Mursi Issues new Decree, and is met With Criticism

Mursi Issues new Decree, and is met With Criticism

By Ali Al-Bassam
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

CAIRO, Egypt  Last Thursday, Egyptian President Mohammed Mursi issued a controversial decree banning judicial challenges to his decisions, thereby nearly seizing near-absolute powers.  The decree was met with heavy criticism, mostly from his opponents, who have held heavy protests throughout Egypt since his announcement.  They have called the decree a “sudden snatch of sweeping powers.”

Egyptian president Mohammed Mursi’s recent decree has been criticized as a “near-absolute” power grab. (Photo Courtesy of Al Ahram)

The decree also extends the work of the constituent assembly drafting Egypt’s constitution by eight weeks, in what is seen as a compromise between Islamists and other representatives as they work together to settle differences in determining the constitution.  Mursi’s office said that it hopes the extension provides enough time for the political groups involved to find “common ground.”

Responding to the criticism, Yasser Ali, an aide to Mursi, said that the decree was limited to “sovereignty-related issues,”  yet Mursi’s opponents believe otherwise.

In an effort to quell the turmoil created by the decree, Mursi met with the Supreme Judiciary Council last Monday in a five hour meeting.  The Judiciary Council had also criticized the decree, calling it an assault on the branch’s independence.  The decree prevents any judiciary body from dissolving the constitutional assembly.  To protest the decree, many judges and prosecutors refused to come to court in Cairo and other cities during Sunday and Monday.

Meanwhile, protests throughout Egypt turned violent as pro and anti-Mursi demonstrators clashed with one another, leaving one protester dead and hundreds wounded.  The Muslim Brotherhood planned to hold a rival rally this Tuesday, but cancelled it in an effort to ease public tension.  The opposition will continue with their protests on Tuesday.

Among Mursi’s critics is Nobel Laureate Mohammed ElBaradei, who called Mursi Egypt’s new pharaoh, and has recently branded him as a God.  “Morsi today usurped all state powers and appointed himself Egypt’s new pharaoh.  A major blow to the revolution that could have dire consequences,” said ElBaradei in a Twitter post.

Tharwat el-Kherbawy, a lawyer and former Muslim Brotherhood member, called those who accepted the decrees “slaves,” and his supporters “mutants.”  Referring to the decree, el-Kherbawy said it was “not permissible for Mursi to make himself like a God.”

Amr Hamzawy, a liberal member of the dissolved parliament, said that the decree is a sign that Egypt was heading toward “an absolute presidential tyranny.”

The decree drew warnings from the West, who urged Mursi to uphold democracy.

Mursi says that his decisions were “necessary to protect the revolution that toppled Mubarak nearly two years ago and to cement the nation’s transition to democratic rule.”

For further information, please see:

Al Jazeera — Egypt’s Morsi Stands by Decree — 26 November 2012

BBC News — Egypt Crisis: Mohammed Mursi Tries to Defuse Tension — 26 November 2012

Al Bawaba — Morsi’s Power-Bender Reminds Egypt That Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely — 25 November 2o12

Al Ahram — Morsi Rocks the Boat — 23 November 2012

Foster Children Removed From UK Couple Because of Political Ideologies

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

LONDON, United Kingdom – Britain faced a political scandal when three children were removed from their foster parents after a social worker discovered the couple’s membership in the right-wing party, UKIP, which supports the independence from the European Union.

The Rotherham Borough Council ordered three children be removed from their foster parents due to the couple’s political ideologies. (Photo Courtesy of RT)

Although various reports determined that the three migrant children were happy with the couple and no concerns were raised over the care provided, the Rotherham Borough Council in Northern England ordered the removal and defined the parents as unsuitable to provide foster care.

Joyce Thacker, the director for children and young people’s services at Rotherham Council, reasoned that the children were placed with the couple solely for emergency purposes and were never meant to stay with the English couple permanently. Thacker continued, “If the party [UKIP] mantra … is ending the active promotion of multiculturalism, I have to think about that. I think they [UKIP] have very clear views on immigration.”

On the contrary, UKIP party leader, Nigel Farage, said authorities “clearly have no understanding of UKIP and by their actions, clearly no desire to know.” He believed that the council was “partially backtracking” by allowing the couple “to adopt. But by the sounds of it, only white children.”

The UKIP party’s stance on immigration says “the tide of mass EU immigration has pushed down wages and restricted job opportunities. Only by leaving the EU can we regain control of our borders.” The party desires a freeze on immigration for 5 years and believes immigrants “must be fluent in English, have minimum education levels and show they can financially support themselves.”

The Rotherham Council decided that the three children were not “indigenous white British” and “social workers had raised concerns about the UKIP political party’s stance on immigration.” However, after great criticism, the children’s removal will be reviewed.

Education Secretary, Michael Gove, stated that the social workers made “the wrong decision in the wrong way for the wrong reasons” and he  will investigate the decision. He continued, “we should not allow considerations of ethnic or cultural background to prevent children being placed with loving and stable families. We need more parents to foster, and many more to adopt.”

In addition, Rotherham Council Leader, Roger Stone, announced that the Department of Education will investigate and “will focus on the information, advice and evidence gathered before making this decision, the nature of the decision itself and how it was communicated.”

For further information, please see:

Postcode Gazette – Sheffield does not ban foster carers over political views – 26 November 2012

The Independent – Council will investigate why children were removed from Rotherham foster family who were Ukip members after Michal Gove and Ed Miliband weigh in to row – 24 November 2012

NBCNews – Kids removed from UK couple over support for ‘independence’ from Europe – 24 November 2012

RT – Politics over parenting: UK foster family’s children removed over ‘racist’ party support – 24 November 2012

Syrian Revolution Digest – Sunday 25 November 2012

Age of the Warlords!

Syrian Revolution Digest – November 25, 2012 

As rebels continue to outpace politicians in Syria, the two sides will soon have little to talk about when it comes to governing the liberated territories. By the time politicians have formed a transitional government it will have become irrelevant. The liberated territories belong to the rebels and they are unlikely to cede control to a bunch of squabbling politicians with no vision or leadership potential.

Today’s Death Toll: 117 (including 2 women and 14 children)
55 in Damascus and suburbs (12 bodies from Daraya found in Mowasa Hospital and 10 martyrs from aerial shelling in Dar Al-Asafeer)
16 in Aleppo
17 in Daraa
7 in Homs
6 in Deir Ezzor
8 in Hama
5 in Idlib
3 in Quneitra

Points of Random Shelling: 251
79 by mortar
129 by artillery
43 by missiles
14 by air bombardments (including 2 instances of use of cluster bombs)

Clashes136
Rebels also liberated Al-Rihanieh Military Camp and the Tishreen Dam (main supplier of electricity to Aleppo). In Damascus, Rebels repelled loyalist attempts to enter the suburb of Daraya and the towns of Eastern Ghoutah (LCC).

 

News

Syrian government air strike near Damascus kills 10 children: activists

Syrian rebels capture helicopter air base near the capital Damascus after fierce fighting

 

Special Reports

Kurd teachers debate Syria war under Assad gaze
The teachers have removed Assad’s portraits from classrooms so as not to be seen as regime collaborators, but have left up the ones in headmaster Adnan’s office, where they sit on couches at break time and chat. They allow journalists in on their discussions on the anti-regime revolt but ask to be identified only by first name and refuse to have their pictures taken.

Palestinians in Syria forced to pick sides
At least 700 Palestinians across the country have been killed since the uprising began, according to opposition groups. As the violence ramps up, the Palestinian community is being forced to choose sides, adding another unpredictable element to a murky conflict. “Some Palestinians have been part of the revolution from the beginning, and some groups have sided with the regime,” said Nadim Houry, the deputy Middle East director for Human Rights Watch. “But sometimes even when they’re not part of it, the fight comes to them.”

Rebel Oil in Syria
Syrian rebels are taking a few things into their own hands. They have captured several major oilfields, two in the country’s southeastern province of Deir al-Zour recently, and are extracting oil that is helping to support the people.

Stalemate in Syria? Army short on loyalists, rebels short on guns
The regime of Bashar al-Assad appears to be favoring long-range weapons out of fear that soldiers close to the front lines will defect.

War’s Silent Scourge: Sexual Violence Against Women
It’s one of the most disturbing horrors of the conflict in Syria: the use of sexual assault as a weapon: Ambassadors Melanne Verveer and Peter Westmacott on how to put an end to the epidemic.

Follow this link to register for FDD’s Washington Forum 2012 “Dictators & Dissidents”

 

Video Highlights

Aerial bombardment on the town of Deir Al-Assafeir, Damascus, kills a number of women and childrenhttp://youtu.be/V0YL5oUrJ1A , http://youtu.be/rKuW1pPTRsg , http://youtu.be/9AYpDox4Eg4

Rebels in Marj Al-Sultan Airbase, Damascus, moving the supplies hey gained from their recent raidhttp://youtu.be/80w64FDPFrI , http://youtu.be/4CfeajT4Huo A recap of the liberation processhttp://youtu.be/2XBjylR8mk0  , http://youtu.be/-NjbJlRb9Jc Taking over a helicopter http://youtu.be/R84oxRCskFk ,http://youtu.be/xXjD9guXe0g Taking over tanks http://youtu.be/mKdDfSzKZ08 A destroyed helicopterhttp://youtu.be/EKfyBjeZzgM Rebels managed to as well to secure the release of the few prisoners detained at the Airbase http://youtu.be/HDHwGV4PV7w

Rebels in Damascus manage to take control of a Shilka unit as well http://youtu.be/L8nEBHipsOg (Shilka is a “lightly armored, self-propelled, radar guided anti-aircraft weapon system.”) It’s confiscated Shilkas that has so far been used by rebels to bring down helicopters.

Rebels in Aleppo showcase their gains from their recent successful takeover of the headquarters of the 46thRegiment http://youtu.be/5Zor0RoVZ6Q , http://youtu.be/7YKkeT6gefY , http://youtu.be/m6l9RSIHMVw

Rebels and loyalists clash in Deir Ezzor City http://youtu.be/JIYFErUsPyo , http://youtu.be/Mt4Gf5Ozw8A Much of the city has been turned into rubble http://youtu.be/bQn76dAbjxo , http://youtu.be/STE-Y6LQ5TI

Civil Society Organizations Refuse Zimbabwean Government’s Funding Offer

By Ryan Aliman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

HARARE, Zimbabwe – Civic society organisations (CSOs) refused to accept an offer of funds from Mines Minister Obert Mpofu on the ground that this might prevent them from making the government accountable for its diamond revenues.

Miners dig for diamonds in eastern Zimbabwe’s Marange fields — an area known for having experienced “the biggest plunder of diamonds since Cecil Rhodes”. (Photo courtesy of AP Photo/Tsvangirayi Mukwazhi-File)

During a review meeting of this month’s international diamond conference in Victoria Falls, Minister Mpofu said that most of the CSO’s who criticized the country’s diamond industry were being funded by “hostile governments” and were against “national interests”.

He suggested that members of the civil society would be more approving of and cooperative with the Zimbabwean government if they were brought “on board on all issues” and a budget was prepared for them. “One who pays the piper calls the tune,” Minister Mpofu said.

“We can say all diamond producers should set aside a small levy of about 1 percent for the NGOs. As a matter of principle, to make progress we will consider some allocation from the diamond producers towards the civil society. The permanent secretary and his colleagues will work on that and I will persuade the diamond producers,” he added.

However, Minister Mpofu’s statement was met with immediate dissent and criticism from various civil society groups.

Farai Maguwu, director of a new minerals watchdog, Center for Natural Resources Governance, said accepting 1 percent of all diamond sales will “compromise [the CSO’s] neutrality.” Maguwu asserted that civil society groups need to protect and maintain their independence to be able to “criticize and pressure” the government to account for its diamond mining activities.

Other CSO’s described Minister Mpofu’s offer as an “obvious bribe”.

Centre for Community Development activist Phillip Pasirayi shot down Mpofu’s proposal saying, “we as civil society utterly reject this offer. Mpofu should be educated enough to know that civil society cannot be forced into being part of the ZANU PF patronage system. We demand accountability and we demand transparency.”

Pasirayi also questioned the motive behind Mpofu’s offer. According to him, why would the government allot diamond proceeds for civic activists “when the money is so desperately needed by other sectors of society.”

“The cash generated from diamonds should go into social services, and infrastructural development, and improving access to medical care and basic service. That is where the money should go,” Pasirayi advised.

Minister Mpofu did not take these responses well. Days after the Victoria Falls Diamond Conference, Minister Mpofu accused the CSO’s for “deliberately peddling falsehoods” and “malicious reports” on Zimbabwe’s diamond industry.

During the breakfast meeting organized by the Mines Ministry in Harare, he regarded the civic activists as “a bunch of individuals masquerading as representatives of the people” determined to undermine the government through “unjustified vilification” of the diamond industry.

“Let me warn our colleagues in civil society that if you do not want to work with us, then we will go it alone and we will be very hard on you,” Minister Mpofu threatened.

 

For further information, please see:

Associated Press – Zimbabwe: Civic groups refuse diamond money offer – 24 November 2012

All Africa – Zimbabwe: Civic Groups Walk Out After Threats By Mines Minister – 22 November 2012

All Africa – Zimbabwe: Civil Society Angered By Mpofu Diamond ‘Bribe’ – 22 November 2012

Yahoo News – Zimbabwe government stealing diamond funds: Report – 12 November 2012

Voice of America – Activists Fear Diamonds Will Fund Mugabe Power Grab – 8 November 2012