An Op-Ed by Colonel Morris Davis: On Guantanamo, Time to Face the Truth

Sen. Kay Hagan and I were born in Shelby, N.C., a city of about 20,000 people between Charlotte and Asheville. The city got its name from Col. Isaac Shelby, a hero of the Revolutionary War best known for his role in the Battle of Kings Mountain that took place about 15 miles southeast of the city that bears his name.

Hagan moved away from Shelby when she was a child. I left years later after I graduated from law school and joined the Air Force.

I moved to Washington in September 2005 when I was appointed chief prosecutor for the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. I stepped into the role believing the narrative we had been told by senior Bush administration officials: The men at Guantanamo were all the “worst of the worst,” the kind of fanatics who would chew through the hydraulic lines of the aircraft flying them to Cuba just to kill Americans.

For the most part, the narrative was false.

About 80 percent of the 779 men ever held at Guantanamo are no longer there; more than 500 left while President Bush was in office. Half of the 164 detainees still imprisoned were cleared for transfer in January 2010 by representatives of the CIA, FBI, Department of Defense and Department of Justice who unanimously agreed that they posed no imminent threat and the U.S. did not need to keep them.

Nearly four years later, 84 men the government says it has no need to keep remain in custody at an estimated cost of $2.7 million per man per year. If Sen. William Proxmire were still alive and in office, hundreds of millions of dollars wasted on needless imprisonment at Guantanamo would win a Golden Fleece Award.

Since 2004, the Supreme Court has decided three Guantanamo related cases: Rasul, Hamdan and Boumediene. The United States got a black eye in all three. In October 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit – the court Congress chose to review Guantanamo military commission cases – ruled that providing material support for terrorism was not a valid war crime for conduct that predated the Military Commissions Act of 2006. In the dozen years since President Bush authorized military commissions in November 2001, just seven detainees have been convicted. All seven were convicted of providing material support for terrorism, the offense the Court of Appeals concluded was not a valid war crime, and for two of them it was the sole charge.


There is just not much good that can be said about Guantanamo.

During their campaigns for the White House in 2008, Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain both pledged to close Guantanamo. After Obama won and the GOP adopted its “if he’s for it, we’re against it” strategy, closing Guantanamo became an early casualty. Beginning in 2011, Congress placed statutory obstacles in the way of the president’s efforts to close the facility, leaving some suspended in a Wonderland-like world where being convicted of a war crime can be a ticket home and never being charged can result in confinement for life.

Some members of Congress have taken steps recently to permit President Obama to begin winding down Guantanamo. In June, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted 23 to 3 to report the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 to the full Senate for debate and approval. Hagan was one of the 23 committee members who supported the bipartisan bill.

The bill gives the executive branch greater authority to manage the detainees held at Guantanamo. This includes allowing the military to transport detainees in need of urgent medical care to military medical facilities in the U.S. The Secretary of Defense would also receive the authority to bring detainees to the U.S. for trials if he finds it is in the interest of national security and can be done without compromising public safety. These provisions will face sharp opposition, and it will take courage to see them through.

In October 1780, a band of Patriot volunteers commanded by Col. Isaac Shelby and others defeated the British at the Battle of Kings Mountain. The victorious Patriots wanted revenge for atrocities they had suffered and chose 36 men from the hundreds of prisoners they had captured. The British loyalists were given summary trials and all 36 were sentenced to die by hanging. Nine men were strung up in a tree, three at a time, before Shelby stepped up in front of the vengeful mob and ordered the killing to stop.

In 2008, in his argument for closing Guantanamo, McCain said, “Our great power does not mean that we can do whatever we want, whenever we want.” That sentiment – just because we can, does not mean we should – reflects what Shelby must have felt when he stood up in front of his Patriots and said enough is enough.

Given the many false perceptions about Guantanamo and most of the men held there, it will take courage for members of Congress to stand up for the long-overdue provisions that will help bring it to a close. I hope Hagan will be counted among that number. I hope she recalls her Isaac Shelby roots.

Morris Davis is a retired U.S. Air Force colonel. He is an assistant professor at the Howard University School of Law in Washington and a member of Amnesty International USA.

Parliamentarians from 21 Countries Pledge to Advance Magnitsky Sanctions Worldwide

PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Distribution

11 November 2013 – In a powerful multi-country move, parliamentarians from 21 countries have pledged their support to further the Magnitsky cause and Magnitsky sanctions around the world. Those sanctions include targeted visa bans and asset freezes on the Russian officials responsible for the torture and death of Sergei Magnitsky as well as other gross human rights abusers.

The newly formed Inter-parliamentary Group formed under the title “Justice for Sergei Magnitsky” will hold its inaugural meeting at the European Parliament on 13 November 2013.

“The Magnitsky case has come to represent all that’s wrong with Putin’s Russia. By forming the inter-parliamentary group on the Magnitsky case, we hope to give expression to the best initiatives from parliaments around the world and implement them across the countries represented by parliamentarians participating in this group,” said Hon. Irwin Cotler, MP, the chair of the Justice for Sergei Magnitsky Inter-parliamentary Group, who was counsel to Nelson Mandela and Natan Sharansky during their long periods held behind bars. He also served as Attorney General and Justice Minister of Canada.

The first parliamentary meeting of the Justice for Sergei Magnitsky Group will take place on the eve of fourth anniversary of Magnitsky’s murder in Russian police custody, which took place on the 16th of November 2009. The parliamentarians are committed to advancing the campaign for Magnitsky sanctions in Europe, Canada and other parts of the world.

“This will be the inaugural launch of a global, coordinated campaign to impose Magnitsky sanctions internationally,” said Hon. Irwin Cotler, MP.

Magnitsky sanctions are already in place in the United States under the Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act signed by President Obama into law in December 2012.

In the EU, the European parliament has passed three resolutions calling on the Council of Ministers of the EU to implement a similar approach. Up to now, the Council of Ministers has stalled the implementation of sanctions fearing Russia’s retaliation. Now, with the new inter-parliamentary initiative, the legislators hope to make the Magnitsky Law a reality in Europe and overcome the resistance from the European Council.

The Justice for Sergei Magnitsky Inter-parliamentary group (IPG, website:http://ipg-magnitsky.org/) consists of members of parliament from 21 countries, including Kristiina Ojuland, an Estonian MEP, who initiated the latest Magnitsky resolution at the European parliament; Senator Jim Walsh, who spearheaded the Magnitsky resolution in the Irish Parliament; Dominic RaabMP, who authored the  Magnitsky Motion at the British Parliament; Barbara Lochbihler, German MEP and chair of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament; Marek Migalski, a Polish MEP, and Jose Ignacio Sanches, a Spanish MP, who took upon the Magnitsky case in their respective roles. The Magnitsky Inter-Parliamentary Group also comprises an advisory board of Russian activists and campaigners involved in human rights and civil advocacy. It aims to build momentum around the initiatives that developed organically in different countries around the Magnitsky legislation.

For further information, please see:

Law and Order in Russia

UN Official: Qatar must reform Labour Relations

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DOHA, Qatar – Francois Crepeau, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, called on Quarter to improve labour relations and respect the rights of migrant workers in the country, which is preparing to host the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) World Cup.

Working conditions for migrant workers have been under scrutiny in Qatar, which has the highest percentage of migrant workers in the world (Photo Courtesy of Al Jazeera)

 

According to the United Nations Qatar should allow workers to organize into unions, abolish the discriminatory “kafala” system, adopt legislation to protect labour rights, and properly enforce existing legislation, to protect workers in the country.

Crepeau said on Sunday that there have been some positive developments for migrant workers but argued that the state must adopt reforms in order to protect the rights of migrant workers in the Country which has the highest ratio of migrant workers in the world.

Migrant workers make up approximately 88% of Qatar’s population. Qatar currently has a high demand for construction workers as the country undertakes several massive development projects including construction projects connected with the 2022 FIFA World Cup.

Crepeau’s speech came at the end of an 8 day visit to Qatar to investigate allegations of abuses of the rights of migrant workers. The plight of migrant workers in Qatar gained international attention after The Guardian published a report on the issue earlier this fall. During his visit, Crepeau met with government officials, migrant workers, academics, and members of Qatar’s National Human Rights Committee.

While Qatar has announced plans to improve conditions of labourers in the country the state has been criticized for failing to enforce existing labour laws meant to protect worker rights. Qatar has fought to keep the images of labour conditions in the country from being seen by the international community. In October the Guardian reported that two German film makers, Peter Giesel the head of a Munich-based production company, and his cameraman Robin Ahne were detained for 27 hours after filming the working conditions of workers in Qatar from the balcony of the Mercure Grand hotel in Doha.

Despite continued concerns about the labour rights situation in Qatar the Fédération Internationale de Football Association organizations has remained committed to house the 20202 World Cup in Qatar. According to FIFA President Sepp Blatter has said that the decision to award the 2022 World Cup to Qatar is “not reversible”.

On Saturday Blatter told reporters in Doha after meeting the emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani that “There is no doubt that the World Cup in 2022 will be organised in Qatar.”

For More Information Please See:

Al Jazeera – UN official urges Qatar labour reforms – 11 November 2013

Al Jazeera –  UN recommendations on Qatar migrant rights – 10 November 2013

Al Jazeera – Blatter: World Cup in Qatar is not reversible – 9 November 2013

The Guardian – Qatar detained two Germans who filmed World Cup labour conditions – 14 October 2013

San Salvador Archbishop Closes Human Rights and Legal Aid Office

By Ellis Cortez
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador – The Roman Catholic Church in El Salvador has abruptly closed its important human rights and legal aid office, which for years denounced and investigated the most egregious massacre cases of the 1980’s civil war.

Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes, responding to the closure of the Tutela Legal office in San Salvador, said he was “worried about the bad signal this sends.”
Salvadoran President Mauricio Funes, responding to the closure of the Tutela Legal office in San Salvador. (Photo Courtesy of Roberto Escobar / European Pressphoto Agency)

The closure triggered national and international condemnation from faith, human rights and solidarity groups. They called for the preservation of Tutela Legal’s extensive archive, which contains evidence for unresolved criminal cases.

On September 30, employees showed up for work at the Tutela Legal office and found the locks changed on the doors and armed guards at the door. They were allowed 10 minutes to clear their desks. Attorneys who have worked with survivors and victims’ families for decades now have no access to evidence in the cases.

The current Archbishop, José Luis Escobar Alas, had closed Tutela Legal and issued a statement saying its work was “no longer relevant.” Employees said they were told that, with the war long over, the office was no longer necessary.

“We had no idea this was going to happen,” Tutela’s director, Ovidio Mauricio Gonzalez, said. “It is a strange coincidence. Just as they are talking about the amnesty, they close Tutela Legal, they close access to the archive, and abandon it to its fate,” he said.

The timing of the closure has caused widespread suspicion. The closure of Tutela Legal comes in the wake of a Supreme Court decision to consider vacating an “Amnesty Law” that has long protected perpetrators of war crimes.

The amnesty law, passed in 1993 by the military-allied Nationalist Republican Alliance government, protected numerous government officials, military officers and guerrilla leaders from prosecution for acts committed during the civil war that took place between 1980 and 1992, in which approximately 80,000 people died.

The court’s decisions renewed hope of the amnesty law being repealed and the possibility of reopening several prominent human rights cases that were investigated and documented by Tutela Legal. 

Late last year, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that the law cannot be used to protect those who ordered and carried out the single largest massacre in the war: the 1981 El Mozote massacre in which at least 800 peasants, including children, were killed by the army.

“I am worried about the bad signal this sends,” President Mauricio Funes said in a news conference, adding he did not know the reasons behind the closing. “The Catholic Church, and especially the archbishop of San Salvador, are not determined to accompany the just causes of the people,” Funes added.

Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero founded the Human Rights Office, originally known as Socorro Juridico (Legal Relief) in 1977, in order to document human rights violations from across the country. In addition to counselling the poor and oppressed, it was one of the only places people could go to report state-sponsored crimes. Every Sunday until his assassination in March 1980, Romero would broadcast a homily from the grand cathedral in San Salvador which included the latest denunciations.

Since then, Tutela Legal has documented more than 50,000 cases of human rights abuses. It holds the most comprehensive archive of El Salvador’s bloody history and its lawyers continue to represent survivors of notorious massacres including El Mozote and Rio Sumpul.

In the past two decades Tutela Legal’s work has proven crucial in cases brought against senior military figures living in the United States.Tutela Legal was also active in new cases, such as the 2007 Red car battery factory lead-poisoning case, and ran education programs and human rights training across El Salvador. Tutela’s work has recently included studies of gang violence, abuses tied to the expanded role of the military in policing, and important legal work for the poor.

Members of the Tutela Legal staff have been examining alternatives. There were suggestions that the office reopen as an independent human rights organization, without the auspices of the church.

For more information please see:

Al Jazeera El Salvador shutters historic rights clinic 12 October 2013

National Catholic Reporter Salvadoran archbishop closes legal aid office 4 October 2013

Los Angeles Times Catholic Church in El Salvador shuts down rights and legal office 2 October 2013

Center for Democracy in the Americas San Salvador Archbishop shuts down historic human rights office, Tutela Legal 2 October 2013