Red Cross “Can’t Cope” with Syria Situation

By Emily Schneider
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DAMASCUS, Syria – The International Red Cross says it “can’t cope” with the situation in Syria any longer. Yet, President Assad still refuses to leave in spite of urgings from the UK prime minister.

ICRC workers hand out aid materials in Syria. (Photo courtesy of ICRC)

“The humanitarian situation is getting worse despite the scope of the operation increasing,” said Peter Maurer, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

The ICRC has worked extensively to bring relief to victims of the Syrian conflict, but it hasn’t been easy. Because of the daily uncertainties of the conflict, the ICRC must continuously react to the needs of victims only after attacks. This makes it nearly impossible to keep a set plan or organize efficiently.

Further, there are still areas of the country that are impossible to reach. Aleppo, for instance, has seen a great increase in violence in the recent months but the ICRC has been unable to coordinate any aid there. Homs, another city hit hard by violence, is only open to the ICRC in certain districts. The ICRC was finally able to reach people in those districts last week, which Mr. Maurer said was a major success.

Other problems, like the diversion of foreign medical supplies to government forces, are rumored to be happening on a daily basis. A Syrian medical group claimed this week that 95% of foreign medical supplies actually fall into the hands of government officials. The ICRC says that this statement is so far unsubstantiated.

In spite of the crumbling humanitarian situation in his country, President Assad refuses to leave or allow foreign troops into the country.

“I am not a puppet, I wasn’t made by the West. I’m Syrian… and I have to live and die in Syria,” Mr Assad told the Russia Today TV channel. He warned that if Syria were to be invaded by foreign troops “the price would be too big” for the rest of the world.

“If we have a problem in Syria – and we are the last stronghold of secularism, stability and co-existence in the region – it will have a domino effect from the Atlantic to the Pacific,” he said.  Although he claims he does not believe the West would invade, added: “If they do so, nobody can tell what’s (going to happen) next.”

The inability of the ICRC to cope with the worsening situation in Syria and President Assad’s refusal to leave come at an opportune time for the Syrian opposition forces, who are reportedly meeting in Doha to discuss uniting under a new, unified leadership.

For further information, please see:

BBC – Red Cross Says it Cannot Cope with Syria Emergency – 8 Nov. 2012

Gulf News – Al Assad: I Will Live and Die in Syria – 8 Nov. 2012

Khaleej Times – Can’t Cope with Syria Crisis: Red Cross – 8 Nov. 2012

Gulf News – Syria’s Divided Opposition Factions Gather for Talks – 5 Nov. 2012

 

German Court Overrules Decision to Allow Racial Profiling

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BERLIN, Germany – A German court recently ruled that skin color alone is insufficient grounds for a police check. This decision overturned a previous ruling that determined certain police are allowed to carry out ID checks based on skin color.

German court determines that German police are not permitted to racially profile. (Photo Courtesy of Deutsche Welle)

In the lower court, the Koblenz court dismissed a complaint by a black German man who was asked to show his papers when he was on a train. When the man refused, he was taken to a police station and searched. Thereafter, two federal police officers alleged the man abused them while he was detained. During the court hearing, the officers said he checked the man’s ID on the train partially because of the man’s skin color.

Although the administrative court in Koblenz held that the police’s behavior was reasonable in order to catch illegal immigrants, the judges in a higher administrative court determined that racial profiling is a clear violation of the ban on discrimination.

The German constitution states, “No person shall be favored or disfavored because of sex, parentage, race, language, homeland and origin, faith, or religious or political opinions.”

Human rights activists applaud the high court’s decision. Alexander Bosch, an expert for police and human rights issues, said, “We welcome the ruling as an important signal against discrimination in identity checks.” He also commented that over the past couple of years, there has been an increase in complaints by people with an immigrant background who were exposed to discriminatory identity checks.

Tahir Della, from the Initiative of Black People in Germany, also favored the decision.  He states, “We have been fighting for years for public recognition of this practice. Police checks of this kind are no one-off. They are the everyday experience of many black people and people of color in Germany. They are put under suspicion and criminalized by this police practice. We hope that this verdict will serve as a basic political signal.”

However, the German police do not agree with the recent decision. Rainer Wendt, chair of the German Police Union, states, “The courts deal with the law in an esthetically pleasing way, but they don’t make sure their judgments match practical requirements.”

Josef Scheuring, head of the union’s federal police division, commented, “A person should never be checked based solely on his or her skin color, and the federal police don’t do this as a rule, but particular situations and considerations could justify such measures.” He believes that this issue should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

For further information, please see:

Deutsche Welle – Court Bans police Racial Profiling – 31 October 2012

Spiegel — Court Rules Against Police Checks Based on Skin Color – 31 October 2012

The Local — Police: sorry for racial profiling on ID checks – 30 October 2012

The Huffington Post — German Police ID Checks By Skin Color OK, Says Court – 27 March 2012

Journalist’s Arrest Creates Uproar

By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

NEW DELHI, India – On Wednesday, authorities arrested and charged Naveen Soorinje, a television reporter, with abetting the July attack in Manglaore.  This has many criticizing the government of “moral policing” and media organizations casting it as an “assault on press freedom.”

Authorities arresting Mr. Soorinje. (Photo Courtesy of BBC)

Mr. Soorinje allegedly took television footage of Hindu activists in the southern state of Karnataka partying and chasing girls and boy, presumably college students, to subsequently beating them.  Furthermore, certain men were caught fondling one of the already traumatized girls.

The Hindu activists caught on tape defended the attack against the boys and girls as just the conditions of a rave party.  Furthermore, the police stated that the group were simply having a birthday party and no drugs were found.

According to BBC, Mr. Soorinje believes that he is being targeted “for exposing the failures of the local administration in dealing with cases of moral policing and attacks on minority communities by Hindu hardline groups.”

“[The] police [had] no business to arrest him.  He was just discharging his professional duties. The arrest sends bad signals on how the local police are mixed up with right-wing organisations,” said retired high court judge in Banglaore and human rights activist Mr. Saldhana.

Yesterday, individuals from various organizations protested in front of the deputy commissioner’s office for Mr. Soorinje’s arrest.  Additionally, the Visual Media Journalists Association also held a protest in front of the city police commissioner’s office.

Moreover, DYFI Dakshina Kannada district president Muneer Katipalla believes that Mr. Soorinje’s arrest was a revenge tactic against him.

“Naveen is a reporter with social concern and has exposed several wrong doings of bureaucrats and politicians and thus earned their ire.  The government should file a special petition in the court and relieve him from all charges,” stated Mr. Katipalla.

The police denied targeting Mr. Soorinje.  According to the Mangalore city police commissioner, Manish Kharbikar, authorities arrested 29 people in connection to the attack and Mr. Soorinje’s name was included in the charge sheet.

“We are only complying with court orders,” relayed police commissioner Manish Kharbikar to BBC.

However, activists representing journalists submitted a memorandum to the state home minister, R Ashok, demanding Mr. Soorinje’s release.  They further demanded harsh consequences for those officers whom previously arrested Mr. Soorinje.

In Mangalore three years prior, the Sri Ram Sena, a Hindu hardline group, attacked women in a city pub because it was against Indian culture for women to go to pubs.

For further information, please see:

BBC – Outcry over India journalist arrest – 9 November 2012

The Hindu – Journalists stage dharma in Udupi – 9 November 2012

Times of India – Support flows in for arrested TV reporter – 9 November 2012

French Government Plans to Legalize Gay Marriage & Adoption Amid Controversy

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

PARIS, France — French president François Hollande’s Socialist government has announced its plan to make good on a key issue of his electoral platform from May: gay marriage and adoption.  The French Parliament presented Hollande’s cabinet with draft legislation of the bill it plans to review in January to legalize gay marriage and adoption, despite strong opposition from the political right, and from the Catholic, Protestant, Jewish and Islamic faiths.

The French Parliament has presented President Hollande’s cabinet with draft legislation Wednesday, to be reviewed in January, which would legalize gay marriage and adoption in France. (Photo Courtesy of France 24)

The draft legislation would probably pass both houses of France’s Parliament fairly easily.  If measures legalizing gay marriage were passed, France would be the 12th country to legalize gay marriage, in the company of other countries including Canada, South Africa, Spain and Portugal; with a population of 60 million, it would also be the largest.

Currently civil unions are allowed between gay couples.  However, such lack several advantages of marriage, including the ability take their partner’s name, gain inheritance and pension rights, and to adopt.

The proposed legislation would also expressly allow gay couples to adopt.  In France, a requirement of adoption is being a married couple, which hereto now has not been an option for members of the gay community.

Legislation appears to be the only measure to overturn France’s gay marriage ban.  Two years ago France’s highest judicial authority, the Constitutional Council, refused to strike down the ban residing in the Civil Code, ruling that the ban was constitutional, but that the legislator could change the law if desired.

Hollande and the legislator’s plans have seen fierce opposition from the political Right and church, throughout the French country.

Over 1000 mayors and deputy-mayors of communities have signed a petition against the bill and in at least 75 towns and cities there have been protests, with some calls for mass protests.

Jean-Francois Cope, a member of the conservative UMP party leadership, wants to draft bill delayed citing that it was “incredibly badly prepared.”  He claims that the measures go far beyond gay marriage: “[I]t is about a complete reorganization, deconstruction of the right of the family, with questions surrounding lineage, the removal of the reference to father and mother in the text.”

Former Prime Minister, François Fillon, has also promised his party will repeal the law and un-marry any gay couples married under it.

The Roman Catholic Church has also expressed its concern over the draft legislation.  Pope Benedict XVI has called on French bishops to oppose the legislation and defend marriage as the “foundation of social life.”

A leader of the opposition, Paris Cardinal Andre Vingt-Trois, expressed his concern that children needed both a father and a mother to build their identities.  He said “When we defend the right of children to build their personality with reference to the man and the woman who gave them life, we are not defending a particular position” and urged the government to consider “the accumulated wisdom of our civilization that marked its gradual exit from barbarism.”

However, Minister of Family Affairs Dominique Bertinnoti argued that “This is an important step towards the equality of rights,” and asserted that the bill will not destroy families, because “on the contrary it is a legal protection.”

The writers of the draft bill intend to only amend the Civil Code “where strictly necessary,” however, they also plan to use gender neutral language throughout al amended sections: “patent” instead of “mother” or “father” and “spouse” instead of “husband“ or “wife.” However, these terms will not be changes globally through the Civil Code.

Even those largely in favor of the law have identified some short comings.  For example, the draft legislation does not provide the right to medically assisted conception for gay couples (e.g. in vitro fertilization for lesbians).  Nor will it allow a single gay person the right to adopt.  Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault has suggested amendments can be added later.

President Hollande expressed his approval of the draft legislation, saying that “[t]his would be progress not just for the few, but for our whole society.”  He further emphasized that the proposed legislation “resolutely takes into account the greater interest of the child.”

Hollande wants to see the new bill on the statute books by mid-2013.

Support for gay marriage is growing in France.  French newspaper Le Monde’s most recent Ifop poll showed 65% support for gay marriage, although only 52% of respondents favored gay couples adopting.

For further information, please see:

France 24 – French Government Backs Draft Gay Marriage Law – 8 November 2012

BBC News – French Gay Marriage and Adoption Bill Backed by Cabinet – 7 November 2012

France 24 – France Adopts Gay Marriage Plan Despite Opposition – 7 November 2012

The Guardian – French Government Approves Introduction of Same-Sex Marriage – 7 November 2012

The Independent – French President Francois Hollande Keeps His Vow to Legalise Gay Marriage – 7 November 2012

The Telegraph – French Gay Marriage Plans ‘A Sham That Will Smash Foundations of Society’ – 6 November 2012

The International Herald Tribune – France: Gay Marriage Ban Upheld – 28 January 2011

France 24 – France Reviews Gay Marriage Ban – 16 November 2010

Paramilitary Drug Gang Slaughters 10 Farmworkers

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BOGOTÁ, Colombia – 10 peasant farmworkers were brutally massacred in the northwestern region of the country Wednesday evening, allegedly for failure to make an extortion payment to a violent paramilitary successor group, which gunned them down in a scene described by a local official as “something out of hell.”

Soldiers stand guard near the front patio of a farmhouse covered in blood where 10 laborers were killed in Santa Rosa de Osos in Colombia’s Antioquia state, Wednesday. Officials say Los Rastrojos, a paramilitary group, are to blame. (Photo Courtesy SF Gate)

After the farmworkers had finished picking fruit for the day, three men approached the farm’s foreman and asked if the owner had been paying protection money.  When he replied that they didn’t know of any payment, the men opened fired, indiscriminately shooting, first handguns, then rifles, and finally launching a hand grenade at the farmworkers, according to one survivor.

“This case has shocked us for the barbaric, brutal way that they murdered these completely innocent people,” said Police Gen. David Guzman.  9 men and 1 woman were killed in the massacre.

The owner of the farm, in the municipality of Santa Rosa de Osos, about 275 kilometres (170 miles) northeast of the capital of Bogotá, was apparently being extorted by a paramilitary group, local officials said.

Local officials and police, from Santa Rosa de Osos, suspect that the bloodbath was the work of a violent offshoot of the Norte del Valle cartel, involved in drug trafficking, extortion and murder.

Known as paramilitary successor groups, these criminal bands are heavily armed drug-trafficking gangs that emerged following the ostensible demobilization of the AUC militia federation in 2006.

The group thought to be responsible in this case, Los Rastrojos or The Scraps, is also blamed for the last major massacre in Colombia, in August of 2009, where 12 members of the Awa indigenous tribe were killed in southwestern Narino state.  Yesterday’s massacre took place in the northwestern Antioquia province, roughly 200 miles from Narino.

A report from the Indepaz think tank released in February said the paramilitary successor groups Los Rastrojos, Los Urabeños, Las Aguilas Negras, Los Paisas and ERPAC had a presence last year in 406 municipalities in 31 Colombian provinces.

Meaning, the groups have expanded their influence by 147 municipalities from 2008, when they were active in 259 of the Andean nation’s 1,110 municipalities.

Local businessmen from Santa Rosa de Osos, have reported a rise in extortion in the area.

They have recounted how members of criminal gangs have been going around the area demanding payments, which they adjust according to the earnings of each individual victim.

According to their reports, the payments have varied from $50 for day laborers to $50,000 for owners of large agricultural businesses.

Francisco Jair Lopera, mayor of Santa Rosa de Osos, called the massacre a source of national shame.

A National Police spokesperson said the regional National Police commander, Col. Jose Gerardo Acevedo, traveled Wednesday night to the massacre site, at La España tamarillo farm, to coordinate efforts to track down the assailants.

For further information, please see:

The Associated Press – 10 peasants killed in Colombian massacre – 8 November 2012

BBC News – Ten Colombian farmworkers killed ‘by extortion gang’ – 8 November 2012

Hispanically Speaking News – Blog del Narco: 10 Farmworkers Massacred by Colombian Drug Trafficking Gang – 8 November 2012

Huffington Post – Los Rastrojos, Colombia Drug Cartel, Massacre 10 Peasants Near Bogota – 8 November 2012

Latin American Herald Tribune – 10 Farmworkers Massacred in Colombia – 8 November 2012

The Province – 10 peasants killed by drug-trafficking paramilitaries in Colombia’s worst massacre since 2009 – 8 November 2012

SF Gate – 10 peasants killed in Colombia massacre – 8 November 8, 2012

The Washington Post – 10 peasants killed by drug-trafficking paramilitaries in Colombia’s worst massacre since 2009 – 8 November 2012