News

Dutch Take Action to Force Release of Detained in Russia

By Ben Kopp
Impunity Watch Reporter, Europe

MOSCOW, Russia – Russian officials shrugged at legal action taken by the Dutch to have 30 Greenpeace-affiliated persons released from a Murmansk detention facility. Around the world, protests drew attention to the matter.

Continued detention of Greenpeace activists sparked worldwide protests for their release. (Photo courtesy of Reuters).

In September 2013, Russian authorities arrested 30 participants in a Greenpeace protest against the Prirazlomnaya offshore oil platform. Two activists scaled the structure before their arrest. Three others barricaded themselves in the radio room and tweeted live updates.

Currently, the participants are detained in the northern Russian city of Murmansk, and face piracy charges, which may result in a 15-year sentence.

Among those arrested aboard Greenpeace’s Arctic Sunrise were two Dutch citizens. On 4 October 2013, the Netherlands began legal proceedings against Russia for unlawful detention of activists and crew of the Arctic Sunrise, which was a Dutch-registered ship.

“With regard to its detention of the ship, Russia invokes its authority to ensure safety at sea in the vicinity of the oil platform,” Dutch Foreign Minister Frans Timmermans wrote. “The Netherlands agrees on the importance of safety at sea, but in this case we contest the lawfulness of detaining the ship and its crew.”

Other activists aboard the ship were from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the U.K., Ukraine, and the U.S.

Protesters have called for the activists’ release on an international scale. As a “global day of solidarity”, Greenpeace stated that it would hold up to 100 protests in approximately 48 countries. In support of 6 arrested British nationals, about 700 people protested at the Russian Embassy in London.

London protestors included Jude Law, Damon Albarn, Paul Simonon, and Vivienne Westwood.

Deputy Foreign Minister Alexei Meshkov said that Russia asked the Netherlands several times to halt the ship’s “illegal activity.”

“Unfortunately, this was not done,” Meshkov said. “Therefore, we have far more questions for the Dutch side than they can have for us. Everything that happened with the Arctic Sunrise was pure provocation.”

Greenpeace claimed the activists held a peaceful protest in international waters, adding that Russian authorities boarded their ship and arrested the activists at gunpoint when they saw the group drive motorboats near an oil vessel owned by Russia and ExxonMobil.

Greenpeace International Executive Director, Kumi Naidoo said, “The activists were taking a brave stand to protect all of us from climate change and the dangers of reckless oil drilling in the Arctic. Now it’s imperative that millions of us stand up with them to defend the Arctic and demand their immediate release.”

For further information, please see:

CNN International – Greenpeace Vigil for ‘Arctic 30’ Held in Russia, as Dutch File Legal Case – October 5, 2013

Guardian – Worldwide Vigils for Greenpeace Activists Held by Russian Authorities – October 5, 2013

Reuters – Russia Dismisses Dutch Legal Action over Greenpeace Activists – October 5, 2013

Sydney Morning Herald – Shattering Conclusion to a Voyage of Peaceful Protest – October 5, 2013

Impunity Watch – President Putin States Activists Who Protested on Russian Oil Rig Are Not Pirates – September 25, 2013

Court Allows Palestine Farmers to Return to Former Israeli Settlement

By Kathryn Maureen Ryan
Impunity Watch, Middle East

RAMALLAH, Palestine – Palestinian farmers can now cultivate land that was the former site of the Homesh settlement in Samaria, after a ruling issued by the Attorney General’s office last week.

Palestinians remove Hebrew written by Israeli settlers on a water tank in a reclaimed area (photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

The ruling followed a June decision by the state to cancel the 1978 military land seizure order, which took land from residents of the Palestinian village of Burka for the creation of a Nahal Brigade, soon after the settlement of Homesh on the Samaria hilltop in the West Bank was created.

Since the disengagement, Homesh – and the former Samaria settlements of Sanur, Ganim and Kadim – have been closed military zones. Access had been blocked to Palestinians and Israeli settlers. Now, as a result of the court ruling, Palestinians can enter Homesh, but Israeli citizens are still barred from entering the site.

Settlers and right-wing Israeli activists and politicians have pressed to resettle the Homesh settlement over the past eight years. Over the past several years, Israeli settlers have received temporary permission from the IDF to hold certain events at the former Homesh settlement. For example, last Passover, settlers held a holiday festival. Politicians have also visited the site, including Defence Minister Moshe Ya’alon, who visited in 2009 as vice premier, where he called for Homesh to be resettled.

The Israel government dismantled Homesh and three other West Bank settlements in 2005. The settlements were dismantled in connection with a wider withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. However, until the court ruling, the government refused to allow the original Palestinian landowners from the local farming community to reclaim their land.

The Israel’s Supreme Court upheld a petition by the Israeli human rights organization Yesh Din requesting the closed military zone be ended and the land returned to the Palestinians. On Thursday, farmers from the village of Burka were allowed to return to their land for the first time. Some Palestinians were reluctant to attempt to return. “I’m afraid to go there because the settlers are armed,” said Hassan Ashqer, a middle aged man who owns land in the former settlement area.

Palestinian rights lawyers are optimistic that the ruling will set a precedent that shows that Israel’s settlement policy can be reversed and Palestinian landowners can reclaim their land. “Once the owners are able to take back possession of their lands…it will be the first precedent ever [in the West Bank] in which an area used for settlement activity is being cultivated again by the Palestinians.”

For more information, please see:

Al Jazeera – Palestinians Win Settlement Land from Israel – 3 October 2013

Fox News – After long legal battle, Palestinian farmers reclaim land they lost to a settlement – 3 October 2013

The Daily-Beast – Court Rules Settlement Land Belongs to Palestinians, But Victory is Hollow – 25 September 2013

Jerusalem Post – A-G: Palestinian farmers can return to Homesh – 16 September 2013

Opposition Leader Warns of Civil War in Sudan

By Erica Smith
Impunity Watch Reporter, Africa

 KHARTOUM, Sudan — The leader of Sudan’s opposition Popular Congress Party (PCP), Hassan Al-Turabi has issued a warning against the outbreak of civil war as a result of the recent protests and turmoil that have rocked Sudan in recent days. 

Sudan’s Islamist opposition leader Hassan Al-Turabi (Photo courtesy of Atlanta Black Star)

Al-Turabi also called for President Omer Hassan Al-Bashir to peacefully step down. Al-Turabi told Sky News TV’s Arabic service that he hope the regime hands over power before people resort to arms and that the regime could no longer sustain power through tyrannical means.

Al-Turabi, who would like to see Islam incorporated into the Sudanese constitution, also called on opposition leaders to work together to create a transitional government and constitution.

Last week, clashes erupted between demonstrators and security forces throughout the country after the government’s removal of fuel subsidies. At least 33 deaths were officially recorded and but activists and opposition sources believe the number of causalities to be as high as 150.

Sudanese authorities have arrested up to 700 people as a result of the protests but have denied using live ammunition on protestors.

Britain has called on the Sudanese government to solve the current conflict through national dialog. “I hope that the answer is that these protests will be a warning to everyone including the government that the situation needs to be addressed,” Simon Fraser, permanent undersecretary in the British Foreign Office, told reporters during a visit to Khartoum.

“It would be a very good outcome if they were to lead, although tragic in themselves, and unacceptable, if this was to lead to an acceleration of a genuine process for comprehensive national dialogue,” he said.

For more information, please see:

World Bulletin — Sudan protesters call for ‘fall of regime’ — 4 October 2013

Atlanta Black Star — Sudan’s Opposition Calls on Bashir to Step Down — 3 October 2013

Sudan Tribune — Sudan’s Turabi warns of civil war and calls on Bashir to step down — 3 October 2013

Yahoo News — Sudan unrest a warning to government to seek dialogue: Britain — 3 October 2013

Number of Mexicans Seeking Asylum Increasing

By Brandon Cottrell
Impunity Watch Reporter, North America  

MEXICO CITY, Mexico – As drug violence continues to plague much of western Mexico, there has been an increase in the number of Mexicans seeking asylum.  The United States, however, has been releasing women and children from detention centers before a formal ruling by an immigration judge is reached and many are ultimately deported.

The “Dreamers,” a group of Mexican immigrants who were deported from the U.S., hope their asylum request is granted so they may graduate from U.S. schools (Photo Courtesy The News Tribune)

For example, through the month of September forty-four women and children were released just from a detention center in San Diego.  After release, the asylum seekers are free to live in America while their asylum claims are pending.  Most of those claims, however, are rejected but some of the seekers remain in the U.S. as illegal immigrants or are deported.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte is critical of the releases and he also thinks the claims of asylum seekers are “being exploited . . . in order [for illegal immigrants] to enter and remain in the United States.”  While the Department of Homeland Security has not commented on the releases, it did issue a statement that said, “custody decisions are made on factors including ties to the community, flight risk and criminal record.”

Of those women and children who were released, is Elizabeth Silva.  Silva, who is from Hot Country, (‘Tierra Caliente”) which is outside of Mexico City, fled to the U.S. after her father and younger brother were shot and killed inside their own home.  Many of the others who seek asylum have similar stories of violence and many are from Hot Country.

Hot Country “is so completely ruled by one vicious drug cartel” that the residents formed self-defense gangs, hoping they could drive out the cartel.  That effort has failed and those involved in the self-defense groups have been targeted by the cartel.  Now, these “targets” are seeking asylum before they are killed.

Some of these asylum seekers carry letters from town official Ramon Contreras that says the holder of the letter is a victim of persecution and they “are under a death threat from a drug cartel . . . please provide them the protection they request.”  However, the letters are not much help, as the U.S. generally does not recognize organized crime as a reason to grant asylum.

There are similar problems at port of entries in Texas.  There, a group of immigrants, called the “Dreamers”, have spent time in the U.S. previously and consider it home.  But they are not being allowed back in.  Most of them are seeking political asylum, however, because they claim if they are forced to stay in Mexico they will be “instant targets” for having spent time in the U.S.

Asylum requests from Mexico have quadrupled since 2006, even though the Mexican government has launched an offensive against the drug cartels.  The U.S. Department of Homeland Security estimates that eleven Mexicans seek asylum daily at the San Diego border crossing, with most of them claiming to be victims of the drug cartels.  However, over 90% of the asylum requests are denied and some estimate that only 2% of requests are granted.  Additionally, many asylum seekers are turned away at the border and one such seeker said U.S. authorities “laughed at us” when we told them we wanted asylum.

 

For more information, please see:

ABC News – Mexicans Seek Asylum as Drug Violence Persists – 3 October 2013

Huffington Post – Big Win For Immigrant Activists Who Staged Border-Crossing Protest In Laredo – 1 October 2013

NPR – Asylum Application Surge And The Shutdown – 3 October 2013

The New Yorker – Dreamers At The Border – 3 October 2013

Pakistan Implicated for Backing Ongoing Terrorist Raids in Kashmir Region

By Brian Lanciault

Impunity Watch Reporter, Asia

NEW DELHI, India– India’s army reported that it has been fighting “Pakistan-backed” militants in Kashmir for more than a week. The Pakistani government denied these charges, citing its recent efforts to engage in peaceful negotiations with the Indian government regarding the disputed region.

Soldiers are stationed in an armored truck near the site of a recent gun-battle between Indian military forces and suspected Pakistan-backed militants. (Photo Courtesy of EPA)

Pakistan dismissed as ‘baseless’ India’s accusation that its troops were involved in massive infiltration attempts across the Line of Control (“LoC”) into Jammu and Kashmir, on Thursday.  Some 30 to 40 fighters have crossed the LoC, which divides the region, senior army officer Gurmeet Singh said.

Claimed by both countries, Kashmir has been a hot-spot of conflict for over 60 years. Bilateral ties have been tested over recent clashes in the disputed region.

Last month, at least 10 people were killed when militants attacked a police station and an army camp in the Poonch area of Indian-administered Kashmir. India has a large security presence in Kashmir with tens of thousands of police and paramilitary forces deployed.

“The army is fighting the largest group of infiltrators including some special troops on the line of control with Pakistan in Indian territory. It’s one of the longest operations in Kashmir,” Lt Gen Gurmeet Singh said.

At least 10 to 12 infiltrators have been killed by Indian soldiers, Lt. Singh said, adding that another group of 10 had tried to cross over on Tuesday. Lt. Singh told reporters on Wednesday evening that Indian soldiers first encountered around 40 militants on September 24 in an abandoned village called Shala Bhata near the line of control.

“There is no question of our territory being taken over,” he said, adding that the army was in “total control of the operation”.

On Thursday, Pakistan’s army denied India’s charge.

“No such thing happened at all. This is a blatant lie. We totally deny this baseless allegation,” Press Trust of India quoted a Pakistani military spokesperson as saying.

The latest fighting is taking place days after Indian PM Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif pledged in New York to work together to halt a recent upsurge of violence in Kashmir. During the weekend PM Singh told the UN General Assembly that Pakistan had to stop being “the epicentre of terrorism”.

India has long accused Pakistan of sponsoring militants in the disputed region. However, violence has declined overall since the early 2000s, despite a recent spike. But relations plunged again over the 2008 Mumbai attack.

PM Singh has expressed disappointment in the Pakistani response and reiterated a call for Pakistan to rein in militants in his UN speech.

Nawaz Sharif swept into power in May with pledges to improve ties with India.

For more information, please see:

BBC– Kashmir clashes: India troops ‘fight Pakistan infiltrators’ — 3 October 2013

Indian Express– Pakistan Army denies infiltration attempts from across the LoC — 3 October 2013

The Telegraph– India and Pakistan militants in 10 day battle in Kashmir — 3 October 2013

Hindustan Times– Gunfight on, army tries to push back J-K intruders — 3 October 2013