China Sends Another Prominent Activist to Jail

China Sends Another Prominent Activist to Jail

By: Jessica Ties
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BEIJING, China– Maoist writer Li Tie was sentenced to ten years in prison and three years deprivation of political rights for subversion after he wrote online articles advocating for political reform.

Activist Li Tie was sentenced to ten years in prison for subversion (Photo Courtesy of Front Line Defenders).

The sentencing of Li Tie comes within a month of activists Chen Wei of Sichuan and Chen Xi of Guizhou being sentenced to nine years and ten years respectively for “inciting subversion”.

According to the spokesman for the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Rupert Colville, “[t]he very harsh sentencing of human rights defender Li Tie is the fourth verdict against a prominent human rights defender in China since last December.” He continued to state that the United Nations is “…very disturbed by this trend of severe suppression of dissent in the county, which appears to be designed to intimidate.”

The basis of Li’s conviction was a set of thirteen articles written by Li and interpreted by the court as an attempt to encourage others to overthrow the government.

Li was initially detained in September 2010 and was formally arrested a month later. During his time in custody he was denied visits from family and was pressured by authorities to accept a government appointed lawyer.

According to Li’s brother, Li Jian, “…they wouldn’t let him have his own lawyer, or rather, they didn’t ban him outright but did everything they could to obstruct him, so it was impossible to hire him.”

Dozens of lawyers, writers and activists have been detained in China since mid-February when protest advertisements began to appear on the internet following a series of uprisings in the Arab world.

The calls for protest, dubbed the Jasmine Revolution, have led the Chinese government to begin to clampdown on activists by detaining and sentencing them to long prison sentences.

Human rights groups claim that the three recent sentences handed down were far more severe than what is normally administered in such cases and is believed to reflect rising government anxiety as the one year anniversary of the uprising in the Middle East approaches.

Also contributing to Chinese anxiety is the change taking place in top-level leadership this year. Chinese authorities fear disruption during the period in which the Vice President assumes the role of general secretary of the party and then president.

According to rights lawyer Mo Shaoping, “[i]t’s now a consensus among many people that the legal environment in China is worsening; the authorities are setting up more and more obstacles.”

 

For more information, please see:

AFP – UN ‘Disturbed’  by Jailing of China Activist – 20 January 2012

The New York Times – China Sentences Another Prominent Activist to Prison – 19 January 2012

Radio Free Asia – Maoist Writer Jailed for Subversion – 19 January 2012

The Washington Post – Another Writer Sentenced as China’s Crackdown Continues – 19 January 2012

Four High-Ranking Kenyans Indicted by ICC

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – The future of Kenyan politics entered a state of flux on Monday, after the International Criminal Court confirmed charges against Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta, Eldoret North MP William Ruto, Head of Civil Service Francis Muthaura and Journalist Joshua Sang.  All four men are major players in the present regime, but the charges against Kenyatta, who also serves as Finance Minister, and Ruto of are particular note.  Both plan to run for president of the east African country this year.

MP William Ruto, journalist Joshua arap Sang, Head of Civil Service Francis Muthaura, and Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta face charges of crimes against humanity brought by the ICC on Monday. (Photos courtesy of KBC)

They will face trial for alleged crimes against humanity that took place in the weeks following the 2007-08 elections.  The charges include acts of murder, excessive force, and forcible relocation of populations.  More than 1,200 people were killed during this time, and an additional 600,000 people were forced to flee their homes.  Some have not been able to return yet.

President Mwai Kibaki, who was the winner of that election, made a call for calm after the announcement.  In his address from Harambee House in Nairobi, he announced that he has instructed Attorney General Githu Muiga to form a legal panel to advise his government on how best to respond to the ICC’s decision.

“I have with immediate effect directed the Attorney General to constitute a legal team to study the ruling and advise on the way forward,” Kibaki said.

The accused plan to appeal the charges against them.  Ruto, who, along with Sang, faces charges of organizing attacks on Kibaki supporters based on their ethnicity or political affiliations, held a press conference to say that he would not suspend his presidential campaign.  He also sounded certain that he would ultimately be acquitted.

“These allegations are and will forever be strange to me. I have been and will forever be a stranger to the allegations against me. My legal team is going to analyze the different actions we will take as a team,” Ruto told journalists in Nairobi. “I want to inform Kenyans that I’m firmly in the presidential race. To my worthy competitors, let us meet at the ballot and let the people of Kenya decide.  To my family especially wife Rachel, mother Sarah and children I am eternally grateful. I am persuaded and clear in my mind truth will prevail and innocence confirmed.

Kenyatta, who is the son of Kenya’s first president and holds a fortune of over $500 million, will stand trial alongside Muthaura in a separate proceeding.  He is accused of multiple crimes against humanity, including sexual violence.  He issued a statement denying the charges.

“My conscience is clear, has been clear and will always remain clear that I am innocent of all the accusations that have been leveled against me,” Kenyatta posted on Facebook, adding that he would continue to cooperate with the ICC, “because I believe in the rule of law.”

Last week, he told the BBC that he would continue his campaign regardless of any charges he faced.

Sang’s inclusion as a suspect was seen as a surprise as he was not part of the government.  He hosted a radio program, which he is accused of using to inform supporters of where to conduct coordinated attacks.

Human Rights Watch hailed the ICC’s decision.  The resulting trials, according to its statement, would “break with decades of impunity in Kenya for political violence.”  The country still needs to set up its own apparatus.  Kenya attempted to form a special tribunal to investigate, but ultimately decided that the ICC would be a better venue.

Amnesty International also expressed concern about the efficacy of having the ICC handle this matter, particularly regarding the effect that budget cuts at the ICC might have on its ability to provide fast and fair trials for the defendants..

“[T]hese are just four individuals. Thousands of human rights abuses, some of which may amount to crimes against humanity, took place during the post-election period and thousands of victims are still waiting for justice,” said Justus Nyang’aya, Director of Amnesty International, Kenya.  “It is vital that the Kenyan authorities open investigations and, where there is sufficient admissible evidence; prosecute all those suspected of committing crimes.”

The ICC declined to pursue charges against Tinderet MP Henry Kosgey and former Police Commissioner Hussein Ali.  No trial date has been set.

For more information, please see:

BBC — Kenyatta and Ruto to Face ICC Trial over Kenya Violence — 23 January 2012

Daily Nation — ICC Judges Confirm Cases against Four Top Kenyans — 23 January 2012

Daily Nation — Kenyan Suspects to Appeal against ICC Ruling — 23 January 2012

Daily Nation — Kibaki Order AG to Form Probe Team on ICC Ruling — 23 January 2012

KBC — Cases against Ruto, Sang, Muthaura, and Uhuru Confirmed — 23 January 2012

KBC — Kibaki Directs AG to Form Team to Study ICC Ruling — 23 January 2012

KBC — Ruto Maintains He is Innocent — 23 January 2012

Standard — Breaking News: Four of the Six Suspects to Face Trial – ICC — 23 January 2012

Washington Post — Int’l Court Orders Kenyan Presidential Hopefuls to Stand Trial in Postelection Violence Case — 23 January 2012

Arab League Struggles To Win Legitimacy in Syria

By Adom M. Cooper
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

DAMASCUS, Syria–In the latest development coming out of Syria, the country has condemned a new Arab League initiative that calls on President Bashar al-Assad to relinquish his power by holding early elections and forming a “national unity government.” After a meeting of the 22-member body in Cairo, Qatar’s prime minister, Sheikh Hamad bi Jassim Al Thani, stated that the group came to a consensus on the political initiative that would hopefully result in the “peaceful departure of the Syrian regime.”

Arab League monitors, wearing orange vests, oversee the release of Syrian detainees as they leave Adra Prison near Damascus.(Photo Courtesy of BBC)

“After the establishment of the government of national unity, the Arab League will call on the international community to support this national unity government to fulfill its functions. We are looking into an Arab solution for this. We are not looking for a military intervention.”

The Arab League called for the government to begin a dialogue with the opposition within two weeks and for the new government to be formed within two months. The unity government should, within three months, prepare to elect a council that will write a new constitution and prepare for parliamentary and presidential elections.

The Syrian state television released the following statement from a government official, claiming that the resolution was part of a conspiracy against the Syrian people.

“Syria rejects the decisions taken which are outside an Arab working plan, and considers them an attack on its national sovereignty and a flagrant interference in internal affairs.”

In addition to a call for national unity, Al Thani announced that the Arab League’s observer mission in Syria would be extended for another month and the observers would be given additional equipment after Genera Mohammed Ahmed Mustafa al-Dabi of Sudan, the head of the monitoring mission, desired for his mandate to be bolstered.

On Sunday 22 January 2012, Saudi Arabi announced that it was pulling out of the Arab League’s 165-monitor mission in Syria because Damascus had broken several promises on peace initiatives. The decision to extend the mission for a month has been heavily criticized by several analysts and the Saudi decision to leave has cast the mission long-term future into serious doubt. Saudi Arabia is one of the key funders of the league’s projects.

Al-Jazeera correspondent Mike Hanna, reporting from Cairo at the headquarters of the Arab League, shared these words about the situation.

“We understand that al-Dabi has said to the Syrian committees that the mission has not gained enough momentum yet to get a full judgment on it. He said that he needed more time with the added monitors that he’s received in recent weeks and the added geographical places in which the monitoring mission is now extended to see if this mission can in fact work.”

The Syrian Revolution General Commission (SRGC), an anti-regime activist group, claimed on Sunday 22 January 2012, that at least 840 Syrians have been killed since 23 December 2011, the date that the Arab League observers entered Syria. The SRGC also stated that the Arab League has failed to limit the bloodshed or successfully implement the Arab League Peace Plan.

While the Arab League continues to deliberate on how to deal with al-Assad’s regime, the violence did not wish to take a hiatus and deliberate as well. Activists reported that on Sunday 22 January 2012 battles between government troops and army defectors in Douma, a suburb of Damascus. Syria’s Local Coordination Committees reported that at least five individuals were killed.

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil el-Araby stated that the Syrian government has not complied with some parts of an Arab League agreement specifically aimed at ending a violent crackdown on demonstrators and protesters. el-Araby also stated that Syrian officials are treating the crisis as a security problem, noting that armed opposition factions controlling some areas make it increasingly difficult for observers to do their jobs. But he did state that overall, the presence of the monitors has resulted in improvements around the nation.

“The presence of the Arab monitors provided security to opposition parties, which held an increase in number of peaceful protests in areas where the monitors were present.”

But there has been a stark contrast regarding the presence of the Arab League monitors. Burham Ghailoun, head of the opposition Syrian National Council (SNC), stated that the monitors have not seen the full extent of what is going on and thus, cannot adequately address the problems.

“The Arab monitors indicated that the regime did not follow protocol, did not release the detainees, did not remove all military tanks, did not allow press to travel freely, did not recognize even once the peaceful protests, and the massacre of Idlib yesterday is proof of that. The regime let down the Arab League, and Arab nations have the responsibility to respond.”

The UN has reported that more than 5,000 individuals have lost their lives since the anti-regime demonstrations and protests began in March 2011. Syria’s ban on international journalists remains in full effect, continuing to make it difficult to confirm and verify reports that occur around the nation.

If the Arab League wishes to save face and retain any sort of legitimacy, the ban on international journalists needs to be lifted and addressed as it continues to put plans together. The chances of things being hidden from the eyes of Arab League monitors can only decrease with the eyes and ears of experienced international journalists present.

 

For more information, please see: 

Al-Jazeera – Syria Rejects Arab League Transition Plan – 23 January 2012

BBC – Syria Unrest: Arab League Urges Assad To Reform – 23 January 2012

CNN – Arab League Calls For Unity Government In Syria – 23 January 2012

Ahram – Arabs Set To Extend Syria Mission, Rebels ‘Overrun Town’ – 22 January 2012

The Guardian – Saudi Arabia To Withdraw Arab League Monitors From Syria – 22 January 2012

NYT – Arab League Floats Ambitious New Peace Plan For Syria – 22 January 2012

Reuters – Arab League Proposes New Plan For Syria Transition – 22 January 2012

 

 

In An Attempt To End The Violence, Yemeni Government Grants President Saleh “Complete” Immunity

By Adom M. Cooper
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

SANAA, Yemen–The Yemeni parliament has unanimously approved a law giving the country’s outgoing president, Ali Abdullah Saleh, “complete” immunity from prosecution. In return, Saleh has agreed to step down under a Gulf-brokered transition deal. The law, which was adopted on Saturday 21 January 2012, also gives him partial protection from legal action to his aides. In addition, it shields his aides from prosecution over “politically motivated” crimes committed while conducting official duties, except those considered “terrorist acts.”

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh. (Photo Courtesy of CNN)

The final text of the law displays the following words concerning Saleh’s lieutenants: “cannot face prosecution for actions that were politically motivated and carried out in the exercise of their duties but does not provide amnesty concerning acts of terrorism.”

Saleh’s immunity was the crucial piece of a hard-fought Gulf Arab deal that Saleh signed in November 2011. The US-based Human Rights Watch condemned the issuance of Saleh’s immunity as a “license to kill” and was also criticized by protesters and the UN. It would cover the 33-year period of Saleh’s reign and could not be canceled or appealed against.

The transitional government of national unity, which is led by the parliamentary opposition, had submitted eleventh-hour amendments on Friday 20 January 2012, sharply reducing the scope of the amnesty offered to Saleh’s lieutenants following a public outcry.

Yemeni Information Minister Ali al-Amrani said that the law was the best option for the country and that people can now look forward to change and development.

“The law was a pivotal point of debate, and now we are looking forward to February 21 when a president would lead the country. Many changes took place in the law to make it accepted by all factions, but in the end, the efforts were worth it.”

Rights groups claim that hundreds of protesters have lost their lives in demonstrations and protests since the uprisings began in February 2011. The violence has been highlighted by occurrences of street fighting between Saleh loyalists and opposition figures.

The announcement of Saleh’s immunity came one day after post-prayer protests in the southern city of Taiz broke out against the proposed immunity legislation. Taiz is widely considered the second most important city in the country after Sanaa. The United States and neighboring nation Saudi Arabia were supportive of the plan, fearing that further allowing the political upheaval would let al-Qaeda’s regional Yemen-based wing establish a stronghold along the oil-shipping routes through the Red Sea.

A suspected al-Qaeda linked-group has reportedly take over Radda, a small town in Yemen located about 170 km (105.6 miles) southeast of Sanaa. The group claimed that it is closing in on the Yemeni capital.

The Yemeni parliament has also adopted a law approving Saleh’s longtime deputy, Vice President Abdrabuh Mansar Hadi, as the consensus candidate in the election for his successor, which is due to be held on 21 February 2012. Many in the international community believe that violence in the south and east of the country between the army and al-Qaeda linked military might trigger a delay to the poll. But a senior official of Saleh’s General People’s Congress Party (GPC), Sultan al-Barakani, insisted that the vote will occur as scheduled.

The Gulf-brokered transition agreement foresees that Hadi will be the sole candidate but his nomination has been strongly criticized by the protesters due to his close link with Saleh.

As Saleh continues to fester attention, it is crucial to remember the thousands of civilians in Yemen that have been affected by his actions. Although the deal for immunity was hailed by opposition parties in Yemen, youth protesters and international rights groups called the immunity a violation of international law.

UN Human Rights Chief Navi Pillay agreed that the immunity could violate international law.

“I am pleased that immunity law has been modified but it does not go far enough. The scope of the law is still too broad. The UN cannot condone a broad amnesty that covers UN classified crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes, gross violations of human rights, and sexual violence. We would have been more satisfied if these recognized categories of crimes were incorporated into the draft law.”

Human Rights Watch also offered a statement on the law.

“This law sends the disgraceful message that there is no consequence for killing those who express dissent. The Yemeni government should be investigating senior officials linked to serious crimes, not letting them get away with murder.”

Youth protesters continued marching on Saturday 21 January 2012, rejecting any immunity for Saleh or those serving under him over the last three decades. According to the Revolution Youth Organizing Committee, protests have taken place in 13 provinces across YemenThe largest protests took place in Sanaa, where many continued pushing for Saleh’s prosecution. Salma al-Nusari, a youth activist in Sanaa, shared these sentiments about the situation.

“He killed many, and now the opposition wants to forgive him. Blood that Saleh spilt will not be forgiven, and we will continue demanding his prosecution until our demands are met.”

 

 

For more information, please see: 

Ahram – Yemen MPs Approve Controversial Saleh Immunity Law -21 January 2012

Al-Jazeera – Yemen Parliament Approves Immunity Law – 21 January 2012

BBC – Yemen MPs Approve Saleh Immunity Deal – 21 January 2012

CNN – Yemeni President Saleh Granted Immunity – 21 January 2012

NYT – Yemen Legislators Approve Immunity For The President – 21 January 2012

Reuters – Yemen Grants Saleh Immunity To Try To End Crisis – 21 January 2012

 

Muslim Brotherhood Wins Big In Egyptian Elections, Promising Changes from Mubarak’s Regime

By Adom M. Cooper
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

CAIRO, Egypt–As the final stages of free and fair elections in Egypt came to a close, many faces and names reflect a substantive transition from the three decade rule of Hosni Mubarak. According to the Egyptian Election Commission, the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), which represents Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, won 47 percent of all seats in the country’s election for the lower house of parliament.

An Egyptian man casts his ballot in the Shubra area of Cairo.(Photo Courtesy of AP)

The head of the Egyptian Election Commission, Abdel Moez Ibrahim, announced on Saturday 21 January 2012 that the FJP secured 235 seats in the new People’s Assembly. It also secured 127 seats on party lists, while its candidates won another 108 in the first-past-the-post constituency votes ever in Egypt. These votes were cast for individual candidates.

The Islamist Salafi al-Nour party won 24 percent of all seats available and the liberal al-Wafd won approximately seven percent of seats. The remaining 22 percent of seats were divided up amongst smaller political groups and parties.

The voter turnout for the polls was an impressive 54 percent.

Saad al-Katani, a leading Muslim Brotherhood official, shared these sentiments with a correspondent from Reuters concerning his intentions to have the assembly play a reconciliatory role.

“The priorities are meeting the demands of the revolution, including the rights of the injured and those killed in the uprising.”

The advent of the free and fair elections for the lower house of parliament is a landmark for the history of Egypt. They took place over three stages and two-thirds of the 498 seats up for election were reserved for those belonging to registered political parties, while the remaining one-third of seats were contested by individuals. Ten seats were reserved for appointees of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), the military council that has been ruling Egypt since Mubarak’s ouster.

Al-Jazeera correspondent Sherine Tadros, reporting from Cairo, shared these sentiments about the outcome of the elections and what it means for the people of Egypt.

“This parliament, that has its opening session on Monday, has very limited powers. The most important thing it will be doing in the coming weeks and months, is setting up a 100-member body that will then write the constitution.”

There is much work to be done after the uprising in the country claimed many lives and left thousands of civilians feeling as if the military government would not substantively distance themselves from the practices of Mubarak’s regime. Elections for the upper house of parliament will take place in February, after which the constituent assembly will be selected.

But arguably the most important task will occur by June: the election of a new president. Hopeful candidates for the presidency can register to run by April 15.

Since the violence has effectively ended and new political leaders are ascending to important positions, the SCAF must deal with the thousands of people detained and imprisoned. The head of the SCAF, Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, ordered the release of 1,959 people on Saturday 21 January 2012 being held in prisons after having faced military trials.

Al-Jazeera correspondent Sharine Tadros shared these words concerning the detainees.

“It is the biggest pardon since the ouster of then Presiden Hosni Mubarak. All of these people were incarcerated after the SCAF took over and they subjected about 12,000 people to military trials since then. Most of those who are incarcerated and are now being pardoned, are mainly in there for cases to do with rioting, attacking public buildings and so on. There has been a lot of talk about military trials. There’s a big movement here to try and get rid of these military trials, people saying that they violate human rights.”

One of the detainees, a blogger named Maikel Nabil, was convicted of insulting the military and sentenced to two years in jail was among those due to be released.

“Nabil was the first blogger to be incarcerated by military trial back in April and he was against the military and he spoke out against the military and wrote about the military and his case very much resonated across the country at that time because it fed into this idea that the country was just going back to its old ways. All of this coming just a few days before the first anniversary of the revolution, January 25. SCAF is very adamant to make this a day of celebration, whereas others are trying to make it a day of demonstration.”

With all of the deaths and violence that have befallen Egypt since the demonstrations and protests began, one can only hope that the presence of newly elected leaders will actually deliver the change that all of the civilians struggled for. The Arab Spring has fully sprung in Egypt and a new era of power transition has showed the world that peaceful demonstrations and protests can achieve the desired change. It is a great thing to see and hopefully, the Arab Spring can be viewed down the road as one of the Middle East’s pivotal movements for peaceful, democratic change.

 

 

For more information, please see: 

Ahram – Islamists Win 70% Of Egypt People’s Assembly Party List Seats – 21 January 2012

Al-Jazeera – Muslim Brotherhood Tops Egyptian Poll Result – 22 January 2012

BBC – Egypt’s Islamist Parties Win Elections To Parliament – 21 January 2012

The Guardian – Egypt Elections Results Show Firm Win for Islamists – 21 January 2012

NYT – Islamist Win 70% of Seats In The Egyptian Parliament – 21 January 2012

Reuters – Islamist Secure Top Spot In New Egypt Parliament – 21 January 2012