Europe

Dutch “Abortion Ship” Sparks Protests in Morocco

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands – “Women on Waves” (WoW), a Dutch organization that provides abortions and contraception information outside territorial waters, was met with harsh protests in Morocco on Thursday.

Moroccan citizens watch as “abortion boat” arrives. (Photo Courtesy of The Raw Story).

“Women on Waves” is a nonprofit organization, founded in 1999 by Dutch physician Rebecca Gomperts, that provides abortions to women in countries where abortions are illegal.

WoW’s travel to Morocco is the first trip into a Muslim country. The pro-choice organization also planned trips to Ireland, Poland, Portugal and Spain.

Although a local youth group, the Alternative Movement for Individual Liberties, invited the Dutch organization to raise support for the legalization of abortion in the country, Moroccan protesters targeted the Dutch abortion-rights activist at a port where the WoW ship was expected to dock.

Protesters carried pictures of bloody embryos and screamed words such as, “terrorist” and “assassin.” Police  were eventually forced to block persistent protesters as they tried to get closer to the activists. The Moroccan government maintains that the Dutch boat was not permitted to visit, abortion is illegal in the majority of cases in Morocco, and it also is forbidden to give out information about the medical procedures.

Abdelmaik Zaza, a Moroccan lawyer, stated, “Moroccan law forbids abortion. Moroccan religious identity says it is forbidden and so does Islam. So the government cannot allow this ship to come to Morocco.”

In addition, Chafik Chraibi, head of a Moroccan NGO that believes abortions should be performed legally, also resisted the Dutch abortion boat’s visit. He says, “It’s true that the initiative is symbolic, to defend the rights of women to have abortions, but to practice abortion at sea, in international waters, is for me a way of circumventing the law and is something clandestine.”

WoW argues that the purpose of the visit is to offer women “safe legal medical abortions” in a country where the practice is illegal and taboo. WoW also intends to set up hotlines to inform women about safe medical abortions.

Doctor Rebecca Gomperts, the founder of “Women on Waves”, supports her cause by determining around 600 to 800 Moroccan women have an abortion every day. She says, “The problem is that only about 200 cases are done properly, by women who have money. This leads to the deaths of 78 Moroccan women each year on average.”

However, Hannan Idrissa, a member of a Moroccan pro-life group was quoted saying, “The figures on abortion are not right.”

For further information, please see:

The Huffington Post — Dutch Abortion Ship: ‘Women on Waves’ Boat Heads For Morocco – 4 October 2012

International Business Times — Dutch ‘Abortion Boat’ Is Blocked From Entering Morocco – 4 October 2012

The Raw Story — Moroccans voice opposition to Dutch ‘abortion boat’ – 3 October 2012

BBC News — Dutch abortion boat heads to Morocco – 1 October 2012

 

Magnitsky’s Mother Slams the Government’s Cover-Up in Prosecution of Prison Doctor Kratov

Press Release
Hermitage Capital

2 October 2012 – Natalia Magnitskaya, the mother of the late Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, today called on the Russian court to accept new evidence showing the complicity of a large group of Russian law enforcement officials in the torture and killing of her son, and to send the case back to prosecutors.

In her testimony at the Tverskoi District Court in Moscow this morning, Mrs. Magnitskaya gave evidence that the indictment issued by Russian investigators against Dmitry Kratov, a former deputy head of Butyrka prison, does not contain certain critical factual and documentary evidence linking other officials to the crime against her son. Under the Russian criminal procedural code, the court is bound by the scope of the indictment in issuing its sentence and this ommision by the prosecutors would lead to a drastically more lenient sentence.

In her court testimony against Kratov, Natalia Magnitskaya made the following statements:

“In accordance with the law, the victim is entitled to represent and support the prosecution, but in this situation, I am deprived of this right because I cannot support this accusation – the information contained in the case files available to the investigators make it clear that Dmitry Kratov was not the only culprit as the indictment suggests. In these circumstances I ask the court to make the only possible just and lawful decision – to return this criminal case back to the prosecutor and re-open the investigation in light of the new factual circumstances identified by my representative and which the indictment does not include.”

Judge Neverova refused the petition on the grounds that a similar petition had previously been refused from Mrs. Magnitskaya’s lawyer.

“Last time I saw my son alive in the Tverskoi District Court, there were no signs of his fatal condition. That was four days before his death… Who will tell me the truth, what happened to my son during these 4 days? It is in these days and the last hours of his life, which was confirmed by experts, that Sergei suffered injuries from violence,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“My son died not on a deserted street, and not in a dark hallway, he died in a state facility in the presence of many witnesses, and such witnesses were not prisoners, but they were the state officials, doctors and security guards. However, the investigation has been conducted for almost three years by now, and is still very far from completion,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya drew attention to the role of the head of Butyrka detention, Mr Komnov, and his deputy in charge of operational and intelligence activities in custody, Mr Gorchakov, neither of whom have been charged, and instead these officials will be called as witnesses for the prosecution.

“The head of Butyrka detention center Mr Komnov and his deputy Mr. Gorchakov were both responsible for establishing torturous conditions for my son by arranging for numerous illegal transfers between different cells in Butyrka detention center, however, no charges have been brought in relation to them and they now have been invited to the court as witnesses,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya also noted the role of officials at Matrosskaya Tishina detention center and doctor on duty, Alexandra Gaus, who left Magnitsky without any supervision for over an hour when detention center guards used handcuffs and rubber batons on Magnitsky.

“Without any doubt, direct responsibility for the torture of my son and for his brutal murder stays with Dr. Gaus and she should be held criminally liable for this. Despite all of this, investigator Mrs Lomonosova of the Investigative Committee and Deputy Prosecutor General Grin called her to the court as a witness for the prosecution. There have been no changes brought for the committed crime in relation to Dr. Gaus or her accomplices,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs. Magnitskaya recounted her meeting with Dmitry Kratov two months before her son’s death when she requested him to provide medical treatment for her son which he had been systematically denied in custody.

“Based on my personal meeting with Mr Kratov in September 2009, i.e. two months before the death of my son, I have every reason to state that Mr Kratov knew and was aware that by his criminal actions and omission, torturous conditions were created for my son. He was part of this conspiracy and therefore fulfilled his role in the torture of Sergei,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“A young, healthy man who had no medical history in local clinics after being in custody for about a year became sick and had an incredible large number of fatal illnesses…Less than a year after the arrest, state representatives asked me to pick up my son’s mangled body from the morgue, doing it in a way that I was unable to have an independent medical examination of the causes of his death,” added Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Mrs Magnitskaya also highlighted the role of the senior leadership of the Interior Ministry and high ranking officials from the Russian penal system in organizing Magnitsky’s six transfers between detention centers in less than a year.

“Maybe Investigator Silchenko, acting now as “witness for the prosecution”, will be able to explain what his motives were when he signed an illegal decree requesting to execute the forceful delivery of my son to him? On November 24, 2008 the state officials who were the members of investigation group of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Interior Ministry, Mr Ryabinin, Mr Droganov and Mr Krechtov came to my son’s apartment and took him away – young and healthy – forever from his family under a pretext of a criminal case brought by investigator Karpov and the FSB officials,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“Maybe Investigator Silchenko will be able to tell us why my son was transferred six times between different detention facilities within less than one year. Decisions on each such transfers were taken at the federal level, personally by acting Director of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Lt-general Petrukhin, his deputy  General Semeniuk, with direct participation of the Deputy Chief of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Interior Ministry General Logunov and investigator of this committee Mr Silchenko… In total, during his illegal detention, my son was transferred between different cells at least twenty-one times, some transfers were conducted during nights,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

“Sergei died due to violence and torturous conditions that were specifically created for him. This is confirmed by documentary evidence which those who were involved in his death will not be able to hide,” said Mrs. Magnitskaya.

Sergei Magnitsky, an outside lawyer for the Hermitage Fund, was killed in Russian police custody at the age of 37 after he exposed the $230 million theft implicating government officials. He was honored posthumously with 2010 Integrity Award by Transparency International, for his fight against official corruption.

 

For further information please contact:

Hermitage Capital
Phone:             +44 207 440 17 77
E-mail:             info@lawandorderinrussia.org
Website:          http://lawandorderinrussia.org
Facebook:        http://on.fb.me/hvIuVI
Twitter:           @KatieFisher__
Livejournal:     http://hermitagecap.livejournal.com/

Gay Pride Parade Banned in Serbia

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BELGRADE, Serbia – Citing security concerns and called upon to do so by Patriarch Irinej, head of Serbia’s Orthodox Christian Church, Serbia’s Interior Ministry has banned the Belgrade Gay Pride Parade planned for Saturday to cap off Pride Week.

Police clash with anti-gay protestors during the Belgrade Gay Pride Parade in 2010. (Photo Courtesy of Radio Free Europe)

Along with the parade, all other public events scheduled for Saturday have been banned in order to preserve the peace and security of citizens, according to the government.

“Conflicts and victims are the last thing Serbia needs at the moment.  All conditions to ban public meetings scheduled for October 6 are in place, including the rally which is part of the so-called Pride Parade, as well as all rallies against the parade,” said Ivica Dacic, the Serbian Prime Minister and Minister of Interior.

Tensions were heightened on Wednesday afternoon, as 2,000 police in riot gear were deployed to the Center for Cultural Decontamination where a controversial exhibit opened: “Ecce Homo.” the same evening.  The art exhibit received threats from right-wing groups, angry at the exhibit’s portrayal of Jesus Christ.

Serbia has a strong orthodox Christian tradition.  Acceptance of homosexuality has been slow, and many gay rights events have ended in violence.

Patriarch Irinej, called Saturday’s planed parade a “parade of shame” that would cast a “moral shadow” on Serbia.  He characterized it as a threat to Serbia’s centuries-old Christian culture and the model of the heterosexual family as the foundation of humankind.

The LGBT community in Serbia has attempted pride rallies in the past, but has been met with violence, when the rallies were not banned outright.  In 2001, a small gathering was broken up by ultranationalists.  In 2009, gay activists wanted to hold a pride parade, but authorities canceled at the last minute due to safety concerns.

In October 2010, the Pride Parade went forward.  5,000 police in riot gear were deployed to protect a fraction of as many marchers.  They were met with violent right-wing, anti-gay protestors.  About 100 police were injured; dozens of right-wing protestors were arrested.  There was also extensive property damage across the capital Belgrade.

Officials banned the Pride Parade last year, fearing a repeat of violence.

There is concern that the government should be doing more, or is even obstructing reform.  “The state isn’t doing enough to educate, to take a stand,” Aleksandar Skundric, a 28-year-old gay Belgrade native says.  “A lot of politicians said they were eager to take the ‘blame’ for canceling the [2011] pride parade.”

Part of Serbia’s application for European Union membership is a pledge to respect human rights.  However, there is concern by activists that the government, headed by former nationalists, has little interest in protecting the LGBT community.

Goran Miletić, program director of the Civil Rights Defenders and an organizer of the Pride Parade, has condemned the government’s failure to carry out the parade.  “If last year [the decision to ban the pride] represented the capitulation of the state, today it shows an open coalition [of the state] with hooligans because the authorities have fully adopted the arguments of the extremist organizations, as well as their demands,” Miletic said.

Before the parade ban was announced, Miletić had said that the LGBT community “will not just sit” this year, and planned to take certain steps if the parade was banned.

For more information, please see:

B92 – “All Eyes on Serbia Ahead of Gay Pride Parade” –3 October 2012

B92 – Serbian Authorities Decide to Ban Gay Parade – 3 October 2012

Balkan Insight – Serbia Bans Gay Pride Amid Security Concerns – 3 October 2012

Global Post – Serbia Bans Gay Pride Parade – 3 October 2012

The Independent – Gay Pride March Banned in Serbi – 3 October 2012

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – Belgrade Braces Itself for Gay-Pride Parade – 3 October 2012

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – Serbian Officials Ban Gay-Pride Parade – 3 October 2012

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – Serbia Bans Gay Parade, Other Gatherings – 20 September 2011

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – In Serbia, Gay Activists Prepare For the Worst – 10 October 2010

European Parliament Pushes for Gender Equality on ECB

By Alexandra Sandacz
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

BRUSSELS, Belgium – Recently, the European Council and the European Parliament have struggled over the lack of women on the European Central Bank’s governing council.

Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank is on her way to a parliament survey. (Photo Courtesy of Reuters)

Currently, women hold only 17 percent of the top positions in the central banks of the 27-member European Union. Their representation in higher positions falls dramatically and is non-existent at the top levels.

As of 1998, only two women have occupied positions on the ECB’s executive board. Moreover, unless a woman is appointed to the current vacancy, another woman could not be appointed until May 31, 2018, when ECB Vice President, Vitor Constancio, is expected step down.

Although Parliament does not explicitly hold veto power as to the appointment of council members, Parliament questions candidates through public hearings and floor debates. The European Commission and lawmakers at the European Parliament have strived to push for a woman to be a member of the ECB executive board since 2010.

In a letter to the EU governments, various members of the European Parliament wrote, “We notice that the EU member states’ nominations to some of the most important… EU institutions result in an appallingly monotonous line-up of nominees.”

Sylvie Goulard, a European member of parliament, wrote a letter to Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, stating, “At issue is discrimination” and requested “that at least one woman is immediately appointed to the ECB Governing Council.”

In a push to appoint a woman to the ECB executive board, Parliamentarians postponed hearings to fill the seat on the executive board of the European Central Bank because not enough women were promoted as candidates. Also, Parliament continues to delay Luxembourg’s Yves Mersch appointment to the ECB.

In order to achieve their goal, the European Parliament will have to produce a satisfactory candidate because their only authoritative power is a limited legislative power over the European Banking Authority. Consequentially, the European Parliament’s wish to appoint a woman could be ignored.

Ironically, this current gender equality struggle occurs simultaneously as the European Commission plans to introduce a potential requirement for private companies’ non-executive boards to be at least 40 percent female by 2020, otherwise facing fines and other sanctions. Nine European states are opposed to this potential quota plan.

Viviane Reding, the European Union’s justice commissioner, said on Monday, “Thankfully, European laws on important topics like this are not made by 10 men in dark suits behind closed doors, but rather in a democratic process with a democratically elected European Parliament, which will decide on an equal footing with the council.”

For further information, please see:

The Commentator — EU Commission quota plan would violate human rights – 1 October 2012

Spiegel — Europe Battles over Gender Equality at the ECB – 1 October 2012

Reuters — EU parliament steps up push for woman in top ECB role – 25 September 2012

The New York Times — European Central Bank Candidacy Delayed Over Lack of Women – 7 September 2012

Legislation Expanding Treason Definition in Russia Could Criminalize Foreign-funded Organizations

By Madeline Schiesser
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MOSCOW, Russia – Russian Parliament’s State Duma has, in its first reading, unanimously approved a bill that would broaden the definition of treason, equating it to espionage and potentially criminalizing many kinds of international advocacy.   According to rights activists, this legislation appears to be part of a widening crackdown on dissent.  Lawmakers claim that it would make law enforcement more effective.

The Federal Security Service (FSB), successor to the KGB, drafted the legislation widening the definition of treason.

Recently the Kremlin has moved to force the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) out of Russia.  Opposition demonstrators have seen strict criminal charges.  (See Pussy Riots and Osipova.)

In what is seen as the latest crackdown on dissent, the proposed legislation would open up the definition of treason to include financial or consultative assistance to a foreign state or organization.  The definition of high treason would include activities harming Russia’s external security.

This legislation results from Kremlin concern that foreign funding is adverse to the interests of the Russian government.  “We should include international organizations on the list of agents that can be charged with treason due to the fact that foreign intelligence agencies actively use them to camouflage their spying activity,” FSB deputy head Yury Gorbunov told the Duma.

The legislation specifically defines expands treason as “providing financial, technical, advisory or other assistance to a foreign state or international organization . . . directed against Russia’s security, including its constitutional order, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.”

Many Russian non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rely on foreign funding; such funding would be difficult to receive under the new legislation.  NGOs may be further inhibited from working with Russian citizens because the legislation would allow Russian citizens providing assistance to foreign states or international organizations to be charged with treason.

And, a person or group could be charged with high treason and sentenced to up to 20 years in prison if found to be relaying a state secret to a “foreign government or international, foreign organization.”

Environment and Rights Center (ERC) Bellona chairman Alexander Nikitin says, “This is yet another bill from the series of recent laws meant to tighten the noose around the necks of Russia’s citizens, especially those who work with NGOS, who work as journalists, who work as researchers as well as those who work as scientists.”

Furthermore, a law passed in July, which takes effect November 20, requires NGOs, or civil society organizations, that advocate and receive foreign funding to register with the Ministry of Justice as “foreign agents.”  Failure to register carries large fines and closure for the NGO and up to two year’s prison time for employees.  Status as a “foreign agent” must be stated on all literature and websites.  As the term has roots to the Stalinist purges, many NGOs are concerned that the measure is designed to destroy their credibility.

Lyudmila Alekseyeva a human rights advocate of the Moscow Helsinki Group, which has also pledged not to register as a “foreign agent,” said the treason bill is aimed at “ending any independent public activism.”

Veteran rights activist Lev Ponomaryov, pointing to the “very broad definitions of treason and espionage” said the legislation could be used to prosecute government critics.  He explained that “everyone who accidentally becomes aware of secret information can be convicted” and that Russian leaders “have now chosen an ideological course — you can even call it a national idea — to search for external and internal enemies.”

Before the legislation becomes law, it must go through two more readings in the Russian Parliament and be signed by President Putin, who is expected to support it.

For further information, please see:

Human Rights Watch – The Kremlin May Call It Treason – 28 September 2012

Bellona – Russian Parliament Votes in First Reading to Expand Treason Laws – Casting a Darker Shadow on the Future of NGOs – 24 September 2012

The Moscow Times – Treason Bill Gains Momentum – 23 September 2012

The New York Times – Russia Moves to Broaden Definition of High Treason – 21 September 2012

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty – New Russian Bill Would Widen Definition of Treason – 21 September 2012