Africa

The Growing Trend of “Corrective Rape” in South Africa

By Tamara Alfred

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

As other African countries continue to fight over the potential criminality of being homosexual, South Africa, where gay marriage is completely legal, is dealing with the growing the trend of “corrective rape.”

“Corrective rape” is when a man forces himself on a homosexual woman believing it will end her lesbianism.  The men who are perpetrating this violence believe that by raping a woman they can turn her into a “real African woman.”

Zukiswa Gaca, a 20-year-old South African girl, was a victim of “corrective rape” in December 2009. (Photo Courtesy of CNN.)

The extent of the problem is hard to know since the South African police do not separate “corrective rape” statistics from other rape cases.  Additionally, the government does not acknowledge that “corrective rape” is a major issue.  Earlier this year, a Ministry of Justice spokesman told Time that the government “accept[s] that there is room for improvement, but that does not mean that the situation has gotten out of hand.”

Interpol estimates that half of South African women will be raped sometime during their life.  The Daily Mail reported that ten women are currently assaulted by men every week.

Meanwhile, human rights groups in the country – where gay rights are constitutionally protected – are outraged.  Activists want to see South Africa’s justice system take a stronger stance against “corrective rape,” and are pushing for legislators to make it a hate crime.

Cherith Sanger, of the Women’s Legal Centre in Cape Town, said, “We believe that corrective rape warrants greater recognition on the basis that there are multiple grounds of discrimination.  It’s not just about a woman being raped in terms of violence against women, which is bad enough, but it’s also got to do with sexual orientation so it’s another ground or level of unfair discrimination leveled against lesbians.”

Human Rights Watch recently conducted interviews in six of South Africa’s provinces and concluded that “social attitudes towards homosexual, bisexual, and transgender people in South Africa have possibly hardened over the last two decades.  The abuse they face on an everyday basis may be verbal, physical, or sexual – and may even result in murder.”

The South African director at Human Rights Watch, Siphokazi Mthathi, said, “Sexism is still deeply embedded here.  There is still a strong sense among men that they have power over women, women’s bodies and there’s also a strong sense that there’s not going to be consequences because most often there are no consequences.”

In 2009, the UK’s Channel 4 broadcast a report by Samira Ahmed in which she asked a man, “what do you think of the men who say you have to rape a lesbian to fix her.”  The man replied, “I think that is good because that is not good to be a lesbian.  I think that is a good idea to do that to them.”

Ironically, South Africa is considered more tolerant on the continent where being gay is illegal in many other countries.  The South African Constitution specifically forbids any discrimination based on the sexual orientation of its citizens.   As a result, those entrusted with enforcing the country’s “tolerant laws” are now being accused of re-traumatizing victims.

One woman followed by CNN, 20-year-old Zukiswa Gaca, reported being attacked in December 2009.  In the course of trying to find out information regarding her case, she eventually had to make a 30-minute drive from her home where she found the third assigned investigating officer to her case.  He met with her in the wide, open office.

When Gaca asked why the police had not interviewed a friend of the alleged attacker who had witnessed the rape, another officer in the room told her, “I never take a statement from a suspect’s friend.”  He continued that “[t]he only statements that are important here are the ones from your friend, a neutral person or a neighbor.  Not someone who was there watching while you were being damaged and he wasn’t helping.”

Gaca continued to force the police to do their jobs every step of the way.  She was the one who insisted the police re-arrest her alleged attacker after they let him go without taking DNA evidence.  Gaca was also in the car when the police finally questioned the witness.  He answered while leaning in through the car’s open window, while Gaca sat and watched.

The actions are possible violations of South Africa’s Victims’ Charter, drafted in 2004, which grants seven fundamental rights to every victim of crime.  Included is the right to be treated with fairness and with respect to one’s dignity and privacy.

Now almost two years later, Gaca is still awaiting her day in court.

“They always get away with it.  I’m just pushing so that there will be a different story on my case,” she said.  “Maybe if this guy could be sentenced or something happens to him I think a lot of my friends will report their cases because some of the lesbians, they don’t report their cases, they don’t go to the police station because they know that it will just be a waste of time.”

For more information, please see:

Indian Express – S African lesbians becoming victims of barbaric ‘corrective rape’ – 31 October 2011

Digital Journal – ‘Corrective rape’ a growing trend in South Africa – 29 October 2011

CNN – Horror of South Africa’s ‘corrective rape’ – 28 October 2011

Kenyan Airstrike Hits Somali Refugee Camp, Killing Five and Injuring Dozens More

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

JILIB, Somalia – Kenya’s efforts to find members of the hardline Islamic group Al-Shabab went slightly offline on Sunday.  During an air raid over Jilib, a coastal town in southern Somalia, a bomb fell on a refugee camp that is home to more than 7,500 people.

Kenyan troops approach the Somali border in order to find and eliminate members of the militant Al-Shabab organization, which Kenya holds responsible for a series of kidnappings within its borders. (Photo courtesy of Agence France-Presse)

Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF or Doctors Without Borders), an aid organization that participates in the camp’s operations, five people, including three children, had died so far and another 45 had been hospitalized due to wounds sustained from shrapnel.  Due to the bombing activities, MSF has temporarily withdrawn its staff from the area.

“So today the nutrition clinic and cholera centre are closed,” explained mission leader Gautam Chatterjee.  “We will re-open as soon as things are a bit safer for our staff there.”

The strike was aimed at an Al-Shabab camp that was also located in Jilib.  Based on intelligence that a senior official was present, several aircraft flew overhead.  The refugee camp bombing was an accident due to an errant bomb.  Kenya confirmed the attack on the Shabab base, but denied harming the refugee camp.

Major Emmanuel Chirchir, a spokesman for the Kenyan military, said: “We bombed an al-Shabab camp, killed 10 and wounded 47. We are sure about this assessment, no collateral damage, no women, no children.”

Chirchir initially denied claims that the military had bombed the camp.

“MSF is being used by al-Shabab [for propaganda purposes],” he told the BBC program Focus on Africa.  The military later admitted that civilian casualties may have been incurred, but not due to the airstrike itself.  Instead, a vehicle filled with ammunition and high explosives caught fire during the raid.  In trying to escape, the driver brought it into the refugee camp, where it exploded.  The resulting blast was deemed the cause of civilian casualties from his perspective.

MSF’s departure is another setback for humanitarian aid in Somalia, a conflict-ravaged East African country that has not had a stable government for more than 20 years.  Six areas presently under Al-Shabab control are in a state of famine, as declared by the United Nations.  But while the present skirmishes continue, the prospects of delivering much-needed aid are slim.

“The new escalation in fighting and insecurity along the Kenya-Somalia border risks increasing the suffering for civilians already devastated by drought and conflict,” another aid organization, Oxfam, said in a statement it issued last month. “The situation in Somalia is increasingly alarming.”

Al-Shabab has promised reprisals against the invaders.

“Kenya has brutally massacred civilians already displaced by hardship … We will ensure that Kenya mourns more than we did,” said Sheikh Abukar Ali Ada, a regional Al Shabab official.  “They cowardly killed around 15 civilians. We will similarly target them and take revenge.”

Though it has some backing from the Somali government, Kenya has no timetable for withdrawal other than saying that it will leave when it feels safe again.

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera — Somali ‘Civilians Killed’ in Kenyan Air Raids — 31 October 2011

BBC — Kenya Air Raid in Somalia Jilib Town ‘Kills Civilians’ — 31 October 2011

Daily Nation — Death Toll in Kenya Raid in Somalia Rises to Five — 31 October 2011

Daily Nation — Kenya, Somalia Seek Support for War on Al Shabaab — 31 October 2011

Garowe Online — Kenyan Air Strike in Somalia ‘Kills Five and Wounds Dozens’ — 31 October 2011

New York Times — Aid Group Says Refugee Camp in Somalia Was Hit by Airstrike — 31 October 2011

Kenya Launches Incursion into Somalia to Secure Borders and Economic Prosperity

By Zach Waksman
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

NAIROBI, Kenya – Ten days ago, Kenya began a campaign to hunt down members of the radical Islamist militant group Al-Shebab, which occupies much of southern Somalia.  Its offensive has brought forces across the shared border between the two countries.  The new incursion has drawn scrutiny from Somalia and poses risks to both countries’ future security.

Kenyan police officers patrol Nairobi, the capital, following grenade attacks by militant Islamic group Al-Shebab. (Photo courtesy of European Photopress Angency)

Kenya has been a relatively stable country since gaining independence in 1963, becoming a Western ally and a popular tourist destination.  But a series of abductions credited to Al-Shebab, including one of humanitarian workers at a Somali refugee camp, led Kenya to strike back, launching its current action.  Or at least this was the initial claim.  Wednesday, spokesman Alfred Matua changed the rationale by saying that the abductions acted as a “good launchpad.”

“An operation of this magnitude is not planned in a week,” he said. “It’s been in the pipeline for a while.”

Part of the reason for this move appears to be economic gain, rather than security.

“This isn’t about tourism,” said a senior Kenyan official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “This is about our long-term development plan. Kenya cannot achieve economically what it wants with the situation the way it is in Somalia, especially Kismayu,” referring to a planned port city 60 miles south of the border that is occupied by Al-Shebab.

“Just imagine you’re trying to swim,” he added. “If someone is holding your leg and your arm, how far can you swim?”

For years, the United States has been providing weapons and training to the Kenyan military to aid in protecting its borders from its anarchic neighbor.  But this may be the first time Kenya has actually taken military action into Somalia.  The U.S. denied involvement in the present campaign, but acknowledged Kenya’s right to defend itself.  The Pentagon is watching the affair, finding promising initial returns, but fearing the potential next step.

A man claiming to be a member of Al-Shebab pled guilty to carrying out a pair of grenade attacks in Nairobi, the capital, on Wednesday.  The attacks have put the city on high alert.  Al-Shebab has affiliated itself with Al Qaeda and has carried out numerous suicide attacks in Somalia.  One of its goals is to overthrow Somalia’s transitional government, whose forces succeeded in taking control of Qoqani, a border town in the Lower Juba Region.  Despite the setback, the organization vows to stand strong in the face of the Kenyan incursion.

“Kenya violated the territorial rights of Somalia by entering our holy land, but I assure you that they will return disappointed, God willing,” said Sheikh Hassan Turki, a senior Al-Shebab leader.

Though Al-Shebab is an enemy to the interim government, President Sheikh Sharif Ahmed has stated his opposition to the incursion from the beginning, calling the action a potential breach of sovereignty and saying that an agreement with Kenya to run a cooperative security operation against Al-Shebab only allowed Kenya to train Somali troops.

His sentiments have not been echoed within his government.  Internal Security Minister George Saitoti sought an explanation of the president’s statements, which implied that he was turning away from the cooperative security agreement.

“In the light of this the Kenya Government is seeking clarification of the Somali government’s position as it is essential to have a unified approach in dealing with the destabilisation of Somalia by Al-Shebab, and its threats to peace and security to Kenya and the region,” Saitoti said.

One of the major questions that Kenya faces as the operation continues will be the ramifications of this action.  It is expected to have major implications on the delivery of humanitarian aid to the famine-ravaged Horn of Africa.  Mere days after the incursion started, several organizations with operations in Somalia had to suspend operations.  At best, the situation will be a temporary hiccup.  At worst, it will slow aid delivery to a halt.  An extended campaign may give Al-Shebab exactly the motivation it needs to make good on its promise to attack.

For more information, please see:

BBC — Kenya-Somali Border Attack: Al-Shabab Suspected — 27 October 2011

The Standard — Somalia Split over Hunt for Al Shabaab — 27 October 2011

Africa Review — Somali President Wants Kenya Troops Out — 26 October 2011

New York Times — Kenyan Motives in Somalia Predate Recent Abductions — 26 October 2011

Al Jazeera — Kenya Sends Troops to Attack Al-Shabab — 24 October 2011

IRIN — Kenya-Somalia: A Risky Intervention — 20 October 2011

Uganda Struggles with Gay Rights as LGBT Advocate Wins Human Rights Award

By Tamara Alfred

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

Earlier this month, Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera, a Ugandan woman, won the 2011 Martin Ennas Award for Human Rights Defenders.  The award is given annually by 10 of the world’s leading human rights NGOs and has been referred to as the Nobel prize for human rights.  Nabagesera is the founder and executive director of the LGBT rights organization Freedom and Roam Uganda.

The situation for Uganda’s LGBT community is extremely difficult, with numerous documented cases of discrimination, arbitrary arrests, unlawful detention, torture and other ill-treatment based solely on sexual orientation and gender identity.  Activists who work to expose such abuses are frequently targeted.

Ugandan tabloid Rolling Stone publishes a list of the 100 “Top Homos” calling for the people to be hanged. (Photo Courtesy of San Diego Gay and Lesbian News.)

In late January, Ugandan gay rights activist David Kato was murdered after the Ugandan tabloid Rolling Stone published a list of Uganda’s 100 “Top Homos” and called for the people named in the list to be hanged.  Nabagesera’s name also appeared on the list.

“I’ve lived my life fighting openly for gay rights in Uganda, and I’ve had to pay a price for that,” Nabagesera previously told Amnesty International.  “I’ve been evicted from house to house; my office has been evicted; I can no longer move on the streets openly; I’ve been attacked.”

Currently, homosexuality is a criminal offense that carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.  On Tuesday, Parliament voted to reopen a debate over a bill that seeks to expand on the criminalization of homosexuality and make it punishable by the death penalty.

The legislation was first proposed in October 2009 by Ugandan lawmaker David Bahati.  The Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee suggested that the penalty for “aggravated homosexuality” should be the same as for “defilement,” a crime that is punishable by death.  The bill could mandate the death penalty or life in prison for people who are identified as gay, or caught engaging in homosexual acts.

The bill had failed at the end of the previous legislative session after an international outcry directed at the nation.  Both U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.K. Foreign Secretary William Hague condemned the bill, and more than 1.6 million people around the world signed a petition urging the Parliament to let the bill die.

However, the speaker of Parliament Rebecca Kadaga announced Tuesday that the legislature was interested in saving the bills from the previous parliament.

MP Barnabus Tinkasimire backed the bill, saying, “the anti-gays Bill is overdue because the spirit of my ancestors tell me that they lived without these practices [homosexuality]…We can’t afford to stay with such ills in our society and when it comes before the floor, we shall all pass it and support it.”

Bahati had previously said that the bill is aimed at stamping out western-imported immoral behaviors from society, protecting the moral fabric of the nation, saving the traditional family and buttressing legislation against ‘gayism.’

Uganda is not the only African nation currently dealing with gay rights.  Various other countries, including Ghana and Malawi, have passed laws making homosexuality illegal, while some in Zimbabwe are seeking to have gay rights included in the constitution.

For more information, please see:

Advocate.com – Ugandan Parliament Revisits Kill-The-Gays Bill – 25 October 2011

AllAfrica.com – Zimbabwe: Prime Minister Criticised for Supporting Gays – 25 October 2011

San Diego Gay & Lesbian News – “Kill the Gays Bill” returns, passage could be “imminent” – 25 October 2011

The New York Times – Uganda: Anti-Gay Bill Is Revived – 25 October 2011

Bikya Masr – Uganda gay activist wins human rights award – 15 October 2011

US Sends Troops to Assist Removing LRA

By Carolyn Abdenour
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

KAMPALA, Uganda – On Friday, 14 October, President Obama reported that he sent 100 U.S. troops to Uganda to hunt the leaders of the Lord’s Resistance Army (“LRA”).  President Obama said this notoriously violent group “has murdered, raped, and kidnapped tens of thousands of men, women and children in central Africa.”  The LRA has also forced boys to fight and used girls as sex slaves.

LRA leader Joseph Kony is wanted by the ICC. (Photo Courtesy of BBC)

The troops act as advisers to support the regional forces striving to remove head of LRA, Joseph Kony, and his advisers from the battlefield.  President Obama deployed these troops to further U.S. national security interests and foreign policy along with countering LRA efforts in central Africa.

LRA has killed over 2,400 and abducted more than 3,400 people since 2008.  LRA activity has displaced over 380,000 people in the region.  Formed in the 1980s, LRA engaged in a twenty-year war in northern Uganda and its neighboring countries.

Although the U.S. has provided over $40 million along with logistical support, non-lethal equipment, and training and intelligences assistance to support regional efforts to remove the LRA since 2008, the effort has been unsuccessful.

On Wednesday, President Obama deployed the forces to “provide information, advice and assistance to select partner nations.”  The combat-equipped troops will only engage LRA forces as a self-defense necessity.  With each country’s approval, the troops, primarily comprised of Special Operations Forces, will deploy to Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

President Obama did not comment on the deployment duration, but a U.S. military spokesperson said, “Forces are prepared to stay as long as necessary to enable regional security forces to carry on independently”.

The International Criminal Court (“ICC”) issued arrest warrants for Kony and four close aides in 2005 for crimes against humanity and war crimes.  In 2008, Kony refused to sign a peace deal with the Ugandan government because the agreement would not guarantee withdrawal of the ICC arrest warrants.

Uganda’s acting foreign minister Henry Okello Oryem reported he welcomed the U.S. troops now, but the region has begged the Americans and Europeans to help fight these international terrorists for twenty years.

The 34 LRA-affected groups in northern Congo, Central African Republic, and Southern Sudan communicated their appreciation to President Obama’s commitment to address this problem in December through a letter.

Their letter stated, “Each day that goes by without a solution to the problem of the LRA is another day of terror and pain for those of us living under constant threat of renewed attacks . . . .  During these attacks, our family members were killed in unimaginably savage ways: their heads crushed with clubs or machetes; their faces disfigured; and their genitals, mouths, ears, legs and arms cut off, for no reason other than to terrorize.”

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Uganda: US Help Against Rebels Overdue – 15 Oct 2011

Xinhua – Obama Sends US Military to Help Fight Lord’s Resistance Army – 15 Oct 2011

BBC – US to Send Troops to Uganda to Help Fight LRA Rebels – 14 Oct 2011

CNN – Obama Orders U.S. Troops to help chase down African ‘Army’ Leader – 14 Oct 2011