Nasrin Sotoudeh Named Co-Recipient of Sakharov Prize

Nasrin Sotoudeh Named Co-Recipient of Sakharov Prize

By Justin Dorman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

TEHRAN, Iran – The Sakharov Prize is one of the top honors awarded to those annually for their contributions to human rights and freedom of thought. Previous winners include figures like Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi. This year the award was given to Nasrin Sotoudeh and a fellow Iranian, film director, Jafar Panahi.

Nasrin Sotoudeh has been on a hunger strike since October 17th in reaction to harassment against her family. (Photo Courtesy of Iranian)

Nasrin Sotoudeh is a member of the Defenders of Human Rights Centre and is a jailed attorney who previously was known for defending children facing the death penalty, prisoners of conscience, human rights activists, and child victims of abuse. Currently, she is serving a six-year sentence for “acting against national security” and “spreading propaganda against the regime.” Many believe her arrest to be completely arbitrary and understand her imprisonment to be part of the Iranian government’s plan to suppress human rights lawyers.

Sotoudeh has been imprisoned since September 2010. For much of her detainment she was held in solitary confinement and tortured in attempts to make her confess. During this time she was kept away from her family and lawyer. Sotoudeh is no longer in solitary confinement, however, she is still often denied contact with her family.

“The conditions of detention imposed on Nasrin Sotoudeh are unacceptable and clearly aim at imposing additional punishment on her for her human rights activities,” stated Souhayr Belhassen, President of the International Federation for Human Rights.

Sotoudeh was caught writing her legal defense on a tissue, and ever since she has been denied face-to-face meetings with her family. Now she can only see her thirteen-year-old daughter and five-year-old son from behind a glass wall.

Authorities have taken other measures to punish the Sotoudeh family. One action they took was to change her visiting day from Sunday to Wednesday without proffering and real reason. The authorities have also placed travel bans on Nasrin’s daughter and husband and have held the husband in jail, overnight, for peaceful protests of his wife’s detention.

Ann Harrison, Deputy Director of Amnesty International’s Middle East and North Africa programme believes that, “[b]y harassing the family members of prisoners solely in order to stop their legitimate public campaigning, the Iranian authorities are trampling wholesale on their international human rights obligations.”

In reaction to the harassment her family was facing, Sotoudeh began a hunger strike on October 17th which still continues. She wrote to her children in a letter, “I know that you require water, food, housing, a family, parents, love, and visits with your mother. . . However, just as much, you need freedom, social security, the rule of law and justice.”

For further information, please see:

Amnesty International – Health Fears for Imprisoned Sakharov Prize Winner in Iran – 26 October 2012

Daily Beast – Iran’s Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers – 26 October 2012

Guardian – Nasrin Sotoudeh and Director Jafar Panahi Share top Human Rights Prize – 26 October 2012

Iranian – Nasrin Sotoudeh: Prisoner of the day – 22 October 2012

Police Admit Faults in Marikana Massacre

By Ryan Aliman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

PRETORIA, South Africa – On Monday, the police admitted that they may have been at fault in the August 16 shooting involving strikers who worked for a mine owned by the platinum giant Lonmin in the Marikana area.

Striking miners carrying the coffin of one of the victims in the Marikana Massacre.(Photo courtesy of AFP/File, Rodger Bosch)

In a statement issued during a public inquiry, the South African Police Service (SAPS) said that some of its officers either overreacted or mistakenly shot at protesters in response to “friendly-fire”.

“The response of some police officers may have been disproportionate to the danger they faced from the group of more than 200 armed protesters,” the opening statement read. “The police officers are prepared to accept that they may have been responding to ‘friendly fire’, believing it to be fire from the protesters,” it added.

The SAPS statement was delivered by the SAPS lawyer, Ishmael Semenya, to a commission examining the evidence surrounding the events of what is now dubbed as “the Marikana massacre”. The commission, headed by Judge Ian Farlam, is currently investigating the role of the SAPS, along with trade unions and Lonmin authorities, in the incident.

Described by the South African media as the single most lethal use of force by South African security forces against civilians since 1960 and the end of the apartheid era, the August 16 shooting resulted in the death of  36 miners, 2 police officers, 4 other unidentified persons and the injury of 78 other workers and police.

The SAPS also admitted that the number of police officers deployed at Marikana was “insufficient” to control the crowd of approximately 3000 angry miners, many brandishing traditional weapons, machetes and sticks as they protested for higher pay. Semenya insisted, however, that the police officers merely acted in self-defense when “the situation got out of control”. “The use of lethal force was the last possible resort. There was no murderous intent from the part of the police service,” he told the commission.

Dumisa Ntebeza, the lawyer for the victims’ families, refuted Semenya’s statement by contending that “no less than 14 of the striking miners were shot from behind, many in the back or in the back of the head.” “This evidence, which we understand is unlikely to be contradicted, is wholly inconsistent with the claims of necessity that the SAPS will advance,” Ntebeza asserted.

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, a crime scene technician admitted that the SAPS may have lost some of the evidence collected from the scene. He admitted that the police may have missed some cartridges and bullets, adding that the SAPS has yet to finalize its ballistic reports.

 

For further information, please see:

AFP – S. Africa police admit possible mistakes in Marikana deaths – 23 October 2012

Mail and Guardian – Cop admits some evidence from Marikana shooting may be lost – 23 October 2012

Al Jazeera – Police admit ‘overreacting’ at Marikana – 22 October 2012

Business Day Live – Marikana: ‘No murderous intent’ on part of police – 22 October 2012

SABC News – Marikana Mineworkers were Shot in the Back – 22 October 2012

The Telegraph – Marikana massacre ‘could have been avoided’ – 22 October 2012

 

 

Police Find Eight Tortured Bodies Dumped Near Mexico City

By Mark O’Brien
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

MEXICO CITY, Mexico — Authorities discovered eight dead bodies dumped along the streets of a Mexico City suburb on Thursday.

A police spokesperson said found the bodies in Ecatepec, a poor suburb north of the capital city.  Six of the bodies—five men and one woman—appeared to have been severely beaten.

“They were all naked and showed signs of torture,” police spokesperson said.  “It also appeared their throats had been cut.”

The other two bodies, both men between the ages of 18 and 22, died from gunshot wounds on another street.  So far, police have not identified the bodies or any suspects in what police called two separate crimes.

“Both incidents are being investigated by the homicide prosecutor’s office, which immediately assigned personnel to conduct the corresponding investigation,” the Mexico state Attorney General’s Office said, according to Global Post.

Fox News Latino reported that investigators believe the killings were linked to organized crime because of the way the victims were murdered.  The news organization quoted city officials as saying no messages were left with the bodies.

Fox News Latino also quoted city officials as saying two of the bodies had ropes around their necks, and all of them had “tattoos on different parts of their bodies.”

Since Mexico began cracking down on drug cartels six years ago, more than 60,000 people have died in violence linked to drug trafficking.  The Associated Press reported that Mexico City had been predominantly free of that violence, although it was slowly making its way there.

In September, Mexico deployed troops to Nezahualcoyotl, an eastern suburb, when fighting between two drug cartels spilled into the streets.

Reuters reported that the number of drug war deaths kept by the Mexican newspaper Reforma “is on course to suffer its heaviest death toll this year since [President Felipe] Calderon launched his offensive, at a time when the national count has erased somewhat.”

Ecatepec is home to both incoming President Enrique Pena Nieto and incoming State of Mexico Governor Eruviel Avila.  Both are members of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which governed Mexico between 1929 and 2000.  As Reuters reported, “[c]ritics accused the PRI of turning a blind eye to the drug trade while in power.”

But Nieto, who will be sworn in this December, has pledged to continue the national crackdown on organized crime.  Until last year, he governed the State of Mexico, where both Nezahualcoyotl and Ecatepec are located.

For further information, please see:

Global Post — Mexico Violence: 8 Bullet-Ridden Bodies Found on Outskirts of Mexico City — 26 October 2012

Fox News Latino — Police Find 6 Bodies in Central Mexico — 25 October 2012

Reuters — Eight Bodies Found Dumped in Mexico City Suburb — 25 October 2012

Seattlepi.com — 8 Bodies Found on Outskirts of Mexico’s Capital — 25 October 2012

Violence in Myanmar’s Rahkine State Persists, Resulting in Dozens of Deaths

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

SITTWE, Myanmar – Violence between Rohingya Muslims and Buddhists flared up again in Myanmar’s western state of Rakhine causing the deaths of approximately 60 inhabitants, roughly 31 of which were women.

Demonstrators hold up signs asking for aid. (Photo Courtesy of Reuters)

Rakhine was the stage of a brutal conflict between the majoritarian Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims last June when the rape and homicide of Buddhist woman was blamed on Muslims.  Last June’s violence caused countless deaths and thousands more were displaced when their homes burned to the ground.

Officials are still investigating what exactly set off the violence this time around.  In addition to the existing casualties, dozens of others sustained injuries and thousands of homes along with several religious buildings were destroyed.

An accurate picture of the situation in Rakhine is still elusive as the state access is restricted making the information difficult to verify.  Witnesses to the violence and tragedies, however, have reported that at least 25 men and 31 women have been killed.  Roughly 1,900 homes have also been set ablaze.  It is still uncertain which side, whether the Buddhists or the Muslims, have sustained the most casualties.

The violence has affected the towns of Yathedaung, Kyaukpyu, Kyauk Taw, and supposedly countless others.  Thousands have begun to flee their homes, and approximately 50 boats carrying Rohingya Muslims were reportedly headed for Sittwe, the capital of Rakhine state.

Those fleeing are believed to be heading to the refugee camps situated in the outskirts of Rakhine capital, Sittwe.  The prior conflict in June had already displaced thousands of inhabitants who have been bunkered down in the makeshift camps for months.

The U.N. expressed its concerns regarding even more displaced inhabitants fleeing for the already overcrowded camps in the periphery of Sittwe.  The thousands of refugees fleeing their homes and seeking safety include many women and children.

The international community watches on as the United Nations and local police forces call for calm and peace among the conflicting groups.  President Thein Sein had negotiated ceasefires and uneasy peace between the two conflicting groups in the past; however, the government has been unable to implement a permanent solution to the violence.

The estimated 800,000 Rohingya Muslims are still considered illegal immigrants in Myanmar, and Bangladesh, where many have fled from, continues to deny Rohingyas refugee status.  Amnesty International has demanded Myanmar to repeal the 1982 citizenship law that continues to subject Rohinya Muslims to their stateless condition.  However, the state of affairs regarding Rohingya citizenship in Myanmar has yet to be addressed.

For further information, please see:

Bangkok Post – 20 die in Myanmar violence – 25 October, 2012

BBC – Burma Rakhine clashes death toll at 56 – state officials – 25 October, 2012

Centre Daily Times – 56 dead in new ethnic violence in Myanmar – 25 October 2012

Reuters – Sectarian violence worsens in Myanmar’s volatile west – 25 October 2012

EU Awards Prestigious Human Rights Award to Iranian Activists

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

STRASBOURG, France – On Friday, the European Union gave its largely respected human rights award to two Iranian activists, an imprisoned lawyer, Nasrin Sotoudeh, and a formerly imprisoned filmmaker, Jafar Panahi.

Sakharov Prize winners, Nasrin Sotoudeh (left) and Jafar Panahi (right). (Photo Courtesy of RFE/RL)

The European Union awards the Sakharov Prize to an individuals or groups dedicated to the defense of human rights and freedom of thought. The award was created in December of 1988 and is named after Soviet scientist and dissident Andrei Sakharov.

European Parliament President, Martin Schulz, stated, “The award… is a message of solidarity and recognition to a woman and a man who have not been bowed by fear and intimidation and who have decided to put the fate of their country before their own.”

The jailed Russian punk band, Pussy Riot, and a Belarussian civil rights activist, Ales Beliatsky, were also nominees this year.

Co-winner, Nasrin Sotoudeh, a lawyer, is known for her defense of opposition activists. Sotoudeh also defended women who were jailed for demanding equality, and journalists who were punished for expressing their opinions. Often times, she took these important cases pro bono work and insisting Iranian authorities uphold the rule of law and justice. She is currently serving a six-year jail sentence for “acting against the national security” and “propaganda against the regime”.

Schultz announced, “If the fight for freedom, if the fight for human rights, for human dignity, for freedom from torture and against the death sentence, for freedom of opinion and for justice in criminal proceedings is an attack on national security, then we support this person in her attack on the national security of a regime that does not respect any of these fundamental rights. The prize for Mrs. Sotoudeh is a clear rejection of the regime in Iran.”

The other recipient, Jafar Panahi, a director, is regarded for his humanist films on life in Iran. While facing his own arrests in 2009 and 2010, some of his colleagues were also sent to jail for their outspoken criticism of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In 2010, he was placed under house arrest and banned from filmmaking for 20 years. Despite his filmmaking restrictions, his 2011 documentary, This is Not a Film, was secretly smuggled out of the country on a USB drive that was hidden in a cake.

Schulz continued, “As in every good portrait, [Jafar Panahi in his films] shows not only the merits but also the contradictions and the daily problems of Iranians. State regimes clearly fear nothing more than the portrayal of the bitter reality that reigns inside their nations. And this is why people like Mr. Panahi are silenced in such regimes.”

Unfortunately, it’s unlikely that the imprisoned Iranian co-winners will make it to Strasbourg for the ceremony on December 12.

For further information, please see:

BBC News — Iran dissidents Sotoudeh and Panahi win Sakharov prize – 26 October 2012

International Business Times — EU Awards Iranian Dissidents With Sakharov Prize – 26 October 2012

The New York Times – European Rights Award Given to Convicted Iranians – 26 October 2012

RFE/RL – Iranians Win Sakharov Free-Thought Prize – 26 October 2012