Syrian Revolution Digest: 3 June 2012

Syrian Revolution Digest: 3 June 2012

THE COMMENTARY IN THIS PIECE DOES NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF IMPUNITY WATCH.  

*WARNING VIDEOS MAY CONTAIN GRAPHIC IMAGES*

Abkhazia on the Mediterranean!

By announcing that he is no longer the president of all Syrians but only of those who accept his rule, Bashar Al-Assad formalized his “divorce” from the revolutionaries. Now the fight over division of “marital” assets begins at earnest. Unsurprisingly this will translate into more bloodshed; after all, this was an unfriendly divorce. “Friends” will also sort themselves out. Iran and Russia will stand by their man in hope of getting a foothold in the upcoming Abkhazia on the Mediterranean. While the “Friends of Syria,” for all their dithering, will have to deal with the remaining mess.

Sunday June 03, 2012

Today’s death toll: 33. The Breakdown: 23 in Damascus (Douma, Daraya, Artouz, Saqba, Assal Al-Ward, Qudsaya, Damascus City), 7 in Homs (including 3 in Qusayr), 3 in Hama, 3 in Aleppo, 1 Daraa (a child).

In the Damascene suburb of Douma, the known activist Adnan Wahbi, a co-founder of the National Coordination Body, was assassinated in his home by unknown assailants. Colleagues blame pro-Assad death squads. This Mr. Wahbi’s bodyhttp://youtu.be/Pacf5IKlxdw

In the Hiffeh District, Lattakia Province, local activists report that inhabitants of a number of Sunni villages have been forced to evacuate after days of pounding and raid by local pro-Assad militias.

News

Op-Eds & Special Reports

Video Highlights

Many of Houla’s inhabitants, Homs Province, have been forced to flee into neighboring communities where their living conditions are dismal: the children in this video are not dead, for now, they’re just sleeping. International dithering might yet seal their fatehttp://youtu.be/AGaYrIn5P3I Meanwhile, the pounding of the town continued, even as Bashar Al-Assad delivered his speech and blamed the massacre of Houla on monstershttp://youtu.be/JphA0S_Fg9w A new report by Syrian TV clams that 800 heavily armed men came into this town besieged by the regular loyalist troops and conducted the massacre, then left. There is no explanation of why the current pounding is taking place.

In the town of Douma, Damascus Suburbs, clashes left over 10 locals dead: the poundinghttp://youtu.be/q8dVhBYQBSk The martyrs http://youtu.be/t0dm7lspNu4 ,http://youtu.be/DfGoXRPnE3E , http://youtu.be/b-r_jgmIcZo , http://youtu.be/FCAqP-2VICE , http://youtu.be/-xuxjzUF4L8 (Graphic) http://youtu.be/6CGaqaIJ-6w The body of activist Adnan Wahbi http://youtu.be/Pacf5IKlxdw

The town of Saqba, Damascus Suburbs, comes under fire http://youtu.be/aUJaDRSsdnw ,http://youtu.be/2IEagS9FueM Chopper surveying the scene http://youtu.be/71tXwQjKuEI

Fields around the village of Al-Rami, Idlib Province, catch fire after intense poundinghttp://youtu.be/i1Dz1BtEEEc A number of locals were killed and immediately buriedhttp://youtu.be/ZnuOFsPjoNI

The pounding of Ariha, Idlib Province, continues http://youtu.be/XgcaIRxMZz0 ,http://youtu.be/YJ9tTXv6joI

The town of Mourik, Hama Province, comes under heavy poundinghttp://youtu.be/qpJkgtBnte4

In Aleppo Province, loyalist troops move into the town of Hayanhttp://youtu.be/V5bbBx7tWPI the pounding sets many installations on firehttp://youtu.be/LMS1oE8fQqE

The pounding of Old Homs continues http://youtu.be/xk0YLIRBbdI ,http://youtu.be/3AUFzqi46O0

The town of Ghabaghib, Daraa Province, comes under heavy poundinghttp://youtu.be/8rBfSBXZNMg

Self-Immolations Spark Chinese Detentions of Tibetans and Further Governmental Restrictions

By Jenna Furman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BEIJING, China — After fourteen months, Tibetan self-immolations continue in protest of Chinese policies and restrictions aimed to repress a Tibetan movement for political and cultural autonomy.

Tibetans protest Chinese rules and regulations. (Photo courtesy of BBC News)

Last week, two Tibetan men set themselves on fire in front of the main temple in Lhasa, the Tibetan capital. One of the men reportedly died from his injuries. The fact that the self-immolations were the first to occur in the heavily guarded Tibetan capital demonstrates the growing strength and force of Tibetan protests against Chinese rule.

In response to these latest self-immolations, the Chinese Government aired a documentary stating that those who self-immolated were terrorists, criminals, or mentally ill.

Tibetan activists not only protest Chinese rule, but also call for the return of their exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. The Chinese Government has deemed the Dalai Lama a separatist and accuse him of inciting the Tibetan self-immolations. The Dalai Lama, in turn, blames the Chinese Government for the self-immolations and states that China’s “cultural genocide” against Tibetans and their lifestyle has led to desperation among Tibetans to have their voices heard.

In a separate incident, a 33-year-old Tibetan mother, Rechok, set herself on fire last Thursday outside of a Buddhist monastery in a small town in Aba county, located in the adjacent province of Sichuan. She died shortly thereafter. Sichuan has been the scene of repeated self-immolations throughout the past year.

Rechok’s self-immolation was the 35th Tibetan self-immolation to occur since March of 2011 and the fourth to occur in the town of Zhongrangtang, also known as Barma in Tibetan. At least 27 self-immolators have died to advocate Tibetan political and cultural freedom.

Following last week’s self-immolations, Chinese authorities detained an estimated 600 Tibetan residents and pilgrims. Reports indicate that even witnesses suspected of recording the self-immolations were detained by authorities. Those protestors who were not residents of Tibet were expelled.

Additionally, the Chinese Government has passed new legislation which allows police to act without reporting to higher authorities in emergency situations and allows for severe sentences for people who allegedly spread rumors. This new legislation reflects on the Chinese Government’s fear of unrest during a month-long Buddhist festival that began last week.

The Chinese Government claims the legislation is intended to promote stability in the Tibetan region amidst a wave unrest marked by increasing numbers of self-immolations.

For further information, please see:

BBC News – Detentions Reported in Tibet Capital After Immolations – 31 May 2012

The Guardian – Tibetan Woman Dies After Setting Herself on Fire – 31 May 2012

Reuters – “Hundreds Detained” in Tibet After Self-Immolations – 31 May 2012

The Washington Post – Groups say Tibetan Woman Latest in Recent Wave of Self-Immolations to Protest Chinese Rule – 30 May 2012

The Times of India – Lhasa Burning: 2 Tibetans set Themselves Ablaze – 29 May 2012

 

Notes From India: Limitations Advocating for Those With Disabilities

Emily Schneider
Special Contributor, Blog Entry #1

“Go to hell, you go to hell! Never would a first year intern prescribe this medication to someone after only one high blood pressure reading, yet he prescribed it to me and my child died.  And now you are saying he is innocent! He is a murderer and you condone it!”

I pushed forward with the crowd, through the doors and into the courtroom.  It was my third day in India, my second day working at Human Rights Law Network (HRLN), and my first time in an Indian courtroom.  I stood on my tiptoes and craned my neck.  I could see the woman, wearing the traditional, and required, white collar of an advocate, screaming at the judge.

The onlookers around me gasped at her behavior.  The man next to me whispered to his colleague, “She is not right, she has called the judge a murderer indirectly; certainly she needs to see a doctor.”  His audience nodded in agreement.  The judge said something inaudible and soon guards entered the room and pushed through the crowd.  They dragged the woman out as she screamed accusations and insults at the judge, the other attorney, and the crowd.

Court guards forced us to all exit the courtroom and as people milled about in the hall I heard snippets of conversations in English.  It seemed that the consensus was that she was crazy. People whispered that she would go to jail for this.  My supervisor found me in the crowd and explained the woman’s story.  She was an attorney who experienced complications with her pregnancy.  After seeing a doctor, she was prescribed a medication to lower her blood pressure.  She later lost the baby and blamed the doctor because of the blood pressure medication he prescribed.  She then sued him for malpractice and I had just witnessed the hearing.  My supervisor explained that the Chief Judge of the High Court in Delhi was a patient man for allowing her to rant so long.  “He’s in a good mood today, let’s hope it carries into the afternoon for our hearing as well,” she said.

We were in court that day to hear the arguments for a case concerning torture of disabled persons.  In India, there are limited resources available to those with disabilities or families of those with disabilities.  When a child is born with a disability, the family usually abandons them due to lack of resources and they are put in a government-run care facility.

Recently, one of these facilities failed an inspection by the state.  Due to intense media coverage, the facility’s failure was brought to the attention of HRLN.  Between December and January, this care facility logged 19 fatalities due to the atrocious conditions of the home.  Over 700 disabled children lived in a space meant to serve 300 children maximum; and they were assisted by only three care-takers.  HRLN filed a petition with the court in January, and by the time of the first hearing on February 6, more children had died.

At that hearing, the court ordered the care facility to reform and set another hearing to follow up on the matter.  Since February, the care facility has failed to improve and it now houses over 900 children.  The judge, who has a reputation for supporting NGO’s, signed a court order allowing HRLN to visit and inspect the facility.  This was an incredible victory for HRLN because under normal circumstances only the State is allowed to visit or inspect a care facility.

If HRLN conducts inspections and finds after a set timeframe that the facility is not improving, they can bring the matter before the court again.  Both my supervisor and the arguing attorney found this judgment more than satisfactory.  My supervisor was so elated she cautioned me against believing it was always this easy to achieve victory.  I was dumbfounded.  This did not seem like a victory to me. It seemed like a compromise made only by the goodwill of the judge that day.  However, I’m discovering that most causes HRLN takes on are losing ones from the start.  Thus, even a compromise, with the slimmest opportunity of bringing real change, is an improvement.

Emily Schneider is a third-year law student at Syracuse University College of Law.  She will be contributing to Impunity Watch by blogging about her experiences in India, where she is spending her summer working as an intern.  

Magnitsky Bill Moves Forward in the U.S. Congress

PRESS RELEASE

3 June 2012 – On Thursday, 7 June 2012, the US House of Representative’s Foreign Affairs Committee will mark up and vote on the Magnitsky bill (H.R. 4405) that imposes visa bans and asset freezes on foreign human rights offenders and corrupt officials. Following that, the Magnitsky bill will move to the full vote in the House of Representatives. This is taking place amid the escalating Russian government rhetoric against the bill and the equally rising call from Russian civil society leaders for enacting the bill .

“This is a major development as it clears the last major bottleneck to get the Magnitsky bill passed in the House,” said a Hermitage Capital representative.

The House consideration of the Magnitsky bill is significant for three reasons.

First, the consideration in the Foreign Affairs Committee is taking place a week after the Russian President’s foreign policy adviser tried to pressure the US over the Magnitsky bill. On 29 May 2012, Yuri Ushakov, foreign policy adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin, publicly threatened counter-measures if the bill gets passed:

“We got used to the Jackson-Vanik amendment, we know well how to manage it, and it has not particularly bothered us. But if this new anti-Russian law is adopted, then of course that will require some measures from our side in response.” 

The Russian government’s position on the bill is at odds with Russian public opinion. According to a Levada Center poll held last August, 60 percent of Russians support visa bans and asset freezes by the US and the EU on the Russian officials implicated in the Magnitsky case.

Second, the U.S. House of Representatives is moving on the Magnitsky bill at a much faster pace than the Senate, who origally led on the bill. In the U.S. Senate, Foreign Relations Committee Chair John Kerry indicated that the bill would be considered in April, but in spite of a number of public promises it has not been on the agenda of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee leading some commentators to believe that Senator Kerry is being pressured by the US State Department to block the progress of the bill.

Third, the House may consider the Magnitsky bill before any consideration of repealing the Jackson-Vanik amendment, which many had believed would be linked. The repeal of Jackson-Vanik amendment isconsidered necessary by the US administration for granting Russia Permanent Normal Trade Relations before Russia joins the World Trade Organization, which is expected this summer.

The Magnitsky bill is supported by Russian opposition leaders as the single most effective way to deal with widespread Russian corruption and rights abuse. A recently released movie, Sergei’s Law, features fourteen Russian civil society activists urging to enact the Magnitsky bill in the U.S. Congress. The video was produced by College-100, a network of U.S. student body presidents representing over 3 million young people.

“The Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012” was introduced by U.S. House Representative James McGovern in April 2012. The bill has gained 25 co-sponsors in one month, including Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chair of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, where the bill will be up for mark up this week.

 

For further information please contact:

Hermitage Capital

Phone:              +44 207 440 17 77
E-mail:             info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Website:           http://lawandorderinrussia.org
Facebook:        http://on.fb.me/hvIuVI
Twitter:             @KatieFisher__
Livejournal:     http://hermitagecap.livejournal.com/