New Tactics in Human Rights: Share Your Experiences Creating Safe Spaces

ICTJ In Focus February 2013 – Issue #27

Iranian Lawyers Call on Iranian Authorities to Cease Infringements on Independence of Legal Profession in Iran

Press Release
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center

February 25, 2013 – On the occasion of Defense Lawyers’ Day (February 25th) in Iran, a group of 35 Iranian defense and human rights lawyers has published an open letter calling on the authorities in the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) to cease infringements on the independence of Iran’s legal profession. In particular, the letter calls for the cancellation of a bill that, in essence, transfers total supervisory control over lawyers to a quasi-judicial body and whose passage is described as “a coup de grace to legal practice in Iran”.

Signatories to the letter include Mohammad Olyaeifard—an Iranian lawyer who served one year in prison in 2010 for reportedly speaking out against the execution of one of his juvenile clients.  Other signatories include prominent Iranian criminal defense lawyers like Mehrangiz Kar, Mahnaz Parakand, Shadi Sadr, Mohammad Mostafaei and others who have been forced to flee Iran on account of their representation of clients in matters that the Iranian government finds politically sensitive.

In recent years, the Iranian parliament, judiciary and executive have imposed increasingly restrictive measures on the Iranian Bar Association and its members through formal measures and in practice that result in infringements on the independence of the profession. The open letter calls attention to one particularly concerning development—the proposal and passage of the “Bill for Formal Attorneyship” which, among other measures, seeks to appoint a supervisory body that will grant control over the issue, suspension and revocation of attorney licenses to the judiciary; grant the judiciary ownership over the Iranian Bar Association’s property and assets; and change the name of the “Bar Association” to the “Organization of Attorneys” so as to imply its subordination to the judiciary.

In light of these concerns, the letter calls on the Iranian judiciary to withdraw the Bill as soon as possible, the Iranian government to refuse the confirmation and submission of the Bill to Parliament and on the members of Parliament, in the event they should receive the Bill, to reject its provisions.

Mohammad Hossein Nayyeri—an Iranian lawyer living in exile and one of the drafters of the letter—says, “The new Bill, if adopted, will leave neither independence nor the Bar Association intact. It would provide a more arbitrary process of selection of lawyers so as to prevent any liberal individual from entering the legal profession in the first place. Then, an unchallengeable authority would be given to a Judiciary-appointed body to revoke the licenses of any lawyer it considers non-conformable. Lawyers that receive their licenses from such organizations are not in a position to stand against violations of human rights. They are not able and willing to defend political opponents or prisoners of conscience without fear of losing their job—therefore they cannot defend the rights of the public against the State.  In the eyes of the IRI Judiciary this would be an ideal Bar.”

“As this statement goes to press, Nasrin Sotoudeh—a prominent human rights lawyer, women’s activist and 2012 winner of the Sakharov Prize—continues to languish in an Iranian prison because of her defense of clients in politically sensitive cases,” says Gissou Nia, the Executive Director of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, a US-based NGO that has closely followed this issue. “And just last week, lawyer Mohammad Seyfzadeh—who along with Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi and imprisoned lawyers Mohammad Ali Dadkhah and Abdolfattah Soltani, is a founding member of the Center for Human Rights Defenders—was sentenced to a further six years in prison for ‘acting against national security’ after already spending two years in prison for his membership in the Center for Human Rights Defenders, among other charges. The Iranian judiciary must withdraw this Bill and other measures that threaten the independence of lawyers like Sotoudeh and Seyfzadeh, who are simply trying to do their jobs by providing a defense to whomever requests it—regardless of political affiliation, religion, ethnicity or status in society.”

The letter further calls on the International Bar Association, bar associations in different countries and the global legal community as a whole to take action in support of their Iranian colleagues and in defense of the independence of the legal practice in Iran. It also calls on the United Nations and the international human rights community to remind the IRI of its international obligations regarding the independence of lawyers, the right to a defense and fair trial, and the consequences of passage of the Bill and its violation of international norms and standards. 

To learn more about the increasing restrictions on the Iranian Bar Association and Iran’s legal profession click here to read IHRDC’s legal commentary, Iranian Bar Associations: Struggle for Independence:

http://cts.vresp.com/c/?IranHumanRightsDocum/8c5874a412/09f1bf055e/7f885d7600

 

For further information please contact:
Mohammad Hossein Nayyeri
Lawyer & Legal Advisor
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center
Email: MHNayyeri@iranhrdc.org

Gissou Nia
Executive Director
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center
Email: GNia@iranhrdc.org
Phone: +1 203 654 9342

The European Union Has Joined the Money Laundering Investigation of the $230m of Stolen Money Exposed by Sergei Magnitsky

Press Release
Hermitage Capital

25 February 2013 – Financial intelligence experts from six EU member states have joined forces to investigate the money laundering trail uncovered and exposed by late whistle-blowing Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, reported EU Observer.

“The FIUs are working on the case and there will be a follow-up meeting before the summer,” a source at the EU Commission told EU Observer.

According to the EU Observer, the European Commission has formed a joint investigation at a meeting of the Financial Intelligence Units platform on 7 February (http://euobserver.com/magnitsky/119156).

The EU Financial Intelligence Units’ Platform is a group set up in 2006 by the European Commission, which gathers financial intelligence units from the member states. Its main purpose is to facilitate cooperation among national financial intelligence units.

Prior to his arrest and death in custody, Mr Magnitsky gave testimony detailing how a group of Russian government officials and organized criminals stole companies from his client, the Hermitage Fund, and $230 million they had paid in taxes to the Russian treasury. The Magnitsky investigation identified that the thefts from the budget were systematic and took place through the same Russian tax offices both before and after the $230 million theft.

“As EU countries start cooperating and sharing information, eventually the whole money laundering scheme will become crystal clear,” said a Hermitage Capital representative.

 

For further information please contact:

Hermitage Capital
Phone:             +44 207 440 1777
Email:              info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Website:          http://lawandorderinrussia.org
Facebook:        http://on.fb.me/hvIuVI
Twitter:           @KatieFisher__
Livejournal:     //hermitagecap.livejournal.com/

Britain’s Top Cardinal Steps Down After Sexual Allegations

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

LONDON, United Kingdom – The United Kingdom’s top cardinal, Keith O’Brien, is to step down as an archbishop after news reports of inappropriate behavior toward various priests in the 1980s surfaced. Furthermore, he will not to take part in the election of the next pope to succeed Pope Benedict XVI.

Cardinal Keith O’Brien steps down as archbishop after allegations of “inappropriate behavior” surface.

Cardinal O’Brien’s announcement comes a day after a the British newspaper, The Observer, reported that three priests and one former priest brought allegations against O’Brien that date back 30 years.

One former priest claims Cardinal O’Brien made an inappropriate approach towards him in 1980, after night prayers, when he was a seminarian at St Andrew’s College, Drygrange. Furthermore, he resigned as a priest when Cardinal O’Brien was first made a bishop.

Another complainant says while he was living in a parish, inappropriate contact took place between him and O’Brien. A third complainant stated that he consistently experienced “unwanted behavior” by the cardinal in the 1980s. Lastly, the fourth complainant claims the cardinal used night prayers as an “excuse for inappropriate contact”.

James Robbins, BBC’s world affairs correspondent, reported that for years, the Vatican squashed criticism of other cardinals who might have been involved in covering up sexual abuse. For example, Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles is attracting attention for his role in the cover-up of sexual abuse by priests.

However, the recent accusations will be taken more seriously because Cardinal O’Brien was allegedly involved directly in improper behavior towards other priests.

Ironically, Cardinal O’Brien is famous for his outspoken defense of Catholic teaching on abortion, euthanasia and homosexuality.

Last year, Stonewall Scotland, a gay rights group, named O’Brien “Bigot of the Year” after he said gay marriage was a “grotesque subversion of a universally accepted human right”.

Catherine Deveney, author of the relevant Observer piece, stated her story was important because the Cardinal set a very adamant “moral blueprint” for the way other people should lead their lives.

She further stated, the four accusers were “men of integrity” who had “done a difficult thing and acted according to their conscience”.

Although Cardinal O’Brien contested the allegations, he stated he would not attend the conclave because he not wish media attention in Rome, during conclave, to be focused on him. Consequentially, Britain will have no voice in the conclave to choose Pope Benedict’s successor.

For further information, please see:

BBC – Cardinal Keith O’Brien Resigns as Archbishop – 25 February 2013

CNN – Scandal Threatens to Overshadow Pope’s Final Days – 25 February 2013

The Guardian – Cardinal Keith O’Brien Resigns – Full Statement – 25 February 2013

USA Today – Britain’s Cardinal Keith O’Brien to Skip Papal Elections—25 February 2013