Hundreds of Decomposing Human Remains Fished Out of the Yellow River in China Each Year

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

LANZHOU, China – Reports say that roughly 100 decomposing human bodies are fished out of the Yellow River every year in and around the city of Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu province.

Workers fishing garbage out of the Yellow River in Lanzhou. (Photo Courtesy of South China Morning Post)

A report from a Shanghai newspaper reported that the figure of 100 is actually low, and the most recent statistics place the number of decomposing human remains retrieved from the river closer to 200 or 300 per year.

The report from the Shanghai newspaper is bolstered by “body fishers,” like Wei Jinpeng, who collect the floating corpses along the river so they can display the bodies and sell them back to the families of the deceased.  Wei Jinpeng says the estimate of 100 per year is likely incredibly low given that he alone fishes out roughly 80 to 100 bodies per year.

Body fishing is also an incredibly lucrative trade for those who engage in the business, like Wei Jinpeng, in the city of Lanzhou.  The city’s government has dragged their feet in cracking down on the gruesome trade since issuing a promise to the public to fix the problem back in 2006.

Law enforcement and city officials remain uninterested in the body fishing epidemic despite reports stating that around 5% of the bodies fished out of the Yellow River are results of criminal activity and murder.  Many of the bodies fished out of the river are murdered, female migrant workers.

The dumping of human remains into Chinese rivers has been an ongoing problem for decades, but has recently resurfaced as a controversial issue in international media due to the investigations surrounding the dumping of tens of thousands of pig carcasses in the Huangpu River in Shanghai and dead ducks being dumped into the Nan River in Sichuan province.

The controversy stems from the possibility that the human remains, as well as the animal remains that riddle the Chinese rivers, may be contaminating and polluting the water supply provided by the rivers.  A 2005 Daxia Hydropower Company report suggested that the human remains in the water supply make the water hazardous to drink.

If the bodies are left untreated and decomposing in the rivers, the environmental impact and pollution is much more severe than the regular dumping of household waste into the rivers.   Additionally, in a 2012 investigation, river water is believed to regularly mix with well water which is consumed by humans, but the river water contaminated with human remains makes the water unsafe to drink.

For further information, please see:

The Times of India – Pigs, ducks and now bodies in China river – 2 April 2013

Foreign Policy – Is This a Pandemic Being Born? – 1 April 2013

Forbes – Now In China’s Rivers: Decomposing Humans – 31 March 2013

South China Morning Post – Officials in Lanzhou say bodies floating in river not affecting water quality – 29 March 2013

March Marked Bloodiest Month in Syrian War

By Dylan Takores
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DAMASCUS, Syria – At least 6,000 deaths occurred in Syria this March, making it the deadliest month since the civil war began two years ago.

Man praying at grave of rebel soldier in Daraa. (Photo Courtesy of Reuters)

The true death toll may be higher than 6,000 because both government and rebel groups frequently underreport actual death totals.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that the government and rebels each suffered approximately 1,500 casualties in March.  However, the number of civilian deaths in March outweighed the staggering death tolls for both the opposing armies.  Over 2,000 civilian were reportedly killed, including 298 children and 291 women.  An additional 387 unidentified civilians and 588 unidentified fighters combined to bring the death total above 6,000.

The rise in casualties reflects the growing range of conflict within Syria.  Fighting between rebels and government forces continues to spread beyond major cities such as Damascus, Aleppo, and Homs into other areas of the country.  In particular, violence is rising in the southern provinces of Daraa and Quneitra, along Syria’s borders with Israel and Jordan.

The key battleground in the conflict is the country’s capital, Damascus.  President Bashar Assad stationed his best and most loyal troops there to protect against further advances and reclaim portions of the city occupied by rebels.

In an effort to dispel rebel occupation, government forces sent air raids over rebel and civilian zones on Tuesday.  They shelled the northern Damascus neighborhoods of Jobar, Barzeh, and Qaboun.

However, Assad’s army is not the only force inciting violence.  Rebels in Aleppo recently began an aggressive attack, referred to as “Freeing the Prisoners.”  According to the Aleppo Media Center, the plan is intended to free detainees from the city’s prison by attacking and capturing Kindi Hospital, Ghondol Square, and the central prison.

Rami Abdul-Rahman, head of the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, condemned the international community for its lack of effort in preventing further violence in Syria.  He stated, “If there is no solution, we think the numbers will get worse in the coming months.”

Abdul-Rahman calculated that the total number of deaths since the conflict began two years ago to be 62,554, although he admitted the true total might be twice as many.  The United Nations’ most recent report, issued on February 18, placed the casualty total at 70,000.  The Syrian government has not released any information regarding the death tolls.

 

For further information, please see:

Boston Globe – March was deadliest month in Syrian war – 2 April 2013

The Independent – March was Syrian civil war’s bloodiest month as 6,000 die in conflict – 2 April 2013

Reuters – March was bloodiest month in Syria war: rights group – 1 April 2013

Washington Post – Activists say government warplanes and artillery pound areas in and around Damascus – 1 April 2013

Bolivia Threatens to Withdraw from the Inter-American Commission of Human RIghts

By Pearl Rimon
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

SUCRE, Bolivia – Bolivian President Evo Morales has made recent comments about the country’s withdrawal from the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (IACHR).

Bolivian President Evo Morales (Photo Courtesy of AP/Peter Kramer).

This announcement came immediately after the IAHCR ‘s hearing on the construct of a road through the Isiboro Sécure National Park and Indigenous Territory.

“We are seriously considering withdrawing from the commission,” Morales said, according to The Associated Press. “We have our dignity and sovereignty to put in place in these kinds of institutions,”

President Morales’ stance is similar to Ecuadorean President’s Correa’s, who is advocating a series of reforms to the IACHR. One of Correa’s reforms is to change IAHCR’s headquarters in Washington D.C. The Commission “has offices in the United States and that country has not ratified any human rights treaty,” said Morales. President Correa and the Bolivian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA) received approval for the proposal to block the Organization of American States (OAS) rapporteur’s office from pushing reports on freedom of expression, block the office from independent financial support and place it under control from member states. The OAS is made up of ambassadors from member states.

The ALBA members have threatened to withdraw from the human rights organization if their proposal was not met. ALBA took advantage of the weakening support for the human rights system in South America. The OAS is in charge of writing the restructuring for the organization that encompasses the ALBA’s recommendations.

Morales has accused the OAS of coming to Bolivia for the purpose of defending governments “that were massacring the Bolivian people.”

OAS Secretary General José Miguel Insulza said that he would oppose efforts to weaken human rights. However, in response to the ALBA’s recommendations, Insulza proposed a statutory overhaul to govern the IACHR. His recommendations are for the governments to decide the IAHCR monitoring, force delays in the organization’s  findings and restrict the power to issue precautionary measures.

Isuluza has said, “  “The OAS and its member states need an autonomous and strong commission and an autonomous and strong court of human rights. But these bodies also need to take into consideration, in the course of their work, the points of view of the democratic governments of the hemisphere.”

The Inter-American system for the protection of human rights occurred after the adoption of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man in 1948. The Commission of Human Rights was created in 1959.

Venezuela withdrew from the American Convention on Human Rights in September.

 

For further information, please see:

Christian Science Monitor — Victory for human rights in Latin America? – 25 March 13

 Al Jazeera — The IACHR against colonialism – 23 March 13

 Fox News Latino — Bolivia Threatens To Pull Out of International Human Rights Organization – 22 March 13

Americas Quarterly — Human Rights Under Siege in the Americas – 12 February 13

Liu Hui, Brother-in-Law of Imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Detained on Fraud Charges

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BEIJING, China – Liu Hui, brother-in-law of imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo, has been taken into custody and will soon be put on trial because of accusations of fraud.

Liu Xia, wife of Liu Xiaobo and sister of Liu Hui, during a house arrest visit. (Photo Courtesy of Radio Free Asia)

Mo Shaoping, Liu Hui’s lawyer, said that his client Mr. Liu has been detained over a property dispute; however, the evidence the state has against him is insufficient for an actual conviction.  The case against Liu Hui is based on an accusation that he and an old colleague stole from the company they worked for.

The Associated Press reported that Liu and his accomplice allegedly took three million RMB (roughly $483,000) from their workplace.  Liu Xia, the wife of the jailed Nobel Peace Prize winner and sister of Liu Hui, believes that her brother’s detainment is an intimidation tactic to force her to comply with her house arrest.

Liu Xia was sentenced to a lengthy house arrest term alongside her husband who was sentenced to an 11 year prison term.  The couple was convicted based on charges of subversion against the central government in late 2009 when Liu Xiaobo attempted to bring down the one party system in favor of democratic reforms in China.

Hu Jia, a prominent human rights activist in the Beijing area who visited with Liu Xia during her house arrest, perceives Liu Xia’s conditions as weakening.  Liu Hui said during her meeting that she would “go mad soon” after the events surrounding her brother’s detainment.

Mo Shaoping, whose firm defended Liu Xiaobo during his legal proceedings against the state when he was brought up on subversion charges, told local news agencies that Liu Hui had been under surveillance by authorities for several months.  It is uncertain whether the current charges are in any way connected with the subversion activities of Liu Xiaobo.

Mr. Mo further said that the evidence against Liu Hui is insufficient for a criminal proceeding and the current dispute should be settled in civil courts.  Liu Hui has also publicly denied any wrongdoing on his part.  Mr. Liu could face as much as 10 years in prison if found guilty for this property dispute.

China’s judicial branches are firmly in the grips of the Communist party and will usually find defendants, like Liu Hui, guilty for the crimes they have been charged with.  Mr. Liu will stand trial in Huairou, a northern district in the capital city of Beijing.

There has been no notification of a set trial date yet; however, Liu’s lawyers expect a firm date within the month.

For further information, please see:

Democracy Digest – China jails Nobel laureate’s relative – 1 April 2013

BBC – Jailed China Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo’s relative held – 29 March 2013

The New York Times – Relative of Jailed Chinese Laureate Faces Fraud Charges – 29 March 2013

Radio Free Asia – Chinese Laureate’s Relative Held on ‘Fraud’ – 29 March 2013

Brazilian Angel Of Mercy? Or Serial Killer Among The Ill

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASILIA, Brazil – Despicable, or misguided? These are the questions some in Brazil are asking as Dr. Virginia Soares de Souza was removed from her Brazil hospital on accusations of murder. The Brazilian health ministry alleges that de Souza killed seven terminally ill patients at the Evangelical Hospital in Curitiba. Why? To free up beds in her hospital for new patients.

Brazilian Doctor accused of killing terminally ill patients in order to  free up beds. (Photo courtesy of Fox News Latino)

De Souza maintains her innocence, claiming that she is being falsely accused. Despite her claims of innocence a few of her statements collected by wiretap indicate that something subversive was going on in Curitiba. “I want to clear the intensive care unit. It’s making me itch.” Not on itself conclusive of serial killing by euthanize, authorities came to suspect de Souza of injecting patients with a drug cocktails and tampering with respirators after nurses began reporting   suspicions that their patients were poisoned.

While the investigations currently has attributed the deaths of seven patients to her actions, investigators are looking at the medical records of some 300 other patients who were treated under de Souza’s supervision and care.

Authorities indicated that de Souza recruited doctors to help her administer drug cocktails of anesthetics and sedatives in order to alter the chemical balance within her patients before they succumbed to death. Beyond de Souza, another seven health care professionals have been charged with the case. Their actions, according to prosecutors, was to euthanize the victims against the wishes of patients and their families, all in the name of clearing up the clutter and over capacity of patients within the ICU.

The investigation is going back seven years, with doctors analyzing the medical charts of more than 1,700 patients. Investigators allege that in cases where de Souza did not herself prescribe the drug cocktails, she ordered underlings to alter respirators, potentially speeding up their untimely deaths.

While society debates the merits of assisted suicide and euthanasia, Virginia Soares de Souza does not have the legal protections that Dr. Kevorkian argued. If convicted de Souza will be facing multiple murder charges ant the possibility of a serial killer moniker.

Dr. Mario Lobato, the doctor in charge of the investigation has told reporters that “they all have the same [M.O.], the same relationship between the drug and the death,” he continued that some of the victims were still conscious and until the time moment of their deaths.

For more information, please see:

CNN – Brazilian Doctor Killed 7 Patients To Free Up Hospital Beds, Police Say – 29 March 2013

Latino Fox News – Dr. Death? Brazilian Doctor Killed Patients To Free Up Hospital Beds, Police Say – 28 March 2013

Christin Science Monitor – Doctor Killed 300 Patients? Doctor Felt ‘All Powerful ‘ Say Prosecutors – 28 March 2013

Digital Journal – Brazilian Doctor May Have Killed Hundreds – 27 March 2013