The Shocking Truth!
Car Bombs Attack Shiite Pilgrims, Ignite Tensions in Iraq
By Emily Schneider
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
BAGHDAD, Iraq – Shia pilgrims were targeted by a car bomb yesterday, resulting in twenty deaths. Many Shiite Muslims made the pilgrimage to the holy city of Karbala, about 100km southwest of Baghdad, to celebrate the festival of Arbaeen.

Millions of pilgrims have visited Karbala to mark an anniversary associated with the revered Shia figure, Imam Hussein. Provincial governor, Amal al-Din al-Har, quoted by AFP, said that the festival drew around 750,000 pilgrims from 30 different countries.
The most recent spate of attacks is reinforcing fears that sectarian violence is increasing. In the past, Shiite pilgrims were targeted by Sunni militants during religious festivals. Zaid Mohammed, a 21-year old student, walked to Karbala from a nearby city to celebrate the festival in spite of these fears.
“All the people came here to show their gratitude and appreciation for the sacrifices made by Imam Hussein while fighting injustice,” he said. “We have decided to confront all the security risks that we might face on our way to Karbala.”
As pilgrims were returning from the festival in the late afternoon, a car bomb exploded in the small town of Musayyib, about 60 kilometers south of Baghdad. This is the second explosion this week. The first blast occurred this past Monday in the town of Musayyib. That blast killed seven people.
The bomb went off near a bus stop frequented by pilgrims from Karbala taking them to other Iraqi cities, police told BBC News. There were no reports on Thursday of any group claiming responsibility for the bombing. Oftentimes, past attacks on Shia pilgrims have been blamed on Sunni militants even when they did not directly claim responsibility.
Ali Sabbar, a pilgrim who witnessed the explosion, told Reuters news agency: “I was getting a sandwich when a very strong explosion rocked the place and the blast threw me away. When I regained my senses and stood up, I saw dozens of bodies. Many cars were set on fire.”
Another witness, teacher Ibrahim Mohammed, said, “the explosion shook the whole block and smashed the windows of my house. I ran to the scene of the explosion only to find charred bodies and burning cars. There were women screaming and searching for their missing children.”
Although Iraqi authorities typically tighten security in Karbala and along routes used by pilgrims during the festival, they admit they are unable to prevent all attacks.
For more information, please see:
Al Jazeera – Shia Pilgrims Killed by Car Bomb in Iraq – 4 Jan. 2013
BBC News – Car Bomb Kills Shia Pilgrims South of Baghdad Iraq – 3 Jan. 2013
Huffington Post – Car Bomb in Iraq Kills 20 Shiite Pilgrims – 3 Jan. 2013
Washington Post – Car Bomb Targeting Shiite Pilgrims Reflects Iraq Tensions – 3 Jan. 2013
Russian Court Acquits Doctor Charged with Negligence in Magnitsky Death; Posthumous Trail Against Magnitsky Begins
By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe
MOSCOW, Russia – A Russian court has acquitted the only person to be formally tried in the death of Sergei L. Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer who died in prison three years ago after uncovering tax fraud by Russian officials. Dr. Dmitry Kratov was head of medical services at Butyrka Prison, where Magnitsky was held, and had been accused of negligently refusing requests to treat Magnitsky’s life-threatening hepatitis, diabetes, and heart condition.

Last Monday, prosecutors, in an unusual move, asked for charges to be dropped against Kratov, with which the court agreed Friday. The prosecutors changed direction, no longer pressing for a conviction, four days after Russian President Vladimir Putin stated at a news conference that Magnitsky had died of natural causes and was not tortured in prison.
The Moscow Tverskoy District Court Judge, finding no connection between Dr. Kratov’s lack of medical care and Magnitsky’s death, further stated that Kratov could sue the government for illegal prosecution.
However, according to Nikolai Gorokhov, a lawyer representing the Magnitsky family, Kratov signed paperwork to refuse Magnitsky’s repeated requests to be moved from prison to a hospital. Furthermore, Gorokhov claims that Kratov was aware that Magnitsky had been diagnosed with pancreatitis and gallstones five days before Magnitsky’s death.
Furthermore, prosecutor Dmitry Bobkov earlier stated that Kratov “failed to organize the necessary diagnostic and treatment measures, which resulted in Magnitsky’s death,” but also claimed that Kratov never received complaints from Magnitsky nor was informed by staff members.
60 Russian officials were implicated by the United States Helsinki Commission as allegedly playing roles in Magnitsky’s death. Charges were brought against some of those 60, but dropped earlier this year against all, including another doctor, except Kratov.
Magnitsky’s employer, Hermitage Capital, issued the following statement Friday: “There is no doubt that people responsible for Magnitsky’s death are being protected by the president of Russia . . . Now that President Putin is personally involved in the obstruction of justice in a major case of extrajudicial killing, he will have to face the consequences of his actions.”
Instead, it is the late Magnitsky who faces judicial prosecution. After blowing the whistle in 2008 on a $230 million tax scam by Russian tax and police officials against his employer Hermitage Capital, Magnitsky was promptly thrown in prison by those he had accused on charges of the very same tax fraud he had uncovered. Although the case was closed after Magnitsky’s death, it was again reopened in August 2011. In February 2012 investigators then announced plans to try the deceased Magnitsky, and in November prosecutors sent the case to court.
Magnitsky and his employer, London-based head of Hermitage Capital William Browder who is being tried in absentia, are accused of $17.1 million in tax evasion.
Last week, Russian prosecutors went ahead with the beginning of the posthumous fraud trial against Magnitsky before the Tverskoy District Court (the same court which acquitted Kratov). However, the preliminary hearing in the case was postponed until January 28th because the defense lawyers representing the Magnitsky family refused to participate, citing the illegality of trying a dead man.
Gorokhov, who continues to represent the Magnitsky’s family, has stated that he has “no plans to participate in an unconstitutional affair.”
Gorokhov has argued that posthumous legal proceedings are only appropriate if aimed at quashing a previous conviction or rehabilitation. According to Gorokhov, to continued fraud probe against Magnitsky, which was initiated by prosecutors despite requests by Magnitsky’s relatives to the contrary, also violates a decision by Russia’s Constitutional Court.
Browder, who has campaigned to punish those allegedly responsible for Magnitsky’s death, denounced the fraud trial as “an act of reprisal against those who exposed the criminal group of corrupt officials.”
For further information, please see:
Rights in Russia – Write to Your MP on the Sergei Magnitsky Case – 1 January 2013
Moscow Times – Former Butyrka Doctor Acquitted of Negligence Charges in Magnitsky Case – 28 December 2012
New York Times – Russian Acquittal Escalates Human Rights Feud With U.S. – 28 December 2012
RFE/RL – Moscow Court Acquits Doctor In Magnitsky Case – 28 December 2012
ABS-CBN News – Russia Puts Dead Lawyer on Trial – 27 December 2012
Syrian Revolution Digest: Tuesday, 1 January 2012
Return to Arrogance!
Syrian Revolution Digest – January 1, 2013
We don’t need America to be the world’s “top cop,” we just need her, and each member of the global community, to realize that there are certain humanitarian and moral obligations that they simply cannot ignore without major consequences for all. Leadership is not convenient, and often it is not even a choice, at least not in the ethical sense.
Today’s Death Toll: 136 (including 6 women and 16 children)
42 in Damascus and suburbs, 44 in Hama including 23 martyrs from the village of Maan and 16 from Hasraya, 15 in Deir Ezzor including 9 unidentified martyrs in the village of Hatla, 12 martyrs in Homs including an entire family from Deir Baalba, 8 in Daraa, 9 in Aleppo, 4 in Idlib, 1 in Lattakia, and 1 in Raqqa.
Points of Random Shelling: 287
22 areas were subjected to aerial shelling. In 5 areas, the LCC documented barrel bombing, 2 areas were subjected to cluster bombs; and 1 area was subjected to thermobaric bombing. Mortar shelling was reported in 125 areas and followed by artillery shelling in 98 locations. 38 areas were subjected to indiscriminate missile attacks.
Clashes: 133
In Damascus, rebels downed a MiG in Eastern Ghouta and liberated the Khansaa School, which represents the first line of defense at Wadi Al-Deif and the regime withdrew from the checkpoints at Al-Hameh and Al-Bouhamid. In RAqqa, rebels were able to seize control of the Toubian gas field in southern Raqqa. In Hama, rebels repelled a military convoy that was heading to Mourek. In Aleppo, rebels seized control of most of the military airports and issued a warning that they would target the international airport in Aleppo (LCCs).
News
Clashes in Syria shut down Aleppo airport
Syria’s grim toll continues into 2013
Syria ushers in New Year with more violence
Syrian Military Mounts Offensive in Suburb of Damascus
Special Reports
Why Russia Won’t Help on Syria
Many people in the Russian foreign-policy establishment believe that the string of U.S.-led interventions that resulted in regime change since the end of the Cold War — in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya — are a threat to the stability of the international system and potentially to “regime stability” in Russia itself. Russia did not give its imprimatur to these interventions, and will never do so if it suspects the motive is removal of a sitting government. The notion that Russia could eventually be the target of such an intervention might seem absurd in Washington, but suspicion of potential future U.S. intentions runs deep in Moscow. Therefore, Russia uses what power it has to shape the international system — particularly, its permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council — to avoid creating a dangerous precedent that could eventually be used against it.
As Regime Teeters, Jews Mull Outreach to Rebel Fighters
“There are many in the opposition who believe that Israeli concerns over change in Syria are, in part at least, behind the lack of a more proactive response by the international community to the situation in Syria,” said Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian pro-democracy activist. Abdulhamid is a fellow at Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a non-partisan Washington think tank that serves as an academic home for many neo-conservative thinkers. The group has emerged as one of the key players in forging ties with the budding Syrian opposition and urging a more active U.S. role in bringing about the demise of the Assad regime… “The agreed line by the opposition is that the status quo in the Golan Heights will be maintained until conditions permit for organizing peace talks,” said Abdulhamid, referring to Israel’s occupation of that area since the 1967 Six Day War. This approach could satisfy Jewish and pro-Israel groups whose focus on Syria’s future government in any event prioritizes other concerns.
Reflections On A Difficult Time: Spending New Year’s In Damascus
With all the absurdities of war, we still felt like something was missing in receiving the new year. But with barely eight guests in the hotel, the bar and cafe had been closed for months. So we ordered two coups of champagne from room service, and held up our glasses for better days.
Borzu Daragahi: How to defend Bashar Assad in 10 easy steps
Return to Arrogance
In his defense of the Obama Administration’s stance on Syria, Aaron David Miller makes this “erudite” argument:
We should not be the world’s top cop or caseworker, charged with fixing every calamity. We don’t control history. And it’s time we attend to our own broken house instead of running around the world trying to repair everyone else’s.
This is the kind of argument that was probably made by the American aristocracy in the first half of the 20th Century regarding “intervention” in certain parts of their country and their cities. It was wrong then, not to mention classicist and racist, it is wrong now, and equally classicist and racist. This is world has grown too small and our destinies too interlocked for this kind of argument to be of any relevance or make any sense.
Indeed, not long ago, international leaders acknowledged this fact by endorsing a new legal notion designed to help them tackle exactly the kind of scenarios currently unfolding in Syria: The Responsibility to Protect. Of course, now, all are rushing to bury their heads in the sand, making up all different sorts of justifications as they go along. But world leaders, especially the American leader, cannot escape culpability and responsibility.
After all, all acknowledged the Assad regime’s role in the assassination of former Lebanese PM, Rafic Al-Hariri and his ongoing support for a variety of terrorist organizations around the world, especially in Iraq and Lebanon. Yet, with encouragement from the Democratic Establishment in the United States (under the leadership of Senator John Kerry and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi), even before Senator Obama became President, the world abandoned its policy of isolating the Assad regime and began circulating the idea that he was a reformer in the face of all evidence to the contrary. President Obama pursued this policy of rapprochement down to the dawn of the Revolution.
American officials were willing to ignore facts in order to pursue an illusion, and now they are doing the same. The facts of the Syrian Revolution are simple: this was not a sectarian movement, nor a civil war nor a radical uprising. But through dithering and downright cowardice, it was allowed to degenerate into the mayhem we see today because Assad was given every leeway to crackdown with impunity.
Miller is right in noting that the situation in Syria was quite different from Libya and that intervention in Syria is a more complicated affair and carries more risks. But the ethical imperative for the intervention and for America’s leadership in this matter is nonetheless clear. President Obama might want to turn his back on this, and he is not alone of course, but do spare us your hypocritical rationalizations.
Video Highlights
Leaked video shows pro-Assad militias killing two captives by stabbing them repeatedly laughing all the while http://youtu.be/PBHtjwXQUCQ It’s atrocities likes these coupled with global indifference that helped transform the nonviolent protest movement into a sectarian conflict. But indifference and hand-wringing in the face of such impunity will beget a backlash sooner or later, at which time the perennial “why do they hate us?” will make it usual appearance, and I doubt there will many sympathizers.
U.S. Overlooks Bloodshed in Syria at its Own Peril
By Andrew Beiter (repost from The Buffalo News)
During World War II, a Polish Catholic social worker named Irena Sendler and her network of allies rescued 2,500 Jewish children from the Warsaw Ghetto in Poland. When asked years later where she got her courage, Sendler harkened back to something her father had told her: “Always remember, my darling Irena, that if you see someone drowning, you must rescue them – even if you cannot swim.”
It doesn’t require too much imagination to guess what Sendler might say today about the worsening situation in Syria. Since the rise of the Arab Spring almost two years ago, the dictator Bashar Assad and his forces have killed more than 30,000 Syrians, with well over 1 million fleeing for their lives to neighboring refugee camps. The crisis is yet another test of our humanity and the future of the world.
What makes the issue even more incredible is that the revolt was started in the town of Daraa by a group of 9- to 12-year-old boys, who brazenly wrote on the side of their school, “The people want to topple the regime.” The students’ efforts were followed by other Syrian children who courageously pressed their painted green hands against the walls of their community as a sign of symbolic protest.
In addition to our shared humanity, what’s at stake for America is that due to the world’s inaction, the rebel movement is now contaminated by al-Qaida and other Islamist forces – all of whom have enthusiastically filled the vacuum that we have chosen to ignore. In short, we overlook Syria at our own peril. At best, the situation there can now be deemed a civil war; at worst, a petri dish where extremism will be grown for a generation.
As for what to do, readers can follow and friend the group I Am Syria that was started by a group of young Western New Yorkers. Concerned citizens can also send a tweet to their elected officials, or call the free 1-800-GENOCIDE hot line, which allows them to encourage their leaders to work for the most peaceful solution possible. Tell them that Syria matters and that you care. As the late Illinois Sen. Paul Simon once said about the genocide in Rwanda, “If every member of the House of Representatives and Senate had received 100 letters from people back home saying we have to do something, then I think the response would have been different.”
Why is all this important? The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has a saying that “What you do matters.” When one human being suffers, it affects us all. As Buffalonians, we celebrate the role that foreigners such as the Marquis de Lafayette and General Casimir Pulaski had in assisting our American Revolution. Now, for our brothers and sisters in Syria, let us in some way do the same.
Andrew Beiter lives in Hamburg and is the director of the Summer Institute for Human Rights and Genocide Studies in Buffalo.