War Crimes Prosecution Watch: Vol. 8 Issue 6 — 17 June 2013

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Central African Republic & Uganda

Darfur, Sudan

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kenya

Libya

Cote d’Ivoire (Ivory Coast)

 

Africa

International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda

Mali

Chad

Special Court for Sierra Leone

 

Europe

Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina, War Crimes Chamber

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Domestic Prosecutions In The Former Yugoslavia

Middle East and Asia

Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Syria

Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal

War Crimes Investigations in Burma

 

North and South America

United States

South & Central America

  Peru

  Colombia

 

Topics

Terrorism

Piracy

Gender-Based Violence

 

Reports

UN Reports

NGO Reports

 

Truth and Reconciliation Commissions

Kenya

 

Commentary and Perspectives

 

Worth Reading

Latvian Regulator Imposes Largest Possible Fine on a Latvian Bank involved in Money Laundering Connected to the Magnitsky Case

PRESS RELEASE

Latvian Regulator Imposes Largest Possible Fine on a Latvian Bank involved in Money Laundering Connected to the Magnitsky Case

19 June 2013 – Following a probe into six Latvian banks, Latvia’s financial markets regulator, the Financial and Capital Market Commission, has imposed a fine of 100 thousand Lats (around $191,000) the maximum fine possible on one Latvian bank for its role in laundering the $230 million stolen from the Russian government directly connected to the Magnitsky case.

The probe was based on a complaint filed by Hermitage Capital Management with the Latvian authorities in July 2012 naming six banks (Aizkraukles Bank, Baltic International Bank, Baltic Trust Bank, PrivatBank, Rietumu Bank and Trasta Komercbank) that received funds directly or indirectly from the $230 million illegal tax refund exposed by the late Sergei Magnitsky.

The name of the sanctioned bank has not been disclosed by the regulator.

The aim of the probe was “to clarify whether the banks had complied with regulatory requirements for anti-money laundering and combating terrorist financing,” said the Financial and Capital Market Commission.

“Following inspections of six Latvian banks conducted in relation to Magnitsky case, Financial and Capital Market Commission (FCMC) adopted a decision to impose an administrative penalty for deficiencies in internal control system on one occasion, i.e. customer due diligence. A maximum fine of 100 000 lats is imposed for violations in the area of laundering the proceeds from criminal activities and terrorist financing,” said the Financial and Capital Market Commission of Latvia.

Commenting on the transnational nature of the money laundering conspiracy exposed by Sergei Magnitsky and which had victimized Hermitage in Russia, the Latvian regulator pointed out it spans “several dozens of banks” and many countries in Europe highlighting the need to unite forces against the common threat to EU financial systems.

A company that received the illicit funds in Latvia on accounts of PrivatBank, one of the banks inspected by the Latvian Financial and Securities Market Commission, called Technomark Business, was registered in the UK, had a parent company registered in Cyprus, which in turn had a Latvian director Erik Vanagels, named in this week’s Sunday Times (http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/People/article1274719.ece) for his involvement in other “several thousands (mainly UK) companies.”

It was previously reported that illicit funds stolen via a scheme exposed by Sergei Magnitsky were wired through six Latvian banks, including: Baltic International Bank: $8.5 million, Trasta Komercbank: $6.2 million, Rietumu Bank: $2.1 million, Aizkraukles Bank (now – ABLV Bank): $1.2 million, Baltic Trust Bank (now – GE Money Bank): $0.9 million, PrivatBank (previously Paritate bank): $0.5 million.

When this information was revealed last September by the Latvian investigative report “Nothing Personal” aired on TV3, none of the banks wanted to talk on camera, according to Latvian publication IR (http://www.ir.lv/2012/9/24/raidijums-magnitska-lieta-iesaistitas-vairakas-latvijas-bankas). ABLV Bank replied last September as follows: “Previously we had known this information. Currently, we are conducting the background investigation.”

The Trasta Komercbank’s comment at that time was: “At the moment we can only comment that, according to Latvian legislation, any kind of information on bank clients is confidential… TKB’s operation is in full compliance with national regulations and international banking standards.”

The news of the Latvian sanctions has been featured in the Latvian media (http://www.ir.lv/2013/6/16/fktk-magnitska-lieta-soda-vienu-latvijas-banku).

For further information, please see:

Law and Order in Russia

Iraqi Car Bombs Heighten Fears of Sectarian War

by Darrin Simmons
Impunity Watch Reporter, Middle East

BAGHDAD, Iraq – May 2013, the most violent time period in Iraq since 2008, has activists fearing a pending sectarian war.  The country has recently been plagued with car bombings and shootings causing injury, death, and destruction with nearly two thousand people killed since April.

Deadly car bombs cause death, destruction, and fear in Iraq (Photo courtesy of Aljazeera)

In the city of Kut, a parked car bomb exploded causing the death of three people and injuring fourteen.  Another car bomb targeting construction workers outside of the city killed two and injured twelve.

The city of Basra experienced a car bomb explosion to which another one followed shortly resulting in the death of at least five people.  In nearby Aziziyah a car bomb exploding near a Shia mosque killed five and wounded ten. Twelve miles south-east of Baghdad, a roadside bomb followed by a car bomb exploded near the city of Madain.  The explosion wounded fourteen people and killed three.

One witness recalled the chaos following the explosion aftermath, “I saw cars on fire, dead bodies covered with blood, and wounded people lying on the ground screaming for help.  When police arrived, a second blast struck which was more powerful, leaving the street in a state of total destruction.”

Shootings have also caused fear and death amongst the Iraqi people.  In Mosel, gunmen began shooting police officers who were guarding a stretch of oil pipeline, injuring five and killing four. Since 2003, Iraqi Sunnis have rebelled against the Shiite dominated government by crossing into Syria to fight against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.  This tension and distrust eventually caused the “intercommunal strife of 2006-07,” and looks to give rise to another war.

Sectarian tensions between Shiites and Sunnis have been escalating over the last six months.  Martin Kobler, Iraq’s outgoing U.N. envoy has vocalized his concern warning that the violence is “ready to explode.” The Iraqi government continually denies the claim by Sunni activists who accuse Prime Minister Nouri Maliki of discriminating against them.  Sunni protests across Iraq and the lack of control by the Shiite authorities have fueled the fire, claim experts on Iraqi domestic politics.

While no group has claimed responsibility for the devastation, many believe Al Qaeda is involved.  The attacks began just one day after the Iraqi Al Qaeda leader, Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, refused to obey an order from the Al Qaeda head of command to stop claiming control of over the group’s Syrian branch.

Attacks such as car bombs bear a striking resemblance to the methods used by Al Qaeda in Iraq.  Suicide bombers, car bombs, and coordinated attacks on security forces are all staples of the terrorist group.

For more information, please see the following:

National – Iraq violence rises to levels not seen since 2008 – 17 June 2013

Al Bawaba – 20 killed in wave of car bombs across Iraq -16 June 2013

Aljazeera – Deadly blasts rock southern Iraqi cities – 16 June 2013

BBC – Iraq car bombings: Attacks hit mainly Shia cities-16 June 2013

Reuters – Car bombs, shootings kill 30 across Iraq – 16 June 2013