U.S. and Coalition Airstrikes Begin Inside Syria

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch Managing Editor

DAMASCUS, Syria – U.S. forces have begun leading airstrikes in Syria against The Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIS) which is attempting to establish an caliphate in Syria and Iraq based on its extremist interpretation of Islamic law. The United States military conducted the airstrikes with fighter jets as well as remotely piloted aircraft and Tomahawk missiles to conduct 14 strikes against ISIS in Syria. 47 Tomahawk missiles were fired by American ships located in the Red Sea and the North Arabian Gulf. The Coalition of states supporting the airstrikes included several Arab allies. Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates took part in the strikes. Several of the Arab Allies participating in the airstrikes played a kinetic role in the strikes meaning they played an active role in carrying out the strikes rather than simply providing material support to the United States.

A U.S. fighter jet prepares for launch from the USS George H.W. Bush located in the Persian Gulf on Tuesday to take part in airstrikes against ISIS in Syria. (Photo courtesy of CNN International)

On Tuesday morning, before heading to the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, United States President Barack Obama addressed the importance of Arab participation in the Coalition combating ISIS on Tuesday morning saying the Coalition that attacked ISIS in Syria overnight “makes it clear to the world that this is not America’s fight alone,” and that Middle Eastern governments are rejecting ISIS and its extremist agenda. Jordan’s minister of information and communication, Mohamamd Al Momani, confirmed Jordan’s participation in the strikes saying the airstrikes would continue in the coming period. Momani said The Jordanian Kingdom is participating in the collation in order to combat “terrorism in its home in order to protect Jordan’s security and stability and to prevent terrorism from reaching the kingdom.”

The strikes primarily targeted the area around Raqqa, which ISIS has declared as its Capital city. For several moths civilians living in Raqqa have been experienced the harsh rule of ISIS after militants took over their city, which had been one of Syria’s most liberal cities. Members of ISIS have implemented severe punishments against civilians for violations of their strict interpretation of Islamic law, opposition members have said public executions have become a daily occurrence in the area.

Abo Ismail, an opposition activist inside Raqqa, said Tuesday that residents were both fearful and elated to see the U.S. attacking ISIS targets there because while they were thrilled to see intentional action against ISIS the group was reacting by increasing security in the city.

“I would dance in the streets, but I am too afraid,” Ismail said.

Syria has been in the midst of a devastating civil war that has killed thousands of civilians and displaced several million people. Syrian rebels have been clamoring for Western military aid as they fight the regime after it began turning its guns on peaceful demonstrators. Despite the late action the Free Syria the Free Syria Foreign Mission said it was elated by the U.S. strikes. “Thank God. What a momentous day — a day that we have been looking forward to for so, so long,” the Syrian opposition group said. “It’s a big step forward, but we are nonetheless clear-eyed that it will be a prolonged campaign to defeat ISIS.”

Ironically attacks targeting ISIS may help the Syrian Regime. Bashar al-Assad’s regime has said it wants to be informed of any action against ISIS taken in its country and will react harshly to actions taken without its approval. However, the regime has been fighting ISIS and other rebel groups in Syria for three years and U.S. and Coalition attacks on ISIS will allow the regime to target moderate rebel groups in the country.  “It helps him because we’re taking out one of the threats to his regime,” said retired Air Force intelligence officer Lt. Col. Rick Francona. “If we destroy ISIS, which we’re committed to do … that takes the biggest player off the table. And all he has to worry about is the smaller, less effective al Qaeda in Syria — al-Nusra — and the (rebel) Free Syrian Army, both of whom he has bested in the past couple of years.”

According to a statement issued by the United States Decampment of Defense “The strikes destroyed or damaged multiple ISIL targets… and included ISIL fighters, training compounds, headquarters and command and control facilities, storage facilities, a finance center, supply trucks and armed vehicles.”

The airstrikes also targeted the Khorasan group, an al Qaeda affiliated organization. In a statement the United States Department of Defense claims the group represents and imminent threat to the United States and the West.  The statement said “The United States has also taken action to disrupt the imminent attack plotting against the United States and Western interests conducted by a network of seasoned al-Qaeda veterans – sometimes referred to as the Khorasan Group – who have established a safe haven in Syria to develop external attacks, construct and test improvised explosive devices and recruit Westerners to conduct operations.

For more information please see:

ABC News – President Obama Says Airstrikes against ISIS Targets in Syria ‘Not America’s Fight Alone’ – 23 September 2014

Al Jazeera – US and Allies Strike ISIL Targets in Syria – 23 September 2014

CNN International – Obama: Syria Strikes Show ‘This is Not America’s Fight Alone’ – 23 September 2014

CNN International – U.S. Strikes ISIS and Khorasan Inside Syria Live – 23 September 2014

FIFA Official: Qatar Won’t Host FIFA World Cup

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Managing Editor Impunity Watch

DOHA, Qatar – On Monday Theo Zwanziger, Executive Committee member for the Fédération International de Football Association (FIFA) suggested that the Committee may choose to remove the 2022 World Cup from Qatar, which has been preparing for the games for years.  According to the FIFA official the decision will come down to one factor: Extreme heat. However, if true, the decision to strip Qatar of the World Cup followed months of international criticism of the Gulf State’s treatment of migrant workers and complaints of slave labor conditions for workers at the World Cup sites.

People celebrate the announcement location of the 2022 World Cup with a screen that reads ‘Congratulations Qatar’ after FIFA announced that Qatar will be host of the 2022 World Cup in Souq Waqif in Doha, in this December 2, 2010. (Photo courtesy of Reuters)

Theo Zwanziger, the former German soccer association (DFB) chief said that the most widely watched tournament in sports will have to be held somewhere else due to health concerns over the extreme heat that players will experience in the Qatari desert. “I personally think that in the end the 2022 World Cup will not take place in Qatar,” he said. “Medics say that they cannot accept responsibility with a World Cup taking place under these conditions.”

Qatar remains adamant that it will host the 2022 World Cup. “The only question now is when, not if,” Qatar 2022 communications director Nasser Al Khater said in a statement. He added “summer or winter, we will be ready.” The oil-rich Gulf state insists that it will be able to use state of the art cooling technologies currently being developed for stadiums, training areas and fan zones. However, there FIFA officials still cite concerns over the health of players and fans; “they may be able to cool the stadiums but a World Cup does not take place only there,” Zwanziger said. “Fans from around the world will be coming and traveling in this heat and the first life-threatening case will trigger an investigation by a state prosecutor. That is not something that FIFA Exco members want to answer for.”

Labor rights activists have raised concerns about dangerous working conditions and have made allegations about unpaid salaries and other abuses of workers’ rights. The Qatari economy is heavily dependent on large numbers of low-paid migrant workers, many of whom ar brought from Asia.

Two weeks ago the Qatari government confirmed that it is holding two British citizens who went missing while researching migrant labor conditions in the country, saying that the men are being questioned about possible illegal activities in the country. The confirmation came after Amnesty International urged authorities to reveal the men’s whereabouts and insure their safety. The Norway-based Global Network for Rights and Development reported that the two British citizens, a researcher, Krishna Upadhyaya, 52, and a photographer, Ghimire Gundev, 36, went missing on Aug. 31 as they were preparing to leave the country.

While at least one high ranking FIFA officials believes Qatar will be stripped of its hosting duties for the 2022 FIFA World Cup because of concerns over extreme heat, the organization has faced criticism for choosing the Gulf State to host the games despite concerns over human rights abuses in the country. Any decision by FIFA to remove the tournament from Qatar on the bases of temperature concerns will likely be interpreted as an attempt by FIFA save face as the organization has been continually criticized by activists as new allegations of abuses in Qatar continue to surface.

For more information please see:

Al Jazeera – Qatar Won’t Host the World Cup: FIFA Official – 22 September 2014

Fortune – FIFA May Pull 2022 World Cup from Qatar ‘On Medical Grounds’ – Exec – 22 September 2014

Reuters – Qatar Adamant it will Host 2022 World Cup Despite Doubts – 22 September 2014

The New York Times – Officials in Qatar Confirm Detention of Britons – 8 September 2014

War Crimes Prosecution Watch Volume 9 – Issue 13 September 22, 2014

Ashraf Ghani Named as the President of Afghanistan

By Hojin Choi

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

KABUL, Afghanistan – Afghanistan’s Election Commission finally announced Ashraf Ghani as the president-elect. The announcement was made Sunday after Ghani and the runner up, Abdullah Abdullah, signed a power-sharing deal. Ghani’s presidential inauguration will be held on September 29.

The Commission Chief, Ahmad Yousuf Nuristani, stated that “[t]he Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan declared Dr. Asraf Ghani . . . as the president of Afghanistan.” This announcement will end the political chaos following the presidential runoff on June 14. While experiencing nationwide terrorists’ attacks on the day of election, Candidate Abdullah insisted election fraud and vote rigging, and his supporters denied the election result. At the time, millions of ballots were suspected of fraud, and Abdullah’s supporters warned to establish “parallel governments.”

The Election Commission went on to review polling stations and ballot papers under a U.N. audit, but the result was unsuccessful.

“Although the audit was comprehensive . . . [we] could not detect or throw out fraud completely,” said Commission Chief Nuristani. The commission withheld the final election numbers. Nuristani said the commission will announce it later, but did not specify when. He did not take further questions from reporters.

Ghani (right) and Abdullah (left) signing the power sharing deal (Reuters)

The details of the power-sharing deal were not disclosed to the public. Reportedly, Abdullah will be in a position named “Chief Executive” that is similar to prime minister. They will also share powers over controlling the nation’s institutes and government agencies, including the military forces. The incumbent president, Karzai, made clear that the former government and administration will not be responsible for the deal and that Ghani and Abdullah will have to work on fulfilling the commitment.

The public reaction varied. The Afghan public seems happy for the end of months of political unrest, but some worried with the possible effects of the deal. Afghan resident Sharifullah told Voice of America that he was disappointed because the hardship people suffered through to vote while under the violence of terrorists was wasted. He added the political deal would harm the principle of democracy in Afghanistan.

The U.N. and the U.S. both welcomed the agreement and described it as an important step toward achieving social stability in Afghanistan. TIME reported that the deal is a “victory for U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry,” as he is the one who first got the candidates to agree in principle to the power-sharing arrangement when he visited Afghanistan in July. TIME also said he revisited to seal the deal in August. John Kerry stated that Ghani and Abdullah have “put the people of Afghanistan first, and they have ensured that the first peaceful democratic transition in the history of their country begins with national unity.”

For more information, please see:

TIME – Afghanistan Finally Has a New President – 21 September 2014

BBC – Afghan presidential contenders sign unity deal – 21 September 2014

Voice of America – Ashraf Ghani Named President-elect in Afghanistan – 21 September 2014