Justice for Sergei Magnitsky: Magnitsky Sanctions Law Introduced in the Canadian Parliament

Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions Law Intro­duced in the Cana­dian Parliament

 

13 May 2016 — Yes­ter­day, the Con­ser­v­a­tive Party of Canada announced the intro­duc­tion of the Jus­tice for Vic­tims of Cor­rupt For­eign Offi­cials (Sergei Mag­nit­sky Law) bill in House of Com­mons and the Sen­ate simultaneously.

 

The Mag­nit­sky bill was intro­duced by James Bezan MP, Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment for Selkirk-Interlake-Eastman, in the House of Com­mons, and The Hon. Raynell Andr­ey­chuk, Sen­a­tor for Saskatchewan, in the Senate.

 

The pur­pose of the Mag­nit­sky Law is to sanc­tion those who are com­mit­ting seri­ous human rights crimes within their coun­tries, or the cor­rupt indi­vid­u­als who are steal­ing the assets of peo­ple,” said Mr Bezan, MP, on the bill introduction.

 

The Hon Irwin Cotler, for­mer Jus­tice Min­is­ter, and one of the strongest advo­cates of Mag­nit­sky leg­is­la­tion in Canada, last year urged Cana­dian law­mak­ers to adopt the law:

 

“It is time…for us to treat Russ­ian domes­tic human-rights vio­la­tions as seri­ously as we do vio­la­tions of polit­i­cal inde­pen­dence and ter­ri­to­r­ial integrity… Coun­tries that value human rights and the rule of law must use the mea­sures at our dis­posal to hold vio­la­tors to account and dis­cour­age future violations.”

 

The Cana­dian Mag­nit­sky Law (C-267) and (S-226) pro­vides for visa sanc­tions and asset freezes against for­eign nation­als respon­si­ble for gross vio­la­tions of inter­na­tion­ally rec­og­nized human rights.

 

Speak­ing about the effect of the Cana­dian Mag­nit­sky Law, James Bezan, MP said:

 

“This would pro­vide the tools and mech­a­nisms to the gov­ern­ment to ensure it can put in place the proper sanc­tions with respect to the travel and eco­nomic activ­ity of those cor­rupt for­eign offi­cials with­out hav­ing to do it on a case-by-case basis.”

 

“More impor­tantly, it also pro­vides both the House of Com­mons and the Sen­ate for­eign affairs com­mit­tees with the abil­ity to look at who is on the dif­fer­ent lists for sanc­tions around the world on an annual basis and report that back to the House.”

 

Before last year’s elec­tion, the Lib­eral Party of Canada, along with other polit­i­cal par­ties, promised to enact Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions if they won. In par­tic­u­lar, the Lib­eral Party said that a Lib­eral Gov­ern­ment would intro­duce leg­is­la­tion, mod­elled on the US Mag­nit­sky leg­is­la­tion, because of the belief that, “by impos­ing sanc­tions, we can impose mean­ing­ful penal­ties on human rights vio­la­tors and deter future vio­la­tions.

 

Yet, after com­ing to power in Novem­ber 2015, Canada’s new Prime Min­is­ter 44-years old Justin Trudeau reneged on his party’s elec­tion promise, sud­denly changed course and decided to “re-engage” with Rus­sia instead.

 

This is a betrayal by Justin Trudeau of the prin­ci­ples that Boris Nemtsov and Sergei Mag­nit­sky stood for and who gave their lives in the fight with cor­rup­tion and human rights abuse,” said William Brow­der, leader of Global Mag­nit­sky Jus­tice campaign.

 

In 2012, Russ­ian oppo­si­tion leader Boris Nemtsov trav­elled to Canada to call on the Cana­dian gov­ern­ment and politi­cians to adopt the Mag­nit­sky Act. He was sub­se­quently assas­si­nated in front of the Kremlin.

 

Address­ing a Cana­dian audi­ence in Ottawa, three years before his mur­der, Boris Nemtsov said:

 

“Mag­nit­sky was killed by pros­e­cu­tors and prison man­age­ment… Putin gov­ern­ment sup­ported the mur­der­ers. The idea of the [Mag­nit­sky] Act is to imple­ment sanc­tions against cor­rupt offi­cials and oth­ers who are respon­si­ble for killing Mag­nit­sky.” (See Full speech by Boris Nemtsov in Canada in 2012, start­ing after intro­duc­tion at 4th min:http://www.ipolitics.ca/2015/03/02/when-nemtsov-came-to-ottawa/ )

 

“As a coun­try with the low level of cor­rup­tion and rule of law, Canada has to fight against crim­i­nals and against cor­rup­tion. You are not against Rus­sia, you are against cor­rup­tion, against crim­i­nals. It will be very painful for Russ­ian cor­rupt bureau­cracy to get such kind of law from Canada. Very painful. Because cor­rupt sys­tem in Rus­sia means that they have prop­erty out­side of the coun­try, they relax out­side the coun­try, they send their kids to get edu­ca­tion out­side,” said Boris Nemtsov, urg­ing Cana­dian law­mak­ers and the Cana­dian Gov­ern­ment to adopt Mag­nit­sky law four years ago.

 

The US became the first coun­try to enact the Mag­nit­sky Legislation.

 

In Decem­ber 2012, the US Con­gress adopted the Sergei Mag­nit­sky Rule of Law Account­abil­ity Act which imposes tar­geted visa bans and asset freezes on per­sons involved in Sergei Mag­nit­sky mis­treat­ment, death, cover up and the crim­i­nal con­spir­acy he had uncovered.

 

In Jan­u­ary 2014, the Par­lia­men­tary Assem­bly of the Coun­cil of Europe, com­pris­ing 47 states, called for the intro­duc­tion of Mag­nit­sky sanc­tions by mem­ber states in case of fail­ure by Russ­ian author­i­ties to respond to the rec­om­men­da­tions of its res­o­lu­tion, “Refus­ing Impunity for the Killers of Sergei Mag­nit­sky”, to which Rus­sia has failed to com­ply since.

 

In April 2014, the Euro­pean Par­lia­ment adopted the Mag­nit­sky Sanc­tions Res­o­lu­tion, list­ing 32 per­sons involved in Mag­nit­sky case and urg­ing the EU Coun­cil to adopt EU-wide sanctions.

 

For more infor­ma­tion, please contact:

 

Jus­tice for Sergei Mag­nit­sky

+44 207 440 1777

e-mail: info@lawandorderinrussia.org

www.lawandorderinrussia.org

ICTJ: In Focus: Why Remember?

In Focus

Divider

Online Debate: Does Collective Remembrance of a Troubled Past Impede Reconciliation?Online Debate: Does Collective Remembrance of a Troubled Past Impede Reconciliation?After a society is torn apart by conflict or repression, who decides whether to remember or forget the painful past? Can forgiveness happen without acknowledgement of wrongdoing? Is there a difference between forgetting and denial? Join us as ICTJ debates the impact of remembrance on reconciliation with David Rieff and Pablo de Greiff.

Read More…

ICTJ on Facebook ICTJ on Twitter ICTJ on YouTube ICTJ Podcast
Subscribe
SUBSCRIBE
Like ICTJ | In Focus: Why Remember? on Facebook
Forward to a Friend
Do you know someone that may be interested in the ICTJ newsletter?
Forward this Email
View Newsletter Archive

Other News

Divider

‘You Must Hear Us, Because We Have a Lot to Say’ Youth Leaders Call for Reparations in Cote d’Ivoire‘You Must Hear Us, Because We Have a Lot to Say’ Youth Leaders Call for Reparations in Cote d’IvoireAfter consulting nearly 2,000 of their peers, youth activists in Cote d’Ivoire presented their reparations policy recommendations to their communities and officials.

Read More…

Panel Discussion Examines the Impact of DenialPanel Discussion Examines the Impact of DenialWhat happens when a state refuses to acknowledge the suffering of victims of mass atrocities? Or when the public celebrates perpetrators as heroes? Earlier this month, a panel discussion hosted by The International Center for Transitional Justice and New York University’s Center for Global Affairs grappled with the impact of denial on justice.

Read More…

Divider

Publications

Divider

The Case for Action on Transitional Justice and DisplacementThis briefing paper calls on the international community to use the time and presence of refugees to help shape the outcomes of crises while they are ongoing.

More Than Words: Apologies as a Form of ReparationThis report explores many of the issues and challenges likely to be faced by those considering a public apology as a form of reparation for victims of serious human rights violations.

More Publications

Upcoming Events

June 06 – 10, 2016

Negotiating Peace and Justice: A Course on the Place of Transitional Justice in Peace ProcessesLocation: Barcelona, SpainView Details

June 15 – 18, 2016

Pathways to ReconciliationLocation: University of WinnipegView Details

More Events

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: Joint Press Release: High-Level Event on “The Future of Civilian Protection in Peace Operations: Endorsing and Implementing the Kigali Principles”

11 May 2016 No Images? Click here

Joint Press Release: High-Level Event on “The Future of Civilian Protection in Peace Operations: Endorsing and Implementing the Kigali Principles”

On 11 May 2016 the Governments of the Kingdom Netherlands and the Republic of Rwanda, in association with the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, co-hosted a high-level event on “The Future of Civilian Protection in Peace Operations: Endorsing and Implementing the Kigali Principles.”

The meeting, convened at UN Headquarters in New York, was launched by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, H.E. Mr. Albert Koenders, and the Minister of State in Charge of Cooperation and Permanent Representative of Rwanda to the UN, H.E. Mr. Eugène-Richard Gasana. Additional opening remarks were delivered by H.E. Mr. Mogens Lykketoft, President of the UN General Assembly.

H.E. Ms. Samantha Power, U.S. Permanent Representative to the UN, Lt. General Carlos Alberto dos Santos Cruz, former UN Force Commander, and Mr. Ian Martin, Executive Director of Security Council Report, were panelists. The event was moderated by Dr. Simon Adams, Executive Director of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.

The Kigali Principles on the Protection of Civilians, adopted on 28-29 May 2015, are a set of best practices to enhance implementation of civilian protection mandates. The eighteen recommendations provide a blueprint to strengthen the international community’s commitment to more effectively protect civilians.

In his opening remarks H.E. Mr. Bert Koenders noted: “People and communities under threat, with nowhere to go, need to know the UN will do anything within its scope to provide protection.”

H.E. Mr. Eugène-Richard Gasana added: “Rwanda’s history teaches us the high price paid by civilians when the UN is unwilling or unable to protect civilians from mass atrocities. The Kigali principles are a commitment to ensure that modern peacekeeping learns from past failures and protects the vulnerable.”

The meeting concluded with a ceremony to welcome 19 new Member States who endorsed the principles, namely: Austria, Belgium, Burkina Faso, Djibouti, Estonia, Finland, Ghana, Guinea, Ireland, Latvia, Malawi, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, Ukraine, United States and Zambia. To date, the Kigali Principles have been endorsed by 28 Member States.

In his closing remarks, Dr. Adams urged all Member States to endorse the Kigali Principles: “In far too many situations in the world today, peacekeepers in blue helmets are all that stand between civilians and those who prey upon their misery. The Kigali Principles recognize that the protection of civilians is at the heart of twenty-first century peacekeeping. They should be endorsed by all UN member states.”

For more information regarding the Kigali Principles, please contact:

Netherlands: Mr. Frits Kemperman (frits.kemperman@minbuza.nl or +1 646-515-2918)
Rwanda: Lt. Col Raoul Batazoha (rbazatoha@minaffet.gov.rw or +1 347-247-4545)

Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect: Atrocity Alert, Issue 4: Syria, Nigeria and Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories

Atrocity Alert is a weekly publication by the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect highlighting and updating situations where populations are at risk of, or are enduring, mass atrocity crimes.

UN Photo/Elma Okic

Syria

Despite the cessation of hostilities, fighting in Syria increased during mid-April, including government forces bombing hospitals and displacement camps. Violence in Aleppo has killed over 300 people in the last two weeks. On 9 May the United States and Russia led a diplomatic push to reinstate the nation-wide cessation of hostilities. The Syrian government agreed to extend a truce in Aleppo, in place since 5 May, until midnight on 11 May.

Nigeria

The humanitarian crisis in Nigeria and neighboring countries remains dire due to the widespread displacement of populations, acute food insecurity and the ongoing threat of attacks by the extremist group Boko Haram. The upcoming regional security summit, taking place in Abuja on 14 May and bringing together the heads of state of Nigeria, France, Cameroon, Niger, Chad, and Benin, should emphasize the humanitarian situation in Boko Haram-affected areas and address ways to improve support for IDPs and refugees.

 UNHCR/C.Arnaud

UN Photo/Evan Schneider

Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories

For the first time since the 2014 war in Gaza, Hamas and Israeli forces engaged in cross-border attacks. The attacks started two days prior to a UN Security Council Arria Formula meeting on the protection of the Palestinian civilian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The meeting was convened on 6 May by the Permanent Missions of Angola, Malaysia, Senegal and Venezuela.