THE COMMENTARY IN THIS PIECE DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF IMPUNITY WATCH.
*WARNING VIDEOS MAY CONTAIN GRAPHIC IMAGES*
The Relics!
By Mark McMurray
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
JERUSALEM, Israel — On Tuesday, Israeli authorities began enforcing a court order calling for the dismantling of a Jewish settlement in the West Bank.

The evacuation comes after Israel’s Supreme Court ruled in September that five of the fourteen buildings in Ulpana, housing thirty families in total, sit on Palestinian land. Temporary housing has been provided for the families in the larger town of Beit El, of which Ulpana is a suburb. Hoping to find a way to relocate the buildings instead of destroying them, the government asked the court to delay the removal of the structures, which was scheduled for July 1. The government’s request was denied, leading to the evacuation this week.
Last week, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the building of additional housing in the disputed territory. Three hundred homes are to be built in Beit El, with an additional five hundred to be constructed in other parts of the West Bank. The announcement came as supporters of the settler movement, mainly right-wing critics within Netanyahu’s Likud party, spoke out against the removal of settlers from Ulpana.
Israel Harel, a senior fellow at the Institute for Zionist Strategies, has mixed feelings about the compromise of building new settlements in Beit El to replace the housing abandoned in Ulpana.
“In the general arena, the settlers’ movement made a big victory,” he said. “But there is a big inner debate about if this compromise should be accepted.”
Tzaly Reshef, a founder of Peace Now–an Israeli group opposing the settlements–believes there will be no two-state solution with the presence of settlements in Beit El. “While Netanyahu may say from here to eternity that the Israelis will negotiate, the Israelis will compromise, what he does on the ground shows his real intentions,” he said. Experts believe the settlements in Beit El would become a part of the Palestinian state if the two-state solution moves forward.
Israel captured the land where the settlement is located as a result of the Six-Day War in 1967. The decision to create new settlements in the area fifteen miles north of Jerusalem has been criticized by the Palestinians and the U.S. They argue that building new structures within the disputed territory undermines the peace process. Critics of the East Jerusalem and West Bank settlements, citing the 2003 road map for peace and Israeli law, also claim that the buildings are illegal under both local and international law.
For further information, please see:
BBC News – West Bank Jewish Settlers Leave Ulpana Outpost – 26 June 2012
New York Times – Settlers Begin Evacuation of a West Bank Outpost – 26 June 2012
Times of Israel – No Violence As Fifteen Families Leave Homes at Givat Ulpana Outpost – 26 June 2012
Jewish Journal – Ulpana Residents Agree to Leave Peacefully – 20 June 2012
By Pearl Rimon
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe
BAKU, Azerbaijan – The legal affairs and human rights committee of the Council of Europe voted on a resolution that calls for Azerbaijani authorities to resolve the cases of more than 80 political prisoners and to ensure that no further arrests on politically motivated charges are made. By the passing of this resolution, the Council of Europe has sent a clear message to the Azerbaijan government to stop using its criminal justice system as a way to deal with political oppositions.

The adopted resolution comes from a report by Christoph Strässer, who was assigned to follow up on political prisoners in the country. Azerbaijan has denied Strässer’s visa for entry into the country since 2009. Strässer was forced to write his report without meeting with the political prisoners and relied on information provided by consulting Azerbaijani lawyers, and local and international human rights groups. His report listed around 100 political prisoners who are in detention due to trumped up charges.
Azerbaijan was admitted into the Council of Europe in 2001 but on the condition that they would release all political prisoners. Among the political prisoners is Vidadi Isganderov, a human rights defender who was sentenced for three years following a complaint he submitted to authorities alleging vote rigging during his 2010 parliamentary election. Instead of investigating his complain, he was charged and convicted of interfering with the elections.
“ARTICLE 19 welcomes this decision by the Council of Europe as crucial step in recognizing that political prisoners exist in Azerbaijan, something which the authorities in that country have continued to deny,” says Dr. Agnes Callamard, director of ARTICLE 19, a London based human rights organization.
Azerbaijani authorities released nine political activists last week, but a number of journalists, human rights defenders and activists remain in custody. This month alone, three were arrested on false charges in what appears to be retaliatory action for their human rights work.
Hilal Mammadov, editor-in-chief of the newspaper Tolishi Sadoi, was arrested on June 21 on alleged drug possession charges and is in pre-trial custody for three months. Mehman Huseynov, a blogger for Institute for Reports’ Freedoms and Safety is in custody and charged with “hooliganism”. Ilham Amiraslanov, an activist for the country’s 2001 flood victims is currently detained on weapons charges. sent to pre-trial custody for three months. On June 12, Mehman Huseynov, a blogger and photographer at the Institute for Reporters’ Freedoms and Safety, was arrested and charged with “hooliganism.” And on June 8, police arrested Ilham Amiraslanov, an activist who worked on behalf of victims of a 2010 flood in eastern Azerbaijan, on trumped-up weapons possession charges.
For further information, please see:
Public Service Europe – Enough is Enough Azerbaijan Must Act On Human Rights 28 June 2012
Azeri Report – Council of Europe Adopts Resolution on Azerbaijan’s Political Prisoners 26 June 2012
New Europe Online – Amnesty International Welcomes Release Azerbaijani Activists 26 June 2012
By Emily Schneider
Special Contributor, Blog Entry #3
We’re visiting our third health center in Bihar, India and I am hot, dirty, and exhausted. We arrived in Patna at 5:00 a.m., after a twelve hour train ride from Delhi, and have been visiting health centers ever since. Right now, we’re at a Primary Health Center (PHC) in Patna. Primary Health Centers are larger than the Sub-Health Centers (SHC) but are spread farther apart throughout the districts. They should be open 24 hours and have doctors and nurses on hand at all times. Our guide informed us that this particular PHC served as the model for all others in the state of Bihar.

We are trying to see as many health centers, covering all economic levels, in as many different districts throughout the state as possible. Our job is to question the doctors and nurses about the care they’re providing and the supplies they have available. We are also supposed to thoroughly document everything we see with pictures. We’re trying to find out if the health centers in Bihar are complying with the established national guidelines. Previously, they were in violation of almost every regulation. For example, Bihar didn’t have enough health centers and the health centers they had established didn’t have enough medical equipment or supplies. Additionally, they weren’t open the requisite 24hours a day, and they were not clean and sanitary.
All of these problems leads to India’s alarmingly high maternal mortality rate. Human Rights Law Network even filed a public interest lawsuit to bring the substandard level of care to the attention of the Indian government and the public. The courts ordered a reform of the Bihar health centers a year ago. Now my team has been sent to see if there was any change following the court order or if the conditions remain the same.

One of the most prevalent problems that directly contributes to maternal mortality rates is anemia. Many studies note there is a prevalence of anemia throughout India and that it contributes to death during childbirth. It also helps to explain the very high maternal death rate in comparison to other countries. The percentage of maternal deaths caused by hemorrhage is also greater in India than the rest of the world. This can also be attributed to the high rate of anemia.
Anemic women are increasingly susceptible to communicable diseases, such as tuberculosis and malaria; both of which are associated with complications during and after pregnancy. According to the most recent National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), in India, it is estimated that 55% of women are anemic; some studies place the number of pregnant women who are anemic as high as 85%. The NFHS-3 survey also stated that in 2004, approximately 22,000 maternal deaths were directly related to anemia. However, the most troubling aspect of the survey is that the number of women suffering from anemia in India has steadily increased over the past ten years.
According to the new government guidelines, women should be provided with dietary supplements during the requisite four ante-natal care appointments. The implementation of this simple practice would be a big step forward in helping to reduce the occurrence of anemia in pregnant women. That is, if it actually ever happened. The problem is that ensuring that this practice does manage to be implemented is dependent on a number of things. First, all pregnant women should be officially registered in their district; second, they should be provided free ante-natal appointments that involve physical checkups, tests for anemia, vaccinations, and dietary supplements; and third, the facility must actually have the proper dietary supplements to provide them to the women.
The reality is that many women never register. Those who do register usually don’t receive any ante-natal care visits. Those few who do go for ante-natal care visits do not get proper physical exams and are hardly ever tested for anemia. Almost none of the women are actually given the dietary supplements to help them stay healthy and strong during pregnancy.

We asked the chief medical officer at the “model” health center to estimate how many mothers he sees with anemia. He told us he hardly ever treats pregnant anemic women and that anemia is a very rare condition in India. Hopefully, in our next few visits we will be able to uncover more information to determine who is correct. The doctor or the statistics from the NFHS-3 survey.
Emily Schneider is a third-year law student at Syracuse University College of Law. She will be contributing to Impunity Watch by blogging about her experiences in India, where she is spending her summer working as an intern.