UNHCR calls on European countries to stop deportations of Iraqi refugees

UNHCR calls on European countries to stop deportations of Iraqi refugees

By Eric C. Sigmund
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

Just days after the official withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, the United Nation’s High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has called on European countries to halt the return of Iraqi refugees to the country.   UNHCR’s appeal came in response to the forced return of 61 Iraqi refugees from four countries last week.   The Commissioner expressed concern about continuing violence within Iraq.  UNHCR spokesman Adrian Edwards told journalists that the Commissioner “strongly urge[s] European governments to provide Iraqis with protection until the situation in their areas of origin in Iraq allows for safe and voluntary returns.”

European countries deporting Iraqi refugees (Photo courtesy of the New York Times)
European countries deporting Iraqi refugees (Photo courtesy of the New York Times)

The latest round of forced deportations is the third in a series of efforts to send Iraqi refugees back to the war torn nation.  UNHCR issued guidelines to European governments hosting refugees recommending that they not be sent home until violence subsides.  The Commissioner reiterated that European nations ought to facilitate development efforts within Iraq.  Although 50,000 U.S. troops remain in Iraq to train and support Iraq’s army and police forces, President Obama announced that all U.S. troops will leave the country by the end of 2011.

According to UNHCR, five provinces, including Baghdad, are sites of continued violence and human rights violations.  The Commissioner has encouraged European nations to offer Iraqi asylum seekers protective status as per the 1951 Refugee Convention.  UNHCR noted that the forced return of refugees may send a message to Middle Eastern countries harboring Iraqi refugees that protection of refugees is no longer necessary.  Currently 1.6 million Iraqi refugees reside in Jordan and Syria and another 50,000 in Lebanon.  

Although President Obama reported that “security incidents have been near the lowest on record since the war began,” UNHCR fears that refugees returning to Iraq will become victims of instability and violence.  Car bombings, kidnappings, and mortar attacks remain a daily occurrence within Iraq.  The Commissioner explained that all nations hosting refugees have a continuing obligation to protect those who have sought asylum until conditions within Iraq improve.

For more information, please see;

Agence France Presse – UNHCR Urges Halt to Unsafe Iraqi Refugee Returns – 3 Sept. 2010

Reuters Africa – U.N. Refugee Agency Blasts Europe for Deporting Iraqis – 3 Sept. 2010

New York Times – Iraq: U.N. Asks Europe to Halt Deportations – 3 Sept. 2010

Washington Times – Deportation of Iraqis from Europe Worries U.N. Agency – 3 Sept. 2010

Indigenous Prisoners Seek Resolution To Hunger Strike

By Patrick Vanderpool
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

People Protest Treatment of Mapuche Prisoners (Photo courtesy of Freedom to all mapuche political prisoners)
People Protest Treatment of Mapuche Prisoners (Photo courtesy of Freedom to all mapuche political prisoners)

 SANTIAGO, Chile – Chilean President Sebastián Piñera recently called for an end to an ongoing hunger strike by indigenous Mapuche inmates.  The Mapuche political prisoners are protesting a Pinochet-era anti-terror law that was used to convict them.

The Mapuche people have clashed with the Chilean government and farmers for years over ancestral lands in the southern part of the country.

The anti-terror law, which has been widely criticized by human rights groups, including Amnesty International, was used to label the inmates “terrorists” based on certain actions, such as setting timber shipments on fire.  The law also allows government witnesses to conceal their identities at trial and permits defendants to be tried by military commissions.

The hunger strike began in July with five prisoners and has since grown to include 34 inmates in various jails throughout Chile.  Many of the prisoners have lost up to 40 pounds during the hunger strike and are experiencing dizziness and low blood pressure. 

Last month, the families of the Mapuche prisoners went to Santiago, the capital, to denounce irregularities in their trials and push for dialogue with the authorities. 

A spokesperson for the Mapuche families stated that the prisoners were at a critical stage in the hunger strike and continue losing muscle tissue and experiencing vital organ failure.

President Piñera said that his government will send two bills to Congress next week to reform anti-terror legislation and the military justice system in an effort to end the strike.  He added, “I want to ask all of those worried about the health of the protesters to help us end this hunger strike.”

The police and military have been accused by human rights groups of using excessive force against the Mapuches in the past.  But the indigenous peoples have come under fire for sometimes violent protests where they have burned crops and the trucks and machinery of forestry companies.

The Mapuches lost their lands to the newly formed states of Argentina and Chile in the early 19th century after having fended off the Spanish conquistadores for centuries.  The indigenous peoples ancestral territory spanned most of the south of Chile and crossed over into Argentina. 

For more information, please see:

Reuters – Chile Wants to End Hunger Strike over Terror Laws – 3 September 2010

The Argentine Independent – Chile: Health of Mapuches on Hunger Strike Worsens – 2 September 2010

IPS – Mapuche Prisoners on Hunger Strike to Demand Talks – 12 August 2010

Intercontinental Cry – Mapuche on Hunger Strike over Chile’s Militancy – 4 August 2010

Kenya Defends al-Bashir’s Diplomatic Visit

By Laura Hirahara
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

President Omar al-Bashir at Kenyas constitution ceremony; Photo courtesy of AFP
President Omar al-Bashir at Kenya's constitution ceremony; Photo courtesy of AFP

NAIROBI, Kenya- On Thursday, Kenya’s government defended their decision to invite Sudan’s president Omar al-Bashir to the country for a ceremony in which Kenya adopted its new constitution.  Following al-Bashir’s trip last week, many have criticized Kenya for not arresting al-Bashir, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes and genocide in the Darfur region.  Kenya’s government, which is a signatory of the ICC and has recognized its jurisdiction, said that arresting al-Bashir now would destabilize Sudan creating negative ripple effects for its neighbors.  Alfred Mutua, a government spokesman for Kenya, stated Thursday, “In the context of Omar al-Bashir’s case, Kenya’s obligation was first to the [African Union] and then to ICC. If Sudan [is] destabilized it is us who would suffer, not the West.”

The U.N. estimates 300,000 people have been killed and another 2.7 displaced in Darfur since al-Bashir seized power in 1989 through a coup.  The ICC has charged him with organizing a militarized force that has committed acts of rape, murder and other crimes against humanity since al-Bashir began fighting rebels there in 2003.  Sudan denies these charges and the African Union has stated they also oppose the arrest warrants.  In response to their refusal to arrest al-Bashir, the ICC has reported Kenya to the U.N. Security Council and the prime ministers of several European nations have directly questioned Kenya’s government officials.  On Wednesday, the United Kingdom spoke with Kenya’s ambassador about al-Bashir’s visit.  After the visit, Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt said, “We made clear that the British government expects the government of Kenya to stand by its obligations under the Rome Statute (that established the ICC), and as a U.N. member state.”

Some within Kenya’s government, while not addressing the warrant against al-Bashir directly, believe inviting him was the wrong move.  A representative from the prime minister’s office stated Tuesday that Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga thinks the visit “sen[t] wrong signals in regard to Kenya’s commitment to the ICC and also Kenya’s respect for human rights.”  In a statement to Voice of America, Elizabeth Evenson, a researcher for Human Rights Watch, said al-Bashir’s visit went against Kenya’s new government after the violence that erupted over their last presidential elections, insulting both the victims in Darfur and Kenya.  Al-Bashir has travelled extensively since the arrest warrants were issued, including to ICC signatory country Chad earlier in the year.

For more information, please see;

Voice of America- Kenya Defends Bashir Invitation– 27 August, 2010

CNN- Kenya Pushes Back Over War Crime Suspect’s Visit– 2 September, 2010

BBC- Kenya Ambassadors Summoned Over Omar al-Bashir’s Visit– 1 September, 2010

Sheriff Sued by U.S. for Civil Rights Abuses

By R. Renee Yaworsky
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

Sheriff Arpaio calls himself Washingtons whipping boy.  (Photo courtesy of NY Daily News)
Arpaio calls himself "Washington's whipping boy." (Photo courtesy of NY Daily News)

ARIZONA, United States—The self-proclaimed “toughest sheriff in America” is now being investigated by the U.S. Justice Department for possible civil rights abuses.  Allegations against him include systematically discriminating against Latinos and being uncooperative in the investigation.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County has become a household name, gaining popularity and controversy for his relentless pursuit of illegal immigrants.  He is also noted for aggressive law enforcement policies and his colorful, defiant attitude.

Some of Arpaio’s practices include using minor traffic violations as an excuse to check individuals’ legal status, and making prisoners in the county jail wear striped uniforms with pink socks and underwear.

Arpaio is often the subject of numerous protests; earlier this summer, opponents of Arizona’s anti-illegal immigration bill chanted, “Sheriff Joe, we are here.  We will not live in fear.”  Undaunted by criticism, he has been elected to office five times and has already raised $2 million for his next run for re-election in 2012.

The Justice Department is alleging that Arpaio violated civil rights laws by “unlawful searches and seizures, discriminatory police conduct, and a failure to provide basic services to individuals with limited English.”

Arpaio was taken to court this week after the Justice Department filed a lawsuit accusing him of obstructing their investigation.  Arpaio’s office ignored repeated requests by the Department for documents and tours of certain facilities.

Thomas Perez from the Department’s civil rights division called Arpaio’s actions “unprecedented” and lamented the fact that the government “was forced to resort to litigation to gain access to public documents and facilities.”

Arpaio responded to the allegations at a press conference on Thursday, saying, “This is the people of Arizona they are going against, using me as a puppet.  They’re not going to put handcuffs on this sheriff.  I’m not going to surrender!”  He told ABC News that the federal government should be thanking him for “all of the hard work that we are doing assisting them.”  He considers the allegations a “ruse” and denies racially profiling Latinos.

Arpaio’s office is faced with losing federal grants if it is found to have acted with discrimination.  Legal troubles continue to grow as a federal grand jury in Phoenix is also investigating alleged intimidation of county workers by evening visits to their homes.

The sheriff has said that he will not be “intimidated” and has vowed to fight.  “I’m going to continue, maybe tomorrow, to enforce all the illegal immigration laws.”

For more information, please see:

ABC News-Controversial Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio Under Investigation for Allegedly Violating Civil Rights-3 September 2010

NY Times-Justice Dept. Sues Sheriff Over Bias Investigation-2 September 2010

LA Times-U.S. sues Arizona sheriff in civil rights probe-2 September 2010

Mother of Arrested Syrian Blogger Pleads for Her Release

By Alyxandra Stanczak
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East
 

DAMASCUS, Syria – Student and blogger Tal Bint Dawser al-Ballouhi was summoned on 27 December 2009 by Syria’s intelligence apparatus, the Syrian Intelligence Services. The goal of the summoning was to interrogate al-Ballouhi about articles and poetry she wrote about her home country, Palestine, as well as Syrian and Arab affairs in general. After her interrogation, she was arrested and detained, and her family has not seen or heard from her since her disappearance.

Syrians are increasingly turning to blogging as a source of reliable media. Photo courtesy of arabmediasociety.com
Syrians are increasingly turning to blogging as a source of reliable media. Photo courtesy of arabmediasociety.com

Syrian authorities seized al-Mallouhi’s computer from her Damasucus home after her detainment. Al-Mallouhi specifically criticized the Partnership for the Mediterranean (an EU initiative to reach out economically to certain Arab countries), a French diplomatic initiative bringing together Arab and European countries, as well as Israel. The Syrian authorities have not commented on her arrest, which is common in the arrest of political activists.

Al-Mallouhi’s situation is not unique, as many Syrian bloggers have been arrested and sentenced to long prison terms. Syrians have turned to the internet as an outlet of news and information since print media in the country is largly regulated and censored by the government. Blogging has allowed citizens to express their opinions and obtain news to which they would otherwise not have access.

Al-Mallouhi’s Mother has appealed to Syrian president Bashar Assad and has attempted to make compelling pleas to the government for her daughter’s release. She has even gone so far as to talk to specific Syrian security branches and obtained a promise from one security branch that her daughter would be released before Eid ul-Fitr, or the end of Ramadan, which this year occurs on 10 September 2010. Al-Mallouhi’s mother does not believe this security branch will honor their deadline and is petitioning President Assad to intervene, citing that her daughter, who is a high-school student, did not know the political implications of her writings.

For more information, please see:

Arab News – Mother of young Syrian blogger appeals for her release – 3 September 2010

The Peninsula – Arrested blogger’s mom writes to Assad – 3 September 2010

Syrian Human Rights Committee – Humanitarian campaign for the release of prisoners of conscience – 2 July 2010