Imprisoned Ex-Leader of Taiwan Requests U.S. Intervention

Imprisoned Ex-Leader of Taiwan Requests U.S. Intervention

By Hyo-Jin Paik
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

TAIPEI, Taiwan– Earlier this month, the Taiwan High Court sentenced the country’s ex-leader Chen Shui-bian to life in prison for money laundering, embezzling state funds, accepting bribes and committing forgery.  This week, the same court rejected Chen’s petition for release on bail as Chen supporters demanded that the appellate court uphold Chen’s human rights.

One local newspaper said, “Let this be a warning to all political parties, politicians, government officials and businessmen.  The Chen family deserves no sympathy for the heavy sentence.  We should respect the court’s decision.” 

Chen shui bian

Taiwan’s Ex-President Chen Shui-bian.  Courtesy of Reuters. 

Chen, however, has petitioned the U.S. to intervene and restore his civil and human rights.  The Taiwan Civil Rights Litigation Organization is sponsoring a legal action for Chen and is demanding his immediate release.

Chen claims that under the 1952 San Francisco Peace Treaty, Taiwan was not awarded to Republic of China; therefore, still remains under U.S. Military Government.  Accordingly, Chen plans on using international law and U.S. constitutional law to resolve his legal problems.

 Free chen shui bianChen’s supporters.  Courtesy of Start Telegram.

 Calling Chen’s trial unfair and invalid, Taipei Director of Democratic Progressive Party Huang Ching-lin said he supports Chen’s theory. 

Furthermore, some Taiwanese media also expressed concern for Chen’s case, especially for his lengthy detention during trial.  One daily paper said, “There was a widespread belief that this was hardly a fair trial.  The flawed process has affected the healthy developments in our country’s democracy and our international image.”

However, Chinese Nationalist Party Legislator Lee Hung-chun commented that Chen must be “mentally ill after spending so much time in detention.”

Chen has been in custody since December and continues to argue that he is innocent, claiming that he is a victim of Beijing’s political conspiracy.  Chen said his corruption trial was a “political revenge for his lifelong push to declare formal independence from China.”

Chen’s wife also received a life sentence, while his son and daughter received shorter sentences.
 

For more information, please see:

AFP – Taiwan media divided over ex-leader’s life sentence – 11 September 2009

Asia News – Ex President Chen SHui-bian to stay in prison – 25 September 2009

China Post – High court decides to detain Chen Shui-bian – 25 September 2009

Taipei Times – Chen asks US court to intervene to free him – 24 September 2009

Indian Journalist and Activist Arrested and Tortured

By Megan E. Dodge
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

DHAKA, India– Jiten Yumnam a journalist, also an anti-Tipaimukh dam and rights activist, remains captured and at risk after being tortured while in Custody in India.

Jiten and seven others (Chungset Koireng, Likmabam Tompok Singh, Shamjet Sabano Nanbo Singh, Irom Brojen Singh, Amom Soken Singh, Toarem Ramanda Singh and Thiyam Dinesh Singh) were arrested in areas surrounding Manipur on September 14. This is based on assertions by the, Asian Human Rights Commission, a Hong Kong-based regional rights organization, which issued a statement on Thursday, September 24. The statement indicated that, “We have obtained court documents which show Jiten and seven others accused and were arrested on mere suspicion and unsubstantiated allegations.” 

Jiten was active in an international campaign against police officers who murdered a young man and a pregnant woman in the Manipur capital this July. In the present matter, the police claimed to have received information that the detained congregated on September 14 to plan further protests against the extrajudicial executions of civilians to intensify the pressure on security forces. Investigation officer, Ibomche Singh, sought a 20-day custody of the eight. Although the police claimed the detained had confessed to the charges during interrogation, when questioned before a court, the protesters denied confessing, and said they had been badly tortured. The court recorded this and agreed to extended police custody until 29 September.

Jiten and the seven other activists arrested, were reported taken into custody without explanation, and it is believed by some sources that cases against them were fabricated using the National Security Act, 1980. The Act is widely misused by the government to lengthily detain human rights defenders and political activists, and there is concern that this will be applied to Jiten and the other activists presently captured.

Evidence shows that Jiten was in need and requested medical attention, however, the detained were examined only once by a doctor despite having been previously tortured.  According to one source, neither the victim nor his family have been told of the charges against him. Unverified reports have suggested that he and seven other persons arrested on the same day will be charged with offenses punishable under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

For more information, please see:

News from Bangladesh – India anti-dam activists at risk in custody – September 28, 2009 

South Asia Media – India anti-dam activists at risk – September 27, 2009 

Asia Human Rights Commission – INDIA: A detained human rights defender is at risk of false charges and torture  – September 18, 2009

Palestinian Refugee Camps in Lebanon: When Will Changes Be Made?

By Brandon Kaufman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BEIRUT, Lebanon– The latest figures show that there are nearly four hundred thousand Palestinian refugees living in Lebanon.  Of that number, fifty-three percent live in twelve refugee camps scattered throughout the country.  The existence of these camps, however, does not mean that the refugees are living in suitable conditions.

Lebanese law forbids Palestinian refugees from working in seventy-two different professions.  These prohibitions include various private sector careers such as engineering, medicine, and law, as well as all public sector jobs.  Furthermore, there are a number of low skilled professions such as guarding buildings and trash collecting which are also subject to the prohibition.  As for the remaining low skilled positions, Palestinian refugees are required to obtain work permits and very few of these permits have been issued.

Aside from the professional prohibitions, a recent Lebanese law forbids Palestinians from buying and owning property.  Even Lebanese women married to a Palestinian man are forbidden from giving their children any property as an inheritance.  In addition, the new law obstructs renovation work at the camps by prohibiting the entry of any building equipment.  As a result, many of these camps lack many basic services such as electricity, water, and sewage systems.

In response to these conditions, the Lebanese argue that the refugees are temporarily in the camps and for them to normalize the situation with the Palestinians.  They are concerned that this would lead to an unwanted sense of permanent settlement.  Currently, it is estimated that nearly forty percent of 15 to 24 year-olds in the camps are unemployed.  Not only that, but chronic health failure is reported in just under twenty percent of Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, a rate higher than that of Palestinian refugees in both Syria and Jordan.

In light of recent political developments in the region, the sentiment seems to be that the right of return for Palestinians is not a realistic possibility in the immediate future. As a result, many continue to feel that Lebanese law needs to reflect the ongoing struggle being faced by Palestinian refugees.

For more information, please see:

China View- Lebanese President Rejects “Any Form” of Palestinian Settlement of Refugees– 26 September 2009

The Daily Star- Sleiman Voices Hopes for Lebanese Seat on Security Council– 26 September 2009

The Palestinian Chronicle- Palestinian Refugees in Lebanon: From Deprivation to Violence– 18 September 2009

Taylor Denied More Allegations in Court

By Kylie M Tsudama
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – Charles Taylor remains on the stand in the International Criminal Court (ICC) defending his actions during the Sierra Leonean civil war.  He continues to defend himself against the allegations that he armed and supported Sierra Leonean rebels who killed and mutilated thousands.

This week Taylor denied allegations that he ordered an attack by Sierra Leonean rebels on Guinea to oust President Lansana Conte in 2000.

“No I did not, no I did not,” he said.  “We were being attacked by LURD (Liberians United for Reconciliation and Democracy) from Guinea but I was equally busy with other issues that were not war-like.  It was in my best interest to attack Guinea but why not use Liberians for that?”

Taylor also denied having any knowledge of a planned rebel attack on Sierra Leone in 1991 and called those allegations “lies.”  He was responding to allegations brought in 2008 by a prosecution witness who said that Taylor took part in a plan with the RUF (Revolutionary United Front) rebels to invade Sierra Leone.

“It’s a lie,” said Taylor responding to the witness’ account that he saw Taylor and RUF leader Foday Sankoh together in Voinjama, Liberia making plans to attack Sierra Leone.  “I had not even gone from Kakata to Gbangha and so I would not have moved to Voinjama.  There is no way you can get to Voinjama except you go through Gbangha.”  He added, “May be he saw a ghost of someone looking like Charles Taylor, its all a lie.”

Allegations that Taylor gave Sankoh $20,000 as payment for safekeeping diamonds have also been denied.

“If I wanted to send money for Sankoh, I would have done so through the Liberian Foreign Minister who was in Lome,”Taylor said.  “It would have been a good gesture just like Eyadema (former Togolese President) and Obasanjo (former Nigerian President) did give him money, but I did not.”

The trial will resume on Tuesday, as the ICC will be observing a holiday on Monday.

For more information, please see:

CharlesTaylorTrial.org – Taylor Denies Giving Money to Rebel Leader or Safekeeping Diamonds – 24 September 2009

CharlesTaylorTrial.org – ‘I Did Not Know of Any Prior Plans for the Invasion of Sierra Leone in 1991,” Taylor Says – 23 September 2009

CharlesTaylorTrial.org – Taylor Did Not Order the RUF to Attack Guinea – 22 September 2009

Fiji Prime Minister Stands Ground Refusing to Restore Democracy

By Eileen Gould
Impunity Watch Reporter, Oceania

SUVA, Fiji – Yesterday, Fiji’s Interim Prime Minister, Commodore Frank Bainimarama, addressed the United Nations in New York in the wake of the European Union’s decision to extend its trade sanctions on Fiji until March 2010.  The international community has urged Fiji’s government to rethink its position.

The EU refuses to provide Fiji with any development aid until it demonstrates a commitment to return to a democratic state. This aid was aimed at improving Fiji’s economy by assisting, for one, the sugar industry.  Poverty levels in Fiji’s rural communities continue to rise, and its people are extremely discontented.

According to a professor from the School of Economics at the University of the South Pacific, Wadan Narsey, the EU’s decision is indicative of the international community’s increasing concern about the situation in Fiji.

“For the European Union to say that they are going to continue with these sanctions for another six months ought to be taken very seriously by this military government that they have got to rethink their strategy forward,” Narsey said.

Fiji’s government refuses to hold elections until 2014.  This timeline is unacceptable, according to Kamalesh Sharma, the Secretary General for the Commonwealth of Nations, who met with Prime Minister Bainimarama in New York on September 25th.

Sharma also reiterated the Commonwealth members’ disapproval of the human rights situation in Fiji.  He further stated that the Government should rescind the Public Emergency Regulation, an act extending a broad range of powers to the government, including the power to censor the media.  The pair was unable to reach an agreement.

On September 26th, Bainimarama addressed the 64th Session of the United Nations General Assembly international community.  He plans to put a new constitution into place by September 13th.  “The basis for the new constitution will be the ideals and principles formulated by the People’s Charter for Change and Progress, a document prepared following widespread consultation with, and input from, the people of Fiji”.

The Prime Minister claims that Fiji’s history shows a great deal of “mismanagement, corruption and nepotism”.   He requested that the international community have patience as Fiji attempts to overcome its past.

He further expressed his disappointment with the UN’s decision to exclude Fiji troops from participating in peacekeeping operations.  Although he did not explicitly mention Australia or New Zealand, it is no secret that these countries are Fiji’s strongest critics.

In December 2006 Bainimarama staged the fourth coup in Fiji since 1987. The Commonwealth suspended Fiji’s membership on September 1.
For more information, please see:
Fiji Village – PM calls for patience and understanding – 27 September 2009

Radio New Zealand News – No agreement between Commonwealth and Fiji – 27 September 2009

TVNZ – Fiji urged to change election plans – 27 September 2009

Xinhua News – Fiji asks critics to have patience during the reform period – 27 September 2009

ABC News – Bainimarama to address UN General Assembly – 26 September 2009

The Associated Press – Fiji stung by exclusion from new UN peacekeeping – 26 September 2009

UN News Centre – At UN, Fijian regime asks critics to have patience during reform period – 26 September 2009

Radio New Zealand International – Fiji regime urged to rethink its stance as EU sanctions continue – 25 September 2009