Congressman Wants Yemeni Cleric Stripped of Citizenship

Congressman Wants Yemeni Cleric Stripped of Citizenship

By Ahmad Shihadah
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

WASHINGTON DC, USA – A U.S. lawmaker is seeking to revoke the American citizenship of radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who is known for his inflammatory anti-American teachings and his communications with Maj. Nidal Hasan, the suspected shooter in the Fort Hood rampage in November.

Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., introduced a resolution Wednesday urging the Obama administration to strip al-Awlaki of his American citizenship, arguing that the cleric voluntarily renounced his citizenship by recruiting terrorists.

“As recent reports highlight, the U.S. government views al-Awlaki as a proven threat, and will take him dead or alive,” Dent said in a written statement, referring to Obama’s approval of the targeted killing of al-Awlaki. “Being a citizen of the United States of America is more than a right; it’s a responsibility.”

”He’s an inspiration to many of these terrorists,” Dent said. ”This guy is a traitor. This man is a real threat to this country and it’s long since time to deny him his citizenship.”

Legal experts were skeptical of success.

Temple University law professor and international law expert Peter Spiro said the Supreme Court has ruled the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from terminating an individual’s citizenship against his will.

‘There have also been proposals with respect to other Taliban or other al Qaeda-associated Americans that their citizenship be revoked and those proposals have gone nowhere, and I expect the same thing to happen here,” Spiro said.

Similar efforts to strip so-called ”American Taliban” John Walker Lindh and Yaser Hamdi, an American captured in Afghanistan, of their citizenship failed, he said.

”Maybe that Dent some points politically, making him look like he is tough about terrorism, but this is going nowhere,” he said. Hamdi later surrendered his citizenship in exchange for being released to Saudi Arabia.

Rutgers School of Law constitutional law professor and citizenship expert Linda Bosniak said the Supreme Court has set a high bar for the government to withdraw citizenship from native-born Americans.

”It is considered a constitutional right that individuals should be able to maintain their citizenship unless the government can prove they affirmatively desire to renounce it,” Bosniak said.

Certain acts, such as treason or serving in a foreign army in conflict with the United States, are presumed to be ”expatriating acts,” she said. But to strip someone of his citizenship the government has to prove that the acts were committed and that they were done voluntarily and with the intent of relinquishing citizenship.

Dent said he’s heard those arguments but he contends that al-Awlaki is voluntarily a traitor. ”He has declared war on the United States,” Dent said. ”He has voluntarily revoked his citizenship by his own actions.” Al-Awlaki could appeal but would have to return to the United States, where he would face arrest.

For more information, please see:

Fox News – Rep. Introduces Resolution To Strip Radical Cleric Of Us Citizenship – 22 April 2010

Pennsylvania Ave. – Rep. Dent Takes Lead On Revoking Islamic Cleric’s Citizenship – 21 April 2010

The Morning Call – Dent Wants to Revoke U.S. Citizenship Of Radical Cleric – 22 April 2010

Nuremberg Prosecutor Whitney Harris Leaves Legacy of Justice and Hope

By Sovereign Hager
Impunity Watch Managing Editor, News

Photo Courtesy of University of Washington Alumni
Photo Courtesy of University of Washington Alumni

ST. LOUIS, Missouri – On April 22, 2010 the world lost Whitney Harris, a leading advocate of international criminal justice. Harris was the last surviving prosecutor of the principal surviving Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg. He was ninety-seven years old.

Harris was originally from Seattle and attended the University of Washington. He went on to obtain his law degree from the University of California, Berkeley in 1936. Harris joined the Navy after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and was charged with investigating war crimes after the war.

Harris was one of the first members of the staff for the trial of major German war criminals, trying twenty-two high ranking Nazi officials, leading to nineteen convictions. During the Nuremberg war-crime trials in 1945, Harris, then just thirty-three years old, served as a lead prosecutor and tried the senior leader of the Nazi Security Police. He was instrumental in getting the confession of Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Hoess, head of the Auschwitz concentration camp, and aided in the cross examination of Hermann Goering, Hitler’s second in command.

Following his service as a prosecutor, Harris continued a life of public service and continued to address war crimes and genocide. He served as Chief of Legal Advice during the Berlin Blockade and was a law professor at Southern Methodist University. Harris also served as chairman of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association. He authored “Tyranny on Trial, the Evidence at Nuremberg,” considered by the New York Times to be the first “complete historical and legal analysis of the Nuremberg trial.”

Harris’s later work centered on speaking, writing, and teaching about international law and justice. He gave numerous speeches on human rights and in 1980 established the Whitney R. Harris Collection on the Third Reich of Germany at Washington University in St. Louis. Today the Whitney Harris World Law Institute continues his legacy. The current director remembers Harris’ consistent emphasis of the good that came out of Nuremberg. “I think he had a truly undying faith in the ability of humankind to do better.”  Harris was an outspoken supporter of international tribunals, which he saw as building and growing from the principles and achievements of Nuremberg.

In June of 2006, Harris recorded an essay for NPR’s “This I Believe Series,” where he shared these powerful words: “We must learn to end war and protect life; to seek justice and find mercy; to help others and embrace compassion.”

Acquittal of Dutch Arms Dealer who Supplied Liberia’s Charles Taylor Overturned

By Elizabeth Conger
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

Koer
Photo: Alleged arms dealer to Charles Taylor, Guus Kouwenhoven.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – The Dutch Supreme Court has ordered a retrial of Guus Kouwenhoven, the Dutch businessman convicted in 2006 for illegal arms dealing to Liberia during the Second Liberian Civil War. Kouwenhoven appealed his eight year sentence in 2008 and was released. The Dutch Prosecutor’s office subsequently appealed the acquittal, and was granted an appeal by the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Guus Kouwenhoven, a timber trader who was in charge of the Oriental Trading Corporation between 2000 and 2003, was accused of  breaking a UN arms embargo by supplying anti-tank weapons and rifles to Charles Taylor’s regime in exchange for Liberian timber. During that period Liberia was embroiled in a bloody civil war.

Kouwenhoven acknowledged his close ties with Charles Taylor, but denied the charges against him. The Hague acquitted Kouwenhoven in 2008 on the grounds that it was not convinced of the credibility of the testimony provided by certain witnesses in his original trial.

The Supreme Court says that the Prosecutor’s appeal will allow two more witnesses to testify regarding Kouwenhoven’s complicity. The two witnesses allegedly saw Kouwenhoven take delivery of large shipments of weapons bound for Liberia. These two witnesses, who have chosen to remain anonymous, previously made their statements regarding the arms dealing to the Sierra Leone Tribunal.

A date has yet to be set for the Kouwenhoven appeal. Charles Taylor is currently on trial in The Hague before the Special Court for Sierra Leone.

For more information, please see:

BBC – New trial for Dutch ‘arms smuggler’ Guus Kouwenhoven – 21 April 2010

AP – Dutch court: New appeal for alleged arms smuggler – 20 April 2010

Radio Netherlands Worldwide – Supreme Court annuls arms dealer’s release – 20 April 2010

Lebanon Denies Having Received Scud Missiles

By Brandon Kaufman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BEIRUT, Lebanon– Lebanon’s prime minister, Saad Hariri, dismissed Israeli accusations on Monday that Syria had been providing Scud missiles to Hezbollah.

Hariri’s comments were the first public statements made by a Lebanese government official since accusations made last week by Israel’s president, Shimon Peres.  Hariri told a group of Lebanese citizens living in Rome that “At the start of the summer season, they (Israel) make such threats.  All this is similar to what was said previously about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found.  Israel is trying to reproduce the same scenario for Lebanon. The rumors about Scud are only a pretext for threatening my country,” he said, calling the claims “false.”

Syria has also denied Mr. Peres’s accusations about the Scud missiles, which are warheads that can travel hundreds of miles and would make Israel vulnerable to an attack if carried out.

American officials have said that there is no definitive confirmation that any Scud missiles were delivered to Hezbollah militants.  Nonetheless, the Obama Administration on Monday summoned Syria’s top diplomat to Washington to discuss the matter further.

It is widely believed that Syria and Iran have replenished Hezbollah’s arms supply since their 2006 war with Israel.  The conflict, which devastated Lebanon’s infrastructure, left more than a thousand Lebanese dead and several Israelis dead.

Trying to quell fears of another Israeli-Hezbollah war, Israel’s defense minister Ehud Barak said on Monday that Israel has absolutely no intention of starting a war.  He did not, however, address the issue of reports that Scud missiles are being delivered to Hezbollah militants in Lebanon.

Hariri, who has clashed with Hezbollah in the past, said the group had legitimately won elections in southern Lebanon and could only be disarmed via political dialogue. Hariri and his allies accused Syria of assassinating his father and former prime minister, Rafik al-Hariri, in 2005.  His disagreements with Syria’s ally, Hezbollah, threatened to plunge Lebanon into a new civil war, but he has since mended ties with Syria and formed a government that includes the group.

For more information, please see:

Reuters- Hariri Denies Syria Supplied Scuds to Hezbollah– 21 April 2010

National Post- U.S. Warns Syria After Scud Missile Allegations– 21 April 2010

The New York Times- Lebanon Rejects Israel Accusations About Scuds– 20 April 2010

ICJ Decision on Uruguay/Argentina River Factory Case

By Sovereign Hager
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

THE HAGUE, Netherlands-The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that a paper mill can remain open despite the fact that Uruguay violated a treaty in constructing the plant. The ICJ decision, available here, found that despite Uruguay’s breach of a 1975 treaty regulating the use of the River Uruguay, Uruguay had met its environmental obligations.

Argentina argues that the mill is polluting the river Uruguay, which forms the border between the two countries. The dispute arose when Uruguay failed to inform Argentina of the construction of the plant. The 1975 treaty rules the management of shared waters and Argentina argued that the mill was severely contaminating the water. The Argentine government then began sponsoring pickets that blocked the international bridge linking Gualeguaychú with Fray Bentos.

The plant is located at a location used for fishing, tourism, and recreational use. The plant is owned by a Finish pulp producer Metsa-Botnia and was sold to UPM Kymmene in December. The plant pulps eucalyptus trees for paper.

Scientists have lamented that Argentina and Uruguay have not done more to reduce river pollution from other sources, despite their long political battle over the paper mill. Uruguay relied on studies paid for by the paper company and accepted by the national environmental agency, which found the plant had no measurable impact on the River Uruguay.

The River Uruguay drains about 210,000 square miles of farmland and the agricultural runoff is known to include chemicals from fertilizers, which combine with heavy metals from factories. The polluting factories are known to be on the Argentine side of the river.   Greenpeace officials are urging both Uruguay and Argentina to develop shared rules for factories along the river. A Greenpeace official told the Associated Press that the disagreement between Argentina and Uruguay “involves a lot of hypocrisy” because “there hasn’t been a serious and ongoing evaluation of pollution in the river, neither in Uruguay nor in Argentina.”

For more information, please see:

Buenos Aires Herald-ICJ Rules Uruguay Breached River Treaty; Botnia to Continue Operating for “No Pollution Detected”-21 April 2010

Reuters-World Court Rules Uruguay Can Use Paper Mill-April 20 2010

UN News Center-Uruguayan Mill Can Operate Despite, UN World Court Rules -20 April 2010