Pope Francis Leads Israeli and Palestinian Leaders In a Peace Prayer At the Vatican

VATICAN CITY- In an effort to re-launch Middle East peace talks, Pope Francis invited Palestine president, Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli president, Shimon Peres to the Vatican for a prayer of peace.

The invitation took place just weeks after the U.S. sponsored peace negotiations collapsed.

The invitation comes at a time where animosity is mounting over a rising Palestinian unity government that Israel will not accept because the government has the support of Hamas, the Islamic group running Gaza that Israel accuses of being terrorists.

Abbas, Peres, and Pope Francis pray at the Vatican.

To add to the animosity, Israel is building more homes in the occupied West Bank, angering the Palestinians and deterring the peace process.

Last month, on a trip to the Holy Land, Pope Francis invited the leaders to Vatican City for prayer, a move that energized many Palestinians, but caused anger among Israelis. During his visit, Francis made an unplanned stop to pray at the wall Israel built to block out Palestine’s West Bank, a move that many thought showed sympathy to Palestinians and further angered Israelis.

Vatican officials have insisted that Pope Francis has no political agenda in inviting the Middle East leaders to pray at his home. His only hope is to re-kindle a desire for peace.

“This pray meeting will not be for mediation to find solutions,” Pope Francis said. “We are just meeting up to pray, and then everyone goes home.” Francis said it would be “crazy” to expect any mediation in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

However, many officials think the meeting has potential significance beyond just symbolism, as it shows Pope Francis as a leader who is willing to forgo normal diplomatic and theological protocol and go out on a limb for the sake of peace.

“In the Middle East, symbolic gestures and incremental steps are important,” said Rev. Thomas Reese, a veteran Vatican analyst for the National Catholic Reporter. “Who knows what conversations can occur behind closed doors in the Vatican.”

Abbas and Peres embraced in the foyer of the Vatican hotel and joked together before sitting on either side of Pope Francis in the Vatican prayer garden for an hour-long invocation of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim prayers delivered in English, Hebrew, Arabic, and Italian. The men also planted an olive tree in the garden as a sign of peace.

The prayers focused on three themes common to each of the religions: thanking God for creation, seeking forgiveness for past wrongdoing, and praying to God to bring peace to the region

Francis told the two men, who first signed the Oslo peace accords in 1993, that he hoped this meeting would ignite a “new journey” towards peace. Francis further said that too many children have died from war and violence and that their memory should now instill thoughts of patience, strength, and coexistence.

“Peacemaking calls for courage much more than warfare,” Francis said. “It calls for the courage to say yes to encounter and no to conflict.”

For more information see:

Al-Jazeera- Pope Leads Israeli-Palestinian Peace Prayer– 8 June 2014

CBC News- Pope Francis holds symbolic peace prayers with Middle East leaders– 8 June 2014

Daily Mail- Pope Francis embraces divided Middle East leaders and presides over Christian, Jewish and Muslim prayers at Vatican in bid to revive collapsed peace talks– 8 June 2014

CBC News- The Pope’s modest “prayer meeting” for the Middle East– 7 June 2014

 

 

 

Thousands Take to the Street to Protest Spanish Monarchy

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch Managing Editor

MADRID, Spain – Thousands of Spaniards have taken to the streets in dozens of cities across the country to protest the Spanish Monarch. The protesters have called for a referendum to abolish the Spanish Monarch, which they see as out-of-touch and outdated. It only took a few hours after 76-year old King, Juan Carlos, announced he was abdicating the thrown in favor of his son for Anti monarchy protests to take to the streets across the country. According to an El Pais Poll, almost two-thirds of the Spanish population are opposed to the continuation of the Monarchy in Spain.

Protesters flood the streets of Madrid with the color’s of the country’s Second Republic, calling for an end to Spain’s Monarchy and the establishment of a new Republic. (Photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

On Saturday, dozens of left-wing political parties and citizens organizations came to support republicanism. The Protesters chanted ” España, mañana, será republican” meaning “Spain, tomorrow, will be republican,” as they waved the colors of the country’s Second Republic, red, purple and gold, which was established in 1931 but overthrown just ten years later by Generalissimo Francisco Franco at the end of the country’s civil war. In Madrid the protests, were among the largest mass rallies seen in the nation’s capital. Thousands of protesters also gathered in Barcelona, chanting “Dear Felipe, nobody has chosen you.”

The anti-monarchist movement, which has gained popularity in Spain due to the public frustration with the political system, corruption, and high unemployment, views the country’s royal family as a main part of Spain’s political problems. Mercedes Trujillo, an anti-monarchist campaigner said, “we don’t want them to think we are like babies, that we can’t decide what we want. We don’t want a king, we want to choose,”

Supporters of the Spanish Monarchy have held smaller demonstrations. They argue that the monarchy is a uniting force, keeping Spain’s regions together in a way that a President would not. Alberto Nunez, a supporter of the Monarchy, said that the king “has been for socialists, for populists, he has spoken to governors, presidents from all over the world no matter their ideology. A president of a Republic might have issues.”

In the Basque region, which has a unique language and culture and has long sought greater autonomy from Spain, of Northern Spain estimated 100,000 protesters formed a 123km human chain linking the Basque town of Durango to Pamplona, the capital of the Navarre region. The protesters waved Basque flags, calling not only for the end of the Spanish Monarchy but for the right of the people in Basque to vote for their region’s independence. The Protesters linked arms and raised their hands in the air, holding Basque Flags, as helicopters flew overhead. In recent years Basque leaders have negotiated more tax independence from Spain. The Violent separatist group ETA, which has been weakened by arrests and decreasing popular support, declared an end to its armed struggle in 2011. On May 29 adopted a symbolic declaration of self-determination.

Demonstrators participating in the human chain linking the Basque town of Durango with the Navarran capital of Pamplona leap mountain pass of Kanpazar on June 8, 2014 (Photo Courtesy of Reuters UK)

In recent months democratic independence movements have gained popularity in Spain, partially inspired by demonstrations in Catalonia. The Catalan President, Artur Mas, told the press last week that he was forging ahead with plans for an Independence vote to be held on November 9 which the central government has said it will block on constitutional grounds.

For more information please see:

The Guardian – Majority in Spain Want Referendum on Future of Monarchy – 9 June 2014

Al Jazeera – Anti-monarchy Protests Persist in Spain – 8 June 2014

International Business Times – Thousands Stage Anti-Monarchy Protests Across Spain – 8 June 2014

Reuters UK – Basques Form 123-km Human Chain calling for independence Vote – 8 June 2014

Former U.S. President Bush and His Administration Accused of War Crimes

By: Lyndsey Kelly
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

WASHINGTON, D.C.,United States of America – In an interview with Democracy Now!, Richard Clarke, the nation’s former top counterterrorism official, stated that he believes former U.S President George W. Bush and former U.S Vice President Dick Cheney are guilty of committing war crimes during their 2003 invasion of Iraq.

Former United States President Bush accused of committing war crimes during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (Photo Courtesy of The Washington Times).

Richard Clarke served as the national coordinator for security and counterterrorism for just one year during President Bush’s term in office. Clark resigned in 2003 following the invasion of Iraq. When asked about the decisions made by former U.S President Bush regarding the 2003 invasion, Clarke stated, “I think things that they authorized probably fall within the area of war crimes.” 

The United Nations was careful to create an all-encompassing definition of war crimes to ensure the accountability of those who act illegally during a time of war.

War crimes are criminal acts committed during armed conflicts and the term refers to grave breaches of the rules of warfare…Acts such as torture, destruction of property, and the killing of civilians or hostages can be defined as war crimes, as can the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, or any devastation not justified by military necessity.

Clarke who previously made headlines for accusing President Bush of ignoring warnings regarding an attack by al-Qaeda prior to September 11, 2001 stated, “It’s clear that things that the Bush administration did – in my mind, at least, it’s clear that some of the things they did were war crimes.”

Clarke’s accusations of misconduct of the Bush administration are not unprecedented. Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, former Secretary of State Colin Powell’s chief of staff, accused former Vice President Cheney of war crimes in 2011.Wilkerson emphasized the former Vice President’s affinity for enhanced interrogation methods. Wilkerson stated, “Waterboarding is a war crime, unwarranted surveillance…all of which are crimes.”

Bush and seven top members of his administration were convicted in absentia of war crimes in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in 2012 for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Current United States President, Barack Obama, has tasked the Department of Justice with a case that seeks immunity for Bush and his administration for any and all war crimes they may have committed.

When President Obama first took office he stated that he would not seek criminal charges against former President Bush or any of his staff. Obama inherited two wars started by Bush, thus he may be worrisome that he may be charged with war crimes by any future President. Based upon the definition of war crimes provided by the United Nations, a closer examination of military decisions in the past century may likely lead to the conclusion that many former president’s are guilty of war crimes.

For further information please see:

Democracy Now! – Former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke: Bush Committed War Crimes – 9 – June – 2014.

Examiner – Bush and Cheney are War Criminals, Says Former Bush Counterterrorism Official – 9 – June – 2014.

Huffington Post – Former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke: Bush, Cheney Committed War Crimes – June – 9- 2014.

The Washington Times – Ex- Bush Intel Man: President, Cheney, Rumsfeld Guilty of War Crimes – June- 9 – 2014.

World’s First Climate Change Refugee Denied Asylum in New Zealand

by Max Bartels 

Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania 

Wellington, New Zealand 

A Man from the small Pacific islands of Kiribati applied as a “climate refugee” in New Zealand. Mr. Teitiota is the first to apply for such a refugee status. A New Zealand Judge dismissed Mr. Teitiota case and denied him and his family refugee status. This ruling was appealed the New Zealand Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the lower court. Mr. Teitiota and his family have been living illegally in New Zealand for the past seven years, after his initial visa exprired he applied for refugee status. Since Mr. Teitiota’s case and appeal have failed in the New Zealand courts, he and his family are to be deported back to Kiribati. Mr. Teitiota is married with three children, all three children were born in New Zealand; however, New Zealand does not recognize the offspring of illegal immigrants born in the country as citizens.

Kiribati
Abandoned Kiribati farm that has been destroyed by sea water
(Photo Curtesy of The Guardian)

The New Zealand court held that under international law Mr. Teitiota does not qualify as a refugee. The UN Refugee Convention of 1951 states that a refugee must fear persecution if they returned home, the courts determined that this is a criterion that Mr. Teitiota does not meet. The court went on to say that if refugee status were granted, the floodgates would open for all medium-term environmental deprivation or damage refugees, which would create an influx of refugees. The court further said that Mr. Teitiota and his family would be able to resume their prior subsistence life with dignity in Kiribati.

The islands of Kiribati are quickly being swallowed by the Pacific Ocean. Projections show that the Island will cease to exist by the end of this century. However, the island will become uninhabitable even earlier due to the rise in the rise in the sea-level combined with a more severe storm cycle that will contaminate the water table and with it all the agricultural land. The main atoll, Tarawa is six square miles in total, crammed into this space are 50,000 islanders and that space is quickly shrinking.

The President of Kiribati is exploring options for a mass migration and the Kiribati government hoped that the case in New Zealand would give them that option. Other options the government is pursuing include the purchase of land in Fiji as a possible resettlement option. The government has also explored the option of building a man made island to resettle the population. In total there are over 100,000 people in Kiribati that will eventually be displaced by the rising sea level. With any option the government pursues it will be difficult to relocate such as large group of people.

For more Information, please see:

The Guardian — New Zealand Refuses Climate Change Refugees- Mass Action is Now Needed — 12 May 2014 

The Independent — World’s First Climate Change Refugee’ has Appeal rejected as New Zealand Rules Loane Teitiota Must Return to South Pacific Island Nation of Kiribati — 12 May 2014 

Australian International Business Times — New Zealand Denies Asylum to World’s First Climate Change Refugee; Court Orders Deportation of Kiribatian — 13 May 2014 

The New Zealand Herald — World’s First Climate Change Refugee has Appeal Rejected — 13 May 2014 

 

Colombian Presidential Election Results in a Runoff

By Delisa Morris

Impunity Watch News Reporter, South America

President Santos and presidential candidate Zuluaga. Photo courtesy of CNN.com

BOGOTA, Colombia – Colombians will be waiting for the presidential election results until after the June 15 runoff.  As of Friday, the presidential race was too close to call between President Juan Manuel Santos and his challenger Ivan Oscar Zuluaga.

Many believe that the outcome of the presidential race will determine the fate of the country’s half-century guerilla war.  President Santos has staked his reputation on peace talks between the Colombian government and the Marxist rebels.  Hoping that peace talks that began with the FARC rebels in 2012, being held in Cuba, will end the 50-year conflict.

Presidential candidate Zuluaga, wants to implement tougher conditions, fearing that President Santos is being too lenient with the rebels.  His appeal to voters has been that the talks could lead to little or no punishment for guerillas’ war crimes and hand them instant political power.

Imposing tougher conditions could cause the FARC to walk away, leaving a return to the military option the only alternative.  Colombians are desperate for peace, but both candidates are selling extremes, forcing Colombians to choose between handing over the government to the rebels, leaving war crimes unpunished and a potentially endless war.

Since the conflict began in May 1964 at least 220,000 people have died.  President Santos, 62 and Zuluaga, 55 are both economists.  The presidential rivals are former cabinet colleagues under former president Alvaro Uribe and both support free market economics and continued close ties with the United States.

Santos began as a comfortable favorite before Zuluaga surged with the backing of former president Uribe, who is still popular amongst Colombians.

In a Gallup poll the candidates were neck-and-neck, but two other surveys showed a clear lead to Zuluaga or Santos.

The Gallup poll on Thursday showed the candidates in a dead heat statistically given the margin of error, with 48.5 percent for Zuluaga versus 47.7 percent for the president.

On Friday, a Cifras y Conceptos poll showed 43.4 percent of voter respondents would vote for Santos and 38.5 percent for Zuluaga, while the research firm Ipsos Napoleon Franco reported 49 percent to Zuluaga and 41 percent to Santos.

Clara Lopes, a leftist candidate defeated in the first round of voting with 15 percent of first rounds votes, publicly placed her support behind Santos.

FARC leader Rodrigo Londono, widely known by his war alias TImochenko, scoffed at both candidates, releasing a lengthy statement this week, saying they are both warmongers.

“Colombians face a real dilemma, but its not that they must choose between war with Oscar Ivan Zuluaga and peace with Juan Manuel Santos.  It’s clear that either one of them represents war,” he said, calling for a “powerful coalitions” to the left to face whoever wins.

For more information, please see:

Reuters — Polls Show Cliffhanger Presidential Election in Colombia — 06 June 2014

Fecima — Polls Show Cliffhanger Presidential Election in Colombia — 06 June 2014

Newslocker — Polls Show Cliffhanger Presidential Election in Colombia — 06 June 2014

The Economist — Colombia’s Presidential Election: A Vote for Peace — 07 June 2014