Germany, Italy in Legal Bout Over WWII Reparations

Germany, Italy in Legal Bout Over WWII Reparations

By Terance Walsh
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Germany has turned to the United Nations’ highest court on Monday to repeal an order by an Italian court for Germany to pay reparations to Italian victims of Nazi war crimes in Italy during World War II.

Village of Distomo after WWII massacre (Photo courtesy of Athens News)
Village of Distomo after WWII massacre (Photo courtesy of Athens News)

In 2004 a court in Italy ruled that Luigi Ferrini, an Italian civilian, was owed restitution because he was deported to Germany in 1944 and was forced into slave labor in the armaments industry.  Ferrini initially filed his complaint against Germany in 1998.  Since the Italian court ruled in his favor hundreds of relatives of victims of Nazi war crimes have filed complaints for enslavement, imprisonment, and killing.

In 2008 the Italian court decided to seize Villa Vigoni, an Italian-German cultural center on Lake Cuomo, to pay for the judgment.  Germany initiated its case against Italy later that year.

The gravamen of the dispute is Germany’s contention that the Italian court’s ruling violates German sovereign immunity.  The Germans maintain that allowing national courts to have jurisdiction over other nations would lead to “legal disorder.”  Such a system would open the door for complainants to “shop around for the most favorable national courts” to hear their grievances, Germany’s top legal adviser said.  By issuing an order of restitution, Italy “failed to respect the jurisdictional immunity” Germany is due under international law.  Instead of focusing on the individuals, the Italian court should be concerned with the broader legal implications of its ruling.

Susanne Wasum-Rainer, Germany’s director-general of legal affairs, is concerned that if Italy were allowed to demand reparations “the consequences would be severe.”  A decision favorable to Italy “would put in question and challenge open to challenges before domestic courts.”

“What this case is not about is the Second World War, violations of international humanitarian law or the question of reparations,” Wasum-Rainer added.

In response Italy asserts that the protection of human rights supersedes all other legal interests.  No immunity, sovereign or otherwise, can be afforded in issues of crimes against humanity.

“Germany… has adopted a stance that denies Italian victims access to justice,” said Salvatore Zappala, Italy’s legal representative to the UN.  “States cannot absolve themselves from the responsibility of reparations for serious violations of humanitarian law.”

“State sovereignty cannot be absolute,” added Giacomo Aiello, another member of Italy’s legal team.  The Italian court held Ferrini’s rights higher than Germany’s interest in sovereign immunity because the crimes committed against Ferrini were “international crimes,” which took precedence over sovereign immunity.

The Greeks stand behind Rome in this matter.  Many of Greece’s citizens have similar claims against Germany and will be allowed to argue their case before the World Court.  The Greeks’ claims arise from the killing of 214 Greek civilians in the village of Distomo at the hands of the Nazis in June 1944.

To Miltiadis Sfountouris, the law suits are not about money.  “It’s a moral thing, to find justice.”  Sfountouris said his 78-year-old mother jumped from a window in Distomo to escape the Nazi death squads.  She still lives in Distomo and has never received reparations.  Even though courts have ruled in favor the victims’ families for war reparations, the victims have been blocked from confiscating German property in Greek territory to pay for the damages.  As a result, no reparations have actually been paid for the massacre.

In addition to individual Greek lawsuits, the Greek government will exercise its right to participate in the dispute between Italy and Germany.  Prime Minister George Papandreou announced the decision last January to his cabinet.  “We are all aware of the gravity and significance of this issue and of its special symbolism,” he said.  He cited “obvious moral, legal and political reasons but also important issues of the highest national importance and the overall interests of the country at a specially crucial period for our homeland….  Our actions serve a self-evident debt to actively honor the memory of those that sacrificed themselves for this homeland.”

Recently Germany paid almost $6 billion to over one million people or their relatives who were exploited by the Third Reich.

The UN Court will be charged with weighing individual rights against the order and consistency of state sovereign immunity.  Germany and Italy will argue their cases this week but the court is not expected to rule on the matter for several months.

For more information please see:

IOL News — Victims of Nazi war turn to court — 16 September 2011

Expatica — Nazi crimes victims before Italian courts a “last resort” — 13 September 2011

Tengri News — Germany, Italy before UN world court over Nazi reparations — 13 September 2011

Deutsche Welle — Germany, Italy face off in court over Nazi war crime reparations — 12 September 2011

The State — Germany, Italy at UN court over WWII compensation — 12 September 2011

Athens News — Greek government to back war reparations claim in ICJ — 12 January 2011

War Crimes Prosecution Watch, Vol. 6, Issue 12 — September 12, 2011

Vol. 6, Issue 11 — September 12, 2011

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Central African Republic & Uganda

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kenya

Libya

AFRICA

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

EUROPE

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

War Crimes Investigations in Burma

NORTH AND SOUTH AMERICA

United States

TOPICS

Terrorism

Piracy

Universal Jurisdiction

Gender-Based Violence

REPORTS

UN Reports

NGO Reports

TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSIONS

Canada

Ivory Coast

Sierra Leone

South Africa

Soloman Islands

COMMENTARY AND PERSPECTIVES

WORTH READING

War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. For more information about War Crimes Prosecution Watch, please contact warcrimeswatch@pilpg.org.

Venezuela’s Presidential Elections Moved Forwards Possibly Assuring Chavez Re-election

by Emilee Gaebler
Impunity Watch Rep0rter, South America

CARACAS, Venezuela – Election changes have just been announced in Venezuela by Tibisay Lucena, the president of the National Electoral Council.  Presidential elections traditionally take place in December of election years.  In the upcoming 2012 election year, the Venezuelan Presidential election has been moved up to October 7.

Tibisay Lucena announces the election date changes.  (Photo Courtesy of El Universal)
Tibisay Lucena announces the election date changes. (Photo Courtesy of El Universal)

President Chavez tweeted, “7 October 2012: your destiny is written! We will write another revolutionary victory on your page! We will live and we will conquer!” as a response to this announcement.

Chavez, who announced his intention to run for re-election earlier, will be up for a third term in office and a victory will place him in power of Venezuela for a consecutive 18 years.  In 2007, Chavez attempted to modify the Constitution, which he had drafted, to allow him to run for re-election for a  third term.  This move was unsuccessful. 

Again, in 2009, Chavez sought to strike down term limits and amend the Constitution.  This move was highly controversial as it was noted that Constitutional amendments are only permissible once per congressional term.  Despite the reservations of this being an unconstitutional act, Chavez was successful, paving the way for his upcoming 2012 campaign. 

Earlier this summer, in June, Chavez announced that he was battling cancer.  On June 20 he had a tumor removed in Cuba and since then has undergone multiple rounds of chemotherapy.  He announced Tuesday that he will start a final round of chemotherapy soon.  He expects to be at full strength when he begins campaigning in December. 

Approval ratings for Chavez stood at 70% at his 2006 re-election.  Current polls place his ratings at roughly 50%.  Opposition parties point out that moving the election date forward makes it harder for other candidates to successfully challenge Chavez.  They note that this is a particularly opportune time for rival parties due to the President’s weakened position.

Instead of receiving a full year in which to campaign, the candidates will only get eight months to mount a successful opposition.  MercoPress reports that political analyst Luis Vicente Leon believes shortening the campaign period will favor Chavez because an effective opposition needs to spend extensive time traveling around the country, meeting people and gathering support.  Additionally, Chavez’s unlimited access to broadcast hours makes him the most recognizable politician in the Venezuelan arena.

The National Electoral Council is justifying their decision by citing a need to separate national from regional and local elections.  Regional and local elections of governors will still take place in December.  Tibisay Lucena claims this division is to benefit voters, so they can focus on each election, instead of having the Presidential race overshadow the others.

 

For more information, please see;

Americas Quarterly – Date Set for Venezuela’s 2012 Presidential Election – 14 September 2011

El Universal – Venezuelan Electoral Body Decides to Separate Elections – 14 September 2011

Latin American Herald Tribune – Venezuela Sets Presidential Elections for 7 October 2010 – 14 September 2011

MercoPress – Venezuelan Presidential Election Moved Forward to 7 October 2012 – 14 September 2011

Vietnam Political Prisoner Dies in Jail

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

HANOI, Vietnam – Truong Van Suong, a political prisoner who has spent 33 years of his 68 year life in jail, died from medical complications while in detention.

Truong Van Suong died in prison after serving over 33 years as a political prisoner (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian).
Truong Van Suong died in prison after serving over 33 years as a political prisoner (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian).

In November 2010, Suong’s family was notified by prison officials that Suong had developed a serious heart condition. As a result of this condition, he was given one year of medical parole.

This parole was spent at a hospital until authorities suddenly re-appeared to return Suong to prison on August 19, just weeks before his passing, against the objection of his family who told authorities that his heart was too fragile to survive the conditions of his imprisonment.

Phil Robertson, the deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch has criticized the Vietnamese government for forcing Suong to return to prison when he “urgently needed proper medical treatment.”

Phil Robertson also stated that “by locking him up again in such terrible health, the government of Vietnam essentially condemned him to die alone, separated from family and friends in his last days.”

Luong Thanh Nghi, Foreign Ministry spokesman, confirmed the death and stated that it came despite receiving hospital attention and returning to prison from medical parole in “stable health”.

Suong served as an officer in Southern Vietnam’s Army during the Vietnam War. When the north invaded Saigon, Suong was forced to spend six years in re-education camp in central Vietnam.

After being released, Suong fled to Thailand and joined the United Front of Patriotic Force for the Liberation of Vietnam in an attempt to bring democracy to Vietnam.

After returning to Vietnam, Suong and 200 other individuals were arrested after a Vietnamese spy informed the government of their involvement with the organization. In 1983 Suong was charged with treason and his involvement in an attempt to overthrow the Vietnamese government for which he was sentenced to life in prison.

Suong is the second political prisoner to die in Vietnam since July.

Human Rights Watch is calling on the Vietnamese government to “…immediately release all political prisoners unconditionally, but they should especially prioritize the release of those with serious health problems so they can receive proper medical treatment.”

For more information, please see:

Forbes – Vietnam Political Prisoner Dies After 33 Years – 13 September 2011

The Guardian – Vietnamese Political Prisoner Truong Van Suong Dies in Detention – 13 September 2011

Voice of America – Vietnamese Prisoner Dies in Prison After Year-Long Medical Parole – 13 September 2011

Radio Free Asia – Prominent Dissident Dies in Jail – 12 September 2011