Asia

Top Chinese Official Pays a Visit to Taiwan

By Brian Lanciault
Impunity Watch Senior Desk Operator, Asia

TAIPEI, Taiwan–China’s top official in charge of relations with self-ruled Taiwan said on Friday that he understood and respected the choices of its people.  He was met by noisy protests in the traditionally anti-China far southern region of the island.

Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (left) and Yu Zhengsheng, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference meet and discuss relations between the two nations. (Photo Courtesy of Focus Taiwan)

Zhang Zhijun, director of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, is making his first trip to Taiwan, a visit marked by a highly unusual meeting with an opposition party stalwart and mayor of the pro-independence southern port of Kaohsiung, Chen Chu.

Protesters waved placards deriding Zhang as a “communist bandit”. Zhang’s atypical charm offensive in Taiwan stands in contrast to China’s ties with several other countries in Asia where territorial disputes have erupted over maritime boundaries. China has recently condemned people in the former British colony of Hong Kong, which returned to China in 1997, for pushing for greater democracy.

Chen has previously visited China and met Zhang there, spearheading efforts by the Democratic Progressive Party to engage with Beijing.  Such high-level meetings in Taiwan with opposition figures are practically unheard of.

“We know that Taiwan people cherish very much the social system and the life style they have chosen,” Zhang said after meeting Chen. “We in mainland China respect what Taiwanese people have chosen.”

China welcomes people from all parties to help improve relations across the Taiwan Strait, Zhang added, calling his talks with Chen “pleasant”.

China has claimed Taiwan as its own, to be taken by force if necessary, though the two have been ruled separately since defeated Nationalist forces fled to the island in 1949 at the end of the Chinese civil war with the Communists. China says it will not tolerate a de jure independent Taiwan. Many Taiwanese look anxiously, and perhaps fearfully, at China, where the ruling Communist Party remains unmoved by calls for political liberalization. Taiwan is a structured democracy after undergoing a democratic transition in the 1980s. Pride in democracy has helped to reinforce the unwillingness of many Taiwanese to be absorbed politically by China.

That sentiment is felt particularly keenly in Kaohsiung, one of the main heartlands of Taiwanese cultural identity and where, in 1979, rights activists held a pivotal rally which helped spark Taiwan’s eventual democratic transition.

“It’s been a very difficult journey that Taiwan has gone through in the past few decades,” Zhang said.

Chen, who was deeply involved in Taiwan’s struggle for democracy, said she explained to Zhang that the protests he may have witnessed were part of Taiwan’s political system.

“I told director Zhang that as soon as he arrived at the airport, he may have heard very different voices and protest. I said this is a very normal part of Taiwan’s democracy. I appreciate if he can understand that,” Chen said.

In 2009, China reacted angrily at plans to show a documentary about exiled Uighur leader Rebiya Kadeer, a woman China labels a dangerous separatist, at the Kaohsiung film festival, sparking a boycott of the city by Chinese tourists. At the time Chen shrugged off China’s complaints, saying it would harm Kaohsiung’s commitment to human rights if it gave in to Beijing.

Underscoring the depth of feelings in southern Taiwan, Zhang was met by hundreds of protesters at Kaohsiung’s train station, some waving placards reading “Communist Zhang Zhijun, get the hell back to China”.

A much smaller group of protesters also greeted him when he flew into Taipei on Wednesday.

“Chen Chu should face the demands of the people and the values of human rights and refrain from the pursuit of economic growth at the expense of Taiwan’s hard-earned democratic achievements,” said Chen Yin-ting, part of another group of protesters outside the venue where Zhang and Chen held their unprecedented meeting.

The once heavily industrialized Kaohsiung has lost many of its companies and factories to China, drawn away by a massive population and low manufacturing costs, and it has struggled economically in recent years.

Zhang’s trip comes at a sensitive time.

Protesters occupied Taiwan’s parliament and mounted mass demonstrations over three weeks starting in March in anger at a pending trade pact, which will open various sectors in both economies. The opposition calls the pact a threat to Taiwan’s industry and sovereignty

Signed a year ago, it has stalled in Taiwan’s parliament, which is set to discuss it at a session overlapping with Zhang’s visit. Advocates, including the China-friendly President Ma Ying-jeou, say it is a step to normalizing ties and will provide jobs and raise living standards.

For more information, please see:

Taipei Times– China respects Taiwan’s choice: Zhang –28 June 2014

The China Post– Kaohsiung mayor meets TAO minister –28 June 2014

Focus Taiwan– Taipei mayor talks of ROC during Beijing visit –27 June 2014

Reuters– China official met by protests, says respects Taiwan’s choices –27 June 2014

Thailand Received the Lowest Grade on U.S. Human Trafficking Report

By Hojin Choi

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

 

BANGKOK, Thailand – The U.S. Human Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report downgraded Thailand to “Tier 3,” the lowest level. Tier 3 also includes over 20 other countries, such as North Korea, Syria, Iran, Malaysia, and so forth. The report is released by the Department of State annually.

Thailand maintained its rank in Tier 2 in 2009, but dropped to Tier 2 Watch List in 2010. The lowest, Tier 3, indicates that the government does not fully comply with the minimum standard set forth in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and that it is not even making significant efforts to do so. When a country is classified in Tier 3, the U.S. government imposes penalties by placing restrictions on bilateral assistance, including non-humanitarian and non-trade-related foreign assistance. The U.S. may also oppose assistance from international financial institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

In the report, Thailand is reported as a “source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking.” The majority of trafficking victims are “forced, coerced, or defrauded into labor or exploited in the sex trade.” The number of labor trafficking victims is also concentrated into commercial fishing and fishing-related industries. The report says some victims are “forced to beg on the streets.”

The human trafficking problems in Thailand became more known to the world when the Guardian, an English news media, revealed the slave labor in Thai fishing industries in June. The media had investigated a lead for six months regarding “20-hour shifts, regular beatings, torture, and execution-style killings.” The article says some workers were offered methamphetamines to keep them working, and their products are being sold to top global retailers, including U.S.-based Walmart and Costco, French-based Carrefour, and U.K.-based Tesco.

Migrant laborers in Thailand (CNN)

The Thai government appears concerned about the TIP report. Early this year, the Thai government entered a contract with leading U.S. law firm, Holland & Knight, LLP.  The deal called for lobbying to the White House, Congress, and the U.S. Department of State. The contract was intended to persuade these institutions and posit a defense that Thailand is fighting against human trafficking problems.

The Thai government expressed its regret that the TIP report did not recognize the nation-wide efforts to fight against the human trafficking problems. In a statement, one government spokesperson said “Thailand made significant advances in prevention and suppression of human trafficking along the same lines as the State Department’s standards.” According to the Thai government, combatting human trafficking is a “national priority” and human trafficking is “anathema” to the nation’s core values.

Vijavat Isarabhakdi, the Thai Ambassador to the U.S., said in the interview with CNN that 225 defendants were convicted in 2013 for human trafficking. This number represents over four times more than the previous year’s defendants. “I think that we’ve been doing a lot, but we acknowledge the fact that much more needs to be done,” he said.

However, according to the TIP report, it is questionable whether the government’s efforts could indeed have a remedial effect, citing “corruption at all levels.” Some government officials have protected brothels and industries from raids and inspections. Local and national police officers often make protective relationships with the traffickers. Immigration officials and police “reportedly extorted money or sex from Burmese migrants detained in Thailand for immigration violations and sold Burmese migrants unable to pay labor brokers and sex traffickers,” the report said.

 

For more information, please see:

U.S. Department of State – Trafficking in Persons Report 2014

CNN – Tackling Thailand’s human trafficking problem – 21 June 2014

The Guardian – Revealed: Asian slave labour producing prawns for supermarkets in US, UK – 10 June 2014

The Guardian – Thai government condemned in annual US human trafficking report – 20 June 2014

Bangkok Post – Washington downgrades Thailand over human trafficking – 20 June 2014

The New York Times – U.S. Gives Thailand and Malaysia Lowest Grade on Human Trafficking – 20 June 2014

Afghan Presidential Runoff Peppered with Over 150 Terror Attacks

By Hojin Choi

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

 

KABUL, Afhanistan – Voting in the Afghan presidential runoff ended Saturday. The runoff is to elect a successor to Hamid Karzai, who has been in office since 2001. In the first round of the election on April 5, former Foreign Affairs Minister Abdullah Abdullah received 45% of the vote, while former Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani received 31.6%. The next president will be determined by a runoff because no candidate received more than 50% of the initial votes.

Ink on the finger indicates that a person has voted in Afghanistan’s presidential runoff election. According to election officials, Nearly 40% of voters were women (CNN)

Abdullah joined the 2009 Presidential Election and lost to Karzai. He dropped out after the first round as a means of protest, alleging large-scale voting fraud. He served as Foreign Affairs Minister under the Karzai regime, but recently positioned himself as a political opponent to Karzai. A week before the runoff, Abdullah narrowly escaped an assassination attempt.

Ghani, another lead candidate, was a senior World Bank Economist. He gave up his U.S. citizenship to run for the 2009 Presidential Election. He also served as Finance Minister in Karzai’s administration and worked as an advisor to Karzai. Abdullah’s camp criticized him for lacking Afghan street credibility.

The runoff went on amid violence and Taliban attacks. During the election period, the Taliban abducted and executed a candidate for provincial council and nine of his supporters. They went on to attack an election commission office in Kabul causing the death of a provincial council candidate, several workers, and police officers. The Ministry of Interior was attacked by a suicide bomber, and 6 police officers died.

The Taliban’s attacks continued even after the voting ended. The Afghan authority said a roadside bomb killed 11 people, including three election workers Saturday night after the polls closed. The victims were going home from the polling center and riding a mini bus when the bomb detonated. Afghan Deputy Interior Minister said there were nearly 150 attacks throughout the country on the Election Day, and at least 46 people were killed, including civilians and security forces.

The purpose of attacks seems to be obvious as the Taliban officially announced that they would target voting. The continuous attacks have caused widespread public fear, and possibly resulted in lower voter turnout. On the day of runoff, the Taliban insurgents cut the index fingers of 11 voting participants. Most of them were the elderly returning home after their voting, and their inked fingers were the sign of their participation in the election.

The Taliban insurgents attacked and cut the index fingers of 11 voters (AP)

Nevertheless, voter turnout remained around that of the first round, approximately 6 to 7 million, even though exact numbers were not immediately made available. The election could mark the first democratic transfer of government power in Afghanistan. Some critics suggested that the Taliban’s attacks were motivated by desperation and a fear of losing its power as a shadow state.

According to the Election Commission, official results of the runoff election will be announced July 22.

 

For more information please see:

CNN – Voting ends in Afghan presidential runoff – 14 June 2014

CNN – Roadside bomb kills 11 in Afghanistan, including election workers – 15 June 2014

Washington Post – This Afghan election could be historic. Or fraud and rivalries could cause chaos – 13 June 2014

BBC – Afghan election: Run-off vote held amid violence – 14 June 2014

BBC – Afghan election: Taliban ‘removed voters’ fingers’ – 15 June 2014

25th Anniversary of China’s Tiananmen Square Protests

By Hojin Choi

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

 

BEIJING, China – June 4th marked the 25th anniversary of Tiananmen Square Protests, also known as the “89’ Democracy Movement” or “Tiananmen Square Massacre.” In 1989, student-led protesters, seeking political reform, occupied Tiananmen Square in Beijing for seven weeks and received broad support from city residents. They were forcibly suppressed by military troops with AK-47s and other assault weaponry, causing thousands of death and injuries. The death toll reflects estimates by various human rights groups, as the government has never released an official report.

On the eve of the 25th anniversary, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lei Hong defended the 1989 crackdown saying it was the right path for the sake of the people.

“In the last three decades and more of reform and opening up, China’s enormous achievements in social and economic development have received worldwide attention. The building of democracy and the rule of law have continued to be perfected,” said Hong.

Hong elaborated that “in China, there are only law breakers . . . there are no so-called dissidents.”

The Washington Post reported that it was a “quiet day” with “no trace of remembrance” in Tiananmen Square.

Many young students said they have no memory of the event, and some others even appeared too afraid to respond. The government has “effectively quashed” the public memory.

As the 25th anniversary approached, the security around the square greatly increased. Police officers were stationed every hundred feet or so throughout the streets, and patrolled the square continuously. According to state media, government officials mobilized thousands of informants to lookout for any suspicious behavior. Foreign journalists were warned and directed away from the square, and passers-by were searched.

Tiananmen Square was tightly guarded on the 25th anniversary (Feng Li/Getty Images)

The internet also saw a surge in censorship. According to the Los Angeles Times, even messages including the number “25” were banned from social networking sites on the date of the anniversary. Creative internet-users instead referred to June 4th as “May 35.” As the anniversary approached, even words like “tomorrow” or “today” were banned.

Chinese news media largely ignored the anniversary; but foreign news media and governments gave due attention.

“Twenty-five years later, the United States continues to honor the memories of those who gave their lives in and around Tiananmen Square and throughout China, and we call on Chinese authorities to account for those killed, detained or missing in connection with the events surrounding June 4, 1989,” the White House announced. The United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, demandedthat China release the pro-democracy activists and dissidents who were recently detained prior to the anniversary. China’s Foreign Ministry responded, calling the statement “a grave intervention of China’s judicial sovereignty and internal affairs.”

In opposition to the silence in Beijing, tens of thousands of people gathered with candle lights for the commemoration in Hong Kong. The vigil organizer estimated the number of participants at 180,000 while the police estimated a more conservative 99,500.

The Victoria Park Candlelight Vigil has been held every year since 1989. In past years, the vigil was dominated by people ages 40 or older, who remember the event in 1989. But, the New York Times reported that the crowd seemed to be “visibly younger” than previous years.

The Candlelight Vigil in Hong Kong (Reuters)
The organizers expected the record number of participants gathering in Victoria Park in Hong Kong (Reuters)

 

 

For more information please see:

Los Angeles Times – Few visitors, heavy security as China marks Tiananmen Square anniversary – 4 June 2014

Los Angeles Times – Marking 25th anniversary of China’s Tiananmen Square takes creativity – 3 June 2014

BBC News – Beijing tense on Tiananmen massacre anniversary – 4 June 2014

The New York Times – Crowds Gather in Hong Kong for Anniversary of Tiananmen Crackdown – 4 June 2014

The Washington Post – In Tiananmen Square, no trace of remembrance on 25th anniversary of protests – 4 June 2014

Reuters – China defends Tiananmen crackdown on eve of 25th anniversary – 3 June 2014

Sri Lankan Government Rejects Devolution of Power That Would Ease Tensions with Tamil Minority

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch Managing Editor

SRI JAYAWARDENEPURA KOTTE, Sri Lanka – On Wednesday the government of Sri Lanka once again rejected a policy devolving police powers to the nation’s providence as requested by India’s new government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and required by the Sri Lankan Constitution as a means of easing tensions with the state’s Tamil minority.

Sri Lanka’s President Mahinda Rajapaksa (in white) takes part in a War Victory parade in Matara May 18, 2014 celebrating the end of the Sri Lankan Civil War. Rajapaksa has been criticized by the international community for his government’s failure to investigate alleged war crimes committed during the country’s 26 year civil war. (Photo courtesy of Refuters)

Sri Lanka reached an agreement with the Indian government in 1987 to devolve powers, including power over policing and land, to regional governments as a means to improve relations between the Tamil minority and Sinhalese majority in Sri Lanka. “Police power is important for provinces to maintain law and order,” Primus Siraiva, a northern Provincial Councillor, said. “Otherwise, there could be lawlessness in provinces and the Provincial Council won’t be able to control it.”

Sri Lankan External Affairs Minister G.L Peiris told Parliament that President Mahinda Rajapaksa did not have an in depth discussion on constitutional issues during his meetings Modi. Last week during a meeting between Modi and Rajapaksa, the Indian prime minister stressed the need for the complete implementation of the 13th amendment of the Sri Lankan constipation which was intended to grant more political recognition to the Tamil people, even recognizing Tamil as an official state language.

The Sri Lankan government design to keep policing powers out of the hands of local authorities, including the Tamil minority, is a sign that tensions between the government and Tamil population remain high five years after the end of the Sri Lankan Civil War which ended in 2009.

The Sri Lankan Civil war, which raged on for more than a quarter century left more than 100,000 people dead and thousands more, mainly front the minority Tamil population in the North, are still missing. During the Civil war Tamil rebels fought for a homeland in the country’s northern region. Ethnic Tamils have faced discrimination in Sri Lanka for decades; while many Tamils are indigenous to the island many more were brought to the island by British Colonists to work on tea farms and were seen by members of the Sinhalese population as foreigners who had taken Sinhalese land.

Last month President Rajapaksa, who is under international pressure to investigate war crimes in the battle after the United Nations approved an international probe into the war crimes allegedly committed by both Sri Lankan state forces and members of the Tamil Tigers during the conflict. Members of Minority ethnic Tamils said they had been banned from commemorating the deaths of their relatives five years ago in the final battle of the war with Sri Lanka’s military, a charge denied by the army.

For more information please see:

Al Jazeera – Sri Lanka Says No to Devolution of Powers – 5 June 2014

Reuters – Sri Lanka Again Rejects Devolving Police Powers to Ease Tension With Tamils – 4 June 2014

Reuters – Tamils Say Barred From Commemorating War Dead, Sri Lanka Denies – 18 May 2014

BBC News – Sri Lanka Blocks Tamil Memorials amid War Parade – 18 May 2014

Government of Sri Lanka – Thirtieth Amendment to the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka – 14 November 1987