Too Little Too Late!
By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia
HANOI, Vietnam – Yesterday, two Vietnamese songwriters underwent a 5-hour trial at Ho Chi Minh City’s People’s Court for their alleged anti-government songs violating Article 88 of Vietnam’s Criminal Code. Tran Vu Anh Binh, facing six years in prison, and Vo Minh Tri, facing four years instead, were detained in late 2011.
Vo Minh Tri’s song lyrics purportedly condemned a police intervention and suppression of anti-China activists. The lyrics further addressed other social justice issues.
Meanwhile, other singers have performed Tran Vu Anh Binh’s songs, including one of which criticizing the government for arresting insurgents.
According to the Global Post, the two produced two songs, “Anh La Ai?” (“Who are You?”) and “NuocToi Dau?” (“Where is My Country?”). Furthermore, the lyrics of “Where is My Country?” include the following lyrics: Where is your nationalism?; Why consciously take orders from China?; You will leave a mark to last a thousand years; Your hands will be stained with the blood of our people.”
E News Park Forest reported that yesterday Amnesty International stated that the songwriters “should be released immediately and unconditionally.”
“This is a ludicrous way to treat people just for writing songs,” said Amnesty’s researcher in Vietnam, Rupert Abbott. “These men are prisoners of conscience, detained solely for the peaceful exercise of their right to freedom of expression through their songs and non-violent activities, and should be freed.”
Weeks prior to Tran Vu Anh Binh and Vo Minh Tri’s prison sentences, three Vietnamese bloggers were accused of disseminating anti-government propaganda and subsequently jailed for four to 12 years.
“There is a very disturbing trend of repression against those who peacefully voice opinions the Vietnamese authorities do not like,” continued Mr. Abbott.
On October 14th, the police in Ho Chi Minh City arrested university student Nguyen Phuong Uyen and three other students. Nguyen Phuong Uyen allegedly participated in the circulation of leaflets censuring China and the Vietnam over their territorial dispute. Although the others were released, Nguyen Phuong Uyen remains detained.
“Rather than trying to silence the young people of Viet Nam, the Vietnamese authorities should allow them to express their opinions and have a say in the development and direction of their country,” shared Mr. Abbott.
According to BBC’s South East Asia correspondent, Jonathan Head, Vietnam’s Communist Party is currently experiencing factional splits over mismanagement, fraud, and unstable economy. Therefore, it is not welcoming to criticism.
For further information, please see:
Bangkok Post – Vietnam jails songwriters – 30 Oct. 2012
BBC – Vietnam jails two dissident songwriters – 30 Oct. 2012
Global Post – Viet Khang and Tran Vu Anh Binh, musicians, jailed in Vietnam for anti-government songs – 30 Oct. 2012
E News Park Forest – Viet Nam: Acquit Songwriters Who Face 20 Years In Jail – 29 Oct. 2012
By Ali Al-Bassam
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
MANAMA, Bahrain — Last Tuesday, Bahrain imposed a temporary ban on all protests and gatherings. Interior Minister Sheikh Rashed bin Abdullah Al-Khalifa said that the ban was established to ensure public safety and prevent violence. Al-Khalifa also said that the ban was necessary since violence that accompanied previous protests, disrupted traffic, affected trade and the economy, and damaged private property.
During his press conference, Al-Khalifa mentioned Omran Mohammed Ahmed, a 19 year old police officer, who was killed in an explosion in Al-Eker village when his patrol was attacked by rioters. “Citizens of any country in the world will understand the necessity of implementing security measures to control, but not close, the entrances to the village in order to conduct a thorough investigation into Omran’s death,” he said.
Amnesty International says that the ban on all rallies violates the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly and must be lifted immediately. Al-Khalifa says that no one’s right is violated as long as they comply with the limits prescribed in the ban. Amnesty International reports that within the last few months, scores of people have been arrested for “illegal gatherings,” where prisoners of conscience were jailed solely for exercising their right to peaceful assembly.
“Even in the event of sporadic or isolated violence once an assembly is underway, authorities cannot simply declare a blanket ban on all protetsts…” said Amnesty International Middle East and North Africa Deputy Director Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.
Wefaq, Bahrain’s leading Shia opposition party, believes that the ban is an attempt to silence it. “We reject this decision and consider it against our constitutional right. There is no reason for it because all our events are peaceful,” said Wefaq official Sayed Hadi Al-Mousawi. Al-Mousawi also said that he believes the ban goes against international human rights. Bahrain banned many protests organized by Wefaq in the past few months.
Al-Khalifa also said that the ban is justifiable since organizers have failed to keep protesters from engaging in violence. He believes that a temporary ban is an “opportunity for everyone to take a step back, calm down and gain some perspective.”
Prior to the ban, organizers had to go through a process to gain consent to hold a demonstration. Bahrain’s Code on Public Meetings, Processions and Gatherings imposes significant restrictions, and is in breach under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The code requires that at least 3 organizers with a clean police record must apply for permission, specifying their activity and its subject, and the venue and time. Organizers must be residents of the area where the activity will take place. If permission is not granted then the activity is considered illegal. Several rallies were banned this year due to the location and timings of the rallies since they could have potentially disturbed traffic.
For further information, please see:
Al Jazeera — Bahrain bans Protests and Gatherings — 31 October 2012
Amnesty International — Bahrain’s Protests ban Condemned — 31 October 2012
Bahrain News Agency — Ban on Marches and Rallies is Temporary, Interior Minister says — 31 October 2012
Reuters — Bahrain Must Lift ban on all Protests — 31 October 2012
By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia
DAVAO CITY, The Philippines – Vice mayor, Rodrigo Duterte, of Davao City has offered a 5 million pesos ($121,000) reward for the capture, execution and delivery of a known fugitive’s head.
The fugitive in question is Ryan Yu, the leader of a local car theft ring. Duterte has offered the public two million pesos ($48,400) for Yu’s capture, four million pesos ($96,800) if he is killed, and an additional 1 million pesos ($24,200), on top of the aforementioned reward, if Yu’s head is literally delivered on ice.
Duterte has a reputation for being tough on crime and has been previously associated with death squads. These death squads were responsible for the executions of over 200 suspected criminals during Duterte’s previous mayoral term from 2004 to 2009. The executions included a number of minors as well.
Human Rights Commission (HRC) chairman Loretta Ann Rosales has criticized Duterte’s actions declaring that he has violated the law by ordering the extrajudicial killing of Yu. Rosales claims that Duterte is depriving Yu of proper due process, and despite Yu’s alleged crimes and links to the car theft ring, enjoys certain rights under the law.
Duterte responded to the allegations by calling for Rosales to show him the specific laws that he has violated by ordering the capture of a known fugitive. Duterte claims that there is nothing illegal about using the police and government to sanction the capture of a dangerous criminal linked to a local carjacking gang.
Ronald de la Rosa, the local Davao police chief, says his office was flooded with calls and messages from people asking if the reward offer was legitimate. Rosa assured that the reward was very real, and Duterte says that the funds for the reward will be paid out from his political campaign contributions.
Rosa conveyed that Yu and his gang were responsible for more than 40 stolen vehicles which were stashed in a local warehouse. The discovery of the stolen vehicles prompted Duterte’s call for Yu’s head. Duterte and Rosa have conveyed that the offer is to expedite the capture of a very dangerous criminal who could be armed with automatic weapons.
The reward is to facilitate Yu’s capture; however, it is also incentive for a fairly dangerous endeavor. Duterte says that those who go after Yu need to know that Yu will most likely be armed and incredibly difficult to capture. Because Yu will not come into custody peacefully, it may be possible that Yu must be killed in order for him to be incapacitated.
For further information, please see:
Philippine Daily Inquirer – Don’t castrate gov’t, Duterte tells CHR chief – 29 October 2012
Philippine Star – Duterte mulls raising bounty for car theft ring leader to P6 million – 29 October 2012
Davao Sun Star – Duterte to Human rights commission head: Show me the law I violated – 29 October 2012
NY Daily News – Mayor in the Philippines offers $121,000 reward for decapitated head – 26 October 2012
By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe
KIEV, Ukraine – Opposition leader and ex-prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, announced a hunger strike to protest an alleged rigged voting.
On Sunday, Ukraine’s parliament held their election. President Victor Yanukovych is projected to win; however, international observers are subsequently criticizing the process. On Monday, these particular observers pointed out the flaws in the election process, with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe commenting that the country had taken a “step backwards” on the road to democracy.
Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s pro-business Party of Regions has 34 percent of votes. However, the United Opposition bloc, who promotes and involves jailed opposition leader and former Prime Minster, Yulia Tymoshenko, is in second place with 22 percent of the vote.
Tymoshenko, who was sentenced to seven years in prison for the abuse of power, has “symbolically” led her party from behind bars. Yanukovych was accused of overpaying Russia in a gas deal, and she was, therefore, not permitted to register as a candidate.
The OSCE believes Tymoshenko’s current imprisonment is the epitome of obstacles that impede the elections in Ukraine. Walburga Habsburg Douglas, the Swedish MP who led the OSCE delegation stated, “Considering the abuse of power, and the excessive role of money in this election, democratic progress appears to have reversed in Ukraine. One should not have to visit a prison to hear from leading political figures in the country.”
Tymoshenko announced through her lawyer, “The elections were rigged from the first to the last day. To hide this fact means to destroy Ukraine’s future.” Due to Tymoshenko’s imprisonment, she stated she would not call for “civil unrest in the streets” because she is prevented from guaranteeing “that these actions will be peaceful and organized in the best way.”
While Ukraine was recently considered isolated under President Yanukovich, observers accused the current government as corruption and authoritative. These recent accusations have stemmed from Tymoshenko’s imprisonment, which the United States and the European Union have called a “politically motivated show trial.”
United Opposition official, Arseiy Yatsenyuk, said, “The campaign was very tough, extremely tough. Intimidation, they purchased the voters, they intimidated the members of the election commissions. So they did their utmost with an iron fist to do something to win the elections, but look at the results of the exit polls. They didn’t succeed.”
The OSCE is monitoring the election.
For further information, please see:
BBC News — Ukraine election ‘reversed democracy’, OSCE says – 29 October 2012
CNN — Ruling party leads Ukraine vote – 29 October 2012
Reuters — Ukraine’s Tymoshenko launches hunger strike over “rigged” vote – 29 October 2012
Spiegel — Ukrainian Election Criticized as Votes Counted – 29 October 2012