve the problem, instead of just moving it around the city.”
In addition to the one-time $100 million funding proposed by the council, Mayor Garcetti is calling for an annual $100 million to fund permanent housing for the homeless and to set up a foundation dedicated to the issue.
In the short term, Mayor Garcetti wants $13 million in emergency funding to grow homeless services and housing, most of which would be allocated in the form of subsidies. “If we can lift up those in need, and pick up those left behind, then we can live up to the best of our ideals,” Garcetti said.
Tuesday’s announcement by Mayor Garcetti was also marked by evidence of the confused tactics critics say have hindered an effective city response to a growing challenge.
Council members haven’t identified the sources for all of the money or how it would be used. Meanwhile, the mayor has yet to release a sweeping plan, now weeks overdue, he says he is crafting to end homelessness. Late in July, Garcetti said in a speech that his office was preparing a three-part “battle plan” for what he dubbed a “war on homelessness here in Los Angeles.”
For more information, please see:
BBC News — Los Angeles: $100m plan to tackle homeless ’emergency’ – 23 September 2105
CNN — Los Angeles declares ‘state of emergency’ on homelessness – 23 September 2015
Al-Jazeera America — Los Angeles declares homelessness state of emergency – 22 September 2015
Rights Groups Urge for Saudi Arabia to Cancel Death Penalty for Young Man
By Brittani Howell
Impunity Watch Reporter, The Middle East
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – France and experts from the United Nations, join rights groups in urging that Saudi Arabia cancel the execution of a young man because he was a minor when he was arrested. Ali Mohammed Baqir al-Nimr was sentenced to death in May for taking part in a protest three years ago.

Al-Nimr could be executed, by beheading, and then crucified at any time. Crucifixion is a public display of the body after the execution to warn others not to commit the same crime. The execution is likely to happen at any times, as al-Nimr’s final appeal was rejected last week. His family does not even know when the execution is to occur because Saudi Arabia does not give the families notice.
When he was only 17 years old, al-Nimr was arrested for protesting in the Arab Spring protests in 2012. The protestors demanded equal rights and democracy for the province of Qatif. Al-Nimr was convicted for various charges including, attacking police with Molotov cocktails, being a member of a terrorist cell, incitement, encouraging sectarianism, breaking allegiance with the king, robbing a pharmacy, and rioting.
A source who is close to the al-Nimr family, spoke to CNN and stated that Ali was innocent of the charges. The source told CNN, “Ali’s young. He just went (to the demonstrations) with people from his school and chanted with the guys and took pictures.” The source claimed that al-Nimr’s sentence was only used as a means to seek “revenge against his uncle.” Ali al-Nimr’s uncle, a Shi’a cleric, is also condemned to death for charges including, sedition, breaking allegiance with the ruler, and encouraging sectarianism.
The final appeal was heard in court without al-Nimr or his lawyer being present. Sadeeq al-Jabran, al-Nimr’s lawyer, tweeted on Tuesday, “We as a defense team have not been able to visit Ali al-Nimr at the detention center to prepare his defense.” Many rights groups allege that al-Nimr had not received a fair trial and may have been forced to sign a confession to the charges. It is also alleged that al-Nimr may have been tortured.
France, who rarely comments on Saudi Arabia’s death penalties because of the shear frequency, is “opposed to the death penalty in all cases and circumstances, we call for the execution to be called off,” stated the Foreign ministry spokesman, Romain Nadal.
Saudi Arabia is a signatory on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which prohibits capital punishments for individuals who commit crimes under the age of 18. Donald Campbell, spokesperson for the international human rights charity Reprieve, stated, “The international community – particularly Saudi Arabia’s closest allies, the UK and the U.S. – must stand with the French government and U.N. experts against this outrage, and call on Saudi authorities to halt this unjustified killing.”
A Saudi Ambassador, Faisal Trad, has recently been appointed to a consultative group for the U.N.’s Human Rights Council. A spokesperson for the Human Rights Council, told CNN, “Members of the Consultative Group are appointed by their regional groups” not the U.N. body and “these members serve in their personal capacity, not their national capacity.”
In August, a report published by Amnesty International alleged that 102 people had been executed in Saudi Arabia in the first half of 2015.
For more information, please see:
BBC – The young Saudi who Could be Executed at any Time – 23 September 2015
CNN – U.N., Rights Groups Call on Saudi Arabia to Spare Man From Beheading, Crucifixion – 23 September 2015
Reuters – France Urges Saudi Arabia to Cancel Death Penalty for Young Shi’ite – 23 September 2015
The New York Times – France Urges Saudi Arabia to Cancel Death Penalty for Young Shi’ite – 23 September 2015
The Huffington Post UK – Ali Mohammed al-Nimr Sentenced to Crucifixion in Saudi Arabia for Attending Pro-Democracy Protest– 22 September 2015