Syrian Revolution Digest: Sunday, 14 April 2013

The Political Zone!

It’s time the U.S. intervened to stop the disintegration of Syria and the ongoing slaughter there. It’s time an end was put to all the hedging, wagering, and bet-placement through the imposition of a no-fly zone which, after all is said and done, remains the only path that could get us to the coveted political solution. It’s pretty hard to negotiate with a Scud.  

 Death Toll: 124 martyrs, including 18 children, 7 women and 6 under torture: 34 reported in Damascus and Suburbs; 20 in Hassakeh, mostly in Tal Haddad; 19 in Idlib; 18 in Homs; 18 in Aleppo; 8 in Daraa; 4 in Raqaa; 2 in Deir Ezzor and 1 in Hama (LCC).

News

Symbolic Syrian mosque destroyed; activists warn of phosphorus bombs Throughout the past two years, the Omari mosque has been a gathering place for protesters, the center of anti-government demonstrations in the city. At the start of the uprising, it was briefly used as a civilian hospital for wounded protesters. The mosque was the first place protesters gathered in March 2011 to protest the arrest and alleged torture of teenagers who sprayed anti-Assad graffiti, sparking the waves of weekly peaceful demonstrations that eventually spread across the country.

Syria: Jordan to spearhead Saudi Arabian arms drive Fears over rising power of al-Qaida-linked groups drives move to channel weapons to moderate rebel fighters through Jordan

Syrian crisis: Damascus adjusts to the constant sound of war Two years into crisis, bombs, rockets and planes have become the new normal for Damascenes

Lebanese Shiite fighters backed by Hezbollah fighting inside Syria near border The sectarian tensions in the civil war have spilled over to neighboring Lebanon, which has a similar ethnic divide and a long, bitter history of civil war and domination by Syria. Deadly gun-battles have broken out in Lebanon in recent months between supporters of both sides of the Syrian war. But more broadly, Hezbollah’s deepening involvement shows how the Syrian civil war is exacerbating tensions between Shiites and Sunnis around the Middle East.

Syria’s second revolution? Women stand to be emancipated in more ways than one. Typically characterized in the Western press as grieving widows and childless mothers – bit players in an overlong masculine tragedy – Syria’s women have been prime movers in the two-year-long struggle for emancipation, which carries a double meaning in this context. Women have led the earliest demonstrations against the regime, they’ve chronicled the uprising and its repression in vivid detail, they’ve coordinated humanitarian relief efforts, and they’ve taken up arms. Judging from what I’ve witnessed of the extensive reconstruction planning being undertaken by the Syrian diaspora, women have also been the best organized and most willing to bypass the pettiness and factionalism that have stunted their male counterparts.


Special Reports

Al Qaeda adds urgency to search for Syrian peace Saturday’s meeting of 11 countries from the Friends of Syria alliance will come after the al-Nusra Front, among the strongest formations seeking to topple President Bashar al-Assad, pledged allegiance to al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri on April 10. “We will be meeting under the shadow of the advances of Nusra and other militants. The recent al Qaeda statements have injected a new urgency for the international community to push to end the conflict,” said an official who will attend the meeting on the conflict that has killed more than 70,000 people. Western powers, which want to see the end of the Assad family’s 43-year rule but do not want to intervene militarily in Syria, have been alarmed by the advance of groups like the Nusra Front in a conflict which has deepened the Middle East’s sectarian divide.

McManus: Inching closer to entanglement in Syria In Syria, the Obama administration is already doing more for the rebels than it acknowledges in public. The United States has quietly provided training for selected rebel units on bases in neighboring Jordan. And last month, the New York Times reported that the CIA had expanded its secret role in aiding weapons shipments to the rebels from countries such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. At this point, Obama seems determined to supply just enough aid to try to tip the balance but not enough to get entangled. But the administration’s distinction between lethal and nonlethal aid looks more and more artificial. The reasons that would justify giving military aid to the rebels or imposing a no-fly zone over Syria are only growing stronger. It’s a debate Obama might prefer to avoid, but that’s the problem with a slippery slope.

A muddled plan for the clear danger in Syria Mr. Ford said that “we need to weigh in on behalf of those who promote freedom and tolerance.” Yet Ms. Jones reiterated that the administration was opposed to providing “lethal support” to any Syrian forces — notwithstanding the weapons and fighters that Mr. Ford said were being supplied by Iran or the growing military capability of al-Qaeda described by Mr. Clapper. Translation: It’s vital that Syria’s moderate forces win, but we won’t counter the military support the extremists are getting. Senators from both parties expressed exasperation with this non-policy, but not as much exasperation as President Obama’s stubborn passivity deserves. Mr. Clapper was asked whether the United States and its allies were prepared to secure Syria’s chemical weapons sites. His answer, that it “would be very, very situationally dependent,” was anything but reassuring.

Looking for Obama’s agenda in Syria For now, Americans remain uncertain as to what good they can do in Syria. Proposals to arm rebels or create a no-fly protective zone over rebel-held areas require certainty that the US is backing those rebel leaders who will eventually create a democratic, stable Syria. And any US arms must not reach radical, pro-Al Qaeda groups. Yet by not acting in Syria, the US also risks a collapse of the Assad regime that might result in the country’s stockpile of chemical weapons getting into the hands of terrorists. In balancing these contending risks, the West and friendly Arab nations should agree on what values they offer Syria. Opposing evil isn’t enough – its hold on a country is more easily broken when its opposite is asserted.

My new paper, prepared for a briefing in Washington, D.C. that took place on January 15, 2013, is now out and is titled “Syria 2013: Rise of the Warlords.” It should be read in conjunction with my previous briefing “The Shredded Tapestry,” and my recent essay “The Creation of an Unbridgeable Divide.


Video Highlights

Rebels pound Hezbollah’s position inside Lebanese territories from areas around the town of Qusair in Homs Province http://youtu.be/IPQrFi-bNGI

The pounding of Jobar neighborhood continues http://youtu.be/kubnME-40DE , http://youtu.be/mraC2JCuKD8 Tanks try to pound their way in http://youtu.be/JRiPrmp1quQ To the north, Barzeh neighborhood gets pounded http://youtu.be/sMtj74FJ4vg  Tanks and BMPs roan the streets of the southern neighborhoods http://youtu.be/iDYy96TWoX0 Same in Zamalka neighborhood http://youtu.be/b_YbnuS_Zxc

Clashes between loyalists and rebels in Daraa Province continue to heat up: Khirbet Ghazaleh http://youtu.be/cByztTKRSN8 , http://youtu.be/3aW6Tzs9f8U , http://youtu.be/ynu6oqxVJoc

Clashes heat up around Jisr Ashoughour, Idlib Province http://youtu.be/OUHQvDHBbvs , http://youtu.be/Rvkcv-B6XhE , http://youtu.be/4fq4yeXJuXw

The pounding of rebel strongholds in Homs City continues http://youtu.be/ck8kOUg00KM

Aerial raids on the town of Sheikh Saeed in Aleppo Province http://youtu.be/6b4-g5V2h_k , http://youtu.be/IBHl1x4Mh5s

Putin’s European Visits Met With Gay Rights Protests

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands – This past week, gay rights groups gathered in Amsterdam to greet Russian President, Vladimir Putin. Rainbow flags flew at half-staff, floats crowded the canals, and thousands of protesters waved signs.

During a protest in Amsterdam, a demonstrator holds up a picture of Russian President, Vladimir Putin, with rainbow circles on his face. (Photo Courtesy of RFE/RL)

Putin visited Amsterdam to encourage the growing economic ties between Germany and the Netherlands. The Netherlands is Russia’s leading trade partner in Europe.

Amsterdam deputy mayor, Andrée van Es, claims the city appreciates trade and welcomed Putin’s visit. However, the city also supports the rainbow flag protests.

Van Es stated, “We see Russia as an important trading partner, but Amsterdam has an identity of what I call hyper-diversity… and we very much want to be able to express that, even to our important trading partners.”

She continued, “A lot of people are worried about human rights in Russia in general, but focus is very much on gay rights because of that bill.”

Recently, Putin claimed there was no discrimination against homosexuals in Russia. However, the Russian parliament passed a bill in January banning the dissemination of “gay propaganda” to minors, which includes parades, protests, and the use of the rainbow flag. The law could potentially fine offenders up to $16,000.

Although the evening started as a protest, the night quickly turned into a party. Thousands assembled across from the museum where Putin was dining. Dressed in rainbow colors, the crowd waved signs that said, “Putin go homo” and “I’m a person, not a propaganda”.

However, as many protested and partied, the city took steps to prevent overwhelming behavior. One sign said, “No gay rights propaganda beyond this point.” Another stated, “Do not frighten President Putin: keep this area human rights free.”

As a response, activists used fake police tape, which read “critical journalists not allowed”, to block off access to the museum.

One of Amsterdam’s deputy mayors stated, “We have a large gay community in Amsterdam and we want to make sure that in our city that everybody can live the way they want and be whoever they are and we want to make sure that everybody in the world knows that.”

Putin was also recently met in Germany with topless demonstrators. Women, from the Ukrainian feminist group, Femen, displayed slogans on their bare chests and backs. Furthermore, the females chanted, “dictator”.

After shrugging off the German protests, Putin stated, “I liked it. You should be grateful to the girls, they are helping you make the fair more popular.”

For further information, please see:

RFE/RL – Amsterdam Welcomes Putin With Rainbows – 15 April 2013

EuroNews – Thousands Protest Putin’s Amsterdam Visit – 9 April 2013

FoxNews – Gay Rights Groups to Protest Russia’s Putin in Amsterdam – 8 April 2013

The Washington Post – Gay Rights Supporters Gear Up to Protest Putin Visit to Amsterdam – 8 April 2013

Russia Retaliates with Anti-Magnitsky List

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MOSCOW, Russia – Following the United States’ release of the 18-name Magnitsky List on Friday, Moscow released a corresponding list of 18 Americans banned from traveling to the Russian Federation over their alleged human rights violations.

David Addington, left, John Yoo, center, and Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller are the first three men on Russia’s new list of barred American officials, following the U.S. release of the Magnitsky list. (Photo Courtesy of the New York Times)

Among the American officials on the Russian list are David Addington, who served as chief of staff to former Vice President Dick Cheney and provided legal support for interrogation policies; John Yoo, a high-ranking Bush administration lawyer who wrote several major opinions on torture; and Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller and Rear Adm. Jeffrey Harbeson, both of whom commanded detention operations in Guantánamo Bay.

The remaining fourteen U.S. officials on the list are primarily prosecutors and special agents whom Russia believes responsible for violating the rights of Russians abroad.  Most were involved in cases against convicted arms dealer Viktor Bout or recently sentenced drug-trafficking pilot Konstantin Yaroshenko.

Those on the list are only banned from travel to Russia, an endeavor most would not normally be engaged in anyway.  Yoo merely mocked the Russian’s move, quipping, “Darn, there goes my judo match with Putin.”

The Russian list was created under the authority of the Dima Yakovlev law, which came into effect in January and also ended American adoption of Russian children.

According to an interview Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov gave to the Itar-Tass news agency, the list also contains a “secret” addendum of more names, as the U.S. list reportedly contains.

The Russian government defended its answer to the U.S. Magnitsky List, gravely explaining that its actions were merely a justifiable response.

“We would like to draw particular [attention] to the fact that, unlike the American list compiled arbitrarily, our list features primarily those implicated in torture and the indefinite detention of prisoners in the Guantanamo prison camp, as well as those involved in the abduction and removal to other countries of Russian citizens and in threats to their lives and health,” Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.

“This war of lists was not our decision, but we do not have the right to ignore such open blackmail,” it continued. “It’s time for the politicians in Washington to finally realize that it is fruitless to base a relationship with a country such as Russia on an attitude of mentorship and overt dictation.”

Moscow has maintained the opinion that the Magnitsky Act and List release by Washington directly interfere with Russian domestic issues.  The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called the Magnitsky Act an “absurd” law that “delivers a strong blow to bilateral relations,” while President Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov said that “the Magnitsky case should not be discussed outside Russia, it’s unacceptable.”

Despite the list war, the United States intends to continue to work with Russia on issues of mutual interest, according to White House spokesman Jay Carney.  However, Carney made clear that, “[h]uman rights is an issue that we have disagreements with [Russia] on at times and, you know, we are very frank and candid about that. And we will engage with the Russians on those issues as well as the others that we have.”

Even so, Alexei Pushkov, head of the Russian State Duma’s international affairs committee, warns that the list war “will be present, possibly, for a very long time in our relations and will poison them.”

The full list (courtesy of RT) released by Moscow on Saturday is as follows:

US officials purportedly involved in legalizing torture and indefinite detention of prisoners:

1) David Spears Addington, Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney (2005-2009)
2) John Choon Yoo, Assistant US Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice (2001-2003)
3)  Geoffrey D. Miller, retired US Army Major General, commandant of Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), the organization that runs the Guantanamo Bay detention camps (2002-2003)
4) Jeffrey Harbeson, US Navy officer, commandant of Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), the organization that runs the Guantanamo Bay detention camps (2010-2012)

US officials purportedly involved in violations of the rights and freedoms of Russian citizens abroad:

5) Jed Saul Rakoff, Senior US District Judge for the Southern District of New York
6) Preetinder S. Bharara, US Attorney for the Southern District of New York
7) Michael J. Garcia, former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York
8) Brendan R. McGuire, Assistant US Attorney
9) Anjan S. Sahni, Assistant US Attorney
10) Christian R. Everdell, Assistant US Attorney
11) Jenna Minicucci Dabbs, Assistant US Attorney
12) Christopher L. Lavigne, Assistant US Attorney
13) Michael Max Rosensaft, Assistant US Attorney
14) Louis J. Milione, Special Agent, US Drug Enforcement Administration
15) Sam Gaye, Senior Special Agent, US Drug Enforcement Administration
16) Robert F. Zachariasiewicz, Special Agent, US Drug Enforcement Administration
17) Derek S. Odney, Special Agent, US Drug Enforcement Administration
18) Gregory A. Coleman, Special Agent, US Federal Bureau of Investigation

For further information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Russia Hits Back at US with its Own Blacklist – 13 April 2013

BBC News – Russia Responds in Kind to US Magnitsky List – 13 April 2013

New York Times – Russia Bars 18 Americans After Sanctions by U.S. – 13 April 2013

RIA Novosti – Russia Publishes Its Answer to Magnitsky List – 13 April 2013

RT – Russia Strikes Back with Magnitsky List Response – 13 April 2013