Maldives’ Ex-President Boycotts Court Hearing

By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

MALÉ, Maldives – On Monday, Maldives’ ex-president, Mohamed Nasheed, did not attend his court hearing in Malé.  Mr. Nasheed faces charges of abuse of power for unlawfully ordering for the arrest of Maldives’ chief criminal court judge, Abdullah Mohamed.

Mr. Nasheed speaks to the media. (Photo Courtesy of Radio Australia)

Last week, the Hulhumale Magistrate Court directed the ex-president to appear before it Monday but also, to not leave Malé without its permission.

In addition to his failure to appear in court, Mr. Nasheed did not seek the court’s approval when he left the capital to participate in election campaigning.

According to Associated Press, Mr. Nasheed, who served as Maldives’ first democratically elected president, believes that he was “forced from office in a coup d’etat.”

“The coup has not yet been completed,” Mr. Nasheed informed the AFP news agency after his Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) held a protest in Malé last Friday to criticize the charges against him.

Furthermore, according to BBC, the ex-president denies the charges against him and believes that the trial is politically driven.  To Mr. Nasheed, the court’s purpose in restricting his travels was to prevent him from campaigning in the upcoming elections.

“Once they started to set up a fabricated court, bring in judges who are not judges of that court, and the whole structure of it is so… politically motivated, it is very obvious it is not meant to serve justice,” Mr. Nasheed shared.

In any event, if Mr. Nasheed is convicted, he may face up to three years in jail or banishment to a remote islet in the archipelago.  Furthermore, it may bar him from disputing future presidential polls.

“People will not allow the regime to steal the next election. A free and fair election is our over-arching goal,” said Mr. Nasheed.

After he either resigned or was forcibly moved by the Maldives police, Mr. Nasheed’s deputy, Mohamed Waheed, replaced him as president.

According to the Associated Press, the new president’s spokesman, Abbas Riza, denied Mr. Nasheed’s allegations against the court and said that the court order was “the usual practice, according to the country’s law.”

For more information, please see:

Aljazeera – Maldives ex-president to face trial – 01 October 2012

Associated Press – Maldives’ ex-president fails to show in court – 01 October 2012

BBC – Maldives ex- President Mohamed Nasheed defies court – 01 October 2012

Boston News – Maldives court orders police to bring ex-president – 01 October 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Cambodian Activist Gets 20 Years for Allegedly Inciting Rebellion

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia – Cambodian land rights activist and journalist, Mam Sonando, was sentenced to a 20 year jail term by the Phnom Penh court for allegedly inciting a mass rebellion against the central government.

 

Sonando being hauled away by police. (Photo Courtesy of The Phnom Penh Post)

A well-known critic of the current Cambodian prime minister and political administration, the 71 year old Sonando was accused of urging villagers in the eastern Kratie province to take up arms as part of a greater coup.  Hun Sen, the Cambodian prime minister, believes that Sonando was attempting to secede and establish his own separatist state with the rebelling villagers.

Sonando and his supporters have denied all allegations, and he has maintained his plea of not guilty despite being handed a guilty verdict by the panel of three judges in the Phnom Penh court.  The insistence by the central government of the existence of an actual rebellion is alleged to be mere puffery.  It is believed, by Sonando and his supporters, to be a political move to silence critics and keep the current abuses of the administration quiet.

The current administration has been known to forcibly evict Cambodian citizens from their land.  The central government’s alleged aim is to usurp private citizens’ lands and utilize it for agricultural purposes.  Industries, such as rubber, sugar, and mineral exportation, has exploded in recent years.  Cambodia has enjoyed quite an economic boom which has led to the current land disputes and possible abuses in basic land rights of private citizens.

From a special report by the U.N. Human Rights Council, Cambodia’s population is growing increasingly “desperate and unhappy” over the abuses by their government.  The government has been believed to be using these land grabs as a tool of repression.  A leading environmental campaigner and journalist, who had been reporting on issues such as the current land disputes, was found dead in the trunk of a car.

Last May, clashes between protestors and the central government’s armed forces over land disputes lead to the death of a 14 year old girl in Kratie.  Sonando has, now, been found guilty of assisting these villagers and inciting rebellion among their ranks.  His supporter’s have, however, believed that his recently found guilt and impending incarceration is a victory.  They now have possible direct evidence of abuses by the government, such as prosecuting baseless claims against government critics and activists.

The EU has been under immense pressure to freeze tariff free exports from Cambodia.  The tariff free exportation has, perhaps, contributed to the recent economic boom which has tempted the central government to forcibly and illegally steal land from private citizens.  The EU has also issued a statement doubting the legitimacy of the Cambodian courts.

 

For further information, please see:

BBC – Cambodia jails journalist Mam Sonando over ‘plot’ – 1 October 2012

International Business Times – Myanmar Revisited? Cambodian Pro-Democracy Activist Jailed For 20 years – 1 October 2012

Reuters – Cambodia rights activist jailed 20 years on disputed conviction – 1 October 2012

The Phnom Penh Post – Activist Mam Sonando gets 20 years – 1 October 2012

Big Win for Indigenous Rights in Peru’s Top Court

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

 LIMA, Peru – Peru’s highest court, the Constitutional Tribunal, has ruled that an Amazonian indigenous community could limit outsiders’ access to its territory and upheld the principle of communal autonomy.  The Tribunal also ordered lower courts to void the convictions of four indigenous community leaders who had been jailed during their struggle against illegal loggers, miners, and transportation workers.

A sign put up by the indigenous community at Tres Islas warns motorists that the land is private property. (Photo Courtesy Indian Country)

“We’ve had to move heaven and earth to defend our territory, but we have won,” Esperanza Gonzales, one of the leaders facing a prison term, said at a press conference in Lima.

The Shipibo and Ese’eja community of Tres Islas, located in the southeastern region of Madre de Dios has been battling destructive trespassers for years.  Illegal miners, loggers and transportation companies have stripped portions of the land and polluted water sources.

When the community put up a gate across a road and posted a guard from the community, two of the transportation companies that served illegal miners brought suit against the community on the grounds that the gate violated the companies’ freedom of movement.

An initial court ruling in favor of the companies was upheld on appeal, and was ultimately supported by the Superior Court of Madre de Dios, which in September 2010 sentenced four community leaders to six years in prison and fines of about $2,500 each.

The Constitutional Tribunal, based its decision to overturn the lower courts’ rulings on principles from the Peruvian Constitution, International Labor Organization Convention 169 on the rights of tribal and Indigenous Peoples, jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Although “freedom of movement is a fundamental right, it is subject to certain constraints, such as not invading other people’s land without the owners’ consent,” the decision stated.

The case marks the first time that a Peruvian court has ruled that an indigenous community has a right not only to private property, like any citizen, but also to self-determination within its territory, as long as the aim is not secession from the country.

Although this decision is seen as big win for indigenous rights, advocates caution that there is still much progress to be made.

The ruling only guarantees indigenous communities autonomy over the surface of their land.  Sub-surface resources are still owned by the government, which can grant access to companies wishing to exploit them.

A key provision of Convention 169, which Peru ratified in 1994, is reflected in a new law that would require the government to consult with indigenous communities about any development project that would affect their territories.  The law has not yet been implemented, but the first of such consultations is expected to be held in early 2013.

For further information, please see:

Indian Country – Peru’s Constitutional Tribunal Rules in Favor of Indigenous Community – 2 October 2012

Upside Down World – Peru: Amazon Indians Win Court Case over Land Rights – 28 September 2012

Chicago Times Tribune – Peru top court puts tribal sovereignty ahead of mining, logging – 26 September 2012

Eurasia Review – Peru: Distance Between Government And Indigenous Communities Grows – 26 September 2012

International Labour Organization – Convention No. 169

 

Bahrain Court Upholds Jail Sentences for Medics

By Ali Al-Bassam
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East Desk

MANAMA, Bahrain — Nine medics who were arrested for their role in the pro democracy uprising that took place last year had their jail terms upheld by the Court of Cassation, Bahrain’s highest court, on Monday.  They were convicted on charges of weapons possession, incitement, and for taking part in the demonstrations.  Nine other medics had their sentences overturned in June and two are currently in hiding.

Bahrain’s treatments of medics who protested last year received international criticism. (Photo Courtesy of Al Jazeera)

Dr. Ali Al-Ekri, a former senior surgeon at the Salmaniya Hospital in Manama, the largest hospital in Bahrain, was sentenced to five years in prison, while one of his colleagues received a sentence of three years.  The other medics received sentences ranging between a month and a year.

“We did not get a fair trial…  We think we are a card being used by the regime to negotiate with the opposition,” Al-Ekri said in a telephone interview with Reuters.  This was the final appeal that could be heard, leaving the medics without any other chances to have their case heard.  Mohammed Al-Maskati, head of the Bahrain Youth Society for Human Rights, says that while there are no other opportunities for an appeal left, there still might be a chance for a pardon by the king.

The arrests and convictions of the medics have attained global criticism.  Amnesty International claims that the medics were arrested for publicly denouncing the use of excessive force used by the government during the protests in interviews conducted by international news media.  Washington has also criticized the court’s ruling.

Amnesty International Middle East and North Africa Deputy Director Ann Harrison said during a statement, “[w]ith today’s verdict, the Bahraini government has shown once more it is not serious about human rights and accountability for past violations.”  Harrison believes that Monday’s affirmation of the convictions goes against the promises Bahrain made before the Human Rights Council in Geneva on September 19.  The promises included measures aimed at releasing prisoners of conscience, bolstering fair trial guarantees, and investigating human rights violations committed during and after last year’s reforms.

Rights groups expressed concern during the protests over the government’s treatment of medics.  An independent commission criticized Bahrain for its excessive use of force and torture.  The government has implemented some reforms after last year, but the opposition says that they are “superficial and have not curtailed routine abuses.”  The Shi’ite opposition wants a constitutional monarchy and a more equitable political system that would grant them greater representation, ending decades-old discrimination against them in their search for jobs, also within the army and security forces.

For further information, please see:

Al Jazeera — Bahrain Court Upholds Verdict in Medics Trial — 1 October 2012

Amnesty International UK — Bahrain Should Quash Medics’ Convictions — 1 October 2012

Bahrain Freedom Movement — Bahrain Upholds Jail Terms for Medics — 1 October 2012

BBC News — Bahrain Court Rejects Medics’ Appeal — 1 October 2012

Reuters — Bahrain Court Upholds Jail Terms on Protesting Medics — 1 October 2012

Magnitsky’s Mother is Expected to Testify Tomorrow in the Trial of the Prison Doctor Charged With Her Son’s Death

Press Release
Hermitage Capital

1 October 2012 – Natalia Magnitskaya, the mother of Sergei Magnitsky, is expected to testify against Dmitry Kratov, the doctor at Burtryka Prison who denied her son medical attention at his trial in Moscow tomorrow.

Sergei Magnitsky’s mother, Nataliya Magnitsky, holds a photo of her son. (Photo Courtesy of The Moscow Times)

The court hearing will take place at Tverskoi District Court (25а Tsvetnoi Boulevard, Moscow) at 10:30 am, Tuesday October 2nd

After three years of investigation, the Russian authorities charged Dmitry Kratov, former deputy head of Butyrka detention center responsible for medical care. He is the only official being prosecuted for the death of Mr Magnitsky. Russian authorities charged Kratov with negligence as opposed to torture or homicide. The charges were made ignoring the findings of the Russian President’s Human Rights Council and petitions from Magnitsky’s family showing evidence that Magnitsky was systematically withheld medical care, tortured and ultimately beaten to death in custody in an effort to force him to change his testimonies against corrupt Russian government officials.

In the previous hearing on this case on 13 September 2012, Judge Neverova rejected all petitions filed by Magnitsky’s family seeking to return the case to prosecutors to take into consideration new evidence showing that Kratov was acting in concert with other government officials as part of a conspiracy involving the theft of $230 million from the Russian government. The judge also refused to allow a video recording or live internet broadcasting of the hearing. She refused to move the hearing to a courtroom large enough to allow press and other interested parties to attend the hearing. And finally, she refused petitions to call new witnesses and seek documentary evidence from government organisations.

When Sergei Magnitsky was still alive, the same Judge Neverova also refused his own petitions from custody to stop his rights being violated by the Interior Ministry.

Sergei Magnitsky, an outside lawyer for the Hermitage Fund, was killed in Russian police custody at the age of 37 after he exposed the $230 million theft implicating government officials. He was honoured posthumously with 2010 Integrity Award by Transparency International, for his fight against official corruption.

For further information please contact:

Hermitage Capital
Phone:             +44 207 440 17 77
E-mail:             info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Website:          http://lawandorderinrussia.org
Facebook:        http://on.fb.me/hvIuVI
Twitter:            @KatieFisher__
Livejournal:     http://hermitagecap.livejournal.com/