Asia

20 Dead in Religious Clash Between Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

MEIKHTILA, Myanmar – Myanmar declared a state of emergency on Friday and imposed martial law in four districts, including the city of Meikhtila, after violence broke out between Buddhists and Muslims.

Riot police attempt to restore calm and control in Meikhtila. (Photo courtesy of Reuters)

A police report said the clash between the two religious groups started after a Buddhist couple had an argument with a Muslim gold shop owner.  The argument took a turn for the worse and sparked an eruption of violence involving hundreds of people.

At least twenty people have been killed so far and dozens more have been wounded.  One of the casualties was a Buddhist monk.  Thousands of other bystanders have been displaced from their homes due to the conflict and two camps have been set up to house the victims.

Mobs of Buddhists marched through Meikhtila’s Muslim districts with torches burning down Muslim homes and other establishments.  Myanmar’s state run television reported mosques burning in Yamethin along with 50 more homes.  Mosques and other Muslim buildings in Lewei and Naypyitaw were also set on fire.

Local residents in the affected cities and districts had complained that there were not enough local police forces to quell the unrest.  Myanmar President Thein Sein sent in national military forces to take charge of security.  An overnight curfew was also imposed to improve safety for the citizens.

Ethnic and religious tensions had been simmering underneath the surface of Myanmar’s communities during 49 years of military rule which ceased in March of 2011.  The military rule had quashed all dissent and kept conflicts in check.  The fledgling democracy is now challenged with the task of unifying one of Asia’s most ethnically diverse countries.

Myanmar is largely Buddhist; however, roughly 5 percent of the 60 million residents are Muslim.  Historically, there are well established and long standing Muslims communities in Yangon and Mandalay, two of Myanmar’s largest cities.

This most recent outbreak of violence is similar to the conflict between Rahkine Buddhists and Muslim Rohingya last year in western Myanmar that affected and displaced more than 100,000 residents.  Human rights groups had warned that the western conflict could spread to other parts of the country.

In a separate incident last year, Buddhist monks held rallies against Muslims in the central part of Myanmar near the city of Mandalay.  The current conflict is described by locals as “unpredictable and dangerous.”

Many residents of Meikhtila, where the fighting was the worse, do not feel safe in their own communities.  An estimated 6000 residents have already fled their homes, including 1200 Muslims and have taken refuge at a police station and a large event stadium.

For further information, please see:

Charlotte Observer – Buddhists-Muslims violence spreads in Myanmar – 24 March 2013

Tulsa World News – Sectarian violence kills 20 in Myanmar; state of emergency declared – 23 March 2013

Reuters – Myanmar riots stoke fears of widening sectarian violence – 22 March 2013

Daily Mail – Myanmar riots stoke fears of widening sectarian violence – 21 March 2013

U.N. Passes Resolution Urges Independent Investigation of Sri Lankan Civil War

By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

Sri Jayawardenapura Kotte, Sri Lanka – On Thursday, the United Nations’ Human Rights Council passed a resolution censuring Sri Lanka’s record.  In 2009, Sri Lanka’s military defeated separatist Tamil rebels after a brutal 26-year war; however, the war’s final phase is under heavy scrutiny.

A Sri Lankan Tamil woman holds a portrait of a missing relative. (Photo Courtesy of The Guardian)

Twenty-five countries voted in favor of the resolution, thirteen against, and eight absented.

The resolution urges Sri Lanka to implement an independent and credible inquiry into the alleged war crimes.

The Sri Lankan government has contended that its own investigation in 2011 should suffice. The Sri Lankan commission report cleared government forces of any violations. Despite the government’s report, human rights believe that Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s administration has ignored prior demands for accountability and has delayed implementing the limited recommendations.

According to BBC News, during the United Nations’ Human Rights Council’s proceedings, representatives from Sri Lanka criticized the resolution for jeopardizing the current reconciliation process. Representatives also alleged that the Unites States is targeting countries that do not conform to its “political agenda.”

The resolution echoes the concern over recent Buddhist attacks on Muslims and Christians. It also recognizes development in reforming infrastructure and mentions “considerable work lies ahead in the areas of justice, reconciliation and the resumption of livelihoods.”

Amnesty International stated that the resolution highlighted violation rights but failed to create an independent and international inquiry into the issue.

Other concerns include concern over extra-judicial killings, disappearances, torture, threats to the rule of law, intimidation of civil society activists and journalists, and religious discrimination.

According to T. K. Elangovan, a DMK spokesman, the Sri Lankan government has not met commitments to rehabilitate its Tamil population.  “It is the moral duty of the government of India to see that these assurances were fulfilled or else to put pressure on the government of Sri Lanka to see these assurances are kept up. Why India is a silent spectator,” inquired Mr. Elangovan.

Keheliya Rambukwella, Sri Lanka’s media minister, stated that that matter has been blown up out of proportion. “As long as there are extreme elements in the world you have these things, in even the most five-star democracies,” said Rambukwella.

For further information, please see:

ABC News – Sri Lanka Criticizes UN Resolution on War Abuses – 22 March 2013

BBC News – UN passes resolution against Sri Lanka rights record – 21 March 2013

Voice of America – UN Vote on Sri Lankan Civil War Threatens Indian Government – 19 March 2013

 

 

High Court in the Philippines Delays Implementing the Responsible Parenthood Law

By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

MANILLA, Philippines – On Tuesday, a decision by the Philippines’ highest court delayed the implementation of a reproductive health law providing free access to contraception and family planning.

Catholic Church not in favor of the “Contraception law.” (Photo Courtesy of BBC News)

According to The Washington Post, the court voted 15-5 in favor of 10 separate petitions to stop the implementation of the Responsible Parenthood Law and pend oral arguments until June 18th.

This law requires government health centers to offer universal and free access to most forms of contraceptives to everyone, particularly the Philippines’s poorer citizens, who comprise a third of its population. Prior to the Responsible Parenthood Law, access to contraceptives was expensive and contingent upon the political affiliation of one’s local government. The law also mandates sexual education in public schools.

While advocates of the Responsible Parenthood Law believe that it should be implemented to combat poverty and maternal mortality, petitioners questioning the law’s legality welcomed the high court’s decision.

On December 29, 2012, President Benigno Aquino signed the law after 14 years of campaigning by public health and women activists groups. Edwin Lacierda, the spokeman for the President Aquino, stated that the government respects the high court’s decision and is confident about supporting the law’s merits.

The country has a population of 94 million, 80% of whom are Catholic, and one of Asia’s highest birth rates.

The Responsible Parenthood Law has received much opposition from conservative groups in the country and the Catholic Church.

“For me it’s a good sign, a victory for those who are against the law,” said Bishop Arturo Bastes of Sorsogon.  According to CNN News, Bishop Arturo Bastes believed that Pope Francis, who was officially inaugurated on the same day of the court’s ruling, would be happy to hear of the delay.

According to Mellisa Upreti, a regional director at U.S. based Center for Reproductive Rights for Asia, the Filipino government made a few concessions in deference to the Catholic Church.

For instance, the law did not legalize all forms of contraceptives, including emergency forms of contraception. The Responsible Parenthood Law also contains a measure that permits private and religious-influenced hospitals, the leading providers of health care in the country, to refuse reproductive health services based upon its religious objections.

Despite these concessions, its opponents are still concerned.  However, the Responsible Parenthood Law has its supporters.

Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago believes that the law is necessary to help people in the Philippines “escape the vicious cycle of poverty by giving them options on how to manage their sexual lives, plan their families and control their procreative activities.”

The court will reexamine the law in 120 days.

For further information, please see:

CNN News – Top Philippine court hits pause on divisive contraception law – 20 March 2013

BBC News – Philippine high court delays contraception law – 19 March 2013

Washington Post – Philippine top court halts contraceptives law until it hears arguments over religion, abortion – 19 March 2013

 

 

 

Police in India Arrest Local Tribesmen Suspected of Raping a Swiss Tourist

By Irving Feng
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

Local Indian police arrested five or six young men who allegedly gang raped a Swiss female tourist on Friday, bringing into question India’s commitment to providing adequate safety to women within its borders.

The suspects of the alleged rape from the local Kanjar tribe. (Photo Courtesy of BBC)

The Swiss woman, age 39, was vacationing with her husband when the gruesome crime occurred.  She and her husband were engaged in a 250 kilometer (roughly 155 miles) biking adventure tour from Orchha to Agra to visit the Taj Mahal when they stopped to camp near Sewda road.

They set up camp in a forested area, and the suspected perpetrators invaded their camp area during the night.  The men beat the woman’s husband with wooden sticks, and some of the men sexually assaulted and brutally raped the woman in front of her husband while he was tied up to a tree.

The suspects were reportedly carrying a firearm at the time of the assault.  Police say that the attackers also stole some of the pair’s valuables including cellular phones, laptop computer, and around 10,000 rupees ($185).

The young men suspected of committed the crime were all members of a local tribe known as the Kanjar from the village of Jharia in the Datia district.  Police checked the criminal history of the men and found their records to be clean.  Their ages ranged from 20 to 25.

The couple has made it safely to the Swiss embassy in New Delhi.  The Swiss Ministry for Foreign Affairs released a statement to the press indicating that there is an extreme interest in rectifying the situation for their two citizens, and a course of action will be implemented in due time.

The Swiss government had recently issued a travel warning last month to all tourists travelling to India regarding the alarming number of rapes and other sexual attacks occurring throughout the country.  Other countries may be prompted to release similar warnings to their general publics in the near future.

This newest incident involving a foreign victim comes at a time when sexual crimes in India are on the rise.  The National Crime Records Bureau suggests that roughly one woman is raped every 20 minutes in their country.

After last December’s brutal rape and murder of a physiotherapy student in Delhi, protestors took to the streets to demonstrate and called for the perpetrators to be sentenced to death.  India’s legislature has recently implemented harsher punishments for the crime of rape, increasing the prison terms from seven to ten years to a maximum of 20 years.

For further information, please see:

BBC – Six held over India rape of Swiss woman – 18 March 2013

The Times of India – 5 arrested for Swiss woman’s gang-rape – 18 March 2013

The Huffington Post – Five Men Arrested In Gang-Rape Of Swiss Woman In India – 17 March 2013

Reuters –  Six arrested for gang-raping Swiss tourist in India: police – 17 March 2013

Thai Navy Denies Shooting Rohingya Refugees

By Karen Diep
Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

BANGKOK, Thailand – Yesterday, the Thai Navy denied reports of its members opening fire at a boat last February containing 20 Rohingya Muslim refugees, resulting in the deaths of at least two of the asylum seekers.

Rohingya refugees fleeing on boats. (Photo Courtesy of BBC News)

According to Voice of America, in recent months, thousands of Rohingyas are fleeing the ethnic turmoil and state-sponsored discrimination in Western Burma. As a result, many are traveling by boat to Malaysia and ending up on the West coast of Thailand.

“[N]o [Thai] navy officer could be that ruthless,” said Thai Navy commander Admiral Surasak Rounroengrom.

Mr. Surasak continued to state that the Thai Navy possessed no reason to kill the Rohingya refugees because they were not an enemy.

Although Thailand has refused to accept most of the refugees, it has ordered its navy to stop these boats to provide them with supplies.

“Since the policy is to push them back out to sea, we provide humanitarian aid with food and water, medicine and gas for them to continue their journey. All we do is help them, even fixing their boats [if necessary], before sending them back on their way,” continued Mr. Surasak.

However, according to BBC News, eyewitnesses said otherwise.  Witnesses informed human rights groups that they saw several bodies in the water and even protected some of these refugees during and after the February incident.

“Navy personnel fired into the air three times and told us not to move,” relayed one of the Rohungya refugees to Human Rights Watch (HRW), “But we were panicking and jumped off the boat, and then they opened fire at us in the water.”

Although the spokesperson for the United Nations refugee agency, Vivian Tan, can neither confirm nor deny the events last month, she stated that her agency is worried about the fate of Rohingya refugees.

“U.N.H.C.R. has been advocating that people fleeing persecution should be able to be processed in the country or territory where they arrive.  So, they should not be pushed off for sure,” said Ms. Tan, “They should definitely not be sent back to a place where their lives could be in danger.”

Historically, Thai officials have been suspect of dragging refugee boats that end up in Thai waters out to sea and leave them to die.  Furthermore, they have been accused of selling on asylum seekers to human traffickers.

According to BBC’s South East Asia correspondent Jonathan Head, Thai authorities are rarely held accountable for these allegations regardless of their promise to investigate such incidents.

For further information, please see:

BBC News – Thai Navy Denies Shooting Rohingya Refugee – 15 March 2013

The United Press International – Thais Deny Firing on Rohingya Refugees – 14 March 2013

Voice of America – Fleeing Rohingya Refugees Fired Upon, Says Rights Group – 13 March 2013