Magnitsky’s Mother Slams the Government’s Cover-Up in Prosecution of Prison Doctor Kratov

Magnitsky’s Mother Slams the Government’s Cover-Up in Prosecution of Prison Doctor Kratov

Press Release
Hermitage Capital

2 October 2012 – Natalia Magnitskaya, the mother of the late Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, today called on the Russian court to accept new evidence showing the complicity of a large group of Russian law enforcement officials in the torture and killing of her son, and to send the case back to prosecutors.

In her testimony at the Tverskoi District Court in Moscow this morning, Mrs. Magnitskaya gave evidence that the indictment issued by Russian investigators against Dmitry Kratov, a former deputy head of Butyrka prison, does not contain certain critical factual and documentary evidence linking other officials to the crime against her son. Under the Russian criminal procedural code, the court is bound by the scope of the indictment in issuing its sentence and this ommision by the prosecutors would lead to a drastically more lenient sentence.

In her court testimony against Kratov, Natalia Magnitskaya made the following statements:

“In accordance with the law, the victim is entitled to represent and support the prosecution, but in this situation, I am deprived of this right because I cannot support this accusation – the information contained in the case files available to the investigators make it clear that Dmitry Kratov was not the only culprit as the indictment suggests. In these circumstances I ask the court to make the only possible just and lawful decision – to return this criminal case back to the prosecutor and re-open the investigation in light of the new factual circumstances identified by my representative and which the indictment does not include.”

Judge Neverova refused the petition on the grounds that a similar petition had previously been refused from Mrs. Magnitskaya’s lawyer.

“Last time I saw my son alive in the Tverskoi District Court, there were no signs of his fatal condition. That was four days before his death… Who will tell me the truth, what happened to my son during these 4 days? It is in these days and the last hours of his life, which was confirmed by experts, that Sergei suffered injuries from violence,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“My son died not on a deserted street, and not in a dark hallway, he died in a state facility in the presence of many witnesses, and such witnesses were not prisoners, but they were the state officials, doctors and security guards. However, the investigation has been conducted for almost three years by now, and is still very far from completion,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya drew attention to the role of the head of Butyrka detention, Mr Komnov, and his deputy in charge of operational and intelligence activities in custody, Mr Gorchakov, neither of whom have been charged, and instead these officials will be called as witnesses for the prosecution.

“The head of Butyrka detention center Mr Komnov and his deputy Mr. Gorchakov were both responsible for establishing torturous conditions for my son by arranging for numerous illegal transfers between different cells in Butyrka detention center, however, no charges have been brought in relation to them and they now have been invited to the court as witnesses,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya also noted the role of officials at Matrosskaya Tishina detention center and doctor on duty, Alexandra Gaus, who left Magnitsky without any supervision for over an hour when detention center guards used handcuffs and rubber batons on Magnitsky.

“Without any doubt, direct responsibility for the torture of my son and for his brutal murder stays with Dr. Gaus and she should be held criminally liable for this. Despite all of this, investigator Mrs Lomonosova of the Investigative Committee and Deputy Prosecutor General Grin called her to the court as a witness for the prosecution. There have been no changes brought for the committed crime in relation to Dr. Gaus or her accomplices,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya recounted her meeting with Dmitry Kratov two months before her son’s death when she requested him to provide medical treatment for her son which he had been systematically denied in custody.

“Based on my personal meeting with Mr Kratov in September 2009, i.e. two months before the death of my son, I have every reason to state that Mr Kratov knew and was aware that by his criminal actions and omission, torturous conditions were created for my son. He was part of this conspiracy and therefore fulfilled his role in the torture of Sergei,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“A young, healthy man who had no medical history in local clinics after being in custody for about a year became sick and had an incredible large number of fatal illnesses…Less than a year after the arrest, state representatives asked me to pick up my son’s mangled body from the morgue, doing it in a way that I was unable to have an independent medical examination of the causes of his death,” added Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs Magnitskaya also highlighted the role of the senior leadership of the Interior Ministry and high ranking officials from the Russian penal system in organizing Magnitsky’s six transfers between detention centers in less than a year.

“Maybe Investigator Silchenko, acting now as “witness for the prosecution”, will be able to explain what his motives were when he signed an illegal decree requesting to execute the forceful delivery of my son to him? On November 24, 2008 the state officials who were the members of investigation group of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Interior Ministry, Mr Ryabinin, Mr Droganov and Mr Krechtov came to my son’s apartment and took him away – young and healthy – forever from his family under a pretext of a criminal case brought by investigator Karpov and the FSB officials,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“Maybe Investigator Silchenko will be able to tell us why my son was transferred six times between different detention facilities within less than one year. Decisions on each such transfers were taken at the federal level, personally by acting Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Lt-general Petrukhin, his deputy  General Semeniuk, with direct participation of the Deputy Chief of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Interior Ministry General Logunov and investigator of this committee Mr Silchenko… In total, during his illegal detention, my son was transferred between different cells at least twenty-one times, some transfers were conducted during nights,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“Sergei died due to violence and torturous conditions that were specifically created for him. This is confirmed by documentary evidence which those who were involved in his death will not be able to hide,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Sergei Magnitsky, an outside lawyer for the Hermitage Fund, was killed in Russian police custody at the age of 37 after he exposed the $230 million theft implicating government officials. He was honored posthumously with 2010 Integrity Award by Transparency International, for his fight against official corruption.

 

For further information please contact:

Hermitage Capital
Phone:             +44 207 440 17 77
E-mail:             info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Website:          http://lawandorderinrussia.org
Facebook:        http://on.fb.me/hvIuVI
Twitter:           @KatieFisher__
Livejournal:     http://hermitagecap.livejournal.com/

ICTJ In Focus October 2012 Issue 25

ICTJ In Focus October 2012 Issue #25

Battle Free Speech: Brazil v Google

By Margaret Janelle R. Hutchinson
Impunity Watch Reporter, South America

BRASÍLIA, Brazil – As a young, vibrant, democratic nation, it seems counterintuitive that Brazil would be a leader in digital censorship.  Brazil submitted 418 requests, more than any other country, to block or remove content from Google’s various servers last year.

Brazil, which led the world in requests to block Google content, struggles with technology and free-speech rights. (Photo Courtesy Google)

Attempts to censor content were elevated to another level last week when a judge ordered the arrest of Google’s most senior executive in Brazil, Fabio Jose Silva Coelho, after the company failed to take down YouTube videos attacking a local mayoral candidate.

A different Brazilian judge ordered Google to remove versions of the “Innocence of the Muslims” video that has sparked deadly riots across the Middle East from Brazilian YouTube within 10 days or face fines.

The cases are reviving a debate about Brazilian laws that hold services such as YouTube responsible for the videos posted on them, making the country a hotbed of attempts to stifle digital content.

Brazilian law currently treats content on the internet like material in newspapers, television and radio.  Consequently, Google is considered responsible for user posted material.

Brazil carefully monitors racial issues and has strict electoral laws that limit criticism of candidates in the run-up to elections.  There are lawsuits in at least 20 of its 26 states seeking deletion of Google content.  The video that drew controversy last week aired paternity claims against a mayoral candidate in Campo Grande, a state capital in Brazil’s interior.

Google says it resists restrictions it regards as illegitimate but complies with lawful requests from government officials.  The company appealed the ruling in the Campo Grande case but blocked the video after the court rejected the appeal and police arrested Coelho.

“Our goal with YouTube is to offer a community that everyone can enjoy and, at the same time, is a platform for freedom of expression worldwide,” Coelho said in a blog post after his brief detention.  “This is a great challenge, mainly because content acceptable in one country may be offensive — or even illegal — in others.”

Many Brazilians criticized the government’s handling of the Campo Grande case and what they see as elevating the rights of political candidates over the free-speech rights of their constituents.

“It’s a step back in terms of freedom of expression, something like we see happening in countries like China,” said Monica Rosina, professor at Fundaçao Getulio Vargas Law School. “It’s bad for the Brazilian image abroad.”

In the video case, the judge said Google would be fined 10,000 Brazilian reais ($4,926) per day if it doesn’t comply with his order.  Still, the judge acknowledged the complexity of policing videos on YouTube.

There is pending legislation in Brazil that would provide some protection for intermediaries such as Google.  The legislation, known as Marco Civil, would not fully prevent the kind of case that resulted in Coelho’s arrest, which was brought under Brazil’s more specific electoral laws.

Maria Clara Garcaz, a 20-year-old university student in Rio de Janeiro, expressed worries about the court action.

“It’s like we live in a silent, disguised dictatorship.  When we had our real dictatorship, at least you knew for certain what you could and couldn’t say,” Garcaz said.  “Political speech can be censored at any time and it’s moving into the Internet, exactly where people speak out.”

For further information, please see:

The Independent – Governments in young democracies fret over social media – 4 October 2012

PKKH – Google’s Brazil Chief Detained; Court Bans Anti-Islam Video – 27 September 2012

Yahoo Finance – Arrest of Google Brazil head stirs debate over Web – 27 September 2012

The Guardian – Google executive in Brazil faces arrest over video – 25 September 2012

 

Human Rights Watch publishes Report over Torture in Gaza

By Ali Al-Bassam
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

GAZA STRIP — “Abusive System: Criminal Justice in Gaza,” A Human Rights Watch (HRW) Report released on Wednesday, said that Hamas has routinely subjected Palestinian detainees to torture and abuse.  The report says that since 2007, Hamas has executed at least three men over “confessions” obtained through torture.  HRW now calls for an immediate moratorium on capital punishment in the Gaza Strip, and also for Hamas to cease the prosecution of civilians in military courts.

 

The report by Human Rights Watch says that civilians have been tried in military courts. (Photo Courtesy of Human Rights Watch)

HRW’s report describes extensive violations by Hamas security services, including warrantless arrests, failure to promptly provide families of detainees information of their whereabouts, and also accounts of torture. HRW also reported about human rights violations within Hamas’ court system, such as the denying detainees access to a lawyer.  HRW also discovered instances of detainees being deprived of their due process through warrantless arrests and abusive interrogations.

The Independent Commission for Human Rights, a non partisan Palestinian rights group, says it received 147 complaints of torture by the Internal Security Agency, the drugs unit of the civil police force in Gaza, and also by police detectives.

In a statement accompanying the report, Joe Stork, the deputy Middle East director of HRW, said that Gaza’s “ [c]riminal justice system reeks of injustice, routinely violates detainee’s rights, and grants impunity to abusive security services.”

The report charges Hamas for failing to prosecute any abusive security officials, and have essentially granted Internal Security service officials impunity from prosecution in particular.

Journalists also criticized Hamas for its reporting restrictions.  A Palestinian press freedom group recanted a scene that occurred last Sunday, where they were warned of restrictions and threatened journalists with abuse for attempting to cover a rare demonstration, which criticized Hamas officials for their failure to put out a fire that killed a three year old boy.  “We often receive threats when we cover events.  I’m calling on Palestinian authorities to provide a safe working environment for journalists,” journalist Husein Jamal said.

In a response to a claim made by HRW regarding their lack of access to detention centers, the Ministry of Interior in Gaza said in a statement, “[w]e assure you that our detention centers are open for human rights centers.”  The Ministry of Interior also accused HRW of being politically biased, and also for failing to address human rights violations in the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

Hamas officials claim to have disciplined hundreds of security service members for abuses since 2007, yet it has yet to publish the details about those who have been punished.

For further information, please see:

Bikya Masr — Gaza Sees Continued Arbitrary Arrests, Torture, Unfair Trials — 3 October 2012

The Guardian — Hamas Accused of Routine Torture of Detainees in Gaza Strip — 3 October 2012

Human Rights Watch — Gaza: Arbitrary Arrests, Torture, Unfair Trials — 3 October 2012

Ma’an News Agency — Hamas Ministry Rejects Torture Allegations — 3 October 2012

Ma’an News Agency — HRW: Hamas Should Urgently Reform Justice System — 3 October 2012

New York Times — Human Rights Watch Report Critical of Hamas Justice System in Gaza — 3 October 2012

Second Human Rights Attorney Killed in Honduras in As Many Days

By Mark O’Brien
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Unknown gunmen killed a second human rights lawyer in as many days last week, according to a progressive blog on human rights abuses.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay called on Honduras to take urgent action to stop crimes lawyers and journalists. (Photo Courtesy of The United Nations News Centre)

World War 4 Report reported that gunmen shot and killed Eduardo Manuel Diaz Mazariegos, who was a Honduran Public Ministry prosecutor in the country’s southern department of Choluteca.  The blog reported Mazariegos’s background included criminal and human rights cases.

Mazariegos’s killing on Sept. 24 came two days after another lawyer was killed at a wedding near the capital of Tegucigalpa.  Antonio Trejo Cabrera, whom the BBC described as “a prominent lawyer who represented peasants in disputes with large land owners,” was shot and killed after he stepped outside the church to answer a phone call.

“We asked the police and the prosecutor’s office for protection, and they never responded,” said Enrique Flores Lanza of the Honduran Bar Association.

Cabrera’s family said he had asked for government protection because of safety concerns, including various threats.

“Nobody cared,” his brother, Rigoberto, told the Associated Press.

Cabrera had said before his death that if he were killed, billionaire Miguel Facusse—one of Honduras’s richest men—would be responsible, according to the AP.  Facusse owns Dinant Corporation, one of the landowners in disputes with peasant cooperatives represented by Cabrera.

“Even though we had differences with [Cabrera], we mourn his death,” said Dinant Executive Director Roger Pineda, who denied that Facusse was behind Cabrera’s death.

The AP also reported that the U.S. Embassy was helping Honduran investigators piece together what happened.  According to an anonymous source, the help included “a U.S. law enforcement advisor already embedded with a specially vetted unit of Honduran police.”

The two murders brought the total number of prosecutors killed since 1994 to seven, according to World War 4 Report.  But statistics from the Honduran Bar Association showed 74 lawyers have been killed in a little more than the past three years, with little response from authorities.

United Nations special rapporteurs called the attacks on human rights defenders “totally unacceptable.”

“It is imperative that the government establishes a national protection program for human rights defenders as soon as possible,” said UN Special Rapporteur Margaret Sekaggya, who met with Cabrera during a visit to Honduras in February.  Sekaggya said Cabrera, who was active in the media denouncing abuses by landowners and politicians, repeatedly received death threats because of his work.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has called on Honduras to combat impunity for crimes against lawyers and journalists, which she said is thriving in a “menacing climate of insecurity and violence in Honduras.”

“It is essential that the people who commit these crimes are brought to justice,” she said.  “Failure to do so will only exacerbate what is already a dire situation.”

For further information, please see:

United Nations News Centre — UN Experts Voice Shock at Killing of Prominent Rights Defender in Honduras — 1 October 2012

World War 4 Report — Honduras: Second Human Rights Attorney Murdered — 1 October 2012

United Nations News Centre — Honduras: UN Official Urges Action to Tackle Chronic Insecurity for Lawyers, Journalists — 26 September 2012

The Washington Post — US Aiding Honduran Authorities in Assassination of Prominent Human Rights Lawyer — 24 September 2012

BBC News — Antonio Trejo, Honduras Rights Lawyer, Killed at Wedding — 23 September 2012