Egypt Rejects Nile Water Negotiations

Egypt Rejects Nile Water Negotiations

By Meredith Lee-Clark
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

CAIRO, Egypt – Egypt has rejected a potential water sharing agreement proposed by a conference of the ten Nile River Basin countries in Sharm Al-Sheik earlier this month. Egypt claims that reducing its traditional water rights threatens its fragile agriculture along the Nile, and perhaps Egypt itself.

Egypt’s latest refusal has led to the other countries upstream, including the Congo, Tanzania, Uganda, and Ethiopia, to threaten to shut Egypt out of the pact. Water pacts along the Nile have been in place since 1929, when most of the countries along the river were under British colonial European control. Egypt has traditionally been the most powerful country in the region, and has also held the most robust water rights.

“We will not sign on to any agreement that does not clearly state and acknowledge our historical rights,” said Egyptian Water Minister Mohamed Nasreddin Allam, after the meeting with representatives from the other Basin countries.

The countries upstream, led by Ethiopia, which contributes eighty percent of the water flowing into Egypt, have demanded what it calls a fairer water deal, departing from pre-independence treaties. Ethiopia and the other upper riparian countries also dispute the legitimacy of a 1959 water treaty between Egypt and Sudan, which allows Egypt alone to use 55.5 billion cubic meters of water per year, 87% of the Nile’s water per year, and granting Sudan 18.5 cubic meters per year. The 1929 and 1959 agreements also give Egypt veto power over any proposed dams and upstream river projects that may influence Egypt’s water flow.

Egypt says the issue could soon be one of national security, and that Egypt may be forced to use military force to protect its water rights. As the effects of climate change worsen, Egypt faces water threats from both ends of the Nile: as sea levels rise, the Egyptian cultural hub in the Nile River Delta could be flooded and inundated with salt water; as water needs become dire upstream, the fabled breadbasket of the Nile River Basin could become arid. Some analysts fear that the Nile River Basin could be a hotspot for a potential “water war.”

For more information, please see:

Afrik.com – Egypt Better Off Settling Water Spat with Ethiopia Led Nile Basin Negotiations – 27 April 2010

Al-Masri Al-Youm – Dying of Thirst vs. Death by Drowning – 27 April 2010

Daily Nation – Tension as Egypt Rejects New Deal for Nile Water – 27 April 2010

Guardian – Egypt Must Negotiate on Nile Water – 26 April 2010

All Headline News – Egypt Will Reassert Traditional Rights to Nile River Water – 23 April 2010

Egyptian Tycoon Tried Again For Murder Of Lebanese Pop Star

By Ahmad Shihadah
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

CAIRO, Egypt – An Egyptian tycoon sentenced to death last year for killing a popular Lebanese singer has appeared in court in Cairo for a retrial.

Hisham Talaat Moustafa, a senior member of the ruling party in Egypt, and co-defendant Mohsen al-Sukkari were granted a retrial on a technicality. They were convicted of the killing of Suzanne Tamim in Dubai in 2008.The case has received much attention, as it involves a member of an elite often seen as being above the law.

Moustafa 50, was sentenced to death last May on charges of hiring Mohsen el Sukkary, 41, and paying him $2 million to kill 30-year-old Lebanese diva Suzanne Tamim in the United Arab Emirates.

Tamim rose to stardom in the 1990s after she won the Arab World’s equivalent of “American Idol.” She moved to Cairo and became involved with Moustafa in a love affair, which turned sour after Tamim fled to London and then to the glitzy Persian Gulf city-state of Dubai in the UAE, and found another lover. Dubai police found her in her apartment with her throat slit in July 2008.

“I swear to God I didn’t kill her,” el Sukkary shouted Monday in a courtroom packed with journalists, lawyers and family members of the defendants. Moustafa also denied the charges. “My son has been unjustly sitting behind bars for the past two years. But I am optimistic about the retrial,” el Sukkary’s father, Munir, said outside the court.

Many Egyptians were bitter about the decision to retry the case, taking it as a sign that Moustafa will walk away unscathed as a member of the elite in a country where cronyism is widespread and many people think rules are often bent for the rich and powerful. Those who thought the integrity of the Egyptian judicial system had been rescued felt let down by the retrial.

There’s a growing gap between Egypt’s rich and poor, and the country has been riveted in recent months by protests demanding higher wages. Legal experts, however, said that popular anger toward an unpopular regime shouldn’t reflect on the trial.

“I read the ruling that granted the new trial, and found it correct and very precise,” said Yehia al Gamal, a human rights advocate and law professor at Cairo University. “However, the image of the regime in people’s minds is a distorted and rotten one. This is why there is a deep distrust,” Gamal added.

If found guilty in this trial, the two defendants will be allowed to appeal the ruling and could face a third trial, Judge Ahmed Mekky told the Reuters news agency.

For more information, please see:

BBC – Egypt Tycoon Tried Again For Murder Of Suzanne Tamim – 26 April 2010

World AP – Egypt Retries Real Estate Tycoon In Lebanese Pop Star’s Killing – 26 April 2010

News 24 – Egypt Tycoon Retrial Begins – 26 April 2010

AJC – Retrial Begins For Egyptian Accused In Diva Murder – 26 April 2010

Proposed Russian Bill to Increase FSB Authority

By Kenneth F. Hunt
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MOSCOW, Russia – A bill submitted to Russia’s Parliament would increase the power of the the Foreign Security Service (FSB) to clamp down on dissident media outlets, journalists, protesters, and extremist groups.

The bill was submitted to the Russian Duma on April 24 by the ruling Russian government.  The Duma is the lower house of Russia’s Parliament.

The legislation would allow the FSB to take preventive measures, including detention of some form, against any person or group that the Kremlin suspects of engaging in extremist activity.  Moreover, the bill would allow the FSB to punish any individual that does not comply with any “legitimate demands” of the FSB.  The bill would also allow the FSB to summon and issue legally binding warnings against both journalists and protesters.

Outrage over the proposed bill has come from both rights groups and Russian opposition parties.

For opposition parities, the bill appears to be a power grab by the Medvedev administration.  The bill grants powers to the FSB eerily similar to the notorious Soviet-era KGB.  Rights groups are also concerned that the bill will be used primarily to harass political rivals and citizens, especially those that are critical of President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin.

The leader of the Yabloko Party, Sergei Mitrokhin, says the bill is designed to intimidate and prevent protest against the government.  Mr. Mitrokhin the says bill “will mostly affect political activists and opponents of current authority” and the FSB is attempting to “psychologically pressure a large circle of [opponents]”.

The Kremlin and FSB defend the bill, saying it is a necessary change in policy after the devastating March 29 subway bombings in Moscow. Moreover, the government cites a dramatic rise in extremist activities over the past several years to rationalize increasing FSB power.

The sponsors of the bills appended a public statement, which accused certain journalists and extremists groups of “propagat[ing] the cult of individualism, violence and mistrust in the government’s capacity to protect its citizens, virtually drawing the youth to extremism.”

The most controversial part of the bill is probably the breadth of the term “extremism”.  A legislator from the A Just Russia Duma faction, Ilya Ponomarev, expressed concern regarding the Kremlin and FSB’s consistent practice of “label[ling] normal social activist as extremists.”

Moreover, any individual who disobeys FSB orders or otherwise hinders their work under the legislation could be subjected to civil and criminal fines or other penalties.  This provision would likely be used against anti-establishment news outlets.

For more information, please see:

ASSOCIATED PRESS – Russia considers new powers for KGB’s successor – 27 April 2010

MOSCOW TIMES – Proposed Bill Could Increase FSB’s Power – 27 April 2010

RADIO FREE EUROPE – New Russian Legislation Would Increase FSB’s Authority – 27 April 2010

RIA NOVOSTI – New bill may give Russia’s FSB power to persecute dissidents – 26 April 2010

Immigrant Civil Rights Groups Urge All to Boycott Arizona

By Brenda Lopez Romero
Impunity Watch reporter – North America desk

SANTA FE, Mexico – President of Somos Un Pueblo Unido, Marcela Diaz urged all families and business to boycott the state of Arizona after the Governor signed the anti-immigrant legislation S.B. 1070 that advocates claim will legally sanction racial and ethnic profiling and police abuse.  The groups are demanding federal comprehensive immigration reform be passed this year.

Diaz stated, “We’re very angry at what’s happening in Arizona. Clearly, this is a law that preys on the fear of community members and it’s divisive and it’s dangerous.”  Diaz said the dangers of the law would be “to push people further down into the shadows. It’s going to alienate people, it’s going to make people afraid in their own communities but they’ll probably end up staying because that’s where they have their roots.”

Under Arizona’s new law police can ask persons for proof of identity if they have a “reasonable suspicion” that they are an undocumented immigrant.

May 1, 2010 is the nationwide deadline for Congress to act and groups including Somos Un Pueblo Unido will hold protests and march throughout the country.

The Obama Administration is investigating possible legal action against Arizona.  Legal advocacy groups and attorneys like John Russo, an immigration attorney in Albuquerque, think the law is on shaky ground and “is going to be declared to be unconstitutional.”

For more information, please see:

Estrella TV – Immigrant Rights Org. Calls For Ariz. Boycott – 26 April 2010

Mercury News – S.F. city attorney calls for boycott of Arizona over immigration law – 26 April 2010

The Progressive – Boycott Arizona – 26 April 2010

Bomber Attacks British Ambassador’s Motorcade In Yemen

By Ahmad Shihadah
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

SA’NA, Yemen – The British ambassador in Yemen survived an attack Monday morning by a lone suicide bomber who detonated his explosive belt as the ambassador’s convoy was passing, witnesses said.

he ambassador, Timothy Torlot, was unhurt, said Chantel Mortimer, a spokeswoman for the British Embassy. There did not appear to be anyone injured aside from the bomber himself, according to witnesses at the scene in Sana, the Yemeni capital.

Reuters reported that three people, including two policemen escorting the ambassador’s motorcade, were injured. The neighborhood where the attack occurred is packed with tea shops and markets.

“There was a small explosion beside the British ambassador’s car. He was unhurt. No other embassy staff or British nationals were injured,” said a spokesman for the British Foreign Office. “The embassy will remain closed to the public for the time being.”

No one had claimed credit for the attack by late Monday, but senior Yemeni officials said it bore the hallmarks of Al-Qaeda. The terrorist network’s regional branch, which has its base in Yemen, has claimed credit for numerous assaults on foreign embassies in Sana, including an ambitious suicide car bomb attack on the well-fortified American Embassy in September 2008 that left 16 people dead, including 6 attackers. Recent attacks have mostly been in outer provinces, but earlier this year, the group threatened to carry out a major attack in the capital.

American intelligence officials regard Yemen’s Al Qaeda branch, made up mainly of Yemenis and Saudis, as a major threat to U.S. regional interests. Washington has been skeptical of Saleh’s government, which for years appeared to tolerate militants as long as they carried out attacks in other countries. Sana’s sentiments appeared to shift in late 2009, however, when the terrorist group became a threat to Saleh, who also was contending with a civil war in the north and a secessionist movement in the south.

The British Foreign Office website states: “We believe that terrorists continue to plan attacks. Attacks could be indiscriminate, including against Western and British interests, such as residential compounds, military and oil facilities, and transport and aviation interests.”

For more information, please see:

BBC News – Al-Qaeda Blamed For Yemen Bomb Attack On UK Envoy – 26 April 2010

VOA – UK Envoy To Yemen Escapes Suicide Bomb Attack – 26 April 2010

The New York Times – Suicide Attack In Yemen Misses British Envoy – 26 April 2010

Los Angeles Times – Suicide Bomber Attacks British Ambassador’s Motorcade In Yemen – 26 April 2010