News

Israeli Soldier is Killed and 11 Civilians Wounded by Palestinian Gunman

By Brittani Howell

Impunity Watch Reporter, The Middle East

JERUSALEM, Israel – As many as 11 people were wounded and one Israeli soldier was killed on Sunday by a Palestinian gunman in a bus station in the Israeli city of Beersheba. The attacker was shot and killed by police in what police described as a drawn out gun battle.

Israeli police officers standing near the body of the Palestinian gunman who shot and killed an Israeli soldier and wounded 11 people. (Photo Courtesy of the New York Times)

An individual who, at the time was believed to be a second attacker, was shot and wounded. The individual was mistaken as an assailant and was not involved in the attack.

Over the past month, 8 Israelis have been killed in random attacks by Palestinians and at least 18 suspected Palestinian attackers have been killed in the 30 attacks against Israel. Palestinians allege that Israel’s security forces are using excessive force. The latest attack is one of the more serious attacks this month.

Israel has erected a concrete wall approximately five meters high between Armon Hanatziv and Jabal Mukaber. The goal was to prevent rocks and petrol bombs from being hurled from Jabel Mukaber, a Palestinian neighborhood, into Armon Hazatziv, a Jewish neighborhood. Emmanuel Nahshon, spokesman for Israel’s foreign ministry, stated, “This has no political meaning.” He continued, “It’s one more aspect of our security measures.”

Palestinians allege that the roadblocks are merely collective punishment. Israel’s police spokeswoman stated that the barrier would remain, “for as long as needed and that it could be lengthened based on security needs.”

Israel has increased the presence of security forces in its cities as well as setting up roadblocks in East Jerusalem.

Tensions between Israelis and Palestinians have been high. Palestinians believe that Israel is changing the status quo of the hilltop compound, known as Temple Mount by Jews and the al-Aqsa Mosque by Muslims. Israel has denied any attempt to change the status quo and holds Palestinians accountable for promoting violence based off of false accusations.

Israeli’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, stated, “Israel is not the problem at the Temple Mount, Israel is the solution. He continued, “We will protect the status quo, we are the only ones who are doing this and we will continue to do it responsibly and seriously.”

For more information, please see:

BBC News – Israel-Palestinian Violence: Israeli Killed in Beersheva Bus Station Attack – 18 October 2015

Reuters – Palestinian Gunman Kills One, Wounds 11 in Israeli City of Beersheba – 18 October 2015

The Associated Press – Israel: Assailant Opens Fire on Bus Station, Soldier Killed – 18 October 2015

The New York Times – Israeli Soldier is Killed in Attack by Palestinian – 18 October 2015

Suicide Bombing in Turkey Kills 95

By Brittani Howell

Impunity Watch Reporter, The Middle East

ANKARA, Turkey – Last Sunday, protestors took to the streets to mourn the deaths of as many as 95 people who were killed by an apparent suicide bomber at a peace rally in Ankara the day before.  The names of those who died, were read one by one on television, on Sunday.

Family members of a victim of suicide bombing mourn the victims death. (Photo Courtesy of Reuters)

The government stated that it was likely that either the Islamic State or the Kurdish rebels were responsible for the suicide bombing. It is alleged that the bombing is similar to a previous suicide bombing incident that had been carried out by the Islamic State in July. That incident had killed 33 Turkish and Kurdish peace activists.

Mourners of the latest suicide bombing placed blame on Turkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The protestors blame him for promoting nationalism and violence in order to gain votes for the upcoming election.

President Erdogan has pursued a military campaign against Kurdish forces and much of the public does not agree with that decision. The government attempted to shut down social media sites like Twitter an Facebook, in order to prevent images of the carnage from circulating, but were unsuccessful.

The attack was one of the deadliest in modern Turkey, and many fear it is just the beginning of violence and political turmoil. Ahmet Yilmaz, who had been injured in the bombing, stated, “If these crises, bombings and blood continue, we will all be crippled in Turkey.”

The government stated that elections will still be held on November 1, 2015, as planned. Many fear that the bombings have compromised a fair election, because of people’s belief that the President is promoting violence for nationalist goals. President Erdogan wants the ruling party to remain in the majority. The military campaign against Kurdish rebels is seen as an attempt to gain the votes of nationalists. A previous polling volunteer, Omur Bolat, stated, “This bombing shows quite clearly that the election will not be conducted in a free, fair, and healthy way.”

A military campaign against the Kurdish rebels may end up benefiting the Islamic State, however. The Kurdish rebels have allied with the Syrian Kurdish forces in the fight against the Islamic State. A Turkish military campaign would against Turkey’s Kurdish rebels would take pressure off of the Islamic State.

For more information, please see:

ABC News – Islamic State Could Gain From Turkish Peace Rally Bombing – 11 October 2015

Los Angeles Times – Protests and Skepticism in Turkey Follow Bombings at Peace Rally – 11 October 2015

Reuters – Turkey Sees Islamic State Hand in Bombing, Vows Election Will go on – 11 October 2015

The Huffington Post UK – Turkey Focuses Investigation of Peace Rally Bombing on Islamic State – 11 October 2015

U.S. to Aid in Fight Against Boko Haram

By Tyler Campbell

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

 

YAOUNDE, Cameroon – Today, at the request of the Cameroon government, the U.S. has promised to deploy 300 troops to aid in the fight against Islamist militant group, Boko Haram. The troops will be there to conduct intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions, but should not be expected to engage in any live combat.

Nigerian Forces Clearing Boko Haram Camp. Photo Courtesy of ABC News

President Barack Obama announced his decision today in a War Powers Act notification letter addressed to the U.S. Congress. This letter not only told congress of plans to send troops to Cameroon but also informed them that 90 military personnel had arrived as of Oct. 12. The non-aggressive nature of these troops was stressed by assuring congress that they were only armed for personal for security and not for any offensive combat.

 

Once the full 300 troops arrives they will be providing a multi-nation task force, made up of troops from Nigeria, Niger, Cameroon, Chad and Benin, with information from airborne intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. There is no set time frame on how long these supporting troops are supposed to be in Cameroon. President Obama stated in his letter that, “they will remain in Cameroon until their support is no longer needed.”

 

The White House later commented that this decision was not prompted by any change in the assessment of threats in the region. It is notable that since Nigerian forces began having success fighting Boko Haram, the threat has spread out into neighboring countries and has taken on more guerilla style tactics. Although no change has been made to the threat assessment from the U.S.’s stand point, Boko Haram has certainly spread out of Nigeria in recent months and become more dangerous to the surrounding area.

 

In the last two weeks Boko Haram has claimed responsibility for multiple suicide bombings in Nigeria and neighboring countries. On Oct. 10, three suicide bombings went off in Chad and left 41 dead. The very next day, two suicide bombings took place in Cameroon and left 9 dead and 21 injured.

 

This is not the first time in recent memory that the U.S. has sent troops to help in the fight against Boko Haram. Last year, Boko Haram kidnapped nearly 300 Nigerian girls from their school during a raid. At that time the U.S. sent 80 troops with drone surveillance equipment to help search for the missing girls. Sadly many of them where never found. Time will tell if these 300 troops are able to be more assistance against Boko Haram.

 

For more information, please see:

 

ABC News – US Deploying 300 Troops to Cameroon to Help Fight Boko Haram – 14 Oct. 2015

France 24 – US to send 300 troops to aid fight against Boko Haram – 14 Oct. 2015

The Hill – Obama pledges more troops to fight Boko Haram – 14 Oct. 2015

The Guardian – Obama to deploy 300 US troops to Cameroon to fight Boko Haram – 14 Oct. 2015

South Africa to Part Ways With ICC?

By Tyler Campbell

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

 

PRETORIA, South Africa – Today the South African majority party, the African National Congress (ANC), has expressed plans to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC). This move is being spurred on by the criticism South Africa has faced from the court when it ignored ICC orders to arrest Sudanese president, Omar al-Bashi, when he visited there in June.

President Omar al-Bashi arriving home from his visit to South Africa. Photo Courtesy of the Times Live

In June president al-Bashi visited South Africa to be at the 25th African Union Summit. At the time there was heated debate within South Africa over whether or not to arrest him. On one side, groups claimed that the South African government was in contempt of the ICC and of local courts for not acting on an arrest warrant for al-Bashi. From the passage of the Rome statute into South African domestic law, compliance with the ICC’s arrest warrant should have been mandatory. The majority ANC party defended its decision not to act by claiming al-Bashi had diplomatic immunity. They did not arrest him because he was attending the AU summit as a guest of the AU and was not on a state visit to South Africa. It is notable that this type of diplomatic immunity is given to heads of state that attend UN meetings with similar warrants.

 

Even at this earlier point in time the ANC was already discussing the idea of leaving the ICC. ANC Secretary General Gwede Mantashe had been vocal in expressing his frustration with the ICC. “It is a tool in the hands of the powerful to destroy the weak and it is a court that is focusing on Africa, Eastern Europe and Middle East,” he said.

 

This line of thinking must have festered until today when the ANC made their intentions official by announcing it in National General Council meeting. Now the South African Parliament must debate whether or not to actually leave the ICC. If the ANC votes along party lines it is likely that any motion will pass since they hold a 60% majority in parliament.

 

Even though nothing is set in stone South Africa has already begun to protect itself from any scrutiny, should they leave the ICC. They have downplayed the importance and usefulness of the ICC. “The principles that led us to be members remain valid and relevant… however the ICC has lost its direction unfortunately, and is no longer pursuing that principle of an instrument that is fair for everybody,” said Obed Bapela, the ANC’s international relations subcommittee chair.

 

 

For more information, please see:

 

The Guardian – ANC plans to withdraw South Africa from international criminal court – 11 Oct. 2015

News 24 – ANC wants SA to withdraw from ICC – 11 Oct. 2015

Deutsche Welle – South Africa’s ruling ANC plans to leave International Criminal Court – 11 Oct. 2015

Deutsche Welle – South African government under fire over al-Bashir – 26 June 2015

Mausoleum Destruction in Timbuktu Leads to ICC Case

By Tyler Campbell

Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

 

THE HAGUE, Netherlands – This September the International Criminal Court faced its first suspect charged with deliberately destroying religious or historical monuments. The suspect’s name is Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi and he is charged in connection with the destruction of historic monuments in Timbuktu. This destruction took place in 2012 when Islamist Tuareg rebels took over the city and destroyed 14 of cities 16 historic mausoleums. These mausoleums had been labeled and protected as parts of a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Islamist militants destroying historic Mausoleum. Photo courtesy of the BBC

The ICC’s accusation against Mahdi reads that he committed a “direct attack against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, and historic monuments.” This charge has been grouped under the larger umbrella of war crimes. The ICC issued a warrant for Mahdi since he is considers a war criminal for these acts. The case was transferred from the Niger court, by the prosecuting attorney Fatou Bensouda, to the ICC after it issued a warrant on September 18.

 

Judge Cuno Tarfusser heard Mahdi’s opening statements and set the date for the first formal hearing on January 18, 2016. During this hearing Mahdi gave some basic information about himself saying, “My name is Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, and I am from the Tuareg tribe… I was born about 40 years ago. I am a graduated of the teacher’s institute in Timbuktu and I was a civil servant in the education department… beginning in 2011.” He also asked to be spoken to in Arabic but declined further statements until he consulted his lawyers.

 

Prosecution at the ICC has alleged that Mahadi was at the head of the Hesbah during the Islamist Tuareg rebels control of Timbuktu in 2012 through 2013. The Hesbah acted as a sort of morality police, enforcing the Islamic religion, during this time period and lead the attack on 10 of the protected historical monuments. The Hesbah targeted these buildings because they were seen as symbols of idolatry to the Islamic faith.

 

The leader of the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Irina Bokova, applauded the decision by the Niger prosecution to transfer this case to the ICC. The direct attack by the Tuareg rebels was seen as a crime against not only the people of Timbuktu but also the world. “The cultural heritage of Mali belongs to all humanity,” she said in a statement given after the transfer. Since the attack, UNESCO has been busy helping the people of Timbuktu rebuild the 14 mausoleums that were destroyed during the occupation. The buildings can be rebuilt, but the thousands of ancient manuscripts that were burnt during the occupation, sadly, are lost forever.

 

 

 

 

For more information, please see:

BBC – Timbuktu mausoleum destruction suspect appears at ICC – 30 September 2015

Deutsche Welle – Islamist leader faces ICC over Timbuktu mausoleum destruction – 30 September 2015

AP – Suspect in destruction of Timbuktu mausoleums sent to ICC – 26 September 2015

All Africa – UN Hails War Crimes Trial for Suspect in Destruction of Historic Monuments – 26 September 2015