Death Toll in Ukraine Conflict Now Exceeds 5,300

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch Managing Editor

KIEV, Ukraine – According to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the overall death toll in the recent conflict in the Ukraine now exceeds 5,358 people. An additional 12,235 have been wounded since mid-April of last year. “The rebel offensive continues and civilians are dying on a daily basis,” United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement issued by his spokesperson. “Any further escalation will prove catastrophic for the 5.2 million people living in the midst of conflict in eastern Ukraine,” the high commissioner for Human Rights said.

Many civilians have fled fighting in Donetsk. since the start of the conflict more than 600,000 people have fled Ukraine to neighboring countries, 400,000 of whom have fled to Russia. (Photo courtesy of BBC News)

Indiscriminate shelling has been reported in residential areas in government-controlled territories such as Debaltseve and Avdiivka and rebel-held cities such as Donetsk and Horlivka the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein said. “Bus stops and public transport, marketplaces, schools and kindergartens, hospitals and residential areas have become battlegrounds in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine — in clear breach of international humanitarian law which governs the conduct of armed conflicts,” the high commissioner said in a statement. Last, the most deadly single incident involving civilians occurred in the southeastern city of Mariupol when two attacks were carried out using multiple-launch rocket systems that killed least 31 people and injured 112 others, the United Nations said.

Despite mounting evidence the Russian government denies denies accusations that it has been sending troops and supplying the pro-Russian rebels. Russian President Vladimir Putin blames the current conflict in the Ukraine is the fault of the west, he told an Egyptian newspaper that Western countries had broken pledges not to expand NATO and forced countries to choose between them and Russia.

Putin’s comments come amid new hopes for a peace deal this Wednesday. German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Francois Hollande flew to Moscow on Friday to discuss proposals to end the fighting. The details of the proposed peace deal have not been released but the plan is believed to include a demilitarized zone of 50-70km (31-44 miles) around the current front lines of the conflict zone. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko reportedly spoke on the phone on Sunday, they announced that a four-way summit could be held Minsk, if the details were agreed before Wednesday.

Chancellor Merkel is expected to brief United States President Barack Obama in Washington D.C. later on Monday on the peace plan as the United considers broadening its role in the region, including the possibility of sending weapons to the Ukrainian government. Some U.S. officials, as well as senior Republicans including Senator John McCain, argue that some form of military support is necessary. However, Chancellor Merkel said she could not “imagine any situation in which improved equipment for the Ukrainian army leads to President Putin being so impressed that he believes he will lose militarily.”

The current crisis in eastern Ukraine began in late February 2014 stemming from an initial internal political crisis and degrading violent clashes in parts of the country and has now reached full scale conflict in the eastern region of the country. Despite the Minsk cease-fire, the situation in Ukraine has deteriorated.

For more information please see

BBC News – Ukraine conflict: Vladimir Putin renews blame on West – 9 February 2015

BBC News – Ukraine crisis: Hollande and Merkel in Putin talks – 6 February 2015

The United Nations News Centre – UN chief ‘gravely concerned’ as civilian death toll from Ukraine conflict continues to rise – 5 February 2015

CNN International – Civilians increasingly under fire as Ukraine devastation grows – 3 February

Push for US to Arm Ukrainian Military with New Minsk Talks Looming

By Kyle Herda

Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

KIEV, Ukraine – German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Francois Hollande, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko are all working towards another meeting in Minsk, Belarus to discuss peace. The first such meeting led to a cease-fire, but that agreement has since broken down as fighting has dramatically increased in Eastern Ukraine once again.

Ukrainian troops positioned around Debaltseve, near Donetsk. (Photo courtesy of The Guardian)

 

One point that Ukraine is pushing for is monitored security on the border between Ukraine and Russia. This is due to evidence that has come in at several points over the past year that suggests Russia has sent weapons, troops, and vehicles to Eastern Ukraine for the rebels to use in their fight against Kiev. Regardless, Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko is eager to bring back peace to their neighboring country.

While these talks may not include the United States, the US is nonetheless considering sending lethal force to Ukraine to assist in fighting the pro-Russian rebels in Eastern Ukraine. Poroshenko says Ukraine would welcome more non-lethal aid such as “counter-barrage radar …, communications and radio jamming technology,” night-vision goggles, and radios. Further, Obama is set to meet with Merkel before she goes to Minsk for the new round of peace talks, likely to discuss and coordinate the United States’s plan and Europe’s plan.

Pro-Russian rebels in Eastern Ukraine, along with Russia, have been pushing for Eastern Ukraine to gain independence as their own nation – “New Russia.” Recently, rebels in the Donetsk region and the Luhansk region have been discussing working together in making this goal a reality, and Putin has pushed for international recognizance of independence. Kiev agreed in the original Minsk agreement to back off from Eastern Ukraine and grant more autonomy to the rebel-held territory, but given the recent violence and shifting of the front, Kiev is less willing to do so now and it will likely effect Kiev’s willingness to grant this again in the new Minsk talks.

For more information, please see:

Fox – Cruz pushes for US to arm Ukraine, as European leaders push for cease-fire – 8 February 2015

The Guardian – Ukraine conflict: four-nation peace talks in Minsk aim to end crisis – 8 February 2015

Yahoo – Putin-backed rebels just made a huge move right under Europe’s nose – 6 February 2015

BBC – Ukraine crisis: Pentagon ‘chief’ inclined to send weapons – 4 February 2015

Jordan Steps Up Its Role in Fight against ISIS

Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch, Managing Editor

DAMASCUS, Syria – The Jordanian government claims to have carried out 56 airstrikes against the Islamic State of Syria and the Levant (ISIS) over the past three days marking a major escalation in the state’s role in coalition airstrikes against ISIS. “We achieved what we aimed at,” Air Force chief General Mansour al-Jbour, head of the Royal Jordanian Air Force, said. The airstrikes targeted ISIS logistics sites and suspected hideouts. While Jordan has carried out nearly 20% of all maneuvers by the US-led coalition against ISIS in Syria since the campaign began the recent surge in Jordanian efforts comes just days after a video showing the brutal emulation of a Jordanian pilot was released by the terror group sparking outrage in Jordan and around the world. According to General Jbour Jordan is now “determined to wipe them from the face of the Earth.”

Moaz Youssef al-Kasasbeh, aged 26, was married to engineer Anwar al-Tarawneh in September 2014, just months before he was captured by ISIS fighters. he leaves behind 7 siblings. (Photo courtesy of BBC News)

The video showing the brutal murder of the Jordanian piolet, Lieutenant Moaz al-Kasasbeh, aged 26, who was captured by ISIS late last year, was released on the internet by ISIS earlier this week. The video showed the young hostage being burned alive in a cage. Jordanian officials now believe Moaz al-Kasasbeh was murdered several weeks ago despite ISIS claims that he was still alive and the group’s attempts to use him as a bargaining chip.

“We have achieved our goals in revenge for Muath” after the recent strikes were carried out, Gen. Mansour al-Jbour said at a press briefing. “But this isn’t the end. Airstrikes carried out over the weekend hit several targets including ammunition depots. The goal of the most recent airstrikes was to break the ISIS command structure, disrupt revenue sources, destroy training centers and interfere with logistics.

Recent video footage released by the United States Central Command shows footage of airstrikes carried out by Jordanian forces against an ISIS target. The video was released on 5 February and shows a target hit near Hasaka, Syria. “The destruction of [ISIS] targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group’s ability to project terror and conduct operations,” CENTCOM said in statement posted with the video on YouTube.

General Mansour Al-Jbour claimed that ISIS has lost 20% of its military capabilities since the start of U.S. led coalition airstrikes in September of last year.  Jordan’s King Abdullah has vowed to avenge the killing of Muath al- Kasasbeh and has ordered his commanders to prepare for an increased military role in the fight against ISIS.

For more information please see:

Al Arabiya – Jordan: ISIS Lost 20% of Its Military Capabilities – 8 February 2015

BBC News –D Islamic State Crisis: Jordan Air Strikes ‘Destroy’ IS Hideouts – 8 February 2015

The Wall Street Journal – Jordan Threatens More Strikes against Islamic State – 8 February 2015

Al Arabiya – Syria’s Hasaka – 7 February 2015

Ferguson Police Testing New Device To Minimize Lethal Force

By Lyndsey Kelly
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America

 
WASHINGTON, D.C., United States of America – Following protests regarding police brutality in the St. Louis suburbs, police are testing a device that would be attached to a regular handgun that may reduce the use of lethal force by law enforcement. The device is being called “The Alternative.” It consists of an orange cap that mounts onto a handgun, and when the gun is fired, the resulting projectile will have enough force to knock a person down but not kill. This week, five Ferguson police instructors will train to use the device, and will then convey their training to the entire police department.

During the Ferguson protests local police fired tear gas in the direction of unruly crowds (Photo Courtesy of TIME).

Post-protests, many have maintained their criticism for law enforcement agencies’ use of “casual brutality.” Debates over police use-of-force have gripped the country following the grand juries’ decision to not indict Officer Darren Wilson, the police officer responsible for the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. Al Eickhoff, Ferguson’s assistant police chief, has stated that he was looing for a new device that would be a practical alternative to lethal force that might have prevented a deadly result in the case of Michael Brown.

The Alternative can be readily affixed to the standard-issue Glock and Sig Sauer pistols. However, it has not yet been tested on a human, but it has been tested on foam, gel and leather. The Alternative is designed to be used in situations where officers must decide in a split second, whether to shoot someone to protect themselves or others. When the attachment is places on the barrel of a gun, and when the weapon is wired, the bullet embed itself into an alloy projectile, that is designed to send a shock wave of pain through the suspect without causing any internal damage. The device is meant to capture the first bullet, and the next round chambered would fire as a regular bullet, that is lethal. Thus, there is concern that if the Alternative should fail to stop its target, the second bullet may be discharged.

Opponents have considered the product dangerous because not only has it yet to be tested, but also because officers must take time to remove the device from their belts and affix it to their weapon, thus exposing the officers to a “greater risk.” The Ferguson police department has said that the technology has been demonstrated to department officials, but there has not yet been a decision to implement the device.

 

For more information, please see the following:

THE GUARDIAN – ‘Less Than Lethal’? Ferguson Test Of Gun ‘Alternative’ Draws Fire From Police Vets – 4. Feb 2015.

NBC NEWS – Ferguson Police Begin Testing ‘Less Letha;’ Gun Attachment – 4 Feb. 2015.

TIME – Ferguson Police Are Testing ‘Less-Lethal’ Attachments For Guns – 4 Feb. 2015.

WASHINGTON POST – Ferguson, Mo., Police Begin Testing New ‘Less-Lethal’ Attachment For Guns – 4. Feb. 2015.

Syria Deeply: Syria is No Longer Able to Treat Chronic Diseases, Leading Health Expert Says

Syria Deeply

“It is estimated that about 600,000 to 800,000 people have been injured because of the war.”

A leading Syrian public health expert, Dr. Fouad M. Fouad, told Syria Deeply that the country’s supply of medications has dwindled to less than 20 percent of what was available before the war. Fouad, who is currently an assistant research professor at the American University of Beirut, was once the director of the Primary Health Care Department in Aleppo. Now he says the supply of medications to treat chronic illnesses such as kidney failure, cancer, diabetes and cardiac diseases has virtually dried up.

Overall, the country’s official and non-official hospital networks are both unsurprisingly in dire straits, said Fouad, who ran mobile clinics across the country before the civil war and has written extensively on the health crises that have emerged from the conflict that has displaced about 10 million people and injured hundreds of thousands.

He spoke to Syria Deeply about the state of the country’s health sector and how it will leave lasting issues in physical and mental health that will challenge Syria for years to come.

Syria Deeply: Based on your research on Syria’s healthcare system, where are the public health services most vulnerable?

Fouad: In principal, the problem inside Syria is caused by the fact that we have several health systems. The first system in place is the principal one, which is affiliated with the Ministry of Health and is part of the regime. The second system exists in areas that are outside the control of the regime. And the third one – if we can call it a healthcare system – exists in the areas under the control of the extremist Islamists. This problem forms a huge challenge for the humanitarian and healthcare response systems, which are functioning and under regime control, and aid is possible. As for the second healthcare system, it has also been possible to deliver some aid through neighbouring countries to the areas that are outside regime control, but it is not enough and far from efficient. The third system, if we can call it a system, is in the areas under the control of the extremist Islamists and there is no chance to deliver aid. We actually don’t know what the problems are that they have.

Syria Deeply: What are some of the biggest problems facing the population today?

Fouad: The healthcare problems were triggered by the collapse of the infrastructure in areas that were under regime control. That led to the spread of contagious diseases, mainly Hepatitis A, diseases related to lack of water sanitation, typhoid, lipidosis, diarrhea. In addition, the services that could be offered and given to women have suffered a lot. We have had cases of unsafe child delivery. The problems resulting from that were numerous including, complications, bleeding and eventually death.

Because the Syrian crisis has taken a longer time, we began to see problems in treating chronic illnesses such as kidney failure, cancer, diabetes, heart operations and others. These illnesses got more complicated because the proper treatment is not available, or is very expensive. Many of the healthcare sector workers have left the country for fear of being targeted or kidnapped. They sought a safe place outside the country, and that placed a bigger burden on the system inside the country.

Syria Deeply: How are people coping? What are some of the creative solutions you’ve seen?

Fouad: In Syria today, we began to see serious problems with the availability of medication. Even the existing medications we had problems with. The medications available to the patients are less than 20% of what was available before the crisis. Many of those who engaged in the past in the medicine production sector are facing a lot of difficulty today. They suffer from disrupted electricity supply, lack of general security and lack of secure movement of their employees and their production and materials. Life and medication became very expensive, hard currency was not available all the time, sanctions were imposed, and there was a lack of safe access to deliver medication to points of need. Many medications disappeared from the markets, including those treating cancers, antibiotics, heart diseases and children’s and women’s diseases. As a result of the above, we started to see a shortage in proper treatment, and the destruction of hospitals and healthcare centers.

As a result, more than 77% of the hospitals have been damaged severely, are non-functional, or it’s very hard for them to operate with full capacity. In the areas that are not under regime control, the healthcare situation is extremely dire and needs help to treat patients in areas such as Idlib, Deir Ezzor and Aleppo. Medication reaches these areas through smuggling, and so often the condition of its safety or preservation are not guaranteed. We really do not know the quality of medication that is being distributed in areas that are outside our control.

More than 15,000 doctors left Syria; many of them were highly qualified and specialized in their fields. Those who are left behind are the young generation who have less experience. As a result, we started to see different problems related to injuries. It is estimated that about 600,000 to 800,000 people have been injured because of the war. Some have their homes destroyed by military attacks, shrapnel or they were in the line of fire.

We do not have information about those who have permanent disabilities, such as the loss of a hand or a leg.

Studies say at least 100,000 suffer from huge disabilities, and will form an economic and social burden, and will be in need of continued services. Many of them have left the job market and need financial support. Therefore, we should provide services for them very soon.

Syria Deeply:: What has been the impact on women?

Fouad: In most wars, and long-term wars, women are affected badly. So often the husband leaves home either to make a living, or to carry arms to fight. The woman becomes the head of the family, and this places a huge burden. This aspect is ignored most of the time, and physiological health becomes a secondary concern. But this is a major element that we have to pay attention to, as it could lead to further complications for a whole generation.

Women are exposed more to problems also because they take care of children, work hard and get a lack of proper nutrition. In addition to that, when an area is besieged, or when goods become very expensive or unavailable, children are those who are affected most.

Syria Deeply: We’ve heard that pregnancy is on the rise in Syria. How are women managing to give birth in such dire circumstances?

Fouad: Child deliveries are conducted most of the time under unsafe conditions, especially in areas where the war is still raging. Unsafe deliveries are also taking place in remote areas that are far from health services or transport routes and areas that have seen influxes of refugees. We hear of complications, premature deliveries, bleeding and lack of first aid emergency services, which eventually leads to deaths.

One of the most important problems women face in wars is actually the availability of proper services.

When women flee to an area whether locally or abroad, the host community often does not provide proper shelter and services. This is what happened when people fled from Idlib, for example, to areas inside Syria or in Lebanon.

Syria Deeply: You ran mobile clinics in Syria before the war. Could they be deployed in a situation like this to provide care? What other flexible methods could work?

Fouad: This is a very important subject when we have a crisis, and when we have areas that are not receiving any services, we can work with different forms of mobile clinics. But this could only work if the area is secure and accessible.

We can also use new technology. For example, we can diagnose and deliver the service through the internet, or smartphones. This applies in cases where a consultation is needed but the physician cannot reach the area in need, provided that the area actually has technological services and equipment such as a laptop, etc.

This kind of tele-clinic is effective for diagnosis and health education, but it is not very effective in areas of treatment, where you need a mobile clinic. But there is a strong need to use the technology of mobile clinics in refugee areas and informal settlements. An example of that is Lebanon, where you have gatherings of refugees or settlements. In this case, mobile clinics are very important, and serve several communities.

Syria Deeply: What is the most basic thing that could be done to improve public health provision today?

Fouad: We have to distinguish and talk on two levels: one is Syrians inside Syria, and the other one is Syrians in neighbouring countries.

For the Syrians inside Syria, the most important element is that there should be coordination between workers in the healthcare sector. If I work to provide a service in a certain area, I need to work with the people who are in charge of distributing the services in this region.

Organizing and managing the service is very important so we do not end up having an overlap or waste.

Coordination, actually, is only possible in secure areas. But security is not the only element. One important element to a better healthcare is funding.

In addition to that, we need an innovative approach to treat health problems. When we have a problem with the vaccination of children, for example, we need to educate a number of people about that at the same time.

When we talk about healthcare outside Syria, it should be comprehensive, especially in hosting countries and communities. When you provide services and aid to the refugees, and you exempt the hosting communities from the aid, you are actually increasing tension. For example in Lebanon, 80% of the national healthcare services that are being offered are private. Therefore, we have to develop the healthcare services in a balanced and equal way.

In areas outside regime control, there is lack of information about the kind of healthcare problems that we face or may face. If we have a problem with diarrhea or polio, the evaluation of these problems is left to the estimation of average people who so often have no experience. We need to know who is providing medical aid and who decides how to distribute it. Unfortunately, there aren’t enough efficient personnel with medical backgrounds to prioritize. As a result we have seen some tragic deaths resulting from medical complications and vaccines.

Health management is really an important issue in the area of healthcare. Mismanagement could lead to tragic results and could be worse than corruption.