Syrian Revolution Digest – Sunday October 15 2012

Syrian Revolution Digest – Sunday October 15 2012

Cluster This!

Use of cluster bombs by Assad falls short of violating the Obama Redline. As such, the development might at best generate a condemnation, but no action should be expected.

Sunday October 14, 2012

Today’s Death toll: 220. The Breakdown: death toll includes 8 children and 3 women. 140 martyrs fell in Damascus and suburbs (including 100 found in local hospital between Daraya and Moadamia), 21 in Idlib, 12 in Aleppo, 12 in Lattakia, 12 in Deir Ezzor, 11 in Homs, 9 in Daraa, 9 in Tartous, and 2 in Hama (LCC).

News

Special Reports

Turkey and Syria share a meandering border over 500 miles long, where in places the villages seem to merge, families share their names and pedigrees, if not their passports, and twisted olive trees roll out over the hillsides. Here, amid the quiet rhythms of rural life, people are witnessing what for 19 months had been one of the gravest concerns about the war next door: that it would spill over the border, draw in neighboring nations and, in a flash, become a regional conflagration. War, it becomes clearer by the day, is inching closer to home.

President Bashar Assad’s embattled regime is believed to have one of the largest chemical weapons stockpiles in the world. Fears have risen that a cornered Assad might use them or that they could fall into the hands of extremists, whether the Lebanese Hezbollah militia, an Assad ally, or al-Qaida-inspired militants among the rebels.

What are we worried about? That Syria will become a state sponsor of terrorism? That it will be hostile to the US and to Israel? That it will be a repressive dictatorship that jails and murders thousands of people? That it will be an ally of Iran, our principal enemy in the region? Syria is already all of those things.

Ammar Abdulhamid & Khawla Yusuf: The Shredded Tapestry: The State of Syria Today

Alawite Defections

In regarding to high level defections among Alawites, it should be noted that Col. Zubaidah Almiqi is not the highest ranking Alawite officer to defect. We know there are more. But Col. Almiqi seem to have been selected to come out in the open because she is one of the few Alawites who hail from the Golan Heights, an area far from the Alawite heartland along the Syrian coast. Being surrounded by rebel bases her family might be safe from loyalist retributions. As we have seen from the situation in Qardaha, dissention in the ranks will be followed by immediate clashes and retributions, as such, it requires careful management. In tactical terms, Alawites who grew disillusioned cannot just “dissent,” they have to plan an uprising and stick with it. This requires careful planning, something that might already be taking place.

Chemical Obama

If the Obama Administration were seriously concerned over the issue of Syrian WMDs falling in the wrong hand, they had a strange way of showing it. Indeed one would have expected a more proactive attitude towards managing the entire situation, including working closely with the opposition to form a transitional government and agreeing on a transitional plan, working closely with the rebels to establish a clear command structure and supervising all efforts meant at arming and training the rebels. This approach would have undercut any attempt at building radical networks by Jihadists in Syria. Instead, the Obama Administration remained aloof, and failed to lead on any front, even from behind. American officials and experts were missing in action throughout the crisis, other western officials followed their lead. This left the doors wide open for a variety of regional actors to approach the conflict on the basis of their own particularistic priorities and in the manner to which they were accustomed: building up radical Islamist networks on the ground (the main backers here are Saudi and Qatar, but always with Turkish support) and using Islamists in exile to lead all work on political transition abroad (Turkey’s work with the Muslim Brotherhood, and Gulf support going to Salafist groups and figures).

Consequently, fear of WMDs falling into the wrong hand are now more justified than they have ever been before, but, at this late stage, there may not be a way for the U.S. to secure the WMDs’ without employing a foot-on-the-ground approach. But if such an approach is used without rebel support and withoutsupporting rebels in their fight against Assad, than any U.S. involvement in this regard could have negative repercussion on the situation and will further radicalize sentiments.

The Obama Administration has recently sent troops to Jordan reportedly as part of a potential future operations meant to secure Syria’s WMDs. But it is not clear that such an operation would entail considering the fact that WMDs locations are scattered throughout the country, and seeing that contact with rebel groups remain too sporadic to allow for efficient coordination of efforts. Little can be achieved without active support from rebels, but rebels are unlikely to help the Administration achieve its objectives, if the Administration is not willing to help them achieve theirs.

By doing nothing, the Obama Administration has, in fact, done plenty to make its own worst scenario in Syria come true, and we all have to live with the consequences of its folly.

Video Highlights

In Idlib and Aleppo rebels bring down two more MIGs: Idlibhttp://youtu.be/xta_ojZbgsY

More towns and villages are being liberated by rebels in Aleppo and Idlib: Heesh (Idlib) http://youtu.be/6YTdUePAQDA

Jabhat Al-Nusrah takes part in liberating a missile base in Aleppo Provincehttp://youtu.be/vGJ50S-9ogE , http://youtu.be/3xjMXSlCvCc

Leaked video shows pro-Assad militias “arresting” a local activisthttp://youtu.be/57XVLLd78UU Another shows a cold-blooded summary executionhttp://youtu.be/uuUcuQ2wL3g

The historic Omayad Mosque in Aleppo City was set on fire as result of shelling by pro-Assad militias. The mosque was used at first as a base by pro-Assad militias who wrote offensive graffiti on its walls, leading to a push by local rebel unit to liberate it, which, in is turn, encouraged pro-Assad militias to shell it.  Like every choice made by rebels and activists since the beginning of this revolution; it always boils down to a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” type situationhttp://youtu.be/F9m1Xb4pEAU

In this TV interview with a Gulf-based channel, the Salafist Scholar Adnan Arour, addresses the issues of foreign fighters and the nature of the desired state in Syria: he says that rebels do not need foreign fighters coming to fight and die on their land, because they have enough men. Rebels needs money, not men, he says and insists that this is the right way for interpreting Sharia law in this regard. He also says that the state that rebels want to establish and that he supports is a state that respects the right of all for dignity, freedom and justice, not an Islamic state. He adopts this point of view, he says, not because he does not believe in an Islamic state, but because he believes that it cannot be established by force but by admonishment http://youtu.be/3w5LPysbUSc. This is a marked diversion from his earlier stands: at the beginning of the revolution, Shaikh Arour even issued a fatwa against challenging the ruling regime, but, he quickly reversed his position, lent support to the revolution and called for retribution against the Alawites. He, then, reversed that position as well. Over the last few months, Shaikh  Arour seems to be trying to become a more acceptable figure to a larger swath of Syria’s Sunni population by carefully calibrating his positions and moderating his views. His strategy seems to be working: he has more followers in Syria now than he had ever enjoyed. His ability to bring material support to the rebels has boosted his popularity as well. Indeed, Arour’s recent venture into the liberated areas in the north was fruitful and resulted in the establishment of the Union of Military Revolutionary Council. Though the Union is not as large as its other Islamist rivals: the Islamic Front for the Liberation of Syria, the Tawhid Brigades, the Jabhat Al-Nusrah (the Syrian incarnation of Al-Qaeda) or its pragmatist rivals, especially the Syria martyrs Brigades, much could change in the days and weeks ahead as facts on the grounds remain in flux.

A bomb in the plush Mazzeh Autostrad Neighborhood targets In-House, a Starbucks-type coffeehouse. The explosion took place at dawn, making clear that the intention was to spread fear rather than produce casualtieshttp://youtu.be/HEHnibCOU6Y

Thousands of Muslims Protest Anti-Islam Film Outside Google’s London HQ

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

LONDON, U.K. – Several thousand British Muslims gathered outside Google’s London offices Sunday to demand that the company remove the anti-Islamic film, “The Innocence of Muslims,” from its subsidiary website, YouTube.

Muslim protestors gathered outside Google’s London HQ, on Buckingham Palace Road. (Photo Courtesy of The Telegraph)

For several hours Sunday, protesters filled the street in front of Google’s London headquarters, forcing Buckingham Palace Road to be closed for at least three hours almost up to the Palace gates.  Barricades were erected, and protestors carried signs with messages such as “We love our prophet more than our lives” and “Prophet Muhammad is the founder of freedom of speech.”

Khalid Mahmood, of campaign group Voyce, explained that the demonstration against Google was the first in the UK, and that other acts would follow.  He said: “This is a demonstration against hate speech on the internet and YouTube in particular.”

The protestors specifically want the 14 minute video from the allegedly forthcoming “Innocence of Muslims” film, which has caused great controversy in the Muslim world in the last month, permanently blocked.

The protest comes only a few days after al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri called for a holy war against the US and Israel over the same video.

Organizer Masoud Alam explained that the video presents an issue not of freedom of speech, but rather of religious intolerance.  He stated: “This is not freedom of expression, there is a limit for that. This insult of the Prophet will not be allowed.”

Muslims came to London for the protest from many corners of the U.K., including some reported from Birmingham, Blackburn, Manchester, Peterborough, and even Glasglow.  Around 800 imams in British mosques took part in organizing the protest.

It is estimated that between 3,500 Muslims, according to BBC News, and 10,000 Muslims, according to the Telegraph, participated in the protest.

Women are difficult to spot in protest photographs and video.  However, according to one protestor, they were present nonetheless “right at the back.”

Organizers plan further protests in the city in coming weeks, including a one million-strong march in London’s Hyde Park.

“Until it is banned we will keep protesting,” Alam affirmed.

“The Innocence of Muslims” video was uploaded on YouTube in July by Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a California-based Egyptian-American, who is now in custody for the unrelated charge of violating the terms of his probation for a pre-existing fraud offense.

Violence surrounding the video erupted in September when an Arabic-language version became available on YouTube.  Amid the resulting violence, four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya, were killed in an attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.

Thereafter, Google and YouTube restricted access to the video in Egypt and Libya.  However, Google continues to assert that this video is not hate speech because hate speech is speech against individuals, not against groups, according to the New York Times.  Because the video criticizes Islam, but not the Muslim people, YouTube finds it to be allowable.

A Spokesperson YouTube said: “We work hard to create a community everyone can enjoy and which also enables people to express different opinions. . . This video – which is widely available on the Web – is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube.”

However, the protestors feel differently.  Sheikh Faiz Al-Aqtab Siddiqui, an imam, explained the severity of the situation: “Terrorism is not just people who kill human bodies, but who kill human feelings as well. The makers of this film have terrorized 1.6 billion people. Organizations like Google are key players and have to take responsibility for civility. You can’t just say it doesn’t matter that it’s freedom of speech. It’s anarchy.”

For more information, please see:

BBC News – Anti-Islam Film Protest Outside Google’s London HQ – 14 October 2012

Global Post  – 10,000 Muslims Rally Outside Google’s London HQ Over US-made Anti-Islam Film: Report – 14 October 2012

The Telegraph – Muslims Protest ‘Age of Mockery’ as Thousands Descend on Google HQ – 14 October 2012

The Guardian – Al-Qaida leader calls for holy war on US and Israel over anti-Islamic film – 13 October 2012

The Telegraph – US Filmmakers Banned from Britain over Anti-Mohammed Video – 12 October 2012

The New York Times – As Violence Spreads in Arab World, Google Blocks Access to Inflammatory Video – 13 September 2012

16-Year-Old Boy Killed in Ghana During Round-Up of Illegal Miners

By Heba Girgis
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

ACCRA, Ghana—Today, police in Ghana began investigating the death of a young Chinese boy who was killed during a security crackdown of illegal gold mining in Ghana. The security officials arrested approximately 100 Chinese nationals in Ghana during a round-up in the Ashanti region of Ghana which is rich in gold and near Ghana’s second largest city of Kumasi. These Chinese nationals remain detained in Ghana. The Ghanaian military argue that the death was an accident, but that further investigation is under way.

Ghanaian Police Investigate Death of 16-Year-Old Chinese Boy. (Photo Courtesy of Updated News)

Chris Kpodo, Ambassador of Ghana said, “We have received reports about the death of a 16-year-old boy of Chinese nationality. It is regrettable, and the government has ordered an investigation into the incident.” He also noted, “We will be granting the ambassador (of China) a diplomatic access to visit the detainees and speak with them.”

Any Chinese men and women in poor health have been released on bail. The rest of the individuals who were arrested were given water and medicine and provided with health checks.

In the past year, there have been many incidents of Chinese citizens being detained and arrested for illegal gold mining. The Ghanaian security officials have just recently vamped up their efforts in cracking down on these types of activities.

Chinese Ambassador to Ghana, Gong Jianzhong, said last month that many Chinese miners are also victims. They lack poor paperwork and therefore become trapped in Ghana by local agents and mine owners. Jianzhong hopes that Ghana can solve this problem at its root rather than only arresting illegal Chinese miners and possible killing some of them.

According to Ghanaian law, foreign companies in Ghana are only allowed to work independently in certain large and open-pit mines. Dai Yan, the former counselor to Ghana, noted that China is not a colonizer “as the West has historically been, and mining cooperation is supposed to be mutually beneficial as Ghana is rich in resources and China can provide technology, equipment and funding.” He also added that this type of cooperation may work to expand job creation.

The Chinese Embassy has now called on all Chinese nationals in Ghana to fully abide by Ghanaian related laws and regulations in order to safeguard and protect their own interests.

 

For further information, please see:

China Daily – Ghana Detains 100 Chinese for Illegal Mining – 14 October 2012

Global Times – Ghana Killing Protested – 14 October 2012

Reuters – Ghana Investigating Death of Chinese Boy During Miner Round-Up – 14 October 2012

Updated News – Ghana Investigating Death of Chinese Boy During Miner Round-Up – 14 October 2012

Buenos Aires First Legal Abortion

By Brendan Oliver Bergh
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina – The Argentinian Supreme Court issued a ruling late Thursday night which granted an abortion to a women rescued from a prostitution ring.

nothing
Pro-Abortion Activists Rally In Buenos Aires. (Photo Courtesy of Today Online)

Argentina like most South America heavily identifies itself as Roman Catholic and 95% of all abortions that take place in the continent are illegal. Yet in March 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that abortions in the case of rape or pregnancies that threaten the women’s life are legal. Buenos Aires has since drafted regulations in order to implement that ruling, limiting the abortions to within the first 12 weeks of gestation of a rape victim’s pregnancy.

The 32 year old women, whose name has been withheld for security reasons had been kidnapped and forced in sexual slavery. Upon her rescue the women made the decision to go against her faith and the protests of her family and terminate her pregnancy.

However this would not be a private affair as controversy stirred up when anti-abortion activists identified the woman and protested outside her home, and then again at the hospital.

What was supposed to be Buenos Aires first legal abortion under the new abortion regulations turned into a spectacle of legal arguments and demonstrations from both sides of the debate. Scheduled for Tuesday, moments before surgery was supposed to take place the anti-abortion group “Pro-Family” received an injunction from a judge effectively stopping the procedure. The judge claimed that there had been no evidence of rape.

For another three days, the woman was forced to wait in what Amnesty International calls “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.” Debates on both sides of the argument stirred as the judge’s decision was appealed to the Supreme Court. Soon after the Supreme Court overturned the lower judge’s decision the trafficked woman was in the hospital despite numerous nurses and doctor’s refusal to take part.

Argentina’s Health Ministry made sure to clarify that abortion was indeed legal in certain circumstances and there would be no punishment for those who carried out the procedure.

Proponents for abortion call this a victory for women’s rights. In 2007 The National Health Research Program and the Ministry of Health of the Nation produced research that showed there were approximately 450,000 to 600,000 illegally performed abortions in Argentina.

The battle in Latin America continues, currently only Cuba has authorized full and legal abortions for its citizens. However, next week Uruguay will continue its legislative action and is expected to legalize elective abortion.

For further information, please see:

Today Online – Rape Victims Struggle To Get Legal Abortions In Argentina – 14 October 2012

La Nacion – They Have 5 Hospitals For Abortion – 13 October 2012

The BBC – Argentinian ‘Sex Slave’ Allowed Abortion After Ruling – 12 October 2012

CNN – Argentine Court Allows Abortions In Rape Cases – 14 March 2012

Pagina 12 – The Figures For Open Debate – 2 June 2007

Chávez Consolidates Power Post-Victory

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

 CARACAS, Venezuela – Hugo Chávez, 58, won his third six-year term as president of Venezuela last week.  Yesterday he swore in a new vice president and replaced six senior Cabinet ministers.  Many of the replaced government officials announced their plans to run in gubernatorial races in states currently controlled by the opposition.

Chávez, surrounded by supporters, celebrates his victory last Sunday over opposition party candidate Capriles. (Photo courtesy venezuelanalysis.com)

It appears Chávez is wasting no time strengthening his party’s influence throughout the nation as part of his strategy to achieve his stated intention of remaining in power until 2031.

The race up to the election last Sunday October 7, 2012, was the tightest Chávez has faced since he first gained power in 1996.  The obvious inequity in campaigning has lead some to declare that the election was “free, but not fair.”  Nevertheless, Chávez won 55 percent of the vote in the election, beating the opposition candidate, Henrique Capriles Radnski, by 11 percentage points.

Chávez’s win may prompt a reexamination of relations between the government and the opposition, which, up until now, have been so polarized that neither side has recognized the other’s legitimacy. During the campaign, Capriles even refused to pledge himself to accept the official results announced by the National Electoral Council.

Signs immediately following the elections indicate that the mutual distrust may be easing.  Keeping a promise he made on election day, Chávez phoned Capriles and for the first time refrained from using derogatory language against his former rival.  More important, Chávez committed himself to “extending a hand” to his opponents and made a call for “national reconciliation,” which would even include business interests of all sizes.

All major opposition leaders firmly resist the use of massive government expenditures to finance ambitious goals.  Up until now, the programs that Chávez claims create the conditions for “socialism” have been financed by windfall oil revenue.  Thus, for instance, expropriations to bolster the nation’s mixed economy are designed to allow state companies to compete with private ones in hopes of controlling inflation, which at over 20 percent is the highest in the continent.  Another costly and ambitious area of investment has been community councils, which receive financing to carry out their own public works projects and to form what the government calls “communes.”  The main opposition parties may be divided with regard to the role of the state, but none of them go along with the type of transformation to which Chávez is committed.

Perhaps the knowledge that he couldn’t move forward with many of his plans with opposition leaders in power is what prompted Chávez to shake up his Cabinet yesterday.

Former Foreign Minister Nicolas Maduro, 49, replaced Elias Jaua as Chávez’s vice president. Maduro, a burly former bus driver, is considered the member of Chávez’s government with the closest ties to Cuba’s Fidel and Raul Castro.

The vice presidential job has assumed new importance because of Chávez’s recent struggle with cancer and rumors have circulated that Maduro is being groomed as his successor.

Jaua will be the ruling United Socialist Party’s candidate for the governorship of Miranda, Venezuela’s second largest state, which is the power base of Capriles.

Among the Cabinet changes was the appointment of General Nestor Reverol as the new minister of the interior and justice, replacing Tareck El Aissami, who will run to be governor of Aragua. Reverol had led Venezuela’s anti-drug body.

Admiral Carmen Melendez is the new head of the Office of the Presidency, replacing Erika Farias, who will seek the governorship of the west-central state of Cojedes.

Chavez also named journalist Ernesto Villegas to run the ministry of communications and public affairs; Aloha Nunez to the head of the ministry of indigenous affairs and Cristobal Francisco to the top post at the environment ministry.

In the swearing-in ceremony aired on state television, Chávez called on his new ministers to continue “the fight to transform the old capitalist and bourgeoisie state … into a socialist state.”

He also called for greater government efficiency.

Years of inadequate maintenance, corruption and perceived incompetence have left Venezuela’s infrastructure in a sorry state.  A blast in the Amuay oil refinery in late August killed 42 people (six are still missing).  Across the country, roads and bridges have collapsed or been washed away by rains, severing main transport arteries.

Citizens complain of crime, unemployment and poor public services.

Over the past year or so, the president has begun to spend his war chest. Calculations are that public spending has expanded by 30% in real terms over the 12 months prior to August.  Some of this has gone on new “grand missions”, as Mr. Chávez calls his social programs, the most important of which promised in 2010 to provide over 350,000 new homes by the end of 2012. That compares with under 600,000 new homes (by official estimates) in the previous 11 years.

Notably, over 3 million people are registered for the new program, providing the government with valuable electoral data.  The government insisted up to the election that an opposition victory would dash the hopes of the homeless, even though Mr. Capriles promised to keep that program going.

Chávez is at a strategy crossroads.  The continuation of far-reaching programs that invigorate the rank and file will meet resistance from opposition leaders who claim they are not sustainable over the long run.  On the other hand, major concessions to the opposition would run the risk of dampening the enthusiasm of his followers.  While the strategies of change and national reconciliation may not be mutually exclusive, it will take considerable political skill to combine the two in ways that overcome the intense political schisms that have divided Venezuela in recent years.

For further information, please see:

The Auburn Plainsman – Venezuela election reminder of how bad it could be – 14 October 2012

iFocus – Venezuela’s Chavez names new cabinet ministers – 14 October 2012

Fox News – Venezuela’s Chavez swears in vice president, 6 other ministers in post-election shake up – 13 October 2012

Reuters – Venezuela’s Chavez shuffles cabinet, then tweets about it – 13 October 2012

venezuelanalysis – Venezuela Reelects Hugo Chavez. What’s Next? – 12 October 2012

The Economist – The autocrat and the ballot box – 29 September 2012